Efficacy of Topical Nonsteroidal Drops as Pain Relief after Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy

Efficacy and safety of pain relief medications after photorefractive keratectomy: review of prospective randomized trials

The objective of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview and comparison of results from all prospective randomized trials published to date of medications used to treat pain after photorefrative keratectomy (PRK). A PubMed database search revealed 23 prospective and randomized studies. They included the following classes of medications: nonsteroidal antiimflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anesthetics, opiates, acetaminophen, gabapentin, and pregabalin. The studies found that although the efficacy of drugs tended to be similar, tetracaine 1% and nepafenac 0.1% tended to have the most analgesic effect. Delayed corneal reepithelialization was a common side effect of both topical anesthetics and topical NSAIDs. Tetracaine 1% resulted in the most significant delay in reepithelialization when tested against placebo control compared with other topical medications tested against placebo. Concomitant use of topical NSAIDs and topical anesthetics, especially tetracaine, may have to be avoided to minimize the risk for delayed corneal healing.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Histopathology of corneal melting associated with diclofenac use after refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To describe the histopathology of the cornea in 3 cases of corneal melting associated with diclofenac therapy after refractive surgery procedures.

SETTING

Clinic and pathology laboratory.

METHODS

Three cases of corneal melting associated with diclofenac therapy (2 after laser in situ keratomileusis [LASIK] and 1 after mini-radial keratectomy enhancement of a LASIK undercorrection) were studied using patient and referring physician interviews, chart reviews, and histopathologic examination of the corneal tissue.

RESULTS

In all 3 cases, the flaps were dislocated and the stromal corneal bed was exposed. Diclofenac, generic or brand name, was used in all cases; in 1 case, both generic and brand name were used. Dosing and duration varied, but in all 3 cases diclofenac was used at least 4 times a day for at least 3 days after LASIK. Topical steroids were also prescribed, but 1 patient did not use them. Preoperative medical conditions were present in 2 cases. Histologic analysis showed evidence of an inflammatory response in advanced cases and keratolysis and lack of inflammatory cells in the flaps that were amputated early.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of generic or brand-name diclofenac with or without adjunctive topical steroids after LASIK can be associated with corneal melting when the LASIK flap is dislodged and the corneal stromal bed exposed. Caution is recommended with diclofenac use after LASIK in such cases.

The effects of the topical administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on corneal epithelium and corneal sensitivity in normal subjects

PURPOSE

To study the changes in the corneal epithelium and corneal sensitivity of healthy subjects after the topical administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; diclofenac, indomethacin, flurbiprofen and ketorolac) frequently used in ocular therapy.

METHODS

A double-masked parallel clinical study was undertaken on 90 subjects (45 men, 45 women; Caucasian; age 21-46 years, mean +/- SD 27.1 +/- 5 years). The subjects were divided into six groups: group 1 was treated with placebo, group 2 with 0.1% diclofenac, group 3 with 0.1% indomethacin, group 4 with 0.03% flurbiprofen, group 5 with 0.5% ketorolac and group 6 with 0.4% oxybuprocaine. One eye was randomly treated with the study drug and the fellow eye was treated with placebo. The medications were instilled four times, at 5 min intervals. Assessment of the corneal epithelium was carried out by vital fluorescein stain before instillation and 5, 15, 30 and 60 min after instillation of the last drop. Subjective burning sensation was assessed by asking participants to rate burning on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). After 1 week, assessment of corneal sensitivity was carried out by the Cochet-Bonnet method, repeating the above scheme of instillation and measurement times.

RESULTS

None of the study drugs, with the exception of oxybuprocaine, produced evident epithelial damage. All the drugs caused a mean burning sensation greater than the placebo. The diclofenac-treated group showed a statistically significant decrease in corneal sensitivity (p < 0.001) at the measurement carried out 15 min after instillation of the last drop and lasting up to the end of the study, when the corneal anaesthesia was similar to that induced by the topical anaesthetic treatment. No significant changes were demonstrated for the other NSAIDs when compared either with the placebo-treated eyes or with the fellow eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a similar mechanism of action and analgesic activity to the other NSAIDs tested, diclofenac was able to induce a reduction in corneal sensitivity. More studies are needed to determine the mechanism of action responsible for this effect.