Systematic Analysis of the Literature in Search of Defining Systemic Sclerosis Subsets

Gastric dysrhythmias in patients with early systemic sclerosis: a cross-sectional study

Objectives

Gastric involvement in patients with early systemic sclerosis (SSc) has not been previously investigated. We aim to evaluate the association of gastric dysrhythmias with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC).

Methods

Cross-sectional study. Patients with early SSc, completed the UCLA GIT 2.0 questionnaire, performed an NVC, and a surface Electrogastrography (EGG). Descriptive statistics was used for demographic and clinical characteristics and Fisher and Kendall Tau tests were used for association analysis.

Results

75 patients were screened, 30 patients were consecutively enrolled, 29 performed the EGG and 1 patient had a non-interpretable NVC. 29/30 were female with a mean age of 48.7 years (25-72). The mean disease duration from the first non-RP symptom was 22.6 +/-10.8 months and most of the patients had limited disease (76.6%). Total GIT 2.0 score symptoms were moderate-severe in 63% of the participants and 28/29 had an abnormal EGG. Bradygastria was the most common pattern present in 70% of the participants. NVC patterns: 17% early, 34% active, 28% scleroderma-like, 14% non-specific, and 2 patients had a normal NVC. There was no association between severe GI symptoms or NVC patterns and severely abnormal EGG, but the presence of bradygastria was associated with severe impairment in the social functioning area (p 0.018).

Conclusions

Gastric dysmotility is common in early SSc and there is a lack of correlation between GI symptoms and NVC scleroderma patterns. EGG is a sensitive, cheap, and non-invasive exam, that may be an alternative to early diagnosis of GI involvement.

Approach to Systemic Sclerosis Patient Assessment

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous disease comprising of a wide spectrum of ages of onset, sex-based differences, ethnic variations, disease manifestations, differential serologic profiles, and variable response to therapy resulting in reduced health-related quality of life, disability, and survival. The ability to subset groups of patients with SSc can assist with refining the diagnosis, guide appropriate monitoring, inform aggressiveness of immunosuppression, and predict prognosis. The ability to subset patients with SSc has several important practical implications for patient care.

Advanced Autoantibody Testing in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis is a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease characterized by immune abnormalities, leading to vasculopathy and fibrosis. Autoantibody testing has become an increasingly important part of diagnosis and prognostication. Clinicians have been limited to antinuclear antibody (ANA), antitopoisomerase I (also known as anti-Scl-70) antibody, and anticentromere antibody testing. Many clinicians now have improved access to an expanded profile of autoantibody testing. In this narrative review article, we review the epidemiology, clinical associations, and prognostic value of advanced autoantibody testing in people with systemic sclerosis.

A Narrative Review of Pathogenetic and Histopathologic Aspects, Epidemiology, Classification Systems, and Disease Outcome Measures in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease, characterized by the presence of three main actors: vasculopathy, immune activation, and fibrosis. This pathologic process is then translated in a clinical picture with great variability among different patients in terms of type of organ involvement, disease severity and prognosis. This heterogeneity is a main feature of SSc, which, in addition to the presence of early phases of the disease characterized by mild symptoms, can explain the high difficulty in establishing classification criteria, and in defining patients' subsets and disease outcomes. The definition of disease outcomes is particularly relevant in the setting of clinical trials, where the aim is to provide reliable endpoints, able to measure the magnitude of the efficacy of a certain drug or intervention. For this reason, in the last years, increasing efforts have been done to design measures of disease activity, damage, severity, and response to treatment, often in the context of composite indexes. When considering disease outcomes, the experience of the patient represents a relevant and complementary aspect. The tools able to capture this experience, the patient-reported outcomes, have been increasingly used in the last years in clinical practice and in clinical trials, both as primary and secondary endpoints. This comprehensive narrative review on SSc will therefore cover pathogenetic and histopathologic aspects, epidemiology, classification systems, and disease outcome measures, in order to focus on issues that are relevant for clinical research and design of clinical trials.