1
|
Orriëns LB, van Hulst K, van der Burg JJW, van den Hoogen FJA, Willemsen MAAP, Erasmus CE. Comparing the evidence for botulinum neurotoxin injections in paediatric anterior drooling: a scoping review. Eur J Pediatr 2024; 183:83-93. [PMID: 37924348 PMCID: PMC10858158 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-023-05309-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
Paediatric anterior drooling has a major impact on the daily lives of children and caregivers. Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) injections are considered an effective treatment to diminish drooling. However, there is no international consensus on which major salivary glands should be injected to obtain optimal treatment effect while minimizing the risk of side effects. This scoping review aimed to explore the evidence for submandibular BoNT-A injections and concurrent submandibular and parotid (i.e. four-gland) injections, respectively, and assess whether outcomes could be compared across studies to improve decision making regarding the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment approach for paediatric anterior drooling. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant studies (until October 1, 2023) on submandibular or four-gland BoNT-A injections for the treatment of anterior drooling in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Similarities and differences in treatment, patient, outcome, and follow-up characteristics were assessed. Twenty-eight papers were identified; 7 reporting on submandibular injections and 21 on four-gland injections. No major differences in treatment procedures or timing of follow-up were found. However, patient characteristics were poorly reported, there was great variety in outcome measurement, and the assessment of side effects was not clearly described. Conclusion: This review highlights heterogeneity in outcome measures and patient population descriptors among studies on paediatric BoNT-A injections, limiting the ability to compare treatment effectiveness between submandibular and four-gland injections. These findings emphasize the need for more extensive and uniform reporting of patient characteristics and the implementation of a core outcome measurement set to allow for comparison of results between studies and facilitate the optimization of clinical practice guidelines. What is Known: • There is no international consensus on which salivary glands to initially inject with BoNT-A to treat paediatric drooling. What is New: • Concluding on the optimal initial BoNT-A treatment based on literature is currently infeasible. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome measures used to quantify anterior drooling.and clinical characteristics of children treated with intraglandular BoNT-A are generally insufficiently reported. • Consensus-based sets of outcome measures and patient characteristics should be developed and implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn B Orriëns
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Division of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Karen van Hulst
- Department of Rehabilitation, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan J W van der Burg
- Department of Paediatric Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands
- School of Pedagogical and Educational Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J A van den Hoogen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Michèl A A P Willemsen
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Division of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Corrie E Erasmus
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Division of Paediatrics, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Dijkhuizen EHP, Ridella F, Naddei R, Trincianti C, Avrusin I, Mazzoni M, Sutera D, Ayaz NA, Penades IC, Constantin T, Herlin T, Oliveira SK, Rygg M, Sanner H, Susic G, Sztajnbok F, Varbanova B, Ruperto N, Ravelli A, Consolaro A. Validity and Reliability of Four Parent/Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Remote Monitoring. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:391-400. [PMID: 35015379 PMCID: PMC10087383 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this work was to provide evidence of validity and reliability for 4 parent/child-reported outcome measures included in the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology juvenile idiopathic arthritis core domain set: the evaluation of the child's pain and level of disease activity, the assessment of morning stiffness duration, and an active joint count for proxy/self-assessment. METHODS Patients were included in the multinational study Epidemiology Treatment and Outcome of Childhood Arthritis. Criterion validity was assessed by examining the correlation of the 4 tested measures with physician measures and the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 10 joints (cJADAS10) in the whole sample and after grouping patients by International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) category, geographic area, and education level. Reliability was assessed comparing 2 visits 7-14 days apart with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS A total of 8,643 parents and 6,060 patients had all the evaluations available. Correlations of tested measures were moderate (0.4-0.7) with physician-reported measures. The level of correlation with the cJADAS10 remained stable after grouping patients by ILAR category, geographic areas, and level of education of the parent filling the questionnaire. In 442 parents and 344 children, ICCs ranged between 0.79 and 0.87 for parents and 0.81 and 0.88 for children. CONCLUSION The 4 tested parent/child-reported outcomes showed good criterion validity and excellent reliability. These tools can be considered for remote patient assessment, when in-person evaluation might not be possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E H Pieter van Dijkhuizen
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy, and Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roberta Naddei
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, and University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Ilia Avrusin
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy, and Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - Diana Sutera
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, and Gaetano Martino University Hospital, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Nuray Aktay Ayaz
- Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | - Marite Rygg
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology and St. Olavs University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Gordana Susic
- Institute of Rheumatology of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | | | | | - Angelo Ravelli
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy, and Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Berman A, Ávila-Zapata F, Horneff G, Alessio M, Becker ML, Belot A, Burgos-Vargas R, Gamir ML, Goldenstein-Schainberg C, Scheibel IM, Terreri MT, Zemel L, Zhuo J, Askelson M, Wong R, Martini A, Brunner HI. Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Patients Ages Two to Seventeen Years With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Subcutaneous Abatacept: Two-Year Results From an International Phase III Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2022. [PMID: 36710243 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in children with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (pJIA) treated with subcutaneous abatacept. METHODS Secondary analysis of a single-arm, open-label 24-month study of patients ages 6-17 years and 2-5 years. PROs included Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (CHAQ-DI), parent global assessment of child well-being (PaGA), pain assessment, and Activity Limitation Questionnaire (ALQ). Clinical outcomes included 50% or greater improvement in JIA American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, clinically inactive disease, and Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score. RESULTS For the 6- to 17-year-old (n = 173) and 2- to 5-year-old (n = 46) cohorts, respectively, median (Q1, Q3) changes from baseline in CHAQ-DI at months 4 and 24 were -0.3 (-0.8, 0.0) and -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1), and -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0) and -0.5 (-1.0--0.1). Median pain scores were below cutoff threshold for clinically relevant pain (<35 mm) by month 1 (6 to 17 years, 32.3 mm; 2 to 5 years, 25.7 mm), reaching a nadir at month 24 (6 to 17 years, 6.0 mm; 2 to 5 years, 2.0 mm). For the 6- to 17-year-old and 2- to 5-year-old cohorts, respectively, median PaGA scores were 47.8 (n = 172) and 42.1 (n = 46) at baseline and 6.3 (n = 107) and 2.0 (n = 37) at month 24. In both cohorts, ALQ components improved from baseline to month 4 and were largely maintained to month 24. Clinical outcomes improved through to month 24. CONCLUSION Early and sustained PRO improvements were reported in this phase III, open-label trial of subcutaneous abatacept in patients with pJIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolino Ruperto
- IRCCS Istituto G. Gaslini Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, UOSID Centro Trial, PRINTO, Genova, Italy
| | - Daniel J Lovell
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Alberto Berman
- Universidad Nacional de Tucuman, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
| | | | - Gerd Horneff
- Asklepios Clinical Sankt Augustin, Sankt Augustin, Germany, and University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Mara L Becker
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Joe Zhuo
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - Hermine I Brunner
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zigler CK, Randell RL, Reeve BB. Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: Considerations and Future Directions. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2022; 48:15-29. [PMID: 34798944 PMCID: PMC9311483 DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2021.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
For children with pediatric rheumatic diseases (PRDs), the inclusion of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is critical to inform decision making in health care delivery and research settings. PROs are direct reports from a child on their health status, without interpretation by anyone else. PROs improve understanding of the patient experience, allow clinicians to provide patient-centered care, and add value to clinical trials. When PROs cannot be collected directly from the patient, caregiver-proxy reports can provide important information on the child's more observable symptoms and functioning. In this article, we describe the current use of PROs in specific PRDs, align current research with best practice recommendations for both clinical care and research settings, highlight exciting new developments, and identify areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina K. Zigler
- Center for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rachel L. Randell
- Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Bryce B. Reeve
- Center for Health Measurement, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.,Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maarj M, Coda A, Tofts L, Williams C, Santos D, Pacey V. Outcome measures for assessing change over time in studies of symptomatic children with hypermobility: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21:527. [PMID: 34839813 PMCID: PMC8628404 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-03009-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Generalised joint hypermobility (GJH) is highly prevalent among children and associated with symptoms in a fifth with the condition. This study aimed to synthesise outcome measures in interventional or prospective longitudinal studies of children with GJH and associated lower limb symptoms. Methods Electronic searches of Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases from inception to 16th March 2020 were performed for studies of children with GJH and symptoms between 5 and 18 years reporting repeated outcome measures collected at least 4 weeks apart. Methodological quality of eligible studies were described using the Downs and Black checklist. Results Six studies comprising of five interventional, and one prospective observational study (total of 388 children) met the inclusion criteria. Interventional study durations were between 2 and 3 months, with up to 10 months post-intervention follow-up, while the observational study spanned 3 years. Three main constructs of pain, function and quality of life were reported as primary outcome measures using 20 different instruments. All but one measure was validated in paediatric populations, but not specifically for children with GJH and symptoms. One study assessed fatigue, reporting disabling fatigue to be associated with higher pain intensity. Conclusions There were no agreed sets of outcome measures used for children with GJH and symptoms. The standardisation of assessment tools across paediatric clinical trials is needed. Four constructs of pain, function, quality of life and fatigue are recommended to be included with agreed upon, validated, objective tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Maarj
- Narrabeen Sports Medicine Centre, Sydney Academy of Sport, Sydney, Australia. .,Department of Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, Australia.
| | - Andrea Coda
- Department of Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, Australia.,Priority Research Centre Health Behaviour, Hunter Medical Research Institute HMRI, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Louise Tofts
- Narrabeen Sports Medicine Centre, Sydney Academy of Sport, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Health Professions, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Cylie Williams
- Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Derek Santos
- Department of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Scotland, UK
| | - Verity Pacey
- Department of Health Professions, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, gait characteristics and relation to function. Gait Posture 2021; 85:38-54. [PMID: 33513531 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis that impacts biomechanical features of gait. This systematic review describes the effects of JIA on gait motion parameters and walking performance. METHODS Six databases were searched (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, the EBSCOHost database SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and Embase). Studies were restricted to children with any subtype of JIA who were assessed for gait motion features (kinematic, kinetic, temporalspatial) or walking performance (velocity or distance covered); could include intervention or treatment exposure with measures of gait and gait speed; could involve comparison of gait in JIA to healthy controls. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018109582) RESULTS: The search yielded 625 papers, 23 of which described biomechanical features of gait and/or assessed walking performance. Twenty studies measured walking velocity and walking ability using simple field tests or laboratory methods. Eleven studies measured temporalspatial parameters such as cadence, step length, stride length, step width, single and double support time. Nine studies evaluated kinetic measurements including joint power, flexion and extension and joint moments. Nine studies evaluated kinematic parameters including range of motion, pelvic tilt, center of motion and trunk sway. CONCLUSIONS Key features of gait in children with JIA include slower gait velocity, shortened step length, decreased range of motion at the hip, knee and ankle with trend towards flexion, decreased joint power, anteriorly tilted pelvis and trunk with shifted center of motion. There is a potential to ameliorate JIA-related gait changes with exercise and/or pharmaceutical interventions.
Collapse
|
7
|
Madanipour S, Prinja A, Lee M, Rashid A. Shoulder arthroplasty for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2020; 28:2309499019890615. [PMID: 31916484 DOI: 10.1177/2309499019890615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
There is limited literature to guide shoulder surgeons in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We aim to help clinicians to formulate an approach to the surgical management of the condition through a review of the available literature on arthroplasty in JIA, general considerations when operating on patients with inflammatory arthropathy and recommendations based on the authors' experience. Four articles report formal data on arthroplasty in JIA with favourable improvements in post-operative pain and function scores after the long-term follow-up. Significant heterogeneity in treatment and a lack of standardisation in quantitative outcomes highlights the need for further larger scale and higher quality research. The aim of this study is to review the evidence and provide information on preoperative evaluation of surgical candidates, operative techniques, choice of implant design and to evaluate functional outcomes in patients who undergo shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suroosh Madanipour
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Aditya Prinja
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marcus Lee
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Abbas Rashid
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brunner HI, Chen C, Bovis F, De Benedetti F, Espada G, Joos R, Akikusa J, Chaitow J, Boteanu AL, Kimura Y, Rietschel C, Siri D, Smolewska E, Schmeling H, Brown DE, Martini A, Lovell DJ, Huang B, Ruperto N. Functional Ability and Health-Related Quality of Life in Randomized Controlled Trials of Tocilizumab in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 73:1264-1274. [PMID: 32702212 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disability in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) or polyarticular JIA treated with tocilizumab. METHODS Secondary analyses of two double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of intravenous tocilizumab in children with active systemic JIA or polyarticular JIA were conducted. Patient-reported outcomes of disability (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire [C-HAQ]), HRQoL (Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form 50 [CHQ-P50], health concepts, physical summary score [CHQ-P50-PhS], psychosocial summary score [CHQ-P50-PsS]), pain, and well-being (100-mm visual analog scale [VAS]) were measured at weeks 0 and 12 for systemic JIA, weeks 16 and 40 for polyarticular JIA, and week 104 for both JIA subgroups. RESULTS The trial included 112 patients with systemic JIA and 188 patients with polyarticular JIA. In patients with polyarticular JIA, the mean ± SD C-HAQ score decreased from 1.39 ± 0.74 at baseline to 0.67 ± 0.65 at week 16 (P < 0.001). In patients with systemic JIA, the mean ± SD CHQ-P50-PhS improved more with tocilizumab therapy than with placebo at week 12 (7.3 ± 10.2 versus 2.4 ± 10.6) (P < 0.05). Almost all mean CHQ-P50 health concept scores, CHQ-P50-PsS, and CHQ-P50-PhS improved (P ≤ 0.002) by week 104 for patients with systemic JIA. Patients with polyarticular JIA and patients with systemic JIA showed significant reductions in disability (mean ± SD C-HAQ scores of -1.09 ± 0.71 and -1.17 ± 0.80, respectively), improvements in well-being (mean ± SD well-being VAS scores of -43.76 ± 26.61 and -51.53 ± 23.57, respectively), and decreases in pain (mean ± SD pain VAS scores of -41.56 ± 31.06 and -51.26 ± 26.79, respectively) (P < 0.001); in patients with polyarticular JIA and patients with systemic JIA who were treated with tocilizumab, 92.9% of polyarticular JIA patients and 96.8% of systemic JIA patients reported no more than minimal pain (a score of ≤35 mm on the VAS) at week 104. CONCLUSION Tocilizumab treatment was associated with significantly reduced disability and pain and improved HRQoL in patients with systemic JIA and polyarticular JIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermine I Brunner
- PRCSG, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Chen Chen
- PRCSG, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | | | - Graciela Espada
- Hospital de Ninos Ricardo Gutierrez, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rik Joos
- Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Yukiko Kimura
- Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - Heinrike Schmeling
- Alberta Children's Hospital and Cumming School of Medicine/University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Diane E Brown
- Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Alberto Martini
- Pediatric and Rheumatology Clinic, PRINTO, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Daniel J Lovell
- PRCSG, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Bin Huang
- PRCSG, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Nicolino Ruperto
- Pediatric and Rheumatology Clinic, PRINTO, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jones AP, Clayton D, Nkhoma G, Sherratt FC, Peak M, Stones SR, Roper L, Young B, McErlane F, Moitt T, Ramanan AV, Foster HE, Williamson PR, Deepak S, Beresford MW, Baildam EM. Different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SIRJIA mixed-methods feasibility study. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-152. [PMID: 32758350 PMCID: PMC7443738 DOI: 10.3310/hta24360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common inflammatory disorder in childhood, affecting 10 : 100,000 children and young people aged < 16 years each year, with a population prevalence of around 1 : 1000. Corticosteroids are commonly used to treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis; however, there is currently a lack of consensus as to which corticosteroid induction regimen should be used with various disease subtypes and severities of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. OBJECTIVE The main study objective was to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to compare the different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. DESIGN This was a mixed-methods study. Work packages included a literature review; qualitative interviews with children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their families; a questionnaire survey and screening log to establish current UK practice; a consensus meeting with health-care professionals, children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and their families to establish the primary outcome; a feasibility study to pilot data capture and to collect data for future sample size calculations; and a final consensus meeting to establish the final protocol. SETTING The setting was rheumatology clinics across the UK. PARTICIPANTS Children, young people and their families who attended clinics and health-care professionals took part in this mixed-methods study. INTERVENTIONS This study observed methods of prescribing corticosteroids across the UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main study outcomes were the acceptability of a future trial for children, young people, their families and health-care professionals, and the feasibility of delivering such a trial. RESULTS Qualitative interviews identified differences in the views of children, young people and their families on a randomised controlled trial and potential barriers to recruitment. A total of 297 participants were screened from 13 centres in just less than 6 months. In practice, all routes of corticosteroid administration were used, and in all subtypes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection was the most common treatment. The questionnaire surveys showed the varying clinical practice across the UK, but established intra-articular corticosteroids as the treatment control for a future trial. The primary outcome of choice for children, young people, their families and health-care professionals was the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, 71-joint count. However, results from the feasibility study showed that, owing to missing blood test data, the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score should be used. The Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, 71-joint count, and the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score are composite disease activity scoring systems for juvenile arthritis. Two final trial protocols were established for a future randomised controlled trial. LIMITATIONS Fewer clinics were included in this feasibility study than originally planned, limiting the ability to draw strong conclusions about these units to take part in future research. CONCLUSIONS A definitive randomised controlled trial is likely to be feasible based on the findings from this study; however, important recommendations should be taken into account when planning such a trial. FUTURE WORK This mixed-methods study has laid down the foundations to develop the evidence base in this area and conducting a randomised control trial to compare different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis is likely to be feasible. STUDY REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16649996. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 36. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley P Jones
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dannii Clayton
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gloria Nkhoma
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Matthew Peak
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Louise Roper
- School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Flora McErlane
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tracy Moitt
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Athimalaipet V Ramanan
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paula R Williamson
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Samundeeswari Deepak
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Faculty of Health and Life Science, University of Liverpool and Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eileen M Baildam
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schanberg LE, Ramanan AV, De Benedetti F, Beukelman T, Eakin GS, Del Gaizo V, Ringold S, Vesely R, Schrandt S, Jaki T, Bili A, Chung JB, De Bono S, Douglass W, Enejosa JV, Kanik KS, Knobe K, Kunder R, Leite-Schnell JC, Suehiro RM, Wong RL, Mieszkalski KL, Marrow LC, Siebenaler K, Fraulo E, Kimura Y. Toward Accelerated Authorization and Access to New Medicines for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71:1976-1984. [PMID: 31313532 DOI: 10.1002/art.41043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
A meeting was organized to bring together multiple stakeholders involved in the testing and authorization of new medications for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) to discuss current issues surrounding clinical trials and access to new medications for children and adolescents with JIA. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance invited representatives of regulatory agencies (Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency), and major pharmaceutical companies with JIA-approved products or products in development, patient and parent representatives, representatives of an advocacy organization (Arthritis Foundation), and pediatric rheumatology clinicians/investigators to a 1-day meeting in April 2018. The participants engaged in discussion regarding issues in clinical trials. As the pharmacologic options to treat inflammatory arthritis rapidly expand, registration trial designs to test medications in JIA patients must adapt. Many methodologies successfully used in the recent past are no longer feasible. The pool of patients meeting entry criteria who are willing to participate is shrinking while the number of medications to be tested is growing. Suggested solutions included proposing innovative clinical trial methods to regulatory agencies, as well as open discussions among stakeholders. Ensuring that new medications are authorized in a timely manner to meet the needs of JIA patients worldwide is critical. Approaches should include open dialog between regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and other stakeholders to develop and implement novel study designs, including patient and clinician perspectives to define meaningful trial outcomes, and changing existing study plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Athimalaipet V Ramanan
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | | - Vincent Del Gaizo
- Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Keith S Kanik
- Global Product Development, Pfizer Inc., New London, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kelly L Mieszkalski
- Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | - Yukiko Kimura
- Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Morgan EM, Munro JE, Horonjeff J, Horgan B, Shea B, Feldman BM, Clairman H, Bingham CO, Thornhill S, Strand V, Alongi A, Magni-Manzoni S, van Rossum MA, Vesely R, Vojinovic J, Brunner HI, Harris JG, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, Mannion M, Rahimi H, Ravelli A, Ringold S, Ruperto N, Schrandt MS, Shenoi S, Shiff NJ, Toupin-April K, Tzaribachev N, Weiss P, Consolaro A. Establishing an Updated Core Domain Set for Studies in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Report from the OMERACT 2018 JIA Workshop. J Rheumatol 2019; 46:1006-1013. [DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.181088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective.The current Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) Core Set used in randomized controlled trials (RCT) and longitudinal observational studies (LOS) was developed without the input of patients/parents. At the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) 2016, a special interest group voted to reconsider the core set, incorporating broader input. We describe subsequent work culminating in an OMERACT 2018 plenary and consensus voting.Methods.Candidate domains were identified through literature review, qualitative surveys, and online discussion boards (ODB) held with patients with JIA and parents in Australia, Italy, and the United States. A Delphi process with parents, patients, healthcare providers, researchers, and regulators served to edit the domain list and prioritize candidate domains. After the presentation of results, OMERACT workshop participants voted, with consensus set at > 70%.Results.Participants in ODB were 53 patients with JIA (ages 15–24 yrs) and 55 parents. Three rounds of Delphi considering 27 domains were completed by 190 (response rate 85%), 201 (84%), and 182 (77%) people, respectively, from 50 countries. There was discordance noted between domains prioritized by patients/parents compared to others. OMERACT conference voting approved domains for JIA RCT and LOS with 83% endorsement. Mandatory domains are pain, joint inflammatory signs, activity limitation/physical function, patient’s perception of disease activity (overall well-being), and adverse events. Mandatory in specific circumstances: inflammation/other features relevant to specific JIA categories.Conclusion.Following the OMERACT methodology, we developed an updated JIA Core Domain Set. Next steps are to identify and systematically evaluate best outcome measures for these domains.
Collapse
|