Feasibility and application of single-hole video-assisted thoracoscope in pulmonary peripheral tumors

Meta-analysis comparing the perioperative efficacy of single-port versus two and multi-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical anatomical lung resection for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

As a new surgical procedure for non-small cell lung cancer, single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has lately gained popularity; nevertheless, it is unknown if single-port VATS offers any advantages over multi-portal. The study aims to assess the different impacts of using single-port VATS versus 2-port or multi-port VATS such as operation and drainage time, blood loss volume, number of resected lymph nodes, and hospital stay in lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria included studies from different languages that compare single-port against 2 or multi-port VATS. The outcomes of these studies were analyzed using a random-effect model and it was used to calculate the mean difference with 95 percent confidence intervals to quantify the impact of different surgical techniques on clinical parameters.

RESULTS

Single or Uni-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery results in significantly lower drainage time after surgery compared with 2-port (P = .03) and multi-port (P < .001) VATS. In contrast to the resection of lymph nodes, there was no significant difference between uni-port and 2-port (P = .49) or multiport (P = .29) VATS. While operation time, blood loss, complications, and hospital stay were significantly lower in uni-port compared with multi-port VATS (P = .04, P = .002, P < .001, respectively), but not with 2-port VATS (P = .44, 0.06, P = .13). There were no significant differences between uni-port and multi-port VATS regarding conversion rate, mortality, and staging.

CONCLUSION

Single or Uni-portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has high efficacy and lower side effects compared with multi-port regarding the perioperative outcomes. Two-port VATS has similar results with uni-port in several parameters.

Comparison of single- and triple-port VATS for lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Objective

To compare the perioperative parameters between single- and triple-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy in the treatment of lung cancer.

Methods

The Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library, and the Web of Science databases were electronically searched from inception to September 2019 for all relevant studies. Study quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The results were pooled using the generic inverse-variance method and expressed as mean differences or risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ten cohort studies with 2,278 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Whether based on RCTs or cohort studies, the pooled results showed no significant difference in the operation time, chest tube duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, lymph node dissection number, postoperative drainage volume, and postoperative complications between single- and triple-port VATS lobectomy (P > 0.05). Single-port VATS could relieve postoperative pain better than triple-port VATS, especially in the first day and fifth day (P < 0.05). No evidence of significant publication bias was found (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Single-port VATS lobectomy can yield similar perioperative results to those of triple-port VATS lobectomy and is more effective in relieving postoperative pain.

Uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) technique and safety of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with uniportal and three-port VATS.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 146 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent VATS lobectomy between January 2018 and May 2018. The general clinical date, perioperative data and life quality were individually compared and analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the uniportal than in the three-port group (p = 0.035), and significantly shorter chest tube drainage and postoperative hospital stay durations were found in the uniportal than in the three-port group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.008). The postoperative 24 and 72 h numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were significantly lower in the uniportal group than in the three-port group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the number or stations of total lymph node dissected (p = 0.222 and p = 0.159). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the postoperative total or respiratory complications (p = 0.917 and p = 0.930).

CONCLUSIONS

Uniportal VATS is a safe and effective alternative for patients with NSCLC. It is a preferable option for appropriate cases as it is conducive to patients' postoperative recovery and quality of life.

[Short-term Outcome of Uniportal and Three Portal Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery for Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are many reports on the advantages of three portal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in the treatment of lung cancer, but there are few reports on the comparison between uniportal and three portal video-assisted thoracic surgery. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the recent curative effect of the postoperative short-term quality of life between uniportal and three portal video-assisted thoracic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 266 patients with NSCLC who underwent intended VATS lobectomy by a single surgical team in our ward between January 2016 and August 2017. The general clinical date, perioperative data and short-term life quality were individually compared and analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in terms of clinicopathological features, total number of dissected lymph nodes and nodal stations, postoperative complications and pulmonary complications (P>0.05). Compared with three portal VATS, the intraoperative blood loss, chest tube duration, postoperative thoracic drainage, length of stay and NRS score were significantly decreased in uniportal VATS, with significant differences (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

As a more minimally invasive surgery, uniportal VATS can be safely and effectively performed for resectable lung cancer, which would achieve even better operation curative effect than three portal VATS.

Thoracoscope combined with internal support system of chest wall in open reduction and internal fixation for multiple rib fractures

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of applying thoracoscope combined with internal support system of chest wall (ISSW) in minimally invasive internal fixation for rib fracture on patients with multiple rib fractures. A total of 84 patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for rib fracture from January 2017 to December 2017 in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tianjin Hospital were selected into the study, and retrospective analyses were carried out. The clinical data, pain score, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, indwelling time of thoracic tube, total drainage volume of thoracic tube for 3 days after operation, indwelling time of wound drainage tube, total drainage volume of wound drainage tube, length of stay, hospitalization costs, postoperative complications, C-reactive protein (CRP) and pulmonary function of patients in the groups were compared. The patients were followed up for prognosis for 2–4 months via re-examination, and chest numbness at 1 month after operation was recorded. Compared with that (145.27±18.80 min) in the traditional group, the operating time in the minimally invasive group (112.20±21.40 min) was shorter (p<0.05). The total drainage volume of wound drainage tube was 145.75±61.03 ml in the minimally invasive group and 248.91±93.95 ml in the traditional group (p<0.05). In addition, the chest numbness at 1 month after operation (11.8%) in the minimally invasive group was better than that (34.00%) in the traditional group (p<0.05). Postoperative pain score, CRP and pulmonary function tests were also significantly different between the two groups (p<0.05). The results indicated that the application of thoracoscope combined with ISSW in minimally invasive internal fixation for rib fracture can effectively improve the prognosis of patients and reduce the length of stay and adverse reactions, and has high economic benefits, which is worthy of promotion and use in clinical practice.