Four-year average follow up of cemented PCA total knees: clinical and roentgenographic analysis

Midterm clinical and radiographic results with the genesis I total knee prosthesis

The midterm results of primary posterior cruciate ligament-retaining, minimally conforming, cemented modular total knee arthroplasties using the Genesis I prosthesis in 110 knees in 72 patients were reviewed. Patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 7.3 years by Knee Society pain and functional scores, radiographic and survivorship analysis, and Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) health status questionnaire. Range of motion increased from an average of 96.3 degrees to 112.5 degrees. Knee Society pain and functional scores increased from preoperative averages of 55 and 44 to 92 and 88, respectively. There were 91 excellent, 16 good, 1 fair, and 2 poor results. WOMAC scores were increased significantly in each subcategory examined (pain, stiffness, and physical function). Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 97% at 10 years. An increase in loosening as a result of eccentric stress concentration secondary to the nonconforming design of this prosthesis, theoretically a matter of some clinical concern, was not shown in this investigation.

Clinical results of the modular porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total knee arthroplasty with cement: a 5-year prospective study

Our study examines the clinical, radiographic, and patient satisfaction outcome of the cemented Modular Porous-Coated Anatomic (PCA) total knee arthroplasty with a minimum 5-year follow up. All data were gathered prospectively and consecutively. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a self-administered survey. Statistical analysis examined the effect of 17 patient factors, 19 surgical factors, and postoperative continuous passive motion use on range of motion (ROM) and HSS scores at 2 years. Seventy-eight Modular PCA arthroplasties performed by 9 orthopedic surgeons on 71 patients between January 1988 and November 1989 are reported in this study. Preoperative HSS scores averaged 51.2 and improved to an average of 89 at 1 and 2 years, and 86 at 5 years after surgery (90% good or excellent). ROM changed after surgery through improvement in preoperative knee flexion contracture, but not in increased knee flexion. One patient underwent reoperation for patellar instability, and one patient's arthroplasty was revised at 53 months for late instability. The total reoperation rate for any reason was 7.7%. Zonal analysis for progressive radiolucency at the bone-cement interface showed increasing frequency of narrow (< 1 mm) radiolucencies concentrated on the anterior and medial aspect of the tibial tray. Ninety-eight percent of patients responded to an outcome questionnaire, and 96% rated themselves improved. The Kaplan-Meier probability of an implant surviving without loosening at 5 years was 100%. The Modular PCA TKA has a low incidence of patellofemoral problems, is clinically successful, and results are stable at a minimum 5-year follow-up examination.

Primary total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis Total Knee Arthroplasty System: 3- to 6-year follow-up study of 105 knees

This prospective study analyzed data from 105 primary total knee arthroplasties performed in 90 patients using the Genesis Total Knee Arthroplasty System. The 34 men and 56 women with a mean age of 68.7 years (range, 41-86 years) were evaluated at a mean follow-up period of 4.25 years (range, 3-6 years). Fifty-five procedures (52%) used cemented femoral and tibial components, 49 (47%) used cementless femoral and cemented tibial components, and 1 (1%) used cementless femoral and tibial components. The preoperative mean pain and function scores were 50 (range, 12-79) and 41 (range, 5-80), respectively. At the most recent follow-up evaluation, the mean pain score increased to 97 (range, 67-100), and the mean function score increased to 88 (range, 40-100). Mean preoperative range of motion was 104 degrees (range, 50 degrees-130 degrees) and increased to 116 degrees (range, 80 degrees-130 degrees) at most recent follow-up evaluation. Clinically, there were 100 excellent results (95%). 4 good results (4%), and 1 poor result (1%).

A follow-up study of porous-coated anatomic knee arthroplasty

Ninety-four patients (105 knees) having a porous-coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty were retrospectively studied. The mean follow-up period was 5.8 years. The diagnoses were osteoarthritis (90.5%) and rheumatoid arthritis (9.5%). There were 80 women and 14 men. The mean age at operation was 58.5 years. Clinical evaluation, using the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score along with radiography, was used to assess knee status before and after surgery. The postoperative mean axial alignment was 3 degrees varus compared with 11 degrees varus before surgery. Placement of the prosthetic components was acceptable, with the femoral component in 6.5 degrees of valgus and the tibial component in 1.9 degrees of varus and 1.1 degrees posterior inclination. Complications included eight aseptic loosenings, four patellar maltrackings, one patellar fracture, eight wound problems, and one extension contracture. Most of the patients' knee function improved after surgery. The initial, postoperative range of motion improved in patients receiving continuous passive motion (CPM) immediately after surgery (P = .03) compared to patients without CPM application; however, the long-term follow-up data show no significance (P = .06) whether CPM was used or not. Age, body weight, degree of arthritic change, and modes of fixation yielded no significant influence on the final outcome. The porous-coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty is a valuable alternative procedure in the advanced arthritic knee when the proper candidates are selected, accurate surgical technique is executed and a suitable fixation mode is chosen.

Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes

Global, aggregated knee rating systems are commonly used to assess patient outcomes following knee arthroplasty. In this study, the authors performed a systematic literature search and found that 17% of the English-language studies addressing primary knee arthroplasty reported on patient outcomes following the procedure using a standardized global rating system. The authors describe, in detail, the rating systems' development and format. This study found 34 different rating systems represented in the literature from 1972 to 1992. Great variability was found in the rating systems' design and utilization. Additionally, these condition-specific, physician-based rating systems did not have documented studies demonstrating their reliability or validity. Future research will need to address the issues of selecting and aggregating outcome measures and of deriving any necessary weighting schemes. The ability of researchers to compare patient outcomes across studies will be enhanced when there is consistency in reported outcome measures.