1
|
Luck KE, Doucet S. A rapid review exploring nurse-led memory clinics. Nurs Open 2021; 8:1538-1549. [PMID: 34102023 PMCID: PMC8186716 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To systematically explore the structures, functions, outcomes, roles and nursing credentials of memory clinics where nurses autonomously lead diagnosis and postdiagnostic care. DESIGN A systematic rapid review was conducted. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Full-Text (EBSCO) and EMBASE were systematically searched in December 2019 with no timeframe limitations imposed. REVIEW METHODS The modified PRISMA checklist was used as a guide to facilitate the review. Articles identified were screened and assessed for inclusion criteria, and screening of reference lists of included studies was also completed. RESULTS Six articles, published between 2011-2019, including two case studies, two descriptive reports, one qualitative study and one programme evaluation were included in the review. Nurse-led memory clinics were situated in community centres, on university campuses, hospitals and in general practitioners' offices. The services offered included assessment, diagnosis and treatment/postdiagnostic care. Nurse credentials included advanced practice nurses and a community psychiatric nurse who was a non-medical prescriber. Overall, there was low quantity and quality of evidence to evaluate outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shelley Doucet
- University of New BrunswickSaint JohnNBCanada
- Dalhousie Medicine New BrunswickSaint JohnNBCanada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mullins LB, Skemp L, Reed D, Emerson M. Internet Programming to Reduce Loneliness and Social Isolation in Aging. Res Gerontol Nurs 2020; 13:233-242. [PMID: 32286668 DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20200320-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Loneliness and social isolation in older adults carry mortality risks similar to cigarette smoking. The study aim was to use a Culturally Informed Healthy Aging (CIHA) assessment process in Housing and Urban Development (HUD) communities of older adults (N = 262). Through the CIHA assessment process, older adults identified pertinent health problems and the study team developed a health intervention, an Internet Information Station (IIS). The IIS pilot study included computer lesson participation (n = 261), written feedback (n = 42), and the revised University of California, Los Angeles (R-UCLA) Loneliness Scale (n = 11). Increased confidence with technology and connectedness were reported, and a significant difference in "There is no one I can turn to" was observed (IIS compared to non-IIS). The IIS remains an active site for interaction 1-year post intervention. These pilot results supplement the research on older adult engagement in problem identification, intervention design, and outcomes measurement. TARGET Older adults living in HUD communities. INTERVENTION DESCRIPTION Through CIHA assessment, health problems were identified, and the IIS was developed and implemented. MECHANISMS OF ACTION Lessons were developed (e.g., computer basics, connecting with technology, open forum) and evaluated. Pre and post lesson, the R-UCLA Loneliness Scale measured social isolation and loneliness. OUTCOMES Older adults were engaged in problem identification, program development, and implementation. Feelings of connectedness improved; however, program evaluation with the R-UCLA scale was difficult to obtain. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 13(5), 233-242.].
Collapse
|
3
|
Deschodt M, Laurent G, Cornelissen L, Yip O, Zúñiga F, Denhaerynck K, Briel M, Karabegovic A, De Geest S. Core components and impact of nurse-led integrated care models for home-dwelling older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2020; 105:103552. [PMID: 32200100 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated care models are highly recommended to overcome care fragmentation in the multimorbid older population. Nurses are potentially ideally situated to fulfil the role as care coordinator to guide integrated care. No systematic review has been conducted specifically focusing on the impact of nurse-led integrated care models for older people in community settings. OBJECTIVES To identify core components of nurse-led integrated care models for the home-dwelling older population; to describe patient, service and process outcomes; and to evaluate the impact of these care models on quality of life, activities of daily living, hospitalisation, emergency department visits, nursing home admissions and mortality. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES English, Dutch, French, German and Spanish articles selected from PubMed and CINAHL, hand-search of reference lists of the included articles and grey literature. REVIEW METHODS A systematic search was conducted to identify prospective experimental or quasi-experimental studies detailing nurse-led integrated care models in the older home-dwelling population. Study characteristics and reported outcomes were tabulated. The core components of the models were mapped using the Sustainable intEgrated chronic care modeLs for multi-morbidity: delivery, FInancing, and performancE (SELFIE) framework. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted to study the overall effectiveness of the included care models on health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, hospitalisation, emergency department visits, nursing home admissions or mortality. Risk of bias was appraised using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included studying a total of 22,168 patients. Core components of integrated care for multimorbid patients such as the involvement of a multidisciplinary team, high risk screening, tailored holistic assessment and an individualized care plan, were performed in a vast majority of the studies; however variability was observed in their operationalisation. Twenty-seven different patient, provider and service outcomes were reported, ranging from 1 to 13 per study. The meta-analyses could not demonstrate a beneficial impact on any of the predefined outcomes. Most included studies were of high risk for several biases. CONCLUSION The summarized evidence on nurse-led integrated care models in home-dwelling older people is inconclusive and of low quality. Future studies should include key components of implementation research, such as context analyses, process evaluations and proximal outcomes, to strengthen the evidence-base of nurse-led integrated care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mieke Deschodt
- Department Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 ON1 box 707, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Gwen Laurent
- Department Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lonne Cornelissen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Gerontology and Geriatrics, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49 ON1 box 707, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olivia Yip
- Department Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Franziska Zúñiga
- Department Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Kris Denhaerynck
- Department Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Matthias Briel
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department Clinical Research, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Azra Karabegovic
- Spitex Zürich Limmat AG Fachentwicklung Chronic Care Kompetenz-Zentrum Spitex Zürich, Rotbuchstrasse 46, 8037 Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Sabina De Geest
- Department Public Health, Nursing Science, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 blok d - box 7001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | | |
Collapse
|