Positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the diagnosis and assessment of giant cell arteritis: when to consider it and why

Clinical symptoms and associated vascular imaging findings in Takayasu's arteritis compared to giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the presence of head, neck and upper extremity symptoms in patients with Takayasu's (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) and their association with vascular inflammation assessed by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or arterial damage assessed by magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

METHODS

Patients with TAK and GCA underwent clinical and imaging assessments within 24 hours, blinded to each other. Vascular inflammation was defined as arterial FDG-PET uptake greater than liver by visual assessment. Arterial damage was defined as stenosis, occlusion, or aneurysm by MRA. Clinically reported symptoms were compared with corresponding imaging findings using generalised mixed model regression. Cranial symptoms were studied in association with burden of arterial disease in the neck using ordinal regression.

RESULTS

Participants with TAK (n=56) and GCA (n=54) contributed data from 270 visits. Carotidynia was reported only in patients with TAK (21%) and was associated with vascular inflammation (p<0.01) but not damage (p=0.33) in the corresponding carotid artery. Posterior headache was reported in TAK (16%) and GCA (20%) but was only associated with corresponding vertebral artery inflammation and damage in GCA (p<0.01). Arm claudication was associated with subclavian artery damage (p<0.01) and inflammation (p=0.04) in TAK and with damage in GCA (p<0.01). Patients with an increased burden of damaged neck arteries were more likely to experience positional lightheadedness (p<0.01) or a major central nervous system event (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

The distribution of symptoms and association with imaging abnormalities differs in patients with TAK and GCA. These findings may help clinicians predict associated FDG-PET and MRA findings based on a specific clinical symptom.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02257866.

Differentiating Disease Flare From Infection: A Common Problem in Rheumatology. Do 18F-FDG PET/CT Scans and Novel Biomarkers Hold The Answer?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fever is common within rheumatology but it is often challenging to identify its source. To do so correctly is paramount in patients with an underlying inflammatory condition receiving immunosuppressive therapy. This review article looks at the available evidence and merits of both 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scans and new proposed biomarkers in determining the cause of fever within rheumatology.

RECENT FINDINGS

18F-FDG PET/CT scans are already an established tool in the detection and diagnosis of malignancy and are emerging for use in fever of unknown origin. More recently, they have been used to identify rheumatological causes of fever such as large vessel vasculitis and adult-onset Still's disease. Within these conditions, biomarkers such as procalcitonin and presepsin may help to differentiate endogenous from exogenous pyrogens. 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning shows promise in locating the source of pyrogens and may be superior to other conventional forms of imaging. As evidence and test availability increases, its use is likely to become commonplace in the diagnostic work-up of fever. Once a source is located, selected biomarkers may be used to confirm a cause.

Usefulness of PET in recognizing and managing vasculitides

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article was to review the recent contributions to the scoring methods of PET in vasculitis as well as to its role in the diagnostic work-up.

RECENT FINDINGS

Both visual and semiquantitative scoring methods can be used to interpret PET scans. PET has been shown to be both sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitis. In addition, it also has a role in predicting vascular complications.

SUMMARY

There is a need to better standardize the scoring methods used to interpret PET scans. In clinical practice, PET is useful to diagnose untreated individuals with suspected large-vessel vasculitis and contributes to identify patients at risk for vascular complications.

Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis Who Are Taking Glucocorticoids

OBJECTIVE

Large vessel uptake on positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) supports the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Its value, however, in patients without arteritis on temporal artery biopsy and in those receiving glucocorticoids remains unknown. We compared PET/CT results in GCA patients with positive (TAB+) and negative temporal artery biopsies (TAB-), and controls.

METHODS

Patients with new clinically diagnosed GCA starting treatment with glucocorticoids underwent temporal artery biopsy and PET/CT. Using a visual semiquantitative approach, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake was scored in 8 vascular territories and summed overall to give a total score in patients and matched controls.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients with GCA and 28 controls were enrolled. Eighteen patients with GCA were TAB+. Mean PET/CT scores after an average of 11.9 days of prednisone were higher in patients with GCA compared to controls, for both total uptake (10.34 ± 2.72 vs 7.73 ± 2.56; p = 0.001), and in 6 of 8 specific vascular territories. PET/CT scores were similar between TAB+ and TAB- patients with GCA. The optimal cutoff for distinguishing GCA cases from controls was a total PET/CT score of ≥ 9, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.75, sensitivity 71.4%, and specificity 64.3%. Among patients with GCA, these measures correlated with greater total PET/CT scores: systemic symptoms (p = 0.015), lower hemoglobin (p = 0.009), and higher platelet count (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Vascular FDG uptake scores were increased in most patients with GCA despite exposure to prednisone; however, the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT in this setting were lower than those previously reported.

(18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of large vessel vasculitis in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica

PURPOSE

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) may present together with large vessel vasculitis (LVV), and frequently requires a more intensive therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of LVV associated to PMR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 40 consecutive patients (27 women/13 men, 68.10±10.27 years) with PMR and suspicion of associated LVV submitted for (18)F-FDG PET/CT. A PET/CT scan was obtained 180 min after (18)F-FDG intravenous injection. A visual analysis was performed on the images. Five vascular regions were evaluated: supra-aortic trunks (SAT), thoracic aorta (TA), abdominal aorta (AA), iliac arteries (IA), and femoral/tibioperoneal arteries (FTA). The intensity of uptake was graded from 0 to 3. A final diagnosis of LVV was established in 26/40 patients (65%).

RESULTS

In the 26 patients with a diagnosis of LVV, the highest intensity of (18)F-FDG uptake was observed in the TA, SAT, and FTA. All of these patients showed uptake at the TA, with grade 2 and 3 in most cases. In 4 of the 14 patients without LVV, no uptake was observed in any vascular region, and in the other 10 patients only a grade 1 uptake was observed in 1 or to 2 territories. Out of the 20 treated LVV patients, (18)F-FDG PET/CT led to a therapeutic change in 17 (85%).

CONCLUSION

(18)F-FDG PET/CT was useful in identifying patients with LVV associated to PMR. The detection of vascular inflammation had an important impact, and led to a change of treatment in a high percentage of patients with LVV.

Giant cell arteritis: diagnosis and treatment

Giant cell arteritis is the most common primary systemic vasculitis in adults. The condition is granulomatous arteritis of large and medium vessels, which occurs almost exclusively in patients aged 50 years or more. This article reviews the diagnosis and treatment of the disease.

The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in large-vessel vasculitis: appropriateness of current classification criteria?

Patients with clinical suspicion of large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) may present with nonspecific signs and symptoms and increased inflammatory parameters and may remain without diagnosis after routine diagnostic procedures. Both the nonspecificity of the radiopharmaceutical ¹⁸F-FDG and the synergy of integrating functional and anatomical images with PET/CT offer substantial benefit in the diagnostic work-up of patients with clinical suspicion for LVV. A negative temporal artery biopsy, an ultrasonography without an arterial halo, or a MRI without aortic wall thickening or oedema do not exclude the presence of LVV and should therefore not exclude the use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT when LVV is clinically suspected. This overview further discusses the notion that there is substantial underdiagnosis of LVV. Late diagnosis of LVV may lead to surgery or angioplasty in occlusive forms and is often accompanied by serious aortic complications and a fatal outcome. In contrast to the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for vasculitis, based on late LVV effects like arterial stenosis and/or occlusion, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT sheds new light on the classification of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TA). The combination of these observations makes the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of patients suspected for having LVV promising.

The use of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and treatment monitoring of inflammatory and infectious diseases

FDG-PET, combined with CT, is nowadays getting more and more relevant for the diagnosis of several infectious and inflammatory diseases and particularly for therapy monitoring. Thus, this paper gives special attention to the role of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis and therapy monitoring of infectious and inflammatory diseases. Enough evidence in the literature already exists about the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis, management, and followup of patients with sarcoidosis, spondylodiscitis, and vasculitis. For other diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune pancreatitis, and fungal infections, hard evidence is lacking, but studies also point out that FDG-PET/CT could be useful. It is of invaluable importance to have large prospective multicenter studies in this field to provide clear answers, not only for the status of nuclear medicine in general but also to reduce high costs of treatment.