Radiographic predisposing factors for degenerative spondylolisthesis

Factors Predisposing to The Formation of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis-A Narrative Review

The relationship between various factors predisposing to the formation of spondylolisthesis, including degenerative spondylolisthesis, has been analyzed by many authors. However, not all observations are consistent. In this review, we identified factors whose impact on the prevalence of spondylolisthesis was most often mentioned in the literature. These included gender, age, bone mineral density, ethnic origin, and oophorectomy. The results were inclusive in terms of physical activity, pregnancy status, and use of hormone replacement therapy. Associations between diabetes and smoking were very poorly marked. The literature so far has identified a number of factors significantly affecting the incidence of degenerative spondylolisthesis. These include age, gender, body weight, ethnic origin, bone mineral density, and hormonal balance. Radiological parameters, which include iliac crest, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and lumbar lordosis, may also be of great importance for assessing changes in the occurrence and progression. However, the authors do not agree on the real significance of individual factors. The aim of this review was to identify the factors predisposing to the formation of degenerative spondylolisthesis, the importance of which has been suggested in the current literature. The systematization of knowledge in this field can allow a more accurate adjustment of the treatment plan for each patient affected by this condition.

Association between lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and spinal pathologies based on T2 whole-spine sagittal magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the association between 4, 5, or 6 lumbar spine vertebrae and the presence of lumbar spinal pathologies.

METHODS

We reviewed all MRI reports and images performed between August 1st, 2018 and July 31st, 2019. Lumbar spine pathologies such as disc herniation, lytic spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis were recorded. The reviewer studied the T2 sagittal screening of the entire spine and counted down manually from C2 to T12 on the assumption that there are seven cervical and twelve dorsal vertebrae. We then recorded whether there were four, five, or six lumbar vertebrae.

RESULTS

Our work incorporated a total of 1985 patients for whom T2-weighted entire spine sagittal MR images were obtainable. The study cohort's average age was 52.2 ± 15.9 years, comprising 944 males and 1041 females. One hundred and thirty-three patients (6.7%) had 4 lumbar-type vertebrae; 1799 (90.6%) had 5 lumbar-type vertebrae; and 53 (2.7%) had 6 lumbar-type vertebrae. There was a statistically significant difference between the rates of 6 lumbar-type vertebrae in males versus females (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference with more spinal stenosis patients in the 6 lumbar-type vertebrae compared to the 4 or 5 lumbar-type vertebrae groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that spinal stenosis is significantly more common in patients with 6 lumbar-type vertebrae.

Pathomechanisms and Predisposing Factors for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Narrative Review

The pathomechanism of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is not fully understood and is likely to be multifactorial. The primary cause of DLS likely is age-related degeneration of all of the components of the segments and their surroundings. Subsequently, additional factors, such as anatomical, hormonal, and mechanical stress factors, may drive the spinal segments to DLS. Reported predisposing factors that have shown a consistent association with DLS include older age, female sex, sagittal facet joint orientation, and high pelvic incidence. Future prospective epidemiological studies that include large groups of subjects and use multivariate analyses of the possible predisposing factors are needed.

The correlation between sagittal spinopelvic alignment and degree of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Recently, several authors reported that a high pelvic incidence (PI) might be a predisposing factor to the development of anterior slip in the vertebral body in degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). The purpose of this study was to analyze patients with DS using a multiple linear regression model, in terms of the correlation between the sagittal spinopelvic parameters and the severity of slip in each lumbar spine, including both anterior and posterior directions.

METHODS

Standing lateral radiographs were taken of 104 patients (59 women and 45 men) with lower back pain. The spinopelvic parameters, including PI, sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT), angle of thoracic kyphosis (TK), angle of lumbar lordosis (LL), and sagittal vertical axis offset (SVA) were measured. Additionally, the %Slip was measured at each level between the L1 and L5. The slip direction was presented as plus to the anterior, and minus to the posterior.

RESULTS

The PI, SS, and/or LL correlate with L3, L4, and/or L5%Slips. The TK and SVA did not correlate with %Slip. A multiple linear regression model shows that PI and LL were significant predictors for L4 %Slip. The ROC curve demonstrated a PI cutoff value of 51.3° and an LL cutoff value of 45.0° to be predictors of anterior slip at L4. Also, our regression models revealed that PI for L3 %Slip and SS for L5 %Slip constitute significant risk factors, while determination coefficients were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that high PI and LL are significant predictors for L4 anterior slip. At L4, the anterior slip risk-factor cutoff value was 51.3° for PI and 45.0°for LL. Additionally, our results suggest that high PI and SS could comprise risk factors for L3 anterior slip and L5 anterior slip, respectively.

Potential pathological mechanisms of L3 degenerative spondylolisthesis in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) occurs mostly at L4. However, there are a small number of patients in whom it occurs only at L3. Accordingly, past reports elucidating the factors of DS have been primarily concerned with L4 DS, and few reports are available on DS at L3. The objective of this study was to compare the differences between lumbar spinal stenosis patients with or without L3 DS and to identify the possible pathological mechanisms of their L3 DS.

METHODS

Among the 369 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent lumbar surgery, we assessed 25 patients who had DS only at L3 and compared them against 50 other age- and gender-matched lumbar spinal stenosis patients without any DS. The following radiographic parameters: pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, L3 slope, L4 slope, L5 slope, and lumbar lordosis were measured on radiographs. The orientation of facet joints and disc heights were measured via computed tomography.

RESULTS

Imaging findings showed that the L3, L4, and L5 slopes in the L3 DS group were significantly greater than in the non-DS group, and only L3/4 facet joints in the L3 DS group were significantly more sagittally oriented than in the control group. The number of patients with low disc heights at L4/5 in the L3 DS group was significantly greater than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested that the greater lumbar slope, including L3 together with more sagittally oriented facet joints only at L3/4 and not at L4/5, may lead to DS only at L3.

Age-related changes in axial and sagittal orientation of the facet joints: Comparison with changes in degenerative spondylolisthesis

BACKGROUND

Despite facet joints being three-dimensional structures, previous computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies have evaluated facet joint orientation in only the axial plane. Facet joint orientation in the sagittal plane has rarely been studied using these imaging techniques. The aim of this study was to elucidate facet joint orientation in both the axial and sagittal planes on computed tomography.

METHODS

A total of 568 patients (343 men, 225 women) (excluding orthopedic outpatients) for whom abdominal and pelvic computed tomography scans were obtained at our hospital between September 2010 and October 2012 were included. Mean age was 63 (range 21-90) years. Patients were divided into a degenerative spondylolisthesis group (67 patients; 30 men, 37 women) and a control group (313 patients; 313 men, 188 women). Facet joint orientation was evaluated in the control group according to patient age (≤50, 51-60, 61-70, or ≥71 years). The findings in the control group were then compared with those in the degenerative spondylolisthesis group. The orientation of the lumbar facet joints at each level was measured in the axial and sagittal planes on computed tomography images.

RESULTS

Facet joint angles decreased with age at L4/5 and L5/S1 in women in the axial plane and at L4/5 in men and L3/4 and L4/5 in women in the sagittal plane. The variation in facet joint angle was greatest at L4/5 in women. Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis showed more sagittally and horizontally oriented facet joints in the axial and sagittal planes; facet tropism showed an association with degenerative spondylolisthesis in the axial plane.

CONCLUSIONS

The axial and sagittal orientation of facet joints in the lower lumbar vertebra, especially L4/5, was negatively correlated with age. This finding could help to explain why older people are more prone to degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Management of symptomatic degenerative low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis

Degenerative low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis is the most common form of spondylolisthesis.

The majority of patients are asymptomatic and do not require surgical intervention.

Symptomatic patients present with a combination of lower back pain, radiculopathy and/or neurogenic claudication and may warrant surgery if non-operative measures fail.

There is widespread controversy regarding the indications for surgery and appropriate treatment strategies for patients with this type of spondylolisthesis.

This article provides a comprehensive evidence-based review of the available literature to support the management of degenerative low-grade spondylolisthesis.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:620-631. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180020.

Degenerative spondylolisthesis: a prospective cross-sectional cohort study on the role of weakened anterior abdominal musculature on causation

PURPOSE

Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a degenerative condition of the spine which, unlike others, is more common in a female population. Previous studies have highlighted possible causative factors such as facet tropism and pregnancy as reasons for this. This study sets out to assess the possible link between abdominal musculature and DS.

METHOD

A prospective cross-sectional cohort study in a single surgeon practice assessed all patients aged over 50 years attending for degenerative lumbar spinal complaints. Patient demographics, as well as the number of pregnancies, children, abdominal surgical procedures, were recorded.

RESULTS

We found 205 patients that met our inclusion criteria (98 Males/107 Females). Women with multiple pregnancies (p = 0.036) and abdominal surgeries (p = 0.021) were more likely to develop DS. Males with ventral hernias were more likely to have developed DS (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the important role that the abdominal musculature plays in stabilization of the spine and highlights its potential role as a factor in the development of DS. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

One-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Posterior Approach: Is Transforaminal Lateral Interbody Fusion Mandatory?: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 2-Year Follow-Up

STUDY DESIGN

A monocentric open-label randomized controlled trial (MRCT).

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between isolated instrumented posterior fusion (PLF) and associated instrumented posterior fusion and interbody fusion by transforaminal approach (PLF + TLIF) for patients suffering from one-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) undergoing surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DS is a common cause of symptomatic lumbar stenosis. PLF has shown better clinical outcome than decompression with noninstrumented posterolateral fusion. TLIF with interbody cage showed better fusion rate than PLF. There is a need for randomized controlled trials to compare PLF with and without TLIF as to clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

This is a MRCT comparing PLF and TLIF techniques in surgical treatment of DS. Sixty patients were included in a secured database from 2009 to 2011 and randomized into two groups: 30 PLF with posterior pedicle screws and intertransverse autologuous graft, and 30 TLIF in which an interbody fusion by transforaminal approach was added. Data included clinical (pain and disability), surgical (blood loss and operating time), and radiological (alignment and fusion) parameters at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Comparison was made by Student t test and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in each group for pain and disability but no difference between the groups. Radiographic assessment showed better posterolateral fusion rate for TLIF without superiority in segmental lordosis improvement. A case of deformity cascade with spino-pelvic mismatch at baseline was noted in PLF.

CONCLUSION

Posterior decompression and instrumented fusion is an efficient technique that proved its significant clinical benefit in the surgical treatment of DS. TLIF did not show its superiority neither in clinical nor alignment parameters despite a better fusion rate. These results suggest that TLIF is not mandatory in this specific indication. Sagittal alignment analysis by standing full-body images should be considered in DS care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.