Reents L. A mixed method approach to substantiate quantitative data with qualitative data: Improving clinical judgment in prelicensure nursing students using simulation.
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 2025;
147:106564. [PMID:
39778249 DOI:
10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106564]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2024] [Accepted: 12/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Current literature demonstrates a gap in research involving mixed method study of clinical judgment development in prelicensure nursing students.
OBJECTIVES
Clinical judgment of two groups of nursing students were compared using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR).
DESIGN
A mixed method convergent parallel quasi-experimental cross-sectional approach was used to determine if simulation increased clinical judgment skills between beginner and advanced pre-licensure nursing students.
SETTING
The research site included nursing labs housing 20 hospital beds and a five-room medical simulation lab.
PARTICIPANTS
Student participants were recruited from the Pacific Northwest. A convenience sample included 128 part-time and full-time beginner fundamental and advanced senior nursing students.
METHODS
t-Test differences were compared between quantitative dependent dichotomous independent variables. Differences in mean scores, standard deviations, and number of data values of each group were analyzed. Qualitative analysis of field notes and post simulation reflection logs occurred alongside quantitative findings.
RESULTS
Quantitative differences in LCJR scoring (Lasater's Clinical Judgment Rubric) were statistically significant (p < .001) using the unpaired t-test as Cohort B (advanced senior) scored higher than Cohort A (beginner fundamental). Qualitative analysis of the 11 LCJR subset data substantiated quantitative scoring through triangulation. Post-simulation reflection logs revealed comparatively similar qualitative responses for both cohort groups as the need for improvement while expressing emotion during simulation was captured.
CONCLUSIONS
Recommendations for educators and administrators include the promotion, design, and execution of simulation across the nursing curriculum by well-trained nursing educators. Formative and summative clinical judgment evaluation will solidify this pedagogical feature in simulation and elsewhere. Simulation is considered a valid pedagogy requiring proper execution for the assimilation of knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Employment of regular clinical judgment assessment and evaluation should occur across the simulation curriculum. Simulation provides a dedicated time and space for nursing students to practice and reflect upon how they will be better prepared in clinical judgment upon graduation prior to entry to practice.
Collapse