Transforming Care at the Bedside: managers' and health care providers' perceptions of their change capacities

Development of the Nursing Quality Improvement in Practice Tool: Advancing Frontline Nursing Practice

BACKGROUND

Frontline nurse engagement in quality improvement (QI) improves nurse-sensitive outcomes; yet research suggests frontline nurses are not engaging in QI.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop, refine, and psychometrically evaluate the Nursing Quality Improvement in Practice (N-QuIP) tool to measure nurses' competency, engagement, and barriers/facilitators to QI engagement.

METHODS

Item development was guided by an expert panel and literature review. Factor analysis and reliability indices were assessed through 681 surveys completed by nurses at one medical center.

RESULTS

Cronbach α coefficients were 0.97 (Skill Scale) and 0.90 (Attitude Scale). Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) for knowledge was 0.36. Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 (Skill) and 3 (Attitude) subscales respectively, aligning well with QI competencies.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary data suggest that the N-QuIP is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nurse QI competence and engagement. Understanding current knowledge, skills, and attitudes and identified barriers/facilitators can help the development of strategies aimed at increasing QI engagement.

Fortalecer la coordinación de enfermería para mejorar el cuidado hospitalario

Introducción: La coordinación adecuada para organizar la atención de enfermería a nivel hospitalario es decisiva frente al servicio que se ofrece a los sujetos de cuidado y al mejoramiento permanente de la institución. Objetivo: Describir qué dice la literatura mundial sobre cómo fortalecer el rol de coordinación de enfermería a nivel hospitalario. Materiales y Métodos: Búsqueda integradora de literatura bajo parámetros de Ganong, con publicaciones arbitradas, observación de seis años, sin límites geográficos, en idiomas inglés, español y portugués.  Resultados: De acuerdo con la literatura surgen tres categorías que incluyen: características del rol de coordinador de enfermería; impacto de esta coordinación en los resultados frente al sujeto de cuidado; y estrategias para fortalecer el rol de coordinación dentro de la institución. La evidencia que respalda el desarrollo de la coordinación de enfermería en el hospital es débil, con una mayoría de estudios de tipo descriptivo. Discusión: La coordinación de enfermería debe articular la dirección y la operación en el hospital y para ello requiere conocer y acompañar la directriz institucional a mediano y largo plazo y manejar estrategias de motivación y acompañamiento para facilitar su logro. Conclusiones:  En una institución hospitalaria, la enfermera coordinadora debe mantener el norte en medio de la cotidianeidad de la asistencia; acompañar y motivar al personal a su cargo mediante competencias de liderazgo, trabajo en equipo y conocimiento clínico e institucional.  Requiere para el ejercicio de su rol, proyectar el cambio y mantener un pensamiento integrador. Como citar este artículo: Laverde Contreras Olga Lucia, Sánchez Herrera Beatriz. Fortalecer la coordinación de enfermería para mejorar el cuidado hospitalario. Revista Cuidarte. 2020; 11(2): e826. http://dx.doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.826

Healthcare middle managers' experiences of developing capacity and capability: a systematic review and meta-synthesis

BACKGROUND

Healthcare middle managers play a central role in reducing harm, improving patient safety, and strengthening the quality of healthcare. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the present knowledge and critically discuss how healthcare middle managers experienced to develop the capacity and capability for leadership in a healthcare system characterized by high complexity.

METHODS

This comprehensive systematic review provided evidence of healthcare middle managers' experiences in developing the capacity and capability for leadership in public healthcare. The three-step literature search was based on six databases and led by a PICo question. The review had a critical hermeneutic perspective and was based on an a priori published, protocol. The methods were inspired by the Joanna Briggs Institute and techniques from Kvale and Brinkmann. The results were illustrated by effect size, inspired by Sandelowski and Barroso.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies from four continents and multiple contexts (hospitals and municipal healthcare) published from January 2005-February 2019 were included. Based on experiences from 482 healthcare middle managers, 2 main themes, each with 2 subthemes, were identified, and from these, a meta-synthesis was developed: Healthcare middle managers develop capacity and capability through personal development processes empowered by context. The main themes included the following: 1. personal development of capacity and capability and 2. a need for contextual support. From a critical hermeneutic perspective, contrasts were revealed between how healthcare middle managers experienced the development of their capacity and capability and what they experienced as their typical work situation.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence of the need for a changed approach in healthcare in relation to criticisms of present organizational structures and management methods and suggestions for how to strengthen healthcare middle managers' capacity and capability for leadership in a healthcare system characterized by high complexity. Evidence of how leadership development affected the clinical context and, thus, the quality of healthcare was found to be a field requiring further research.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42018084670.

Expanding patient engagement in quality improvement and health system redesign: Three Canadian case studies

Healthcare organizations face growing pressures to increase patient-centred care and to involve patients more in organizational decisions. Yet many providers worry that such involvement requires additional time and resources and do not see patients as capable of contributing meaningfully to decisions. This article discusses three efforts in four organizations to engage patients in quality improvement efforts. McGill University Health Centre, Saskatoon Health Region, and Vancouver Coastal and Fraser Health Regions all engaged patients in quality improvement and system redesign initiatives that were successful in improving care processes, outcomes, and patient experience measures. Patient involvement in redesigning care may provide a way to demonstrate the value of patients' experiences and inputs into problem-solving, building support for their involvement in other areas. Further study of these cases and a broader survey of organizational experiences with patient involvement may help elucidate the factors that support greater patient engagement.

The Effects of the Transforming Care at the Bedside Program on Perceived Team Effectiveness and Patient Outcomes

The objective of the study was to document the impact of Transforming Care at the Bedside (TCAB) program on health care team's effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience. A pretest and posttest (team effectiveness) and a time-series study design (patient experience and safety) were used. The intervention (the TCAB program) was implemented in 8 units in a multihospital academic health science center in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The impact of TCAB interventions was measured using the Team Effectiveness (TCAB teams, n = 50), and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and vancomycin-resistant Enterobacter rates (patient safety) and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (patient experience; n = 551 patients). The intervention was composed of 4 learning modules, each lasting 12 to 15 weeks of workshops held at the start of each module, combined with hands-on learning 1 day per week. Transforming Care at the Bedside teams also selected 1 key safety indicator to improve throughout the initiative. Pretest and posttest differences indicate improvement on the 5 team effectiveness subscales. Improvement in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus rate was also detected. No significant improvement was detected for patient experience. These findings call to attention the need to support ongoing quality improvement competency development among frontline teams.