Repeatability of layered corneal pachymetry with the artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner

Diagnostic ability of the corneal anterior and posterior surface area calculated by corneal modelling approach in early stage keratoconus patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the discrimination ability of the corneal anterior and posterior surface area between patients with keratoconus stage 1 and normal individuals.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 116 eyes of 116 normal individuals and 366 eyes of 366 keratoconus patients were included. Keratoconus patients were divided into six groups according to the topographic keratoconus classification of Pentacam. Anterior and posterior surface data of sagittal (SM) and elevation maps (EM) were exported from Pentacam, and human corneal models were created employing the software utilizing the PyVista module of Python programming language. The anterior and posterior corneal surface area (a-CSA and p-CSA) of SM and EM were calculated by the software ranging from central 3 to 8mm diameter.

RESULTS

Anterior and posterior CSA values were higher in KC patients compared to normal individuals (p < 0.001). The p-CSA for SM and EM measured at the central 3mm was higher in patients with KC-1 compared to normal eyes (p = 0.002, p = 0.005, respectively), For both maps, a-CSA and p-CSA measured at the central 4 and 5mm were higher in KC-1 compared to normal individuals (p < 0.05). The highest area under the curve (AUC) values in the diagnosis patients with KC-1 were obtained from 3mm p-CSA for SM (AUC: 0.8338), 3mm p-CSA for EM (AUC: 0.7999), 4mm p-CSA for SM (AUC: 0.8531), 4mm p-CSA for EM (AUC:0.7948), 5mm p-CSA for SM (AUC: 0.8455), 5mm p-CSA for EM (AUC:0.7614).

CONCLUSION

The corneal surface area as a parameter, especially for central 3, 4, and 5mm, has a discrimination ability in diagnosing keratoconus disease and distinguishes normal eyes from KC-1 eyes.

Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping: A Major Review

The corneal epithelium (CE) is the outermost layer of the cornea with constant turnover, relative stability, remarkable plasticity, and compensatory properties to mask alterations in the underlying stroma. The advent of quantitative imaging modalities capable of producing epithelial thickness mapping (ETM) has made it possible to characterize better the different patterns of epithelial remodeling. In this comprehensive synthesis, we reviewed all available data on ETM with different methods, including very high-frequency ultrasound (VHF-US) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in normal individuals, corneal or systemic diseases, and corneal surgical scenarios. We excluded OCT studies that manually measured the corneal epithelial thickness (CET) (e.g., by digital calipers) or the CE (e.g., by confocal scanning or handheld pachymeters). A comparison of different CET measuring technologies and devices capable of producing thickness maps is provided. Normative data on CET and the possible effects of gender, aging, diurnal changes, refraction, and intraocular pressure are discussed. We also reviewed ETM data in several corneal disorders, including keratoconus, corneal dystrophies, recurrent epithelial erosion, herpes keratitis, keratoplasty, bullous keratopathy, carcinoma in situ, pterygium, and limbal stem cell deficiency. The available data on the potential role of ETM in indicating refractive surgeries, planning the procedure, and assessing postoperative changes are reviewed. Alterations in ETM in systemic and ocular conditions such as eyelid abnormalities and dry eye disease and the effects of contact lenses, topical medications, and cataract surgery on the ETM profile are discussed.

Epithelial Thickness Mapping in Keratoconic Corneas: Repeatability and Agreement Between CSO MS-39, Heidelberg Anterion, and Optovue Avanti OCT Devices

PURPOSE

To assess repeatability and agreement of corneal epithelial thickness mapping in eyes with keratoconus using three optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices featuring different technologies: spectral-domain (SD) OCT combined with Placido disk corneal topography (MS-39), swept-source OCT (Anterion), and SD-OCT (Avanti).

METHODS

Three consecutive measurements were acquired with the three devices in 60 eyes with keratoconus. The mean epithelial thickness was calculated in the central 2-mm zone and in 2- to 5-mm and 5- to 7-mm diameter rings. The repeatability was calculated using pooled within-subject standard deviation (Sw). The agreement was assessed by paired t tests and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

The repeatability (Sw) of the epithelial thickness for the central 2-mm zone was 0.91, 0.71, and 0.93 μm for the MS-39, Anterion, and Avanti, respectively. All thicknesses with the MS-39 were greater than those of the Anterion and Avanti, with mean differences of 4.11 ± 1.34 μm (P < .001) and 0.52 ± 1.30 μm (P = .003), respectively. The 95% limits of agreement were 1.484 to 6.736 μm for the MS-39 and Anterion, -3.068 to 2.028 μm for the Avanti and MS-39, and 1.258 to 5.922 μm for for the Avanti and Anterion.

CONCLUSIONS

Epithelial thickness mapping results were most repeatable with the Anterion, followed by the MS-39 and Avanti. The MS-39 gave the thickest values, followed by the Avanti and Anterion. The differences were significant, making the devices not interchangeable for epithelial thickness mapping in eyes with keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(7):474-480.].

Applications of epithelial thickness mapping in corneal refractive surgery

In this review, we discuss the applications of epithelial thickness mapping in corneal refractive surgery. The review describes that the epithelial thickness profile is nonuniform in the normal eye, being thinner superiorly than inferiorly and thinner temporally than nasally. It is postulated that this is due to the eyelid forces and blinking action on the superior cornea. Changes in the epithelial thickness profile have been found to be highly predictable, responding to compensate for changes in the stromal curvature gradient, using the eyelid as an outer template. This leads to characteristic changes in the epithelial thickness profile that can be used for early screening in keratoconus, postoperative monitoring for early signs of corneal ectasia, and for determining whether further steepening can be performed without the risk of apical syndrome following primary hyperopic treatment. Compensatory epithelial thickness changes are also a critical part of diagnosis in irregular astigmatism as these partially mask the stromal surface irregularities. The epithelial thickness map can then be used to plan a trans-epithelial photorefractive keratectomy treatment for cases of irregularly irregular astigmatism.

Epithelial thickness mapping for corneal refractive surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

As more devices become available that offer corneal epithelial thickness mapping, this is becoming more widely used for numerous applications in corneal refractive surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

The epithelial thickness profile is nonuniform in the normal eye, being thinner superiorly than inferiorly and thinner temporally than nasally. Changes in the epithelial thickness profile are highly predictable, responding to compensate for changes in the stromal curvature gradient, using the eyelid as an outer template. This leads to characteristic changes that can be used for early screening in keratoconus, postoperative monitoring for early signs of corneal ectasia, and for determining whether further steepening can be performed without the risk of apical syndrome following primary hyperopic treatment. Compensatory epithelial thickness changes are also a critical part of diagnosis in irregular astigmatism as these partially mask the stromal surface irregularities. The epithelial thickness map can then be used to plan a trans-epithelial PRK treatment for cases of irregularly irregular astigmatism. Other factors can also affect the epithelial thickness profile, including dry eye, anterior basement membrane dystrophy and eyelid ptosis.

SUMMARY

Epithelial thickness mapping is becoming a crucial tool for refractive surgery, in particular for keratoconus screening, ectasia monitoring, hyperopic treatment planning, and therapeutic diagnosis and treatment.

Heidelberg Anterion Swept-Source OCT Corneal Epithelial Thickness Mapping: Repeatability and Agreement With Optovue Avanti

PURPOSE

To assess the repeatability of corneal epithelial thickness mapping in virgin, post-laser refractive surgery (PLRS), and keratoconic eyes using a novel swept-source optical coherence tomographer (SS-OCT), and to determine the agreement of the measurements with a validated spectral-domain (SD) OCT.

METHODS

Analysis of 90 virgin, 46 PLRS, and 122 keratoconic eyes was performed. Three consecutive measurements of each eye were acquired with the Anterion SS-OCT and Avanti SD-OCT devices, and averages of the epithelial thickness mapping were calculated in the central 2-mm zone and in the 2- to 5-mm and 5- to 7-mm diameter rings. The repeatability was analyzed using pooled within-subject standard deviation (Sw). The agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and paired t tests.

RESULTS

The repeatability ranges of the Anterion and Avanti epithelial thickness mapping measurements were Sw: 0.60 to 1.36 µm and Sw: 0.75 to 1.96 µm, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement of the Anterion and Avanti were 0.826 to 8.297. All values of the thickness measurements with the Anterion were lower than those of the Avanti, with the mean differences being 4.06 ± 1.81, 3.26 ± 2.52, and 3.68 ± 2.51 µm in virgin, PLRS, and keratoconic eyes, respectively (P < .001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The repeatability of the Anterion's epithelial thickness mapping was higher than that of the Avanti. In terms of the agreement between the Anterion and Avanti, the epithelium measured by the Anterion was always thinner than that of the Avanti, making their interchangeable use unsuitable without corrections. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(6):356-363.].

Repeatability and agreement of total corneal and sublayer pachymetry with 2 different algorithms of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in myopic and postphotorefractive keratectomy eyes

PURPOSE

To investigate repeatability and agreement of total corneal and sublayer pachymetry with 2 different algorithms of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) in myopic and postphotorefractive keratectomy (PRK) eyes.

SETTING

Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Total corneal, epithelial, and stromal thicknesses were measured using RTVue-XR OCT with Pachymetry + Cpwr (6.0 mm algorithm) and PachymetryWide (9.0 mm algorithm) scan patterns. The repeatability of 25 zones of 9.0 mm map and 17 zones of 6.0 mm map and the agreement between measurements of these 2 algorithms were calculated.

RESULTS

Ninety-five myopic and 117 post-PRK patients were evaluated. By the 9.0 mm algorithm, coefficient of variation (CoV) for total cornea was 2.33% or lesser and 2.49% or lesser and for epithelium was 5.14% or lesser and 5.18% or lesser; and by the 6.0 mm algorithm, CoV for total cornea was 1.80% or lesser and 2.59% or lesser and for epithelial thickness was 3.08% or lesser and 4.80% or lesser in myopic and post-PRK eyes, respectively. Bland-Altman mean difference for epithelial thickness was 0.69 or lesser and 1.16 or lesser and 95% limits of agreement for epithelial thickness was 6.81 or lesser and 8.56 or lesser in myopic and post-PRK eyes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Good repeatability was seen in measurements of total corneal, stromal, and epithelial thicknesses by both algorithms. Agreement of the 2 algorithms in central zone was also good. However, large range of variation in paracentral thickness measurements did not allow us to consider these algorithms as interchangeable.

Phototherapeutic keratectomy

Phototherapeutic keratectomy is an excimer laser-based surgical procedure widely performed by corneal surgeons for treating anterior corneal stromal pathologies. Phototherapeutic keratectomy helps by ablating the corneal stroma, thereby improving corneal clarity and smoothening the surface. Transient discomfort and induced hyperopia from corneal flattening are the immediate postoperative concerns. The long-term course is often marked by the recurrence of original corneal pathology and corneal haze formation. Phototherapeutic keratectomy, however, allows for repeat stromal ablation for managing recurrences, as the corneal thickness permits, without affecting the outcome of future keratoplasty. Adjunctive methods such as topical mitomycin-C may be additionally used to reduce recurrence rates. Also, various masking agents such as carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium hyaluronate, and dextran are used in eyes with irregular corneal surface to allow for uniform stromal ablation. Overall, phototherapeutic keratectomy has provided corneal surgeons an additional surgical tool, particularly those residing in developing nations where the availability of donor corneal tissue is an important limiting factor.

Evaluation of Corneal Oedema – Tools we Have and Those Under Investigation

Collapse

Incidence and Outcomes of Optical Zone Enlargement and Recentration After Previous Myopic LASIK by Topography-Guided Custom Ablation

PURPOSE

To report the incidence, visual and refractive outcomes, optical zone enlargement, and recentration using topography-guided CRS-Master TOSCA II software with the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) after primary myopic laser refractive surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 73 eyes (40 patients) with complaints of night vision disturbances due to either a decentration or small optical zone following a primary myopic laser refractive surgery procedure using the MEL 80 laser. Multiple ATLAS topography scans were imported into the CRS-Master software for topography-guided ablation planning. The topography-guided re-treatment procedure was performed as either a LASIK flap lift, a new LASIK flap, a side cut only, or photorefractive keratectomy. Axial curvature maps were analyzed using a fixed grid and set of concentric circles superimposed to measure the topographic optical zone diameter and centration. Follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

The incidence of use in the population of myopic treatments during the study period was 0.79% (73 of 9,249). The optical zone diameter was increased by 11% from a mean of 5.65 to 6.32 mm, with a maximum change of 2 mm in one case. Topographic decentration was reduced by 64% from a mean of 0.58 to 0.21 mm. There was a 44% reduction in spherical aberration, 53% reduction in coma, and 39% reduction in total higher order aberrations. A subjective improvement in night vision symptoms was reported by 93%. Regarding efficacy, 82% of eyes reached 20/20 and 100% reached 20/32 (preoperative CDVA was 20/20 or better in 90%). Regarding safety, no eyes lost two lines of CDVA and 27% gained one line. Regarding predictability, 71% of re-treatments were within ±0.50 diopters.

CONCLUSIONS

Topography-guided ablation was effective in enlarging the optical zone, recentering the optical zone, and reducing higher order aberrations. Topography-guided custom ablation appears to be an effective method for re-treatment procedures of symptomatic patients after myopic LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(2):121-130.].

Cornea and anterior eye assessment with slit lamp biomicroscopy, specular microscopy, confocal microscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy

Current corneal assessment technologies make the process of corneal evaluation extremely fast and simple, and several devices and technologies show signs that help in identification of different diseases thereby, helping in diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients. The purpose of this review is to present and update readers on the evaluation of cornea and ocular surface. This first part reviews a description of slit lamp biomicroscopy (SLB), endothelial specular microscopy, confocal microscopy, and ultrasound biomicroscopy examination techniques and the second part describes the corneal topography and tomography, providing up-to-date information on the clinical recommendations of these techniques in eye care practice. Although the SLB is a traditional technique, it is of paramount importance in clinical diagnosis and compulsory when an eye test is conducted in primary or specialist eye care practice. Different techniques allow the early diagnosis of many diseases, especially when clinical signs have not yet become apparent and visible with SLB. These techniques also allow for patient follow-up in several clinical conditions or diseases, facilitating clinical decisions and improving knowledge regarding the corneal anatomy.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Between Fourier-Domain OCT, Very High-Frequency Digital Ultrasound, and Scheimpflug Imaging Systems

PURPOSE

To compare corneal thickness measurements between three imaging systems.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of 81 virgin and 58 post-laser refractive surgery corneas, central and minimum corneal thickness were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT), very high-frequency digital ultrasound (VHF digital ultrasound), and a Scheimpflug imaging system. Agreement between methods was analyzed using mean differences (bias) (OCT - VHF digital ultrasound, OCT - Scheimpflug, VHF digital ultrasound - Scheimpflug) and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LoA).

RESULTS

Virgin cornea mean central corneal thickness was 508.3 ± 33.2 µm (range: 434 to 588 µm) for OCT, 512.7 ± 32.2 µm (range: 440 to 587 µm) for VHF digital ultrasound, and 530.2 ± 32.6 µm (range: 463 to 612 µm) for Scheimpflug imaging. OCT and VHF digital ultrasound showed the closest agreement with a bias of -4.37 µm, 95% LoA ±12.6 µm. Least agreement was between OCT and Scheimpflug imaging with a bias of -21.9 µm, 95% LoA ±20.7 µm. Bias between VHF digital ultrasound and Scheimpflug imaging was -17.5 µm, 95% LoA ±19.0 µm. In post-laser refractive surgery corneas, mean central corneal thickness was 417.9 ± 47.1 µm (range: 342 to 557 µm) for OCT, 426.3 ± 47.1 µm (range: 363 to 563 µm) for VHF digital ultrasound, and 437.0 ± 48.5 µm (range: 359 to 571 µm) for Scheimpflug imaging. Closest agreement was between OCT and VHF digital ultrasound with a bias of -8.45 µm, 95% LoA ±13.2 µm. Least agreement was between OCT and Scheimpflug imaging with a bias of -19.2 µm, 95% LoA ±19.2 µm. Bias between VHF digital ultrasound and Scheimpflug imaging was -10.7 µm, 95% LoA ±20.0 µm. No relationship was observed between difference in central corneal thickness measurements and mean central corneal thickness. Results were similar for minimum corneal thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

Central and minimum corneal thickness was measured thinnest by OCT and thickest by Scheimpflug imaging in both groups. A clinically significant bias existed between Scheimpflug imaging and the other two modalities.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) as Re-treatment for a Thick LASIK Flap

PURPOSE

To report the case of a residual refractive error after LASIK for moderate myopia successfully re-treated several years later using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) technique.

METHODS

Case report.

RESULTS

Following LASIK, the patient showed a central flap thickness of 269 microns, whereas residual stromal bed thickness under the flap was 210 microns. SMILE was performed within the flap. In this less invasive surgical procedure, the residual stromal bed is not manipulated and ablation is conducted on the existing flap. At 6 months of follow-up, visual and anatomical outcomes were satisfactory. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 and refractive error was +0.75 -0.50 × 30°.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients with a thick flap and thin residual stromal bed after LASIK, SMILE as re-treatment may be a good option. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(10):718-720.].

Detection of Keratoconus in Clinically and Algorithmically Topographically Normal Fellow Eyes Using Epithelial Thickness Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness of a keratoconus-detection algorithm derived from Artemis very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound (ArcScan Inc., Morrison, CO) epithelial thickness maps in the fellow eye from a series of patients with unilateral keratoconus.

METHODS

The study included 10 patients with moderate to advanced keratoconus in one eye but a clinically and algorithmically topographically normal fellow eye. VHF digital ultrasound epithelial thickness data were acquired and a previously developed classification model was applied for identification of keratoconus to the clinically normal fellow eyes. Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) Belin-Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display "D" score (BAD-D) data (5 of 10 eyes), and Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY) SCORE data (9 of 10 eyes) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Five of the 10 fellow eyes were classified as keratoconic by the VHF digital ultrasound epithelium model. Five of 9 fellow eyes were classified as keratoconic by the SCORE model. For the 5 fellow eyes with Pentacam and VHF digital ultrasound data, one was classified as keratoconic by the VHF digital ultrasound model, one (different) eye by a combined VHF digital ultrasound and Pentacam model, and none by BAD-D alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the assumption that keratoconus is a bilateral but asymmetric disease, half of the 'normal' fellow eyes could be found to have keratoconus using epithelial thickness maps. The Orbscan SCORE or the combination of topographic BAD-D criteria with epithelial maps did not perform better.

Consistency of Corneal Sublayer Thickness Measurements using Fourier-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography after Phacoemulsification

Purpose

To assess the reliability of corneal epithelial thickness (CET), nonepithelial central corneal thickness (NECCT), and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) in patients who did and did not undergo cataract surgery.

Methods

Forty patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification and 40 healthy participants were recruited to evaluate the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of CET, NECCT, and CCT measurements using Cirrus HD-OCT. To analyze repeatability, one examiner obtained 5 consecutive scans in each participant; for interobserver reproducibility, another examiner randomly obtained another scan. Within-subject standard deviation, coefficient of variation (CV), limits of agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) data were obtained.

Results

For intraobserver repeatability, the intrasession CV (CVw) and ICC values of the CET in the operated and nonoperated groups were 3.7% and 0.80 and 3.8% and 0.73, respectively; for NECCT, 0.7% and 0.98 and 0.8% and 0.97; and for CCT, 0.6% and 0.99 and 0.7% and 0.98. For interobserver reproducibility, the CVw and ICC values for the CET in the operated and nonoperated groups were 2.6% and 0.82 and 2.3% and 0.62, respectively; for NECCT, 0.7% and 0.98 and 0.5% and 0.98; and for CCT, 0.5% and 0.99 and 0.4% and 0.99.

Conclusions

The corneal sublayer thickness can be measured reliably using Cirrus HD-OCT in patients who underwent cataract surgery and elderly participants; however, the CET consistency is poorer than the NECCT. Corneal epithelial thickness modifications exceeding 4% reflect true thickness changes instead of random error variations using HD-OCT.

Comparison of Corneal Epithelial Thickness Measurement Between Fourier-Domain OCT and Very High-Frequency Digital Ultrasound

PURPOSE

To compare measurements of corneal epithelial thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and very high-frequency digital ultrasound (VHFDU).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 189 virgin corneas and 175 post-laser refractive surgery (LRS) corneas that had corneal epithelial thickness measurement with RTVue Fourier-domain OCT (Optovue, Inc., Fremont, CA) (tear film included) and Artemis VHFDU (ArcScan Inc., Morrison, CO) (tear film excluded). Averages were calculated for the central 2-mm diameter zone and for two further concentric annuli of 1.5- and 0.5-mm width, each divided into eight sectors. Agreement was analyzed by mean difference (OCT - VHFDU), 95% limits of agreement (LoA) (1.96 standard deviation of the difference), and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

In virgin epithelium, mean central thickness was 53.4 ± 3.20 µm (range: 46 to 62 µm) with OCT and 54.1 ± 2.96 µm (range: 48 to 61 µm) with VHFDU; OCT measured thinnest in 70% with a mean difference of -0.71 µm (95% LoA of ± 3.94 µm, P < .001). In post-LRS epithelium, mean central thickness was 57.9 ± 6.08 µm (range: 42 to 77 µm) with OCT and 60.5 ± 6.47 µm (range: 42 to 79 µm) with VHFDU; OCT measured thinnest in 88%, with a mean difference of -2.48 µm (95% LoA of ± 5.33 µm, P < .001). A larger difference between methods was more common with thicker epithelium.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal epithelial thickness measurements using OCT were found to be slightly thinner than for VHFDU. In contrast to VHFDU, OCT measurement includes the tear film, so the true difference is probably approximately 4 µm more than reported. The difference was greatest inferiorly and higher for post-LRS eyes and in thicker epithelium.

Early Changes in Corneal Epithelial Thickness after Cataract Surgery--Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To assess early variations in central and paracentral corneal epithelial and non-epithelial thicknesses after uneventful clear corneal incision phacoemulsification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with a senile cataract underwent coaxial phacoemulsification through a 2.75-mm-wide corneal incision created at 180° in a prospective cohort pilot study. Corneal sublayer thickness measurements were obtained with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT, Cirrus HD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA) before and after 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. Central measurements were performed in the middle of the FD-OCT scan and in the 3-mm corneal diameter (paracentral 180° and 0° locations). Epithelial, non-epithelial and total corneal pachymetry were measured at the central and paracentral locations.

RESULTS

No significant changes in epithelial thickness were seen 1 week postoperatively. However, 1 month postoperatively, the central, 180°, and 0° paracentral epithelial thicknesses (52.7 ± 3.8, 53.1 ± 5.4, and 52.7 ± 5.3 µm, respectively) decreased significantly (p < 0.01) compared to preoperatively (57.2 ± 4.8, 58.0 ± 5.7, 56.6 ± 5.3 µm, respectively). The 1-week central, 180°, and 0° paracentral non-epithelial corneal thicknesses (515.5 ± 39.6, 534.3 ± 45.6, and 521.3 ± 36.9 µm) were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than preoperatively (486.2 ± 34.7, 498.2 ± 33.8, 497.5 ± 32.3 µm, respectively). The non-epithelial corneal thickness increase was significantly (p = 0.02) greater after 1 week in the central (29.3 ± 17.2 µm) and the 180° paracentral (36.1 ± 28.7 µm) locations than at the 0° paracentral location (23.8 ± 16.5 µm).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate postoperative corneal edema following phacoemulsification irregularly affects the cornea at the sublayer level. The initial central and paracentral non-epithelial thickening is compensated by subsequent central and paracentral epithelial thinning. These initial changes occurred more markedly closest to the main incision over the entrance pupil, which may have visual implications.

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes

This review summarizes the current status of the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure. Following the early work by Sekundo et al. and Shah et al., SMILE has become increasingly popular. The accuracy of the creation of the lenticule with the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) has been verified using very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Visual and refractive outcomes have been shown to be similar to those achieved with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), notably in a large population reported by Hjortdal, Vestergaard et al. Safety in terms of the change in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) has also been shown to be similar to LASIK. It was expected that there would be less postoperative dry eye after SMILE compared to LASIK because the anterior stroma is disturbed only by the small incision, meaning that the anterior corneal nerves should be less affected. A number of studies have demonstrated a lower reduction and faster recovery of corneal sensation after SMILE than LASIK. Some studies have also used confocal microscopy to demonstrate a lower decrease in subbasal nerve fiber density after SMILE than LASIK. The potential biomechanical advantages of SMILE have been modeled by Reinstein et al. based on the non-linearity of tensile strength through the stroma. Studies have reported a similar change in Ocular Response Analyzer (Reichert) parameters after SMILE and LASIK, however, these have previously been shown to be unreliable as a representation of corneal biomechanics. Retreatment options after SMILE are discussed. Tissue addition applications of the SMILE procedure are also discussed including the potential for cryo-preservation of the lenticule for later reimplantation (Mohamed-Noriega, Angunawela, Lim et al.), and a new procedure referred to as endokeratophakia in which a myopic SMILE lenticule is implanted into a hyperopic patient (Pradhan et al.). Finally, studies reporting microdistortions in Bowman's layer and corneal wound healing responses are also described.

Artemis very high frequency digital ultrasound-guided femtosecond laser recut after flap complication

Incomplete flaps are a relatively uncommon complication of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) that occur when creation of the corneal flap is interrupted. Further complications can arise if a second flap is created that intersects the original flap interface, resulting in tissue slivers that can lead to more complications and poor visual outcomes. We report the case of a 56-year-old man who underwent LASIK in which an incomplete flap occurred after 45% completion using a mechanical microkeratome with a 160 µm head. The maximum depth achieved by this incomplete flap was measured by very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound as 182 μm peripherally. Two months later, a second flap was created beneath the incomplete flap, at a depth of 190 μm. The resulting flap had a central thickness of 196 μm and a minimum clearance of 30 μm beneath the incomplete flap. This demonstrates a method for creating secondary flaps that may significantly reduce the risk of flap interface intersection.

Transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy protocol for treating irregular astigmatism based on population epithelial thickness measurements by artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (TE-PTK) in the treatment of irregular astigmatism and define a standard treatment protocol based on population epithelial thickness measurements.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 41 TE-PTK procedures in cases of irregular astigmatism after refractive surgery or with corneal irregularities. The TE-PTK ablations were performed according to preoperative epithelial thickness maps obtained using an Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound arc-scanner (ArcScan, Inc., Morrison, CO). Visual and refractive outcomes were analyzed 12 months after the procedure. The efficacy of the stromal surface regularization was evaluated as the change in epithelial thickness range (ie, the difference between minimum and maximum epithelial thickness). A further refractive ablation was performed immediately after TE-PTK in 12 eyes.

RESULTS

Corrected distance visual acuity was improved by one or more lines in 58% of eyes, whereas 1 eye lost one line and no eyes lost two lines. Significant stromal surface regularization was achieved with epithelial thickness range reduced on average from 41 to 29 μm. There was an unpredictable refractive shift in the TE-PTK only group with a change of more than 0.50 diopter (D) in 59% of eyes. Refractive accuracy in the TE-PTK with refractive ablation group was reasonably good, although there were two outliers (18%) outside ±1.00 D. A therapeutic window was identified between the highest thinnest epithelium of 51 μm and lowest thickest epithelium of 60 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

TE-PTK can be a safe and effective method of reducing stromal surface irregularities by taking advantage of the natural masking effect of the epithelium. There can be a significant refractive shift due to lenticular epithelial masking. A standard protocol of targeting an initial TE-PTK ablation for 55 μm will likely achieve breakthrough of the thinnest epithelium without total epithelial removal, allowing the treatment to be continued in a stepwise fashion.

Vertical and horizontal corneal epithelial thickness profile using ultra-high resolution and long scan depth optical coherence tomography

Purpose

To determine the vertical and horizontal thickness profiles of the corneal epithelium in vivo using ultra-long scan depth and ultra-high resolution spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).

Methods

A SD-OCT was developed with an axial resolution of ∼3.3 µm in tissue and an extended scan depth. Forty-two eyes of 21 subjects were imaged twice. The entire horizontal and vertical corneal epithelial thickness profiles were evaluated. The coefficient of repeatability (CoR) and intraclass correlation (ICC) of the tests and interobserver variability were analyzed.

Results

The full width of the horizontal epithelium was detected, whereas part of the superior epithelium was not shown for the covered super eyelid. The mean central epithelial corneal thickness was 52.0±3.2 µm for the first measurement and 52.3±3.4 µm for the second measurement (P>.05). In the central zone (0–3.0 mm), the paracentral zones (3.0–6.0 mm) and the peripheral zones (6.0–10.0 mm), the mean epithelial thickness ranged from 51 to 53 µm, 52 to 57 µm, and 58 to 72 µm, respectively. There was no difference between the two tests at both meridians and in the right and left eyes (P>.05). The ICCs of the two tests ranged from 0.70 to 0.97 and the CoRs ranged from 2.5 µm to 7.8 µm from the center to the periphery, corresponding to 5.6% to 10.6% (CoR%). The ICCs of the two observers ranged from 0.72 to 0.93 and the CoRs ranged from 4.5 µm to 10.4 µm from the center to the periphery, corresponding to 8.7% to 15.2% (CoR%).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated good repeatability of ultra-high resolution and long scan depth SD-OCT to evaluate the entire thickness profiles of the corneal epithelium. The epithelial thickness increases from the center toward the limbus.

Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of Artemis-2 high-frequency ultrasound in determination of human corneal thickness

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability and limits of agreement of corneal thickness values measured by a high-frequency ultrasound (Artemis-2), hand-held ultrasound pachymeter (DGH-500) and a specular microscope (SP-3000P).

Methods

Central corneal thickness (CCT) was analyzed in this prospective randomized study that included 32 patients (18 men and 14 women) aged 21–24 years. Measurements were obtained in two sessions, one week apart, by two examiners with three devices in a randomized order. Nine measurements were taken (three with each device) on one randomly selected eye of each patient in each measurement session. The coefficient of repeatability and interobserver reproducibility for the values of each method were calculated. The limits of agreement between techniques were also evaluated.

Results

There were no significant differences in CCT values between sessions for each of the three devices (P > 0.05). The repeatability coefficients for the Artemis-2 (±8 μm/±9 μm) were superior to those of the SP-3000P (±9 μm/±11 μm) and DGH 500 (±12 μm/±12 μm) in session 1/session 2 respectively, while the interobserver reproducibility index (differences between session 1 and session 2) was superior for the SP-3000P (±17 μm) with respect to DHG-500 (±29 μm) and the Artemis-2 (±31 μm). In session 1 and session 2, the limits of agreement between the techniques were 35 μm to −31 μm and 34 to −20 μm, respectively, for DGH-500 versus Artemis-2, 73 μm to 3 μm and 60 μm to 9 μm for Artemis-2 versus SP-3000P, and 58 μm to 22 μm and 72 μm to 10 μm for DGH-500 versus SP-3000P comparisons. The DGH-500 and Artemis-2 gave similar values (P > 0.05) in both sessions, but both (Artemis-2 and DGH-500) values were significantly greater than that of the SP-3000P (P < 0.05) in both sessions.

Conclusion

Repeatability was comparably good for the three techniques. However, interobserver reproducibility was approximately twice as good with the SP-3000P compared with the other two devices. The Artemis-2 CCT values consistently agreed with the DGH-500 and less so with the SP-3000P. The Artemis-2 provided CCT values that were, on average, 38 μm and 34 μm greater than that of the SP-3000P in session 1 and session 2, respectively.

Topometric and Tomographic Indices for the Diagnosis of Keratoconus

Purpose

To compare topometric (front surface curvature) and tomographic (3D corneal shape) indices for diagnosing keratoconus.

Methods

Pentacam data from one eye randomly selected of 200 normals (N) and 177 keratoconus (KC) were analyzed. Tomographic and topometric indices were tested. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated, along with pairwise comparisons.

Results

All tested variables had significant differences among N and KC (Mann-Whitney, p < 0.001). Most accurate tomographic indices had higher AUC than best topometric ones (DeLong, p < 0.05). Belin-Ambrosio D (BAD-D) had AUC of 1.00 (sensitivity 100.0%; specificity 98.5%).

Conclusion

Tomographic data was superior than topometric data to detect keratoconus. The BAD-D was an enhanced approach for detecting keratoconus.

How to cite this article

Correia FF, Ramos I, Lopes B, Salomão MQ, Luz A, Correa RO, Belin MW, Ambrósio R Jr. Topometric and Tomographic Indices for the Diagnosis of Keratoconus. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2012;1(2):92-99.

Repeatability of intraoperative central corneal and residual stromal thickness measurement using a handheld ultrasound pachymeter

PURPOSE

To determine and compare the repeatability of intraoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) and residual stromal bed thickness measurements using a handheld ultrasound (US) pachymeter.

SETTING

London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Comparative evaluation of a diagnostic test or technology.

METHODS

This study comprised eyes that had laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment by flap lift in which handheld US pachymetry (Corneo-Gage Plus 50 MHz) had been performed intraoperatively. In each case, 5 consecutive measurements were obtained centrally immediately before and after the flap was lifted. The within-eye repeatability was calculated as the standard deviation of the 5 repeated measurements for the CCT measurements and the central residual stromal thickness (RST) measurements.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 134 eyes (79 patients). The mean CCT was 467 μm ± 40 (SD) (range 393 to 577 μm). The repeatability of CCT measurements was 6.83 μm, the coefficient of repeatability was 13.40 μm, and the coefficient of variation (CoV) was 1.46%. The mean central RST was 335 ± 46 μm (range 259 to 465 μm). The repeatability of central RST measurements was 4.91 μm, the coefficient of repeatability was 9.62 μm, and the CoV was 1.46%.

CONCLUSION

The repeatability of intraoperative handheld US pachymetry was similar between measurements of CCT and measurements of central RST; the CoV was 1.46% in both cases.

Relationship between minimum corneal thickness and refractive state, keratometry, age, sex, and left or right eye in refractive surgery candidates

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between the thinnest point in corneal thickness and the refractive state, keratometry, age, sex, and the ocular side.

SETTING

Eye clinics in Germany and Austria and the Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Medical records of refractive surgery candidates from 2006 to 2010 were reviewed. Univariate variance analysis, covariance analysis, Bravis-Pearson correlations, Spearman rank correlations, and t tests were performed to analyze the relationship between the thinnest point in corneal thickness and the biometric parameters.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 4600 eyes. The mean thinnest point in corneal thickness was 549 μm ± 33 (SD). Refractive state, mean keratometry, and age had a statistically significant impact on the thinnest point in corneal thickness. The mean thinnest point in corneal thickness was 548 ± 33 μm in myopia, 555 ± 34 μm in hyperopia, and 553 ± 35 μm in high astigmatism, with a statistically significant difference between hyperopic eyes and myopic eyes (P<.001). No correlation was found between the thinnest point in corneal thickness and sex or ocular side. Refractive state (r = 0.07, P<.001) and age (r = 0.05, P<.001) showed a positive correlation and keratometry (r = -0.09, P<.001) a negative correlation with the thinnest point in corneal thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractive state, mean keratometry, and age had a statistically significant, although marginal impact, on the thinnest point in corneal thickness. Sex and the ocular side had no effect.

Comparison of residual stromal bed thickness measurement among very high-frequency digital ultrasound, intraoperative handheld ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

To compare residual stromal thickness (RST) measurement by three methods: very high-frequency digital ultrasound (VHFDU), intraoperative handheld ultrasound (US), and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 93 eyes (55 patients) that underwent LASIK retreatment by flap lift where VHFDU and OCT measurements were obtained before the retreatment and intraoperative US RST measurement was performed after lifting the flap. Corneal vertex RST measurements for intraoperative US and OCT were compared with the VHFDU measurement. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Mean corneal vertex RST was 327±53 μm for VHFDU, 338±54 μm for intraoperative US, and 326±43 μm for OCT. Mean difference between VHFDU and intraoperative US was 11±11 μm (range: -12 to 46 μm). Mean difference between VHFDU and OCT was -2±23 μm (range: -53 to 57 μm). The coefficient of determination (R(2)) was 0.96 between VHFDU and intraoperative US and 0.82 between VHFDU and OCT. Intraoperative US was on average 11 μm thicker than VHFDU independent of RST value. Optical coherence tomography was on average thicker than VHFDU for low RST values (250 to 300 μm) and thinner than VHFDU for high RST values (>350 μm). The RST was thicker than VHFDU by >10 μm in 50% and >20 μm in 21% of eyes measured with intraoperative US and by >10 μm in 32% and >20 μm in 18% of eyes measured with OCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual stromal thickness measured by both intraoperative US and OCT was thicker than VHFDU in a significant number of eyes, which could have resulted in retreatment being performed in an eye with insufficient RST.

Epithelial thickness after hyperopic LASIK: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound

PURPOSE

To characterize the epithelial thickness profile in a population of eyes after LASIK for hyperopia or hyperopic astigmatism.

METHODS

The epithelial thickness profile was measured in vivo by Artemis very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound scanning (ArcScan Inc) across the central 10-mm diameter of the cornea on 65 eyes at least 3 months after hyperopic LASIK using a 7-mm ablation zone with the MEL 80 excimer laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Maps of the average, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and range of epithelial thickness were plotted. The cross-sectional hemi-meridional epithelial thickness profile was calculated using annular averaging. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate correlations between epithelial thickness, spherical equivalent refraction treated, and maximum simulated keratometry.

RESULTS

The mean thinnest epithelial thickness was 39.7 +/- 5.6 microm and the mean thickest epithelial thickness was 89.3 +/- 14.6 microm. The average epithelial thickness profile showed an epithelial doughnut pattern characterized by localized central thinning within the 4-mm diameter zone surrounded by an annulus of thick epithelium, with the thickest epithelium at the 3.4-mm radius. The epithelium was on average 10-microm thicker temporally than nasally at the 3.4-mm radius. Central epithelium was thinner and paracentral epithelium was thicker for higher hyperopic corrections and steeper maximum simulated keratometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional high-resolution ultrasound mapping of epithelial thickness profile after LASIK for hyperopia demonstrated thinner epithelium centrally and thicker epithelium paracentrally. Presumably, the paracentral epithelial thickening compensated in part for the stromal tissue removed by the hyperopic ablation, whereas the central epithelial thinning compensated for the localized increase in corneal curvature.