Efficacy of Preoperative Oral Gabapentin in Attenuation of Neuro-Endocrine Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation

Comparative Study of Gabapentin, Clonidine and Placebo in Alleviating the Hemodynamic Changes Due to Tracheal Intubation and Laryngoscopy

INTRODUCTION

Hemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation must be reduced for safe and effective anesthesia. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of oral clonidine, gabapentin and placebo in alleviating the hemodynamic changes due to tracheal intubation and laryngoscopy.

METHODS

This was a double-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted on 90 patients who were undergoing elective surgery and were randomized into three groups. Group I (n=30) received a placebo, group II (n=30) received gabapentin and group III (n=30) received clonidine as premedication before anesthesia induction. Patient heart rate and pressor response were recorded periodically and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the baseline heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the groups. HR elevation was observed in all three groups and found to be significant (p=0.0001) but the increase was higher in the placebo (15 min: 80.80± 15.41) and lower in the clonidine group (15 min: 65.53± 12.43). The elevation in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was least and transient in the gabapentin group, as compared to placebo and clonidine group. Intra-operatively, the requirement of opioids was higher in the placebo as compared to clonidine and gabapentin (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Clonidine and gabapentin were effective in reducing the hemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation.

Effectiveness of preanesthetic administration of gabapentin on sedative action during intravenous sedation with propofol

PURPOSE

There are no sufficient evidences for the sedative effect of gabapentin during anesthesia, especially intravenous sedation (IVS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sedative effect of gabapentin as preanesthetic medication during the IVS with propofol.

METHODS

10 volunteer subjects joined this study. They underwent propofol IVS three times on separate days. On the first day, the IVS without gabapentin was performed as a control. On the second and the third day, gabapentin 200 mg and 400 mg were administered before the IVS, respectively. The target blood concentration (C_T) of propofol was gradually increased, and the bispectral index (BIS) value and Ramsay sedation score (RSS) were evaluated at each propofol C_T. Postanesthetic complications and influences on vital signs were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, the propofol C_Ts in the gabapentin 400 mg group significantly reduced at the BIS values of 60 and 70 (p = 0.031 and p = 0.043, respectively), and at RSS 3, 4, 5 and 6 (p = 0.040, p = 0.004, p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant difference in propofol C_Ts between the control group and the gabapentin 200 mg group. There were no abnormality and no deterioration in circulation and respiration in all groups. There were no significant increases in complications with the administration of gabapentin.

CONCLUSION

The oral administration of 400 mg dose of gabapentin reduced the propofol C_Ts for achieving an adequate sedation level on IVS.

Gabapentin for the hemodynamic response to intubation: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Endotracheal intubation is the gold standard for securing the airway before surgery. Nevertheless, this procedure can produce an activation of the sympathetic nervous system and result in a hemodynamic response which, in high-risk patients, may lead to cardiovascular instability and myocardial ischemia. The aim of this review was to evaluate whether gabapentin can attenuate this response and whether such an attenuation could translate into reduced myocardial ischemia and mortality.

SOURCE

We searched MEDLINE(®), EMBASE™, CINAHL, AMED, and unpublished clinical trial databases for randomized-controlled trials that compared gabapentin with control, fentanyl, clonidine, or beta blockers for attenuating the hemodynamic response to intubation. Primary outcomes were mortality, myocardial infarction, and myocardial ischemia. Secondary outcomes were hemodynamic changes following intubation.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We included 29 randomized trials with only two studies at low risk of bias. No data were provided for the primary outcomes and no studies included high-risk patients. The use of gabapentin resulted in attenuation in the rise in mean arterial blood pressure [mean difference (MD), -12 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI), -17 to -8] and heart rate (MD, -8 beats·min(-1); 95% CI, -11 to -5) one minute after intubation. Gabapentin also reduced the risk of hypertension or tachycardia requiring treatment (risk ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.48). Data were limited on adverse hemodynamic events such as bradycardia and hypotension.

CONCLUSION

It remains unknown whether gabapentin improves clinically relevant outcomes such as death and myocardial infarction since studies failed to report on these. Nevertheless, gabapentin attenuated increases in heart rate and blood pressure following intubation when compared with the control group. Even so, the studies included in this review were at potential risk of bias. Moreover, they did not include high-risk patients or report adverse hemodynamic outcomes. Future studies are required to address these limitations.

Pharmacological agents for preventing morbidity associated with the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation

BACKGROUND

Several drugs have been used in attenuating or obliterating the response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. These changes are of little concern in relatively healthy patients but can lead to morbidity and mortality in the high risk patient population.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to determine the effectiveness of pharmacological agents in preventing the morbidity and mortality resulting from the haemodynamic changes in response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in adult patients aged 18 years and above who were undergoing elective surgery in the operating room setting.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 6), MEDLINE (1950 to June 2011), EMBASE (1980 to June 2011), and the bibliographies of published studies. We reran our search from June 2011 to December 2012 and will deal with these studies when we update the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a drug used as an intervention for preventing or attenuating the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation to a control group, and that mentioned mortality, major morbidity, arrhythmia or electrocardiogram (ECG) evidence of ischaemia in the methodology, results, or discussion section of the reports.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the outcome data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 72 RCTs. The included trials studied the effects of 32 drugs belonging to different pharmacological groups. Only two trials mentioned the primary outcome of morbidity and mortality related to the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Of the secondary outcomes, 40 of the included trials observed arrhythmia only, 11 observed myocardial ischaemia only and 20 observed both arrhythmias and myocardial ischaemia. Arrhythmias were observed in 2932 participants and myocardial ischaemia in 1616 participants. Arrhythmias were observed in 134 out of 993 patients in the control group compared to 80 out of 1939 in the intervention group. The risk of arrhythmias was significantly reduced with pharmacological interventions in the pooled data (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.19, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.26, P < 0.00001, I(2)= 47%). Local anaesthetics, calcium channel blockers, beta blockers and narcotics reduced the risk of arrhythmia in the intervention group compared to the control group. Myocardial ischaemia was observed in 21 out of 604 patients in the control group compared to 10 out of 1012 in the treatment group; the result was statistically significant (Peto OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.92, P = 0.03, I(2) = 19%). However, in subgroup analysis only local anaesthetics significantly reduced the ECG changes indicating ischaemia, but this evidence came from one study. The majority of the studies had a negative outcome. Hypotension and bradycardia were reported with 40 µg kg(-1) intravenous alfentanil, chest rigidity with 75 ug kg(-1) alfentanil, and increased bronchomotor tone with sympathetic blockers.There were 17 studies which included high risk patients. Pharmacological treatment in this group resulted in the reduction of arrhythmias when the data from nine trials looking at arrhythmias were pooled (Peto OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.59, P = 0.005, I(2) = 80%). The analysis from four studies was not included. Three of these trials looked at the effect of sympathetic blockers but arrhythmias or myocardial ischaemia was observed throughout the perioperative period in two studies and some patients had arrhythmias due to atropine premedication in the third study. In the fourth study the authors mentioned myocardial ischaemia in the objectives section but did not report it in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The risk of arrhythmias associated with tracheal intubation was significantly reduced with pre-induction administration of local anaesthetics, calcium channel blockers, beta blockers and narcotics compared to placebo. Pharmacological intervention also reduced the risk of ECG evidence of myocardial ischaemia in the pooled data. Lignocaine pretreatment showed a significant effect but evidence came from one study only. The data suggested that there may be a reduction in ECG evidence of myocardial ischaemia with beta blocker pretreatment but this difference was not statistically significant. There is a need to focus on outcomes rather than haemodynamic measurements alone when studying this response in future trials.