Long non-coding RNA SUMO1P3 may promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of pancreatic cancer via EMT signaling pathway

Long Noncoding RNA and Circular RNA: Two Rising Stars in Regulating Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly malignant tumor with especially poor prognosis. However, the molecular mechanisms of pancreatic oncogenesis and malignant progression are not fully elucidated. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process is important to drive pancreatic carcinogenesis. Recently, long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs(circRNAs) have been characterized to participate in EMT in PDAC, which can affect the migration and invasion of tumor cells by playing important roles in epigenetic processes, transcription, and post-transcriptional regulation. LncRNAs can act as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNA) to sequester target microRNAs(miRNAs), bind to the genes which localize physically nearby, and directly interact with EMT-related proteins. Currently known circRNAs mostly regulate the EMT process in PDAC also by acting as a miRNA sponge, directly affecting the protein degradation process. Therefore, exploring the functions of lncRNAs and circRNAs in EMT during pancreatic cancer might help pancreatic cancer treatments.

Pseudogene AK4P1 promotes pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression through relieving miR-375-mediated YAP1 degradation

Pseudogenes have been reported to play oncogenic or tumor-suppressive roles in cancer progression. However, the molecular mechanism of most pseudogenes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unknown. Herein, we characterized a novel pseudogene-miRNA-mRNA network associated with PDAC progression using bioinformatics analysis. After screening by dreamBase and GEPIA, 12 up-regulated and 7 down-regulated differentially expressed pseudogenes (DEPs) were identified. According to survival analysis, only elevated AK4P1 indicated a poor prognosis for PDAC patients. Moreover, we found that AK4 acts as a cognate gene of AK4P1 and also predicts worse survival for PDAC patients. Furthermore, 32 miRNAs were predicted to bind to AK4P1 by starBase, among which miR-375 was identified as the most potential binding miRNA of AK4P1. A total of 477 potential target genes of miR-375 were obtained by miRNet, in which 49 hub genes with node degree ≥ 20 were identified by STRING. Subsequent analysis for hub genes demonstrated that YAP1 may be a functional downstream target of AK4P1. To confirmed the above findings, microarray, and qRT-PCR assay revealed that YAP1 was dramatically upregulated in both PDAC cells and tissues. Functional experiments showed that knockdown of YAP1 significantly suppressed PDAC cells growth, increased apoptosis, and decreased the ability of invasion. In conclusion, amplification of AK4P1 may fuel the onset and development of PDAC by targeting YAP1 through competitively binding to miR-375, and serve as a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for PDAC.

The World of Pseudogenes: New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets in Cancers or Still Mystery Molecules?

Pseudogenes were once considered as “junk DNA”, due to loss of their functions as a result of the accumulation of mutations, such as frameshift and presence of premature stop-codons and relocation of genes to inactive heterochromatin regions of the genome. Pseudogenes are divided into two large groups, processed and unprocessed, according to their primary structure and origin. Only 10% of all pseudogenes are transcribed into RNAs and participate in the regulation of parental gene expression at both transcriptional and translational levels through senseRNA (sRNA) and antisense RNA (asRNA). In this review, about 150 pseudogenes in the different types of cancers were analyzed. Part of these pseudogenes seem to be useful in molecular diagnostics and can be detected in various types of biological material including tissue as well as biological fluids (liquid biopsy) using different detection methods. The number of pseudogenes, as well as their function in the human genome, is still unknown. However, thanks to the development of various technologies and bioinformatic tools, it was revealed so far that pseudogenes are involved in the development and progression of certain diseases, especially in cancer.

Long noncoding RNAs: role and contribution in pancreatic cancer

Noncoding RNAs are proclaimed to be expressed in various cancer types and one such type is found to be pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The long noncoding RNAs (LncRNAs) affect the migration, invasion, and growth of tumor cells by playing important roles in the process of epigenesis, post-transcription, and transcriptional regulation along with the maintenance of apoptosis and cell cycle. It is quite subtle whether the alterations in lncRNAs would impact PDAC progression and development. This review throws a spotlight on the lncRNAs associated with tumor functions: MALAT-1, HOTAIR, HOXA13, H19, LINC01559, LINC00460, SNHG14, SNHG16, DLX6-AS1, MSC-AS1, ABHD11-AS1, DUXAP8, DANCR, XIST, DLEU2, etc. are upregulated lncRNAs whereas GAS5, HMlincRNA717, MIAT, LINC01111, lncRNA KCNK15-AS1, etc. are downregulated lncRNAs inhibiting the invasion and progression of PDAC. These data provided helps in the assessment of lncRNAs in the development, metastasis, and occurrence of PDAC and also play a vital role in the evolution of biomarkers and therapeutic agents for the treatment of PDAC.

Long non-coding RNA PART1 predicts a poor prognosis and promotes the malignant progression of pancreatic cancer by sponging miR-122

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) prostate androgen-regulated transcript 1 (PART1) was previously shown to exert an oncogenic role in several human cancers. However, whether PART1 is associated with the malignant progression of pancreatic cancer remains unclear. In the current study, we aimed to identify the role and potential mechanism of PART1 in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

qRT-PCR was applied to detect PART1 expression in 45 cases of pancreatic cancer patients. The chi-square test was performed to assess the association between PART1 expression and clinicopathologic features, and Kaplan-Meier method was applied to evaluate overall survival. In vitro CCK-8, transwell invasion, and flow cytometry assays were applied to detect the effects of PART1 on cell proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis, respectively. Luciferase reporter and RNA immunoprecipitation assays were used to identify the regulatory mechanism between PART1 and miR-122.

RESULTS

PART1 expression was upregulated in pancreatic cancer tissues and cell lines. High PART1 expression was closely correlated with tumor size, T classification, clinical stage, and vascular invasion, and predicted a poor overall survival. PART1 knockdown significantly suppressed cell proliferation and invasion abilities of pancreatic cancer but promoted cell apoptosis. PART1 was found to serve as a molecular sponge of miR-122, and miR-122 inhibition partially reversed the inhibitory phenotypes of PART1 knockdown on pancreatic cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

PART1 promotes the malignant progression of pancreatic cancer by sponging miR-122. The PART1/miR-122 axis might be a promising target for anticancer therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

MiR-203a-3p Inhibits Pancreatic Cancer Cell Proliferation, EMT, and Apoptosis by Regulating SLUG

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present research is to study the roles of miR-203a-3p on cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Transcription profiles were acquired from Gene Expression Omnibus database, which was used to screen out the differentially expressed microRNAs and messenger RNAs in pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer tissues were used to verify the bioinformatics results by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The relationship between miR-203a-3p and SLUG was examined by TargetScan software, dual-luciferase reporter assay, and RNA immunoprecipitation. The Cell Counting Kit-8, wound healing, and transwell assays were conducted to investigate the proliferation, migration, and invasion capability of pancreatic cancer cells, respectively. The expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related proteins was determined by the Western blot assay. Xenograft assay was performed to verify findings from in vitro assays.

RESULTS

Bioinformatic analysis found that a total of 113 microRNAs and 1749 messenger RNAs expressed differentially in pancreatic cancer tissues. Among these microRNAs, the expression of miR-203a-3p was significantly decreased in both pancreatic cancer tissues and cells. On the other hand, the SLUG expression was remarkably upregulated in pancreatic cancer tissues and cells in comparison with normal tissues and cells. Moreover, TargetScan software, dual-luciferase reporter assay, and RNA immunoprecipitation revealed that SLUG was a target of miR-203a-3p. The upregulation of miR-203a-3p expression inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion ability of pancreatic cancer cells by suppressing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process via sponging SLUG.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that downregulation of miR-203a-3p in pancreatic cancer cells leads to high expression of SLUG, which promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition process and induces cancer progression.

Pseudogene-Derived lncRNAs and Their miRNA Sponging Mechanism in Human Cancer

Pseudogenes, abundant in the human genome, are traditionally considered as non-functional “junk genes.” However, recent studies have revealed that pseudogenes act as key regulators at DNA, RNA or protein level in diverse human disorders (including cancer), among which pseudogene-derived long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) transcripts are extensively investigated and has been reported to be frequently dysregulated in various types of human cancer. Growing evidence demonstrates that pseudogene-derived lncRNAs play important roles in cancer initiation and progression by serving as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) through competitively binding to shared microRNAs (miRNAs), thus affecting both their cognate genes and unrelated genes. Herein, we retrospect those current findings about expression, functions and potential ceRNA mechanisms of pseudogene-derived lncRNAs in human cancer, which may provide us with some crucial clues in developing potential targets for cancer therapy in the future.

Long non-coding RNA SUMO1P3 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through activating Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway by targeting miR-320a

In this study, we aimed to investigate expression profile of long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA) SUMO1P3, and its role and molecular mechanisms in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

The expression of SUMO1P3 in HCC tissues and cells was detected using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). The chi‐squared test was used to estimate the relationship between SUMO1P3 levels and clinical characteristics of HCC cases. Cellular biological behaviours were investigated using MTT, transwell assays and wound healing assay. Bioinformatics and dual‐luciferase reporter assays were performed to identify potential target of SUMO1P3 in HCC. Additionally, protein analysis was carried out using Western blot.

The expression of SUMO1P3 was significantly higher in HCC tissues and cells than in non‐cancerous specimens and normal cells (P < .01). Moreover, its up‐regulation was closely correlated with lymph node metastasis (P = .027) and TNM stage (P = .019). SUMO1P3 knockdown inhibited the proliferation, migration and invasion of HCC cells. MiR‐320a was a potential target of SUMO1P3, and its expression was negatively regulated by SUMO1P3 in HCC SUMO1P3 could activate Wnt/β‐catenin pathway, which was mediated by miR‐320a.

Elevated expression of SUMO1P3 predicts malignant progression among HCC patients. SUMO1P3 enhances Wnt/β‐catenin pathway through sponging miR‐320a, thus contributing to aggressive progression of HCC.

Re-recognition of pseudogenes: From molecular to clinical applications

Pseudogenes were initially regarded as "nonfunctional" genomic elements that did not have protein-coding abilities due to several endogenous inactivating mutations. Although pseudogenes are widely expressed in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, for decades, they have been largely ignored and classified as gene "junk" or "relics". With the widespread availability of high-throughput sequencing analysis, especially omics technologies, knowledge concerning pseudogenes has substantially increased. Pseudogenes are evolutionarily conserved and derive primarily from a mutation or retrotransposon, conferring the pseudogene with a "gene repository" role to store and expand genetic information. In contrast to previous notions, pseudogenes have a variety of functions at the DNA, RNA and protein levels for broadly participating in gene regulation to influence the development and progression of certain diseases, especially cancer. Indeed, some pseudogenes have been proven to encode proteins, strongly contradicting their "trash" identification, and have been confirmed to have tissue-specific and disease subtype-specific expression, indicating their own value in disease diagnosis. Moreover, pseudogenes have been correlated with the life expectancy of patients and exhibit great potential for future use in disease treatment, suggesting that they are promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets for clinical applications. In this review, we summarize the natural properties, functions, disease involvement and clinical value of pseudogenes. Although our knowledge of pseudogenes remains nascent, this field deserves more attention and deeper exploration.

Long non-coding RNA RNCR3 promotes glioma progression involving the Akt/GSK-3β pathway

Increasing evidence has confirmed that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) serve critical roles in the development of a large number of human malignancies, including glioma. Several previously published studies have reported that the lncRNA retinal non-coding RNA3 (RNCR3; also termed LINC00599) exerts important roles in certain human malignancies; however, the precise biological role and underlying molecular mechanisms of RNCR3 in the development of glioma are yet to be fully elucidated. In the present study, it was revealed that the expression of RNCR3 was increased in glioma tissues compared with in corresponding adjacent normal tissues. Furthermore, increased levels of RNCR3 expression were associated with tumor progression and poor survival rates of patients with glioma. In addition, the U87 and U251 cell lines were selected to investigate the biological function and potential mechanisms of RNCR3 in glioma, and it was observed that RNCR3 knockdown led to an impairment of the proliferative and invasive abilities of cells; furthermore, G1 phase arrest was induced in glioma cells in vitro. Finally, the results of western blot analyses revealed that knockdown of RNCR3 led to a decrease in the expression levels of phosphorylated Akt and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), without any clear effect on the expression levels of total Akt and GSK-3β. Collectively, these results suggested that RNCR3 is able to regulate cell proliferation, the cell cycle and cell invasion in glioma, potentially via the Akt/GSK-3β signaling pathway.

Expression of SUMO1P3 Compared with SUMO1 is an Independent Predictor of Patient Outcome in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Background

The small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO1) and small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 pseudogene 3 (SUMO1P3) are long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). The prognostic significance of SUMO1 and SUMO1P3 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study aimed to use clinical, genetic, and survival data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), to analyze the prognostic significance of SUMO1 and SUMO1P3 expression in the two main subtypes of NSCLC, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).

Material/Methods

Data were acquired from TCGA and in silico survival analysis was performed. SUMO1 and SUMO1P3 expression were compared between patients with LUAD and LUSC. Patient outcome was assessed as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the survival time from primary surgery to the time of locoregional or distant recurrence of lung cancer.

Results

SUMO1P3 was significantly increased in LUSC and LUAD tissues compared with adjacent normal lung tissue and was significantly co-expressed with SUMO1. SUMO1P3 expression was significantly increased in patients with LUAD but not LUSC with reduced RFS after primary or follow-up treatment. Although patients with LUAD who had high SUMO1 or SUMO1P3 expression had reduced RFS compared with low expression groups, univariate and multivariate analysis showed that only SUMO1P3 expression was independently associated reduced RFS (HR, 1.418; 95% CI, 1.041–1.930; p=0.027).

Conclusions

SUMO1P3 expression was an independent indicator of reduced RFS in patients with LUAD.