Ignoring international alerts? The routinization of episiotomy in France in the 1980s and 1990s

As scientific evidence from the UK and the USA in the 1980s was questioning the usefulness of episiotomy, the rate in France increased from 38% in 1981 to 58.4% in 1996. In 1996, the World Health Organization recommended limiting the episiotomy rate to 10%. This article aims to examine this paradox through an analysis of the French medical debate on episiotomy during the 1980s and 1990s. Drawing on an analytical corpus composed of 192 articles published in French professional journals of obstetrician-gynaecologists and midwives, it shows that the majority of these health professionals considered episiotomy to be a preventive intervention. The most influential professional organizations and experts manage to refute most of the international alerts on the limitations and side effects of episiotomy through the constant production of new justifications and competing knowledge for the procedure. In the 1980s, episiotomy was seen as a means to prevent tearing and thus avoid perineal dysfunction. Episiotomy and perineal re-education (which developed into a new health sector) were put forward as 'the' solution to the problem. From the mid-1990s onwards, the focus shifted from the mother to the baby as episiotomy was promoted as a way to reduce the risk of newborn mortality and morbidity. This article shows that the alerts and controversies on the assumed iatrogenic effects of biomedical technologies and practices were silenced through efficient and dynamic production of competing knowledge about their assumed benefits.

Being a midwife in West Africa: Between sensory experiences, moral standards, socio-technical violence and affective constraints

Despite a long history of maternal health programs, the quality of obstetric care and access to facility services remain inadequate in West Africa. Although several qualitative studies have described human resource and facility constraints impacting pregnancy care and the violent or disrespectful care of women during labor, the reasons behind these behaviors have not been elucidated. In order to understand midwives' experiences with caregiving, in 2017-2018 we conducted interviews with 24 professional midwives in Benin and Burkina Faso and examined their perspectives on their profession, obstetric practices and personal lives. By including emotional, sensorial, linguistic and social elements, this paper shows important discordances between the proposals made by programs (such as rural postings and financial disbursement projects) and midwives' socio-emotional duties and economic roles. The study also shows that midwives' attitudes towards their patients are linked to their considering childbirth to be a moral act. Midwives' mistreatment of women in labor corresponds to constant shifts between technical obstetric skills and value judgements concerning expressions of pain, sexuality and desire. In addition, midwives justify their violent practices through the urgency of the situation, especially during crowning. The provision of care and the effective implementation of maternal programs cannot be improved without taking these justifications into account and without constructing dialogues enabling midwives to reflect on their social and emotional constraints, their relationship to the sexuality of childbirth, and the reasons for their practices. We advocate for more methodical research and for midwifery training to include in-depth case studies such as this one which start from the practical difficulties midwives face, making it possible to improve the midwifery profession as it is lived and not as it is imagined by fragmented, ungrounded programs.

[Introduction]

INTRODUCTION

This paper is based on two observations. First, despite multiple health programmes, access to services and quality of obstetric care remain inadequate in Africa. Secondly, although several qualitative studies have described the poor quality of admission facilities, violence during delivery and neglect of the poorest women, the reasons behind these behaviours have not been elucidated.This survey, conducted in Benin and Burkina Faso, examined midwives' experiences of their job, their obstetric practices and their lives.By including the emotional, sensorial, linguistic and social elements, this paper shows important discordances between the proposals made by programmes (installation in rural areas, strict financial management) and midwives' social and emotional duties and economic roles. It highlights the importance of gender relations in the careers of these professionals.The study also shows that the attitudes of midwives are related to the fact that childbirth is considered to be a moral act and their mistreatment behaviour corresponds to constant shifts between technical skills (fertility) and value judgements concerning expression of pain, sexuality and desire. On the other hand, midwives justify their violent practices by the urgency of the situation, especially during childbirth.The provision of care and effective implementation of programmes cannot be improved without taking into account these forms of justification and without constructing dialogues enabling midwives to develop a reflection about their social and emotional constraints, their relation to sexuality, and the reasons for their actions.