The disambiguation of people names in biological collections

Creating a multi-linked dynamic dataset: a case study of plant genera named for women

Background

A discussion on social media led to the formation of a multidisciplinary group working on this project to highlight women's contributions to science. The role of marginalised groups in science has been a topic of much discussion, but data on these contributions are largely lacking. Our motivation for the development of this dataset was not only to highlight names of plant genera that honour women, but to enrich this information with data that would allow the names, roles and lives of these women to be shared more widely with others, both researchers and data sources like Wikidata. Amplification of the contributions of women to botany through multiple means will enable the community to better recognise and celebrate the role of this particular marginalised group in the history and development of science.

New information

The innovative approach of our study resulted in a dataset that is dynamic, expansive and widely shared. We have published a static dataset with this paper and have also created a dynamic dataset by linking flowering plant genera and the women in whose honour those genera were named in Wikidata. This concurrent addition of the data to Wikidata, a linked open data repository, enabled it to be enriched, queried and proactively shared during the whole process of dataset creation and into the future. This innovative workflow allowed wide, open participation throughout the research process. The methodology and workflows applied can be used to create future datasets celebrating and amplifying the contributions of marginalised groups in science.

Paying it forward: Crowdsourcing the harmonisation and linking of taxon names and biodiversity identifiers

Linking records for the same taxa between different databases is an essential step when working with biodiversity data. However, name-matching alone is error-prone, because of issues such as homonyms (unrelated taxa with the same name) and synonyms (same taxon under different names). Therefore, most projects will require some curation to ensure that taxon identifiers are correctly linked. Unfortunately, formal guidance on such curation is uncommon and these steps are often ad hoc and poorly documented, which hinders transparency and reproducibility, yet the task requires specialist knowledge and cannot be easily automated without careful validation. Here, we present a case study on linking identifiers between the GBIF and NCBI taxonomies for a species checklist. This represents a common scenario: finding published sequence data (from NCBI) for species chosen by occurrence or geographical distribution (from GBIF). Wikidata, a publicly editable knowledge base of structured data, can serve as an additional information source for identifier linking. We suggest a software toolkit for taxon name-matching and data-cleaning, describe common issues encountered during curation and propose concrete steps to address them. For example, about 2.8% of the taxa in our dataset had wrong identifiers linked on Wikidata because of errors in name-matching caused by homonyms. By correcting such errors during data-cleaning, either directly (through editing Wikidata) or indirectly (by reporting errors in GBIF or NCBI), we crowdsource the curation and contribute to community resources, thereby improving the quality of downstream analyses.

Recommendations for use of annotations and persistent identifiers in taxonomy and biodiversity publishing

The paper summarises many years of discussions and experience of biodiversity publishers, organisations, research projects and individual researchers, and proposes recommendations for implementation of persistent identifiers for article metadata, structural elements (sections, subsections, figures, tables, references, supplementary materials and others) and data specific to biodiversity (taxonomic treatments, treatment citations, taxon names, material citations, gene sequences, specimens, scientific collections) in taxonomy and biodiversity publishing. The paper proposes best practices on how identifiers should be used in the different cases and on how they can be minted, cited, and expressed in the backend article XML to facilitate conversion to and further re-use of the article content as FAIR data. The paper also discusses several specific routes for post-publication re-use of semantically enhanced content through large biodiversity data aggregators such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) and others, and proposes specifications of both identifiers and XML tags to be used for that purpose. A summary table provides an account and overview of the recommendations. The guidelines are supported with examples from the existing publishing practices.