1
|
Pan P, Zhao S, Wang S, Song Y, Gu L, Chen Y, Zhao J, Lu L, Li X, Xu H, Liu G, Li Y, Xu L, Wang J, Li Z, Bai Y. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of an oral sulfate solution and 3-L polyethylene glycol on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a phase III multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:977-986.e14. [PMID: 37422241 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Adequate bowel preparation is crucial for clear mucosal visualization during colonoscopy. We aimed to comprehensively compare oral sulfate solution (OSS) and 3-L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) for bowel preparation before colonoscopy. METHODS This randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority study was performed in 10 medical centers. Eligible subjects were enrolled to receive OSS or 3-L PEG in a split-dose regimen. The quality of bowel preparation, adverse reactions, and acceptability were evaluated. The quality of bowel preparation was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Safety was evaluated by adverse reactions. The study population was divided into the full analysis set (FAS), the safety set, the modified FAS (mFAS), and the per-protocol set (PPS). RESULTS Three hundred forty-eight potentially eligible subjects were enrolled. Three hundred forty-four subjects were included in the FAS and safety set, 340 subjects were included in the mFAS, and 328 subjects were included in the PPS. Adequate bowel preparation of the OSS was not inferior to 3-L PEG in the mFAS (98.22% vs 97.66%) and the PPS (98.17% vs 98.78%). There was no significant difference in acceptability between the 2 groups (94.74% vs 94.80%, P = .9798). Overall adverse reactions were similar (50.88% vs 44.51%, P = .2370) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS The split-dose OSS regimen was not inferior to the split-dose 3-L PEG regimen for the quality of bowel preparation in a Chinese adult population. The safety and acceptability of the 2 groups were similar. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05465889.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Pan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengbing Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuling Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yihang Song
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lun Gu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Youxiang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jiangrong Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Integrative Medicine Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Lungen Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiuling Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hongzhi Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Gaifang Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hebei Provincial People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yanqing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Le Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiangbin Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
| | - Zhaoshen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoshida N, Inagaki Y, Hasegawa D, Kobayashi R, Tomita Y, Hashimoto H, Hirose R, Dohi O, Inoue K, Morimoto Y, Inada Y, Murakami T, Itoh Y. The Efficacy of 480 ml Oral Sodium Sulfate for Improving Insufficient Bowel Preparation of Colonoscopy with High-Concentrated Polyethylene Glycol. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2023; 2023:6359165. [PMID: 37808965 PMCID: PMC10560111 DOI: 10.1155/2023/6359165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Oral sulfate solution (OSS) is used for bowel preparation (BP) during colonoscopy. The way of taking this agent can be used a same-day regimen (only on the day of colonoscopy) and split regimen (the day before and on the day of colonoscopy) for receiving it. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of a same-day regimen of 480 ml OSS for insufficient bowel preparation (BP) with high-concentrated polyethylene glycol (H-PEG). Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective study was conducted from December 2021 to December 2022 at three related institutions on patients aged ≥ 20 years with a fair or poor Aronchick score of BP with 1 l H-PEG in previous colonoscopy. All patients received a low-residual diet and 10 ml of 0.75% picosulfate sodium a day before the colonoscopy and 480 ml of OSS and ≥1 l of water 3 hours before the colonoscopy. We analyzed the rate of improvement with OSS compared to H-PEG and other efficacies, and adverse events (AE). Results We evaluated 125 cases (77 males) with an average age of 72.1 ± 8.8 years. The completion rate of 480 ml of OSS was 97.6% (122/125). The improvement rate of BP showing good or excellent score with OSS was 70.4% (88/125). Compared OSS with previous H-PEG, the insertion time (min) was 7.0 ± 4.8 vs. 8.1 ± 6.0 (p = 0.01), and the adenoma detection rates were 67.2% vs. 63.2% (p = 0.05). The cleansing time (min) was 131 ± 46 vs. 165 ± 53 (p < 0.01). The rate of AE with OSS was 10.4% (13/125). There were no significant differences about AE in age and gender. The tolerance of OSS compared with H-PEG (good/similar/bad) was 72.0%/24.8%/3.2% (amounts), 26.4%/39.2%/34.4% (taste), and 76.8%/10.4%/12.8% (overall preference), respectively. Conclusions The same-day regimen of 480 ml OSS effectively improved the insufficient BP of 1 l H-PEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohisa Yoshida
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Daisuke Hasegawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ayabe City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Reo Kobayashi
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yuri Tomita
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hikaru Hashimoto
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ryohei Hirose
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Osamu Dohi
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ken Inoue
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Morimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Saiseikai Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yutaka Inada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takaaki Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aiseikai Yamashina Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshito Itoh
- Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hong SH, Lee DS, Kim JW, Lee KL, Kang HW, Kim SH. [Hyponatremic Seizure after Ingestion of an Oral Sulfate Tablet for Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy]. Korean J Gastroenterol 2022; 80:154-157. [PMID: 36156039 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2022.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The oral sulfate tablet (OST), commercially available as Orafang® (Pharmbio Korea Co., Seoul, Korea) in Korea, is being used increasingly because of its bowel-cleansing efficacy, safety, and tolerability in adults undergoing colonoscopy. Other bowel cleansing agents, such as polyethylene glycol and sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate, can cause plasma volume depletion and electrolyte disturbances, such as hyponatremia. On the other hand, the OST has never been reported to cause hyponatremia in Korea. To our knowledge, the authors experienced the first case of hyponatremic seizure in an 81-year-old woman to whom an OST was administered for bowel preparation before a colonoscopy. After ingesting the OST, she presented with seizure, confusion, and dyspnea. Upon arrival, her serum sodium level was 120 mEq/L, and the urine osmolality and sodium levels were 449 mOsm/kg and 253 mOsm/kg, respectively; chest imaging suggested pulmonary edema. The associated symptoms disappeared following treatment with an intravenous injection of normal saline and 3% NaCl to normalize the sodium level. This case shows that the OST can cause hyponatremia and other severe complications related to hyponatremia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Hyun Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Seok Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Ji Won Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kook Lae Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoun Woo Kang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Hwan Kim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Woo JH, Koo HS, Kim DS, Shin JE, Jung Y, Huh KC. Evaluation of the efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and an oral sodium sulfate solution: A multi-center, prospective randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30355. [PMID: 36107563 PMCID: PMC9439845 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Low-volume bowel preparation has been developed to increase patient compliance. We compared 1 L of polyethylene glycol/ascorbic acid (PEG/Asc) and oral sodium sulfate (OSS) with respect to bowel preparation efficacy, compliance, and safety. METHODS A multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blinded, non-inferiority trial was conducted in 3 hospitals. Patients were randomized to receive a bowel-cleansing agent. Bowel-cleansing efficacy was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Satisfaction, feeling, taste of the bowel cleanser, and adverse events after taking the bowel cleanser were investigated through a questionnaire. Additionally, blood samples were analyzed before and after bowel cleansing. RESULTS In total, 172 patients were analyzed (85 with 1 L PEG/Asc and 87 with OSS), and the mean BBPS scores were comparable between agents. The 1L PEG/Asc group tended to have a higher BBPS score in the right colon (2.22 vs 2.02; P = .08). The compliance of 1 L of PEG/Asc was comparable to that of OSS. Patients taking 1 L PEG/Asc reported greater thirst and dizziness (P = .04 and P = .047, respectively) than the OSS cohort. On the other hand, gastrointestinal symptoms such as vomiting and abdominal distension were more common in the OSS group, without statistical significance. In terms of laboratory adverse events, elevation of serum creatinine was found in both groups after taking the bowel cleansing agent (P < .001 for the 1L PEG/Asc group; P = .04 for the OSS group). However, most of the increased values were within the normal ranges. DISCUSSION The 1L PEG/Asc treatment was comparable to OSS in terms of bowel preparation efficacy, compliance, and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Hun Woo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hoon Sup Koo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Dae Sung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Eun Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yunho Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu Chan Huh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Kyu Chan Huh, Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, 685, Gasuwon-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon 35365, Republic of Korea (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen C, Shi M, Liao Z, Chen W, Wu Y, Tian X. Oral sulfate solution benefits polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:1121-1133. [PMID: 35294782 PMCID: PMC9545996 DOI: 10.1111/den.14299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although oral sulfate solution (OSS) has been revealed to be not only safe and efficacious but also noninferior to polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG + ASC), it is unclear whether OSS can ultimately increase the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). We performed this meta-analysis to estimate the effect of OSS on PDR and ADR during colonoscopy. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the comparative effect of OSS versus PEG + ASC on the PDR and ADR during colonoscopy. Cecal intubation time (CIT), cecal intubation rate (CIR), and bowel preparation score were also evaluated. Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.3.0 was used to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS Eight RCTs involving 2059 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. Meta-analysis suggested that OSS significantly increased the PDR (47.34% vs. 40.14%, risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.24, P = 0.01) and ADR (44.60% vs. 38.14%, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33, P = 0.01) during colonoscopy. Subgroup analysis showed that the beneficial effects of OSS on PDR and ADR were consistent among patients with mean age >55 years and with body mass index <25 kg/m2 receiving outpatient colonoscopy, morning colonoscopy, and the 2-L bowel preparation protocol. Meanwhile, patients receiving OSS had a beneficial bowel preparation score. CONCLUSION Compared with polyethylene glycol-based regimens, the OSS bowel preparation regimen significantly increased the PDR and ADR in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized TreatmentChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Mengyang Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized TreatmentChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Zhongli Liao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized TreatmentChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Weiqing Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Research for Cancer Metastasis and Individualized TreatmentChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Yongzhong Wu
- Radiation Oncology CenterChongqing University Cancer HospitalChongqingChina
| | - Xu Tian
- Nursing DepartmentUniversitat Rovira I VirgiliTarragonaSpain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali IA, Roton D, Madhoun M. Oral sulfate solution versus low-volume polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:721-728. [PMID: 34784082 DOI: 10.1111/den.14194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Oral sodium sulfate (OSS) solution and low-volume polyethylene glycol-based solutions are two of the more common low-volume purgatives used as colonoscopy preparations. Data on how these different low-volume solutions compare are mixed. Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare OSS with low-volume polyethylene glycol solutions (PEG) plus ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) solution with respect to (i) satisfactory bowel preparation, (ii) excellent bowel preparation, and (iii) tolerability. METHODS Studies were identified by searching 10 medical databases for reports published from 1974 until 2019. Only fully published RCTs comparing OSS and low-volume PEG-based products with regard to overall satisfactory bowel preparation were included. Pooling was conducted by both fixed-effects and random effects models; results are presented from the random effects model when heterogeneity was significant. RESULTS Seven studies (involving 2049 subjects) met the inclusion criteria. There was no difference between OSS and PEG + Asc with respect to adequate bowel preparation (risk ratio [RR] 1.02 [0.99-1.06]; P = 0.16). OSS did result in a higher chance of excellent bowel preparation (RR 1.18 [1.06-1.31]; P = 0.03). OSS was associated with a 30% increased risk of nausea (RR 1.35 [1.03-1.77]; P = 0.03) and more than double the risk of vomiting (RR 2.30 [1.63-2.23]; P < 0.05) compared with PEG + Asc. Begg's funnel plot indicated low probability of publication bias. CONCLUSIONS Individuals at low risk of inadequate bowel preparation who use OSS for bowel preparation are more likely to achieve excellent bowel preparation, but are more likely to experience nausea and vomiting than are individuals using low-volume PEG-based solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ijlal Akbar Ali
- Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Division, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Daniel Roton
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Mohammed Madhoun
- Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Division, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saito Y, Oka S, Tamai N, Kudo T, Kuniyoshi N, Shirakura T, Omae Y, Hamahata Y, Arai T, Tanaka S, Uedo N, Shimizu S, Fukuzawa M, Uraoka T, Ichinose S, Ogata H, Kobayashi K, Saito S, Tajiri H. Efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution for bowel preparation in Japanese patients undergoing colonoscopy: Noninferiority-based, randomized, controlled study. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:1131-1138. [PMID: 33476415 PMCID: PMC8596579 DOI: 10.1111/den.13930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety of oral sulfate solution administered using the same-day dose and the split-dose regimens with those of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate solution, used for bowel preparation in Japanese patients undergoing colonoscopy. METHODS This multicenter (n = 13), randomized, active-controlled, colonoscopist- and image evaluator-blinded, noninferiority study with parallel-group comparison recruited 632 patients from December 2018 to June 2019. Of these, 602 patients were divided into the oral sulfate solution same-day dose group (n = 200); oral sulfate solution split-dose group (n = 202); and polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate same-day dose group (n = 200). Differences in the efficacy rates between the polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate group and each oral sulfate solution group were calculated using the asymptotic method. The safety of the oral sulfate solution was evaluated, based on the occurrence of adverse events and reactions. RESULTS Both oral sulfate solution protocols were confirmed as noninferior to the polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate protocol for bowel-cleansing. The occurrence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the oral sulfate solution same-day dose group than in the polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate group (P = 0.010). The occurrence of adverse reactions was not significantly different between the oral sulfate solution split-dose and the polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate group. CONCLUSIONS Oral sulfate solution is not only safe and efficacious but also not inferior to polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate solution (active control). It could be used for bowel preparation in Japanese patients scheduled for colonoscopy (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03794310).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Saito
- Endoscopy DivisionNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Department ofGastroenterology and MetabolismHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
| | | | - Toyoki Kudo
- Digestive Disease CenterShowa University Northern Yokohama HospitalKanagawaJapan
| | | | | | - Yoshio Omae
- Department of GastroenterologyKawasaki Saiwai HospitalKanagawaJapan
| | - Yukihiro Hamahata
- Department of ColoproctologyTsujinaka Hospital KashiwanohaChibaJapan
| | - Takehiro Arai
- Gastroenterology DivisionTokatsu‐Tsujinaka HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Department ofEndoscopyHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
| | - Noriya Uedo
- Department of Gastrointestinal OncologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Seiji Shimizu
- Departments of Gastroenterology and HepatologyOsaka General Hospital of West Japan Railway CompanyOsakaJapan
| | - Masakatsu Fukuzawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyTokyo Medical UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Toshio Uraoka
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyGunma University Graduate School of MedicineGunmaJapan
| | | | - Haruhiko Ogata
- Center for Diagnostic and Therapeutic EndoscopyKeio University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Kiyonori Kobayashi
- Research and Development Center for New Medical FrontiersKitasato University School of MedicineKanagawaJapan
| | - Shoichi Saito
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Hisao Tajiri
- Department ofInnovative Interventional Endoscopy ResearchThe Jikei University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|