1
|
Sun Y, Han P, Wang Y, Cheng X, Wu W, Liu Q, Ren F. Risk assessment of extra-uterine involvement and prognosis in young type I endometrial carcinoma with high or moderate differentiation and less than 1/2 myometrial invasion. Aging (Albany NY) 2024; 16:6445-6454. [PMID: 38575312 PMCID: PMC11042967 DOI: 10.18632/aging.205714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate whether young patients with endometrial carcinoma can preserve adnexa and lymph nodes to improve their quality of life without compromising their prognosis. METHODS A total of 319 patients with type I endometrial carcinoma (high or moderate differentiation and less than 1/2 myometrial invasion) hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from May 2012 to July 2021 were included. The patients were divided into four groups: high differentiation without myometrial invasion group (G1MI-), high differentiation with superficial myometrial invasion group (G1MI+), moderate differentiation without myometrial invasion group (G2MI-), and moderate differentiation with superficial myometrial invasion group (G2MI+). Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for extra-uterine involvement. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curve to compare the prognosis in subgroups and rates of extra-uterine involvement were also compared using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Multivariable logistic regression revealed that differentiation (HR = 14.590, 95%CI = 1.778-119.754, p = 0.013) and myometrial invasion (HR = 10.732, 95%CI = 0.912-92.780, p = 0.037) were the independent risk factors for extra-uterine involvement. The overall difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In the subgroups analysis, both adnexal metastasis and lymph node metastasis were statistically significant in the G2MI+ group compared with G1MI- (p = 0.007, p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in the overall survival (OS) rate and progression free survival (PFS) rate among the four subgroups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Surgery with adnexal preservation and without systematic lymphadenectomy could be employed for the patients who are high differentiation with less than 1/2 myometrial invasion or moderate differentiation without myometrial invasion, but not recommended to the patients with moderate differentiation and superficial myometrial invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Sun
- Deparment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
| | - Pin Han
- Deparment of Gynecology, The Luoyang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Luoyang 471000, China
| | - Yuanpei Wang
- Deparment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
| | - Xiaoran Cheng
- Deparment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
| | - Weijia Wu
- Deparment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
| | - Qianwen Liu
- Deparment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
| | - Fang Ren
- Deparment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuccu I, D’Oria O, Sgamba L, De Angelis E, Golia D’Augè T, Turetta C, Di Dio C, Scudo M, Bogani G, Di Donato V, Palaia I, Perniola G, Tomao F, Muzii L, Giannini A. Role of Genomic and Molecular Biology in the Modulation of the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Narrative Review and Perspectives. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11040571. [PMID: 36833105 PMCID: PMC9957190 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies in Western countries. Traditionally, loco-reginal dissemination and histological characteristics are the main prognostic factors. Nowadays, molecular and genomic profiling showed exciting results in terms of prognostication. According to the data provided by The Cancer Genome Atlas and other studies, molecular and genomic profiling might be useful in identifying patients al low, intermediate, and high risk of recurrence. However, data regarding the therapeutic value are scant. Several prospective studies are ongoing to identify the most appropriate adjuvant strategy in EC patients, especially for those with positive nodes and low volume disease. The molecular classification has offered the possibility to improve the risk stratification and management of EC. The aim of this review is to focus on the evolution of molecular classification in EC and its impact on the research approach and on clinical management. Molecular and genomic profiling might be useful to tailor the most appropriate adjuvant strategies in apparent early-stage EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Cuccu
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Ottavia D’Oria
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Translational Medicine and Oncology, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Ludovica Sgamba
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele De Angelis
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Tullio Golia D’Augè
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Turetta
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Di Dio
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Scudo
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Giannini
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|