Comparison of artemis 2 ultrasound and Visante optical coherence tomography corneal thickness profiles

Repeatability and agreement of AOCT-1000 M, RTVue XR and IOL master 500 in measuring corneal thickness mapping and axial length applying principle of optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (AOCT-1000 M and RTVue XR) and partial coherence interferometry biometer (IOL Master 500) in measuring corneal thickness mapping and axial length respectively.

METHODS

Corneal thickness was measured by AOCT-1000 M and RTVue XR. Axial lengths were measured by AOCT-1000 M and IOL Master 500. The repeatability and agreement of corneal thickness and axial length were calculated in two groups of devices. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to verify the repeatability of the device. The 95% confidence interval of the difference compared to the set cut-off value was used to verify the agreement between the two devices.

RESULTS

A total of 60 subjects with 58 eyes were included. The central corneal thickness measured by AOCT-1000 M and RTVue XR were 504.46 ± 42.53 μm and 504.43 ± 42.89 μm respectively. The average difference between groups was 0.03 ± 4.58 μm, and the 95% confidence interval was (-1.17, 1.24), which was far less than the set threshold value of 15 μm (P < 0.001). Both RTVue XR and AOCT-1000 M had very good ICC values of central corneal thickness (0.998 and 0.994, respectively). The average axial lengths measured by AOCT-1000 M and IOL Master 500 were 24.28 ± 1.25 mm and 24.29 ± 1.26 mm respectively and the 95% confidence interval was (-0.02, 0.01), which was less than the set threshold value of 0.15 mm (P < 0.001). The ICC for both devices were 1.000.

CONCLUSION

Good repeatability and agreement were seen in measurements of central corneal thickness and axial length by AOCT-1000 M.

Principles of Ophthalmic Ultrasound

Introduction

Ultrasound imaging of the eye was introduced over 50 years ago. While the physical principles of ultrasound imaging have not changed, technology has undergone tremendous and ongoing development.

Areas covered

The fundamentals of ultrasound physics, biometry (A-scan), structural imaging (B-scan) and blood-flow imaging and measurement (Doppler) will be described. Emphasis will be placed on technological development and potential future advances.

Expert opinion

While A- and B-scan ultrasound of the eye has traditionally been performed with focused single-element transducers, the introduction of annular and linear arrays has enhanced clinical utility. Future advances, especially in multielement arrays, and point-of-care systems promise amazing new capabilities for diagnostic imaging of the eye and orbit.

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule thickness readout compared to change in axial length measurements with the IOLMaster

PURPOSE

To compare theoretical values from the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) lenticule thickness readout with change in axial length measurements taken with the IOLMaster.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 214 eyes from 107 patients undergoing bilateral SMILE surgery for myopia or myopic astigmatism between December 2014 and May 2017 at an ophthalmological practice in Singapore. All eyes were examined pre-operatively and 1 and 3 months post-operatively with the IOLMaster following SMILE surgery. Achieved lenticule thickness was taken as the change in axial length after surgery. A linear mixed-effects model was used to examine changes in axial length, spherical equivalent and acuity over time. The relationships between change in axial length and theoretical lenticule thickness and spherical equivalent were examined with multiple linear regression analyses, and model prediction was assessed with adjusted R² statistics.

RESULTS

Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) spherical equivalent pre-operatively was - 5.25 (95% CI - 5.38 to - 5.12) diopters (D), at 1 month was 0.04 (95% CI - 0.09 to 0.17) D (p < 0.001), and at 3 months was - 0.02 (95% CI - 0.15 to 0.11) D (p < 0.001). Mean (95% CI) pre-operative axial length was 27,726 (95% CI 25,595 to 25,857) μm. Post-operative axial length at 1 month was significantly shorter at 25,595 (95% CI 25,464 to 25,726) μm (p < 0.001) with no change thereafter (p = 0.647). Pre-operative mean ± standard deviation (SD) refractive target was 0.24 (± 0.3) D, and mean difference between target and post-operative spherical equivalent at 1 month was 0.20 D (95% CI 0.16 to 0.25 D, p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that change in axial length at 1 month was, on average, 5% lower than theoretical lenticule thickness, indicating an average difference of 5.4 μm (95% CI 5.2 to 5.6 μm). Preoperative spherical equivalent predicted negative association with change in axial length at 1 month (β = - 14.8, 95% CI - 18.2 to - 11.3, adjusted R² = 0.457, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Calculated lenticule thickness values were less than expected, and post-operative refractive outcomes at 1 month showed a slight under-correction. Further research in this area is needed to validate these findings.

Comparison of very-high-frequency ultrasound and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography corneal and epithelial thickness maps

PURPOSE

To compare corneal thickness and epithelial thickness measurements in maps obtained using the RTVue spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) system and the Artemis 2 immersion arc-scanning very-high-frequency ultrasound (VHF-US) system.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

DESIGN

Comparative study.

METHODS

Eyes of normal volunteers were scanned with the SD-OCT system followed by the VHF-US system and then again by the SD-OCT system. On each map, the minimum corneal thickness and mean values of corneal thickness and epithelial thickness in the 3.0 mm radius zone and in 0.5 mm wide concentric annuli of up to a 3.0 mm radius around the corneal vertex were determined.

RESULTS

Both eyes of 12 normal volunteers were scanned. The corneal thickness values from both devices were highly correlated (R > 0.96); in the 3.0 mm radius zone, they were not statistically significantly different. There was no statistically significant change in epithelial thickness or corneal thickness in SD-OCT measurements taken before versus after immersion US. Although highly correlated (R > 0.76), the SD-OCT epithelial thickness values were systematically thinner (1.7 ± 2.1 μm) than the VHF-US measurements in the 3.0 mm radius zone (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The corneal thickness measurements in the 3.0 mm radius zone in normal eyes were equivalent between the 2 systems. Although correlated, the VHF-US epithelial thickness measurements were systemically thicker than the SD-OCT values.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Drs. Silverman and Reinstein have a commercial interest in Arcscan, Inc. Dr. Reinstein is a consultant to Carl Zeiss Meditec. None of the other authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method presented.

Femtosecond laser versus manual clear corneal incision in cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare functional and morphological outcomes of femtosecond laser clear corneal incision (CCI) versus manual CCI during cataract surgery.

METHODS

Sixty eyes of 60 patients who underwent CCI during cataract surgery were randomized into two groups: femtosecond laser CCI (30 eyes) and manual CCI (30 eyes).

RESULTS

There were no significant between-group differences in uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, surgically induced astigmatism, and corneal aberrations. Keratometric astigmatism was significantly lower in the femtosecond laser CCI group compared to the manual CCI group at 30 and 180 days (P < .05). Central endothelial cell count was significantly higher in the femtosecond laser CCI group compared to the manual CCI group at 7 and 30 days postoperatively (P < .05). A lower increase of corneal thickness at the incision site was observed at 30 and 180 days postoperatively in the femtosecond laser CCI group compared to the manual CCI group (P < .05). In addition, femtosecond laser CCI showed a better morphology (lower percentage of endothelial and epithelial gaping and endothelial misalignment) compared to manual CCI at different time points. Total phacoemulsification time was significantly lower in the femtosecond laser CCI group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The femtosecond laser procedure was safe, efficient, and less damaging, as evidenced by lower central endothelial cell loss, lower increase of corneal thickness at the incision site, and better tunnel morphology compared to the manual technique.

Meta-analysis of Pentacam vs. ultrasound pachymetry in central corneal thickness measurement in normal, post-LASIK or PRK, and keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement differences between Pentacam (Oculus Inc., Germany) and Ultrasound Pachymetry (USP) in normal (unoperated eyes , myopic and astigmatic eyes without corneal disease or topographic irregularity), after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and keratoconic or keratoconus suspected eyes. We assess whether Pentacam and USP have similar CCT differences in normal, thinner corneas after LASIK or PRK procedures, and kerotoconic or keratoconus suspected eyes.

METHODS

Data sources, including PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials on the Cochrane Library, were searched to find the relevant studies. Primary outcome measures were CCT measurement between Pentacam and USP. Three groups of eyes were analyzed: normal; LASIK or PRK eyes; and keratoconus suspected or keratoconic eyes.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies describing 1,908 eyes were enrolled in the normal group. Pentacam results were 1.47 μm ,95 % confidence interval (CI) -2.32 to 5.27, higher than USP without statistically significant difference (P = 0.45). Nine studies with total 539 eyes were included in the corneas after LASIK or PRK. The mean difference in the CCT measurement with Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry was 1.03 μm, with the 95 % CI -3.36 to 5.42, there was no statistically difference (P = 0.64). Four studies with a total of 185 eyes were included in the keratoconic eyes or keratoconus-suspect group, however,the mean difference was -6.33 μm (95 % CI -9.17 to-3.49), which was statistically different between Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry in the CCT measurement (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pentacam offers similar CCT results to ultrasound pachymetry in normal eyes, thinner corneas after LASIK or PRK procedures. However, in keratoconic or keratoconus-suspect eyes, Pentacam slightly underestimates the central corneal thickness than does ultrasound pachymetry, which may result from the difficulty in fixation of keratoconic eyes, misalignment of Pentacam and the variation of ultrasonic velocity due to the histological deformation.