Clinical implications of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 in patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine

RRM1 O-GlcNAcylation inhibition suppresses pancreatic cancer via TK1-mediated replication stress

O-GlcNAcylation of ribonucleotide reductase large subunit M1 (RRM1) at position 734 influences high glucose-induced genomic instability and cell transformation in normal pancreatic cells. By disrupting the ribonucleotide reductase complex, it reduces dNTPs. Although the impact of RRM1 O-GlcNAcylation on pancreatic cancer progression remains unexplored, our CRISPR knock-in technology created the RRM1-T734A mutation to minimize RRM1 O-GlcNAcylation. In pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells with this mutation, we observed heightened replication stress-induced DNA damage, S-phase delays, and diminished in vitro tumor cell growth. Mechanistically, RRM1-T734A enhanced its interaction with RRM2 while impairing binding to RRM2B, leading to decreased NTPs and disrupted dNTP equilibrium. Notably, it doubled dTTP levels via TK1 stabilization mediated by thymidine, resulting in S-phase delay. TK1 silencing restored RRM1-T734A-induced effects on S-phase retardation and decreased colony formation. Our findings highlight the pivotal role of O-GlcNAcylation of RRM1 at T734 in maintaining genomic stability and promoting pancreatic cancer malignancy. Furthermore, reducing RRM1 O-GlcNAcylation increased pancreatic cancer cell sensitivity to gemcitabine, proposing a potential therapeutic strategy.

Therapeutic resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Current challenges and future opportunities

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Although chemotherapeutic regimens such as gemcitabine+ nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX (FOLinic acid, 5-Fluroruracil, IRINotecan, and Oxaliplatin) significantly improve patient survival, the prevalence of therapy resistance remains a major roadblock in the success of these agents. This review discusses the molecular mechanisms that play a crucial role in PDAC therapy resistance and how a better understanding of these mechanisms has shaped clinical trials for pancreatic cancer chemotherapy. Specifically, we have discussed the metabolic alterations and DNA repair mechanisms observed in PDAC and current approaches in targeting these mechanisms. Our discussion also includes the lessons learned following the failure of immunotherapy in PDAC and current approaches underway to improve tumor's immunological response.

Chemoresistance in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), generally known as pancreatic cancer (PC), ranks the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the western world. While the incidence of pancreatic cancer is displaying a rising tendency every year, the mortality rate has not decreased significantly because of late diagnosis, early metastasis, and limited reaction to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection is typically the preferred option to treat early pancreatic cancer. Although 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel can profoundly improve the prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer, the development of chemoresistance still leads to poor clinical outcomes. Chemoresistance is multifactorial as a result of the interaction among pancreatic cancer cells, cancer stem cells, and the tumor microenvironment. Nevertheless, more pancreatic cancer patients will benefit from precision treatment and targeted drugs. Therefore, we outline new perspectives for enhancing the efficacy of gemcitabine after reviewing the related factors of gemcitabine metabolism, mechanism of action, and chemoresistance.

RRM1 predicts clinical outcome of high-and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy

Background

The expression level of ribonucleotide reductase subunit M1 (RRM1) is closely related to the effect of gemcitabine-based therapy in advanced bladder cancer. However, the value of RRM1 expression in predicting progression-free survival in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine chemotherapy has not been elucidated.

Methods

This study randomly assigned 162 patients to either the RRM1-known group or the unknown group. We collected cancer tissues from 81 patients to evaluate the mRNA expression of RRM1 by using liquid chip technology. All patients were diagnosed and then treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy immediately after transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT).

Results

RRM1 expression was high in 21% (17/81) of patients. The RRM1 mRNA level was not correlated with sex, age, weight, performance status, or CUA/EAU risk (p > 0.05). Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for patients with low RRM1 expression than for patients with high and unknown RRM1 expression (p = 0.009). Additionally, the 1- and 2-year relapse rates also differed according to RRM1 expression level. The 1-year relapse rates for RRM1-low, RRM1-high and RRM1-unknown patients were 0, 17.7 and 6.2% (p = 0.009), while the 2-year relapse rates for these groups were 3.1, 29.4, and 11.1% (p = 0.005), respectively.

Conclusions

This preliminary study showed that low RRM1 expression was associated with longer progression-free survival and lower 1-year/2-year relapse rates in NMIBC patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine monotherapy, despite the need for further verification with large sample sizes and considering more mixed factors and biases.

RRM1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with gemcitabine

Background

The usefulness of ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 (RRM1) for predicting the therapeutic effects of gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. RRM1-positive patients show unique clinicopathological features.

Methods

Here, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the relationship between RRM1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC patients treated with gemcitabine-containing regimens. A comprehensive electronic and manual search was performed to identify relevant articles. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were used to estimate the relation between the clinicopathological characteristics of NSCLC patients and RRM1 expression.

Results

The study included 31 observational studies and 3,667 patients. The analysis showed no significant association between RRM1 expression and pathological type, stage, and smoking status; however, RRM1 positivity was significantly lower in women than in men (43.0% vs 51.7%, RR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94, P=0.004).

Conclusion

The present pooled analyses demonstrated that RRM1 positivity in women with advanced NSCLC was associated with a higher rate of response to gemcitabine-containing regimens. Immunohistochemistry may be valuable to prescreen for RRM1 expression in clinical practice, whereas PCR can be routinely used as a verification method. These findings will help design suitable molecular-targeted therapies for NSCLC.

Effect of ribonucleotide reductase M1 expression on overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine chemotherapy: A literature-based meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The prognostic value of ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine chemotherapy has been evaluated in several studies. However, the conclusions remain controversial.

METHODS

By searching the PubMed and Embase databases, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of RRM1 expression in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine chemotherapy. Studies were pooled, and the hazard ratio (HR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Nine relevant articles were included for this meta-analysis study. Our results revealed that the high-RRM1 expression patients had significantly poorer overall survival (HR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.33-2.16, P_{heterogeneity}  = .061, I²  = 44.8%) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.56-2.18, P_{heterogeneity}  = .669, I²  = 0%) than the low-RRM1 expression patients. Furthermore, a statistically significant association between RRM1 expression and OS was found among both Japanese (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.36-2.37, P_{heterogeneity}  = .843, I²  = 0%) and American patients (HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.60-1.94, P_{heterogeneity}  = .439, I²  = 0%).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the expression of RRM1 can be considered a predictor of poor survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine chemotherapy. RRM1 expression assessment could provide more detailed information for patients with pancreatic cancer and could be used to optimize therapeutic schemes.