Decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation after surgery for retinopathy of prematurity: sedoanalgesia vs. general anesthesia

Respiratory Complications in Infants with Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) Requiring Laser Photocoagulation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper was to describe peri-procedural events and complications of infants requiring laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in a level IV neonatal intensive care unit.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was performed of neonates requiring ROP exams from January 2017 to August 2020. Baseline maternal and neonatal characteristics, ROP exam findings, and associated treatment were analyzed. Group characteristics were compared based on the need for laser photocoagulation. Subgroup analysis of the laser group including respiratory outcomes, cardiorespiratory index (CRI) scores, and pain scores was also performed.

RESULTS

Neonatal and maternal characteristics in the laser (n = 27) and non-laser (n = 172) groups were assessed. Of the 81.5% (22/27) that required re-intubation for laser, 36% (8/22) had >1 intubation and 18% (4/22) had >1 extubation attempt. The average duration of intubation following laser was 2.46 ± 7.13 days, with 40% (9/22) needing peri-extubation steroids and 18% (4/22) racemic epinephrine to facilitate extubation. Mean total respiratory support time post-laser was 8.65 ± 15.23 days. Mean neonatal pain, agitation, and sedation scores after laser were zero immediately after the procedure, 0.09 ± 0.33 at 12 hours, 0.11 ± 0.47 at 24 hours, and 0.11 ± 0.51 at 48 hours. The mean CRI scores were 1 ± 0 immediately after the procedure, 1.17 ± 0.4 at 12 hours, 1.41 ± 0.20 at 24 hours, and 1 ± 0 at 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

Nearly all infants undergoing laser photocoagulation for ROP in our cohort required intubation and continued respiratory support. Despite stability during the procedure, complications from intubation were common.

KEY POINTS

· Routine intubation for laser is associated with complications.. · Need for post-procedural respiratory support is common.. · Avoiding intubation may mitigate these neonatal complications..

Safety profile of anesthetic modalities during laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the anesthetic approach with the least adverse events and better cardiorespiratory stability profile, used in infants undergoing laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review was conducted. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched until 27th October 2021. Reference lists of relevant studies, and abstract books of international annual meetings of pediatric Οphthalmology for the years 2020 and 2021 were also looked at, as well as Clinical trials registry ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ).

RESULT

Overall 18 primary studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 3 cohorts, 12 case series) were included, investigating different anesthetic modalities. Cardiopulmonary instability was more common, and hypothermia was less common in the sedation groups of pentazocine/midazolam and fentanyl/midazolam, compared to the general anesthesia group of air/oxygen/sevoflurane (AOS). Cardiorespiratory instability was also more common in sedation with propofol/ketamine compared to general anesthesia with AOS, while postoperative mechanical ventilation was more frequently needed in the latter. Αpnea, need for supplemental oxygen and cardiorespiratory instability was more frequent in infants receiving fentanyl as opposed to ketamine. Fentanyl compared to morphine presented no differences in safety parameters. Finally, topical anesthesia showed the greatest instability with a higher mean postoperative cardiorespiratory index, compared to both sedation and general anesthesia. Episodes of life-threatening events were reported after topical anesthesia, while hypothermia and oliguria presented less often after topical, compared to general anesthesia and sedation.

CONCLUSION

Significant heterogeneity among studies precludes direct comparisons and generalizability of the results. No specific anesthetic modality for treatment of ROP with laser photocoagulation was shown to be superior in terms of safety. Well-designed studies are required to establish the optimal anesthetic approach, considering that laser photocoagulation still remains one of the main therapeutic modalities for ROP.

Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To determine the main indications and assess the most common adverse events with the administration of hypnotic propofol in most pediatric clinical scenarios.

SOURCES

A systematic review of PubMed, SciELO, Cochrane, and EMBASE was performed, using filters such as a maximum of five years post-publication, and/or references or articles of importance, with emphasis on clinical trials using propofol. All articles of major relevance were blind-reviewed by both authors according to the PRISMA statement, looking for possible bias and limitations or the quality of the articles.

SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS

Through the search criterion applied, 417 articles were found, and their abstracts evaluated. A total of 69 papers were thoroughly studied. Articles about propofol use in children are increasing, including in neonates, with the majority being cohort studies and clinical trials in two main scenarios: upper digestive endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. A huge list of adverse events has been published, but most articles considered them of low risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol is a hypnotic drug with a safe profile of efficacy and adverse events. Indeed, when administered by non-anesthesiologists, quick access to emergency care must be provided, especially in airway events. The use of propofol in other scenarios must be better studied, aiming to reduce the limitations of its administration by general pediatricians.

Trends in the Screening and Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity

OBJECTIVES

To determine the current practice patterns of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and treatment and the attitudes toward new screening and treatment modalities in level III and level IV NICUs, as reported by medical directors.

METHODS

Surveys were mailed to the medical directors of 847 level III NICUs identified in the 2011 American Academy of Pediatrics directory in April 2015. In September 2015, responses were compared with American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines and previous reports. Within-sample comparisons were made by level, setting, size, and academic status.

RESULTS

Respondents indicated that ROP screening is most often performed in their NICUs by pediatric and/or retina specialists (90%); retinal imaging devices are infrequently used (21%). Treatment is performed by pediatric (39%) and/or retina (57%) specialists in the NICU, usually under conscious sedation (60%). The most common treatment modality was laser photocoagulation (85%), followed by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection (20%). Some NICUs do not provide treatment services (28%), often due to a lack of ophthalmologists (78%). Respondents showed slightly more agreement (35%) than disagreement (25%) that a retinal imaging device could replace indirect ophthalmoscopy (40% were neutral). More respondents agreed than disagreed (30% vs 15%) that telemedicine for ROP screening is safe, but most were neutral (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Screening and treatment of ROP are not implemented uniformly in NICUs across the United States. Concerns regarding an insufficient ROP workforce are validated.