Combined cis-platinum and alpha interferon therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Future perspectives on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with cisplatin

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the commonest primary liver malignancy. Its incidence is increasing worldwide. Surgery, including transplantation resection, is currently the most effective treatment for HCC. However, recurrence rates are high and long-term survival is poor. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy has not provided clinical benefit or prolonged survival for patients with advanced HCC. Cisplatin (CDDP) is a key drug for the standard regimens of various cancers in the respiratory, digestive and genitourinary organs. Recently, several encouraging results have been shown in using CDDP in the treatment of advanced HCC patients. This review examines current knowledge regarding the chemotherapeutic potential of CDDP.

Systemic Therapy of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Hopeful Should We Be?

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. In the U.S., 18,510 new cancers of the liver and intrahepatic bile duct are expected in 2006, with an estimated 16,200 deaths. The incidence rates for HCC in the U.S. continued to rise steadily through 1998 and doubled during the period 1975-1995. Unresectable or metastatic HCC carries a poor prognosis, and systemic therapy with cytotoxic agents provides marginal benefit. A majority of HCC patients (>80%) presents with advanced or unresectable disease. Even for those with resected disease, the recurrence rate can be as high as 50% at 2 years. Because of the poor track record of systemic therapy in HCC, there has been a sense of nihilism for this disease in the oncology community for decades. However, with the arrival of newly developed molecularly targeted agents and the success of some of these agents in other traditionally challenging cancers, like renal cell carcinoma, there has recently been renewed interest in developing systemic therapy for HCC. This review attempts to concisely summarize the historical perspective and the current status of systemic therapy development in HCC.

Chemotherapy and other systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases

For hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that has advanced to the point that it is no longer amenable to local therapies, systemic therapy can be considered in select patients who have a good performance status. No systemic therapy has been clearly shown to improve overall survival compared with supportive care alone, although cancer-related symptoms can sometimes be palliated with therapy and some objective responses are seen. Systemic therapies for HCC include chemotherapy, both intravenous and infused via the hepatic artery, as well as hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, and targeted biologic agents. Colorectal, pancreatic, breast, and lung cancer are some of the most common tumors that metastasize to the liver. Response rates and effect on overall survival as a result of systemic therapy for liver metastases vary widely depending on primary tumor site. Targeted biologic agents are being integrated into standard treatment regimens for all of these cancer types, with variable effects on survival and other outcomes for all affected patients including those with liver metastases.

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Whilst local treatments are useful in selected patients, they are not suitable for many with advanced disease. Here, we review phase II and III trials for systemic therapy of advanced disease, finding no strong evidence that any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or immunotherapy regimen trialled to date benefits survival in this setting. Many trials were inadequately powered, single centre, and enrolled highly selected patients. From this review, we cannot recommend any therapeutic approach in these patients outside of a clinical trial setting. Including an untreated control arm in clinical trials in HCC is still justified. Every effort should be made to enroll these patients into adequately powered trials, and promising phase II results must be tested in a multicentre phase III setting, preferably against a placebo control arm. Prevention of hepatitis B and C remains vital to decrease deaths from HCC.

Interferon for preventing and treating hepatocellular carcinoma associated with the hepatitis B and C viruses

The possibility that interferon-alpha might be effective for the prevention or treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma is suggested by its efficacy against the associated hepatitis B and C viruses, by its efficacy in the treatment of some other human tumours, and by evidence that interferon-alpha may inhibit the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines and their production of hepatitis B surface antigen. Few studies support the use of interferon-alpha for preventing hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. In contrast, benefit from the use of interferon-alpha to prevent hepatitis C virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma is suggested in a large number of studies, but most of these studies have weaknesses of study design that preclude definitive conclusions. Nevertheless, most of these studies suggest that the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is lower in hepatitis C virus-infected patients receiving interferon-alpha, particularly in patients with a sustained response to interferon-alpha, compared to nonresponders. As a treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, interferon-alpha was only evaluated in a small number of patients with advanced disease; 'partial responses' and prolongation of survival times in a few of these studies suggest that additional studies should be done in patients with less advanced disease.

Remission and survival following monthly intraarterial cisplatinum in nonresectable hepatoma

PRECIS

Intraarterial delivery of 50 mg/m2 cisplatinum on a monthly basis is a well-tolerated regimen for patients with nonresectable hepatoma. The selective uptake of cisplatinum delivered intraarterially suggests other selective intraarterial protocols would be of use in regional cancers treated with cisplatinum.

BACKGROUND

Sixty-seven patients with nonresectable hepatoma were treated with hepatic artery infusions (HAI) of 50 mg/m2 cisplatinum on a monthly basis.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients received an initial course of whole liver external radiation with intravenous (i.v.) cisplatinum 50 mg/m2. Nineteen patients did not receive radiation and received HAI cisplatinum only. All patients then received HAI cisplatinum at 50 mg/m2 on a monthly basis. Six patients were given a tracer dose of radioactive 195m cisplatinum for quantitation by the HAI and i.v. routes.

RESULTS

Monthly HAI cisplatinum was well tolerated and could be repeated indefinitely. Median survival for primarily treated nonresectable hepatomas was 12 months [alpha fetoprotein (AFP) elevated] and 17.5 months (AFP negative). Radioactive cisplatinum given by HAI yielded 34-55% tumor uptake of cisplatinum vs. < 5% by i.v. delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatic intraarterial cisplatinum at 50 mg/m2 is a well-tolerated monthly regimen for patients with nonresectable hepatoma.