Effective optical zone following small incision lenticule extraction: a review

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a "flapless" keratorefractive surgery with excellent safety, efficacy, stability, and predictability for myopia correction. A recent global multicenter study also reported good refractive outcomes for hyperopic SMILE. SMILE has shown advantages including improved biomechanical strength, fewer dry eye symptoms, less corneal denervation, and fewer surgery-induced higher-order aberrations over laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). However, night vision complaints, including glare, halos, and starbursts, could still occur after SMILE. These symptoms have been proven to be closely related to the effective optical zone (EOZ), which is defined as the achieved area of corneal ablation. A larger postoperative EOZ may indicate better visual quality, making EOZ an important safety parameter for keratorefractive surgeries. As SMILE has gained wider application globally, the EOZ following SMILE has also been increasingly studied in the field of refractive surgery. This review provides an update on topics related to the EOZ after SMILE, including its measurement and influencing factors, aiming to benefit the personalization of the surgical algorithm and ultimately improve the visual quality after the SMILE procedure.

Characterization the corneal transparency profile in SMILE-treated myopic patients with densitometry: A 7-year cohort study

PURPOSE

To investigate 7-year changes in corneal densitometry (CD) and its influencing factors following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate to high myopia.

METHODS

A total of 32 patients (52 eyes) with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) refraction of -6.30 ± 1.30 D who underwent SMILE were recruited for this prospective study. Pre- and postoperative CD and corneal aberrations were measured by an oculus Pentacam system, and patients were followed up to 7 years. The CD evolution over time and its influencing factors were explored.

RESULTS

No complications were observed after SMILE. There was a significant time effect on postoperative CD ( P < 0.05). The CD values at the 0-to-2 and 2-to-6 mm of the anterior layer increased at the first day ( P < 0.05) and declined to baselines at 1 year postoperatively; after that, CD values at any zone and any corneal layer presented a decreasing trend over time (all P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative CD was positively correlated with age and optical zone (OZ), whereas negatively correlated with SE, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and corneal aberrations (higher-order aberrations, Coma0 and Coma90) (all P < 0.05). Generalized estimating equation revealed that age, SE, CDVA, OZ, and Coma0 were the main factors influencing postoperative CD values (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CD manifested a long-term decreasing trend in moderate to high myopia treated with SMILE. Its main influencing factors are age, SE, CDVA, OZ, and Coma0.

Assessment of Changes in Cap and Residual Stromal Thickness Values during a 6-Month Observation after Refractive Lenticule Extraction Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

Background: In this study, the changes in corneal cap and residual stromal thickness (RST) values during a 180-day observation period after refractive lenticule extraction small incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE) were assessed. Methods: Fifty patients underwent ReLEx SMILE using the VisuMax 500 femtosecond laser, with corneal imaging conducted pre and post procedure via anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Cap thickness in the center and 1.5 mm from the center in four meridians was measured at various intervals. Results: The results showed a significant decrease in cap thickness 180 days post procedure compared to earlier intervals (p < 0.05). Similarly, RST decreased gradually and significantly post procedure (p < 0.05). Notably, changes in cap thickness within the central 1.5 mm area were more dynamic than RST changes during the 6-month observation period following SMILE. Conclusions: The corneal cap thickness measured with swept-source AS-OCT within the central 1.5 mm area underwent more dynamic changes than the residual stromal thickness during the 6-month observation following SMILE.

Effects of Topical 0.05% Cyclosporine A on Dry Eye Symptoms and Parameters Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of topical 0.05% cyclosporine A on Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score and ocular surface parameters after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia.

METHODS

In this study, 151 patients who underwent SMILE were randomized into the control group (71 eyes) and the 0.05% cyclosporine A group (80 eyes). Both groups received standard treatment during the 1 month after SMILE. Over the next 3 months, The control group continued standard therapy (0.3% sodium hyaluronate) and the 0.05% cyclosporine A group received additional 0.05% cyclosporine A. OSDI total and subscale scores, non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear lipid layer thickness (LLT), and tear meniscus height (TMH) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Compared to baseline, the OSDI scores significantly increased in both groups (P < .001). The 0.05% cyclosporine A group exhibited lower OSDI total scores after administering 0.05% cyclosporine A versus the control group (P = .026). At 1 month of follow-up, NIBUT, LLT, and TMH values significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline (P < .05). The 0.05% cyclosporine A group exhibited higher NIBUT, LLT, and TMH versus the control group, returning to preoperative values after 2 months. Overall, the OSDI total score and NIBUT values during follow-up were not significantly different between the two groups; however, the LLT and TMH values were significantly different between the two groups (P < .001 and .041, respectively) by repeated measures analysis of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical 0.05% cyclosporine A was effective in relieving subjective dry eye symptoms and maintaining ocular surface stability in the early postoperative period of SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(4):e229-e238.].

Ten-year outcomes following small incision lenticule extraction for up to -10Dioptres myopia

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

More than 6 million small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedures have been performed worldwide since 2011. Therefore, its long-term safety and efficacy should be investigated.

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate 10-year refractive outcomes, corneal stability, axial length, and wavefront aberrations in patients who underwent SMILE to correct myopia.

METHODS

Thirty two patients (32 eyes) who underwent SMILE-based myopic correction. Corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corneal stability, axial length, and wavefront aberrations were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 month and 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

At 10 years postoperatively, the safety and efficacy indices for the patients included in this study were 1.19 ± 0.21 and 1.04 ± 0.27, respectively. For 26 (81%) and 30 eyes (94%), correction to within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D of the target was achieved, respectively. Over the 10-year follow-up duration, a mean -0.32 ± 0.56 D regression was observed (-0.03 ± 0.06 D/year). Relative to baseline, horizontal and vertical comas significantly increased, as did the incidence of higher-order aberrations (all P < 0.001), whereas axial length and corneal elevation remained stable during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the SMILE-based correction for myopia of up to -10 Dioptres is safe, effective, and stable, with relatively constant wavefront aberrations and corneal stability over time after treatment.

Study on the biological properties of SMILE-derived corneal stromal lenticules after long-term cryopreservation in nutrient capsules

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term preservation effects of nutrient capsules on the physiological activity, collagen fiber structure and transmittance of corneal stromal lenticules derived from small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

A new nutrient capsule was constructed for long-term preservation of SMILE-derived corneal stromal lenticules. The lenticules were randomly divided into 99% anhydrous glycerol, and hydrogel nutrient capsules. After preserving for 1 year at -80 °C, lenticules were compared with fresh lenticules. The optical transmittance, tissue morphology, ultrastructure, cells activity and immunogenicity of the lenticules was detected and compared between different groups.

RESULTS

The rate of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in the glycerol group compared with the nutrient capsule group (P < 0.0001). More viable cells were present in the lenticules after nutrient capsule preservation compared to the glycerol group (P = 0.0003). The mean transmittance of the lenticules in the glycerol group (50 ± 18%) was significantly lower (P = 0.0008) compared to the control group (75 ± 11%), and the lenticules transmittance of the nutrient capsule group (64 ± 15%) after long-term preservation was not significantly different (P = 0.23) compared to the control group. The structure of HE staining showed that the collagen fibers in the nutrient capsule group were arranged in parallel and neatly, and a few cavitation vesicles were visible inside the tissue. There was no significant difference in the number of lenticular collagen fibers in the nutritional capsule group compared to the fresh lenticule group (P = 0.06). HLA-DR, HLA-ABC, CD45, CD25 and CD69 expression was low in all groups of lenticules after preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutrient capsules can preserve lenticules for a long time and maintain the transmission structure and cells activity of lenticules.

Long-Term Visual Quality and Pupil Changes after Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Eyes without Preoperative Cylinder Refraction

Purpose

To investigate the long-term changes in visual quality and pupil size after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for eyes without preoperative cylinder refraction.

Methods

Thirty-three myopic eyes (33 patients) without preoperative cylinder refraction were corrected using SMILE. Refractive outcomes, corneal curvature, aberrations, contrast sensitivity (CS), and pupil diameter were evaluated preoperatively, and 30 months postoperatively.

Results

The 30-month postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, LogMAR) were -0.10 ± 0.09 and -0.14 ± 0.06, respectively, whereas the preoperative CDVA (LogMAR) was -0.07 ± 0.05. Cylinder refraction of -0.11 ± 0.21 D (ranging from -0.50 to 0.00) was observed at 30 months postoperatively, increasing from the preoperative cylinder refraction of 0.00 ± 0.00 D (P=0.004). Moreover, the centroid coordinates x, y of corneal anterior astigmatic vectors were -0.19 ± 0.22, 0.81 ± 0.33 at 30 months postoperatively, and 0.02 ± 0.28, 0.76 ± 0.51 preoperatively (Px < 0.001 and Py=0.810, respectively). Furthermore, a 15° axis change in the mean anterior corneal astigmatic vector was observed at 30 months postoperatively from the preoperative state, as measured by Pentacam. At 30 months postoperatively, the photopic Log CS reduced significantly with glare at three and six cycles/degrees (P < 0.001 and P=0.015, respectively), a decreased photopic pupil diameter (3.27 ± 0.55 mm vs. 3.10 ± 0.66 mm, P=0.030), and an increased Coma (Z31) and Trefoil (Z3-3) at 4 mm diameter area analysis. However, a significant linear regression relationship was only observed between changes in photopic pupil diameter and changes in photopic Log CS with glare at 12 cycles/degree (P=0.038 and β = 0.282).

Conclusion

Slight cylinder regression was observed with thicker corneal lenticular extraction after SMILE correction of nonastigmatic eyes 30 months postoperatively. This regression was mainly because of the axis changes in anterior corneal astigmatism power. Therefore, a cylinder nomogram modification of 0.25 to 0.50 D is considerable for correcting nonastigmatic myopic eyes with a predicted spherical lenticular thickness over 100 µm.

Three-Month Clinical Outcomes to Correct Myopia or Myopic Astigmatism Using a Femtosecond Laser for Lenticule Creation With Automated Centration and Cyclotorsion Compensation

PURPOSE

To individually evaluate the clinical outcomes for right and left eyes in the first 3 months after laser-assisted lenticule extraction for myopia and myopic astigmatism with the use of the new ATOS femtosecond laser system (Smart-Sight; SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions).

METHODS

A total of 331 eyes from 168 patients (166 right eyes and 165 left eyes) consecutively treated with SmartSight lenticule extraction were retrospective analyzed after a 3-month follow-up period. Patients' mean age was 26 ± 6 years (range: 18 to 47 years) and mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SEQ) was -5.07 ± 1.92 diopters [D] (range: -1.50 to -11.25 D) with a mean astigmatism of -1.04 ± 0.85 D (range: 0.00 to -4.00 D). At 3 months of follow-up, visual acuity, SEQ and cylinder, safety index, efficacy index, corneal higher order aberrations, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were analyzed. Furthermore, refractive and visual outcomes were also analyzed for the right and left eyes individually. All lenticule extraction treatments were performed with the SmartSight treatment method of the SCHWIND ATOS femtosecond laser.

RESULTS

At 3 months after surgery, mean SEQ was -0.12 ± 0.19 D and 98% of eyes were within ±0.50 D of the SEQ. All eyes were within ±1.00 D of the SEQ. Astigmatism of 0.50 D or less was achieved in 99% of eyes. The change in Snellen lines (difference between preoperative corrected distance visual acuity and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity) showed a gain of one or more lines in 13% and in 85% of the eyes the same was achieved. There was a loss of one or more lines at 3 months of follow-up in 1.6%. The safety index was 1.03 and efficacy index was 1.02. No significant difference between the right and left eyes was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-month follow-up data show that SmartSight treatment for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism with the SCHWIND ATOS is a safe, efficient, and accurate procedure. It provided excellent results in terms of visual recovery, predictability, and higher order aberrations. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(1):e30-e41.].

Possible risk factors of opaque bubble layer and its effect on high-order aberrations after small incision Lenticule extraction

Purpose

To evaluate the possible risk factors of opaque bubble layer (OBL) formation in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery and its effects on visual quality.

Methods

Fifty-six eyes from 28 patients were included in this study. The preoperative parameters and intraoperative designs were recorded. Corneal high-order aberrations (HOAs), point spread function (PSF), and modulation transfer function (MTF) were measured using iTrace at pre-operation, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after SMILE. Generalized Estimating Equation and Linear Mixed Effects Model were employed for statistical analysis.

Results

The mean OBL area in SMILE surgery was 2.75% ± 1.25%. The patients were divided into groups based on whether the OBL was greater than the mean group or less than the mean group. Compared to the group with a smaller OBL area, the group with the larger OBL area had steeper corneal curvature and thinner cap thickness, the OBL area was positively correlated with the preoperative keratometry (r = 0.21, p = 0.04) and preoperative spherical value (r = 0.47, p = 0.01). The group with the larger OBL area induced more corneal SA and trefoil at 1 week postoperatively, but the difference was not significant at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

A steep corneal curvature, thin cap thickness, and high preoperative spherical value are possible risk factors for OBL formation in SMILE surgery. The OBL increased the ocular and corneal HOAs postoperatively for a short period (1 week), while it did not affect the long-term outcomes.

Central toxic keratopathy after small incision lenticule extraction surgery:A case report

PURPOSE

To report a rare case of central toxic keratopathy after small incision lenticule extraction surgery (SMILE).

CASE REPORT

A 38-year-old female presented with visual loss 10 days after undergoing SMILE. Subsequently, transparent band keratopathy was protruded in the left cornea and corneal cap opacity was increased, which was accompanied by hyperopic shift and corneal thinning. The patient's condition rapidly improved with the administration of prednisolone acetate and autologous serum, with significant resolution of the transparent band keratopathy within 5 weeks of treatment initiation and subsequent complete visual recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Central toxic keratopathy is a severe complication after undergoing SMILE, which might be effectively treated using with steroids and autologous serum.

Comparison of visual quality after SMILE correction of low-to-moderate myopia in different optical zones

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of different optical zones for small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) on postoperative visual quality in low-to-moderate myopia.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study involved patients who underwent SMILE using two optical-zone diameters: 6.5 mm (50 patients, 100 eyes) and 6.8 mm (50 patients, 100 eyes). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE), corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and subjective visual-quality questionnaire scores were assessed.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, UCVA and SE did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). In both groups, corneal HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma significantly increased at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.05), while trefoil was unchanged after surgery (P > 0.05). Corneal HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma significantly differed between the groups at 1 and 3 months (P < 0.05), while trefoil did not (P > 0.05). Visual-quality scores were higher in the 6.8 mm group than in the 6.5 mm group at 1 month (P = 0.058), but not at 3 months (P > 0.05). In both groups, subjective scores significantly decreased at 1 month (P < 0.05) and gradually returned to the preoperative level at 3 months (P > 0.05). The subjective visual-quality scores were negatively and positively correlated with pupillary and optical-zone diameter, respectively (P < 0.05 for both). Objective visual-quality indicators (HOAs, spherical aberration, and coma) were negatively correlated with optical-zone diameter (P < 0.05) but not pupillary diameter (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SMILE in different optical zones effectively corrected low-to-moderate myopia. The larger the optical-zone diameter, the better the early postoperative visual quality.

Four-year visual outcomes and optical quality of SMILE and implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation for high myopia: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To compare the 4-year visual outcomes of implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia and astigmatism.

METHODS

This retrospective case study included 64 eyes of 40 patients. These patients with preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (SE) between - 6.00 and - 10.00 diopters (D) were screened from the database of SMILE and EVO-ICL implantation procedures in 2015. The ICL group [32 eyes of 19 patients (mean age, 29.6 ± 6.3 years); mean SE, -8.71 ± 1.06 D] and SMILE group [32 eyes of 21 patients (mean age, 27.7 ± 5.6 years); mean SE, -8.35 ± 0.65D] were compared. All patients were then prospectively examined at a four-year follow-up for routine postoperative examinations, higher-order ocular aberrations, retinal image quality and a questionnaire.

RESULTS

The safety indexes were 1.15 ± 0.14 and 1.22 ± 0.21 (P = 0.36) for the SMILE and ICL groups, respectively. No eyes lost two or more lines of CDVA in either group. The efficacy indexes were 0.97 ± 0.16 and 0.96 ± 0.19 (P = 0.87), respectively. Twenty-three eyes (72%) in ICL and 26 eyes (81%) in SMILE groups were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted SE (P < 0.01). ICL-treated eyes had significantly less spherical aberration and coma (P < 0.01 and < 0.05, respectively) postoperatively. Halos were the prevalent visual disturbance in both groups.

CONCLUSION

SMILE and EVO-ICL implantation provided safe and effective correction of high myopia. SMILE showed slightly better long-term predictability. Mild postoperative visual disturbances were observed after ICL and SMILE at 4-year follow-up.

Ferroptosis in the Lacrimal Gland Is Involved in Dry Eye Syndrome Induced by Corneal Nerve Severing

Purpose

Dry eye syndrome (DES) is a prevalent postoperative complication after myopic corneal refractive surgeries and the main cause of postoperative dissatisfaction. Although great efforts have been made in recent decades, the molecular mechanism of postoperative DES remains poorly understood. Here, we used a series of bioinformatics approaches and experimental methods to investigate the potential mechanism involved in postoperative DES.

Methods

BALB/c mice were randomly divided into sham, unilateral corneal nerve cutting (UCNV) + saline, UCNV + vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and UCNV + ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1, inhibitor of ferroptosis) groups. Corneal lissamine green dye and tear volume were measured before and two weeks after the surgery in all groups. Lacrimal glands were collected for secretory function testing, RNA sequencing, ferroptosis verification, and inflammatory factor detection.

Results

UCNV significantly induced bilateral decreases in tear secretion. Inhibition of the maturation and release of secretory vesicles was observed in bilateral lacrimal glands. More importantly, UCNV induced ferroptosis in bilateral lacrimal glands. Furthermore, UCNV significantly decreased VIP, a neural transmitter, in bilateral lacrimal glands, which increased Hif1a, the dominant transcription factor of transferrin receptor protein 1 (TfR1). Supplementary VIP inhibited ferroptosis, which decreased the inflammatory reaction and promoted the maturation and release of secretory vesicles. Supplementary VIP and Fer-1 improved tear secretion.

Conclusions

Our data suggest a novel mechanism by which UCNV induces bilateral ferroptosis through the VIP/Hif1a/TfR1 pathway, which might be a promising therapeutic target for DES-induced by corneal refractive surgeries.

Clinical outcomes of implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens for pathologic and non-pathologic myopia

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical outcomes of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation for non-pathological myopia and pathological myopia.

METHODS

This retrospective case series study which were conducted in Beijing Tongren Eye Center between July 2017 and Oct 2021 comprised 192 eyes of 100 consecutive patients undergoing pIOL implantation. Eyes were divided into two groups based on having pathological myopia or not. Predictability, efficacy, safety, and adverse events were compared at 6 months after pIOL implantation.

RESULTS

Our study included 86 non-pathological myopes (171 eyes, group1) and 14 pathological myopes (21eyes, group2) to analysis. The average ages were 25.5 and 33.0, respectively, and the spherical equivalent (SE) were -9.31D and -17.50D pre-operation. Six months after pIOL implantation, the SE were 0.00 and -0.50, respectively, and the refraction changes were statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). Six months after surgery, 76.92% and 80.41% were within ± 0.50 D of the target and 92.31% and 95.88% were within ± 1.00 D. All eyes had unchanged BCVA or gained 1 or more lines in both groups and mean BCVA both improved a line 6m after operation. The efficacy index in the two groups were 0.95 and 0.88 and the safety index were 1.20, 1.33, respectively which was significantly different (P ≤ 0.05). Over the 6-month follow-up, no cataract, pigment dispersion glaucoma, pupillary block, or other vision-threatening complications happened, either.

CONCLUSIONS

The pIOL performed well for the correction of both non-pathological and pathological myopia throughout the 6-month observation period. The clinical outcomes of pIOL implantation for non-pathological myopia are essentially equivalent to those for pathological myopia.

Prediction of Early Visual Outcome of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Based on Deep Learning

INTRODUCTION

Deep learning (DL) has been widely used to estimate clinical images. The objective of this project was to create DL models to predict the early postoperative visual acuity after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery.

METHODS

We enrolled three independent patient cohorts (a retrospective cohort and two prospective SMILE cohorts) who underwent the SMILE refractive correction procedure at two different refractive surgery centers from July to September 2022. The medical records and surgical videos were collected for further analysis. Based on the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at 24 h postsurgery, the eyes were divided into two groups: those showing good recovery and those showing poor recovery. We then trained a DL model (Resnet50) to predict eyes with early postoperative visual acuity of patients in the retrospective cohort who had undergone SMILE surgery from surgical videos and subsequently validated the model's performance in the two prospective cohorts. Finally, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was performed for interpretation of the model.

RESULTS

Among the 318 eyes (159 patients) enrolled in the study, 10,176 good quality femtosecond laser scanning images were obtained from the surgical videos. We observed that the developed DL model achieved a high accuracy of 96% for image prediction. The area under the curve (AUC) value of the DL model in the retrospective cohort was 0.962 and 0.998 in the training and validation datasets, respectively. The AUC values in two prospective cohorts were 0.959 and 0.936. At the video level, the trained machine learning (ML) model (XGBoost) also accurately distinguished patients with good or poor recovery. The AUC value of the ML model was 0.998 and 0.889 in the retrospective cohort (training and test datasets, respectively) and 1.000 and 0.984 in the two prospective cohorts. We also trained a DL model which can accurately distinguish suction loss (100%), black spots (85%), and opaque bubble layer (96%). The Grad-CAM heatmap indicated that our models can recognize the area of scanning and precisely identify intraoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that artificial intelligence (DL and ML model) can accurately predict the early postoperative visual acuity and intraoperative complications after SMILE surgery just using surgical videos or images, which may display a great importance for artificial intelligence in application of refractive surgeries.

The Impact of Corneal Epithelial Thickening and Inhomogeneity on Corneal Aberrations After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

PURPOSE

To investigate the corneal epithelial remodeling profile after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), the correlated explanatory variables, and its potential impact on corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs).

METHODS

This single-center study prospectively evaluated 75 right eyes of 75 patients scheduled for SMILE. An anterior segment optical coherence tomography device was used to automatically obtain central 6-mm corneal epithelial thickness (ET), total corneal HOAs, and individual Zernike components before and after surgery. The ET inhomogeneity over the central 3- and 6-mm cornea was quantified with coefficient of variance (CV).

RESULTS

Both ET and CV significantly increased 1 month postoperatively (all P < .05). The stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that ET and CV were significantly correlated with preoperative ET and CV, respectively (all P < .01). The corrected spherical equivalent also significantly influenced ET and CV (all P < .01). Over the central 6-mm zone, the alterations of total corneal HOAs and individual Zernike components such as vertical coma (Z7) and spherical aberration (Z12, Z24) were significantly correlated with ET and CV (all P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The SMILE-induced epithelial remodeling involved both ET and ET inhomogeneity. The modulation was associated with preoperative and treatment parameters, and exerted a significant impact on corneal HOA alterations especially over the central 6-mm cornea. Together with the amount of correction and corneal curvature gradient change, preoperative assessment of ET and ET inhomogeneity might help predict postoperative epithelial remodeling. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(1):23-32.].

Changes in anterior chamber dimensions following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the changes in anterior chamber dimensions including horizontal anterior chamber diameter (HACD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and iridocorneal angle (ICA) following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using Scheimpflug-Placido disk tomographer (Sirius).

METHODS

The records of the 73 eyes of 47 patients who received SMILE for myopia and myopic astigmatism were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT), HACD, ACD, ICA, nasal anterior chamber angle (nACA), and temporal anterior chamber angle (tACA) were obtained by tomography, and compared with paired t-tests. Pearson's correlation and linear regression tests were used to evaluate the relationship between these parameters.

RESULTS

The CCT, HACD, and ACD values decreased significantly at 6-month postoperatively (p < 0.05 for all). ICA, nACA, and tACA showed no statistically significant difference postoperatively (p = 0.54, p = 0.118, and p = 0.255, respectively). Pearson's correlation analysis confirms negative relationship between Δ-HACD and Δ-tACA (r = -0.475, p < 0.01), and a loose negative relationship between change in ACD and change in ICA (r = -0.282, p = 0.016). Age and Δ-tACA were found as predictive parameters for Δ-HACD and, Δ-ICA was a predictor for Δ-ACD.

CONCLUSION

While HACD and ACD decreased significantly, there was no significant change in ICA, nACA and tACA. Changes in HACD and ACD should be considered in terms of subsequent surgeries after SMILE.

Influence of optical zone on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction: a short-term study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the influence of preoperative optical zone on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction.

METHODS

In this retrospective clinical study, 581 eyes from 316 patients underwent SMILE were selected, including 117 eyes in the small optical zone group (range from 6.0 to 6.4 mm) and 464 eyes in the large optical zone group (range from 6.5 to 6.8 mm). The measurements included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical, and cylinder were measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed with age, gender, eye (right/left), keratometry and preoperative spherical equivalent between two different groups. The influence of optical zones on postoperative refractive outcomes were evaluated using univariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 78 pairs of eyes were selected by PSM (match ratio 1:1). There were no differences in the age, gender, eye (right/left), keratometry or preoperative spherical equivalent between the small and large optical zone groups. However, the difference of postoperative spherical equivalent was significantly between groups. Patients with larger optical zones had a trend towards less undercorrection (P = 0.018). Univariate linear regression model analysis found that each millimeter larger optical zone resulted in 8.13% or 0.39D less undercorrection (P < 0.001). The dependency between the optical zones and postoperative spherical equivalent was significant in the higher preoperative myopia group (r = 0.281, P < 0.001), but not significant in the lower myopia group (r = 0.028, P = 0.702).

CONCLUSION

The diameter of optical zones would affect postoperative refractive outcomes in small incision lenticule extraction. This study indicated that larger optical zones induced less undercorrection, especially in patients with high myopia.

Long-term changes in corneal densitometry and associated factors following small incision lenticule extraction for moderate and high myopia

Purpose

To investigate long-term trends in corneal densitometry and associated influencing factors following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

A comparative study was performed among 72 eyes of 38 patients undergoing SMILE. Eyes were divided into moderate myopia [mean spherical equivalent (SE),−4.22 ± 0.68D] and high myopia (mean SE,−7.63 ± 1.09 D) groups. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal topography and corneal densitometry (CD) were evaluated preoperatively and 3 years postoperatively.

Results

The efficacy indices at last postoperative follow-up (42.47 ± 0.51 months) were 0.92 ± 0.21 and 0.97 ± 0.22, the safety indices were 1.12 ± 0.17 and 1.14 ± 0.21 for high and moderate myopia, respectively (all P > 0.05). CD values in the 0–6 mm zone of the posterior corneal layer was statistically significantly lower than the preoperative values in both groups. Postoperative CD values (0–2 mm zone) in the posterior layer of the high myopia group were statistically significantly lower than in the moderate myopia group (P = 0.025); CD values (2–6 mm zone) in the anterior layer were higher in the high myopia group (P = 0.026). Correlation analyses showed that CD values in the 0–2 mm middle layer were negatively correlated with lenticule thickness in high myopia (r = −0.411, P = 0.016); there was a negative correlation between the CD values (0–6 mm) and corneal oblique trefoil in this group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Corneal transparency in the 0–6 mm zone of the posterior cornea increased following SMILE in moderate and high myopia. Long-term CD values in high myopia may be correlated with oblique trefoil and lenticule thickness.

Twelve-year global publications on small incision lenticule extraction: A bibliometric analysis

Purpose

To analyze the development process of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery in a 12-year period.

Methods

We conducted a literature search for SMILE research from 2011 to 2022 using the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). The VOS viewer, and CiteSpace software were used to perform the bibliometric analysis. Publication language, annual growth trend, countries/regions and institutions, journals, keywords, references, and citation bursts were analyzed.

Results

A total of 731 publications from 2011 to 2022 were retrieved. Annual publication records grew from two to more than 100 during this period. China had the highest number of publications (n = 326). Sixty-five keywords that appeared more than four times were classified into six clusters: femtosecond laser technology, dry eye, biomechanics, visual quality, complications, and hyperopia.

Conclusion

The number of literatures has been growing rapidly in the past 12 years. Our study provides a deep insight into publications on SMILE for researchers and clinicians with bibliometric analysis for the first time.

Large Population Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in Young Myopic Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for myopia in a large population of young adults.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, the patient population consisted of the first 4,138 consecutive SMILE treatments using the VisuMax femtosecond laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) between 2012 and 2018 at the London Vision Clinic. Inclusion criteria were myopic spherical equivalent up to -9.00 diopters (D), cylinder up to 6.00 D, corrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better, age younger than 40 years, and follow-up of 12 months. Outcomes analysis was performed using the Standard Graphs for Reporting Refractive Surgery.

RESULTS

Data were available at 12 months in 3,722 eyes (90%), and 416 eyes (10%) were lost to follow-up. Mean attempted spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was -4.61 ± 1.84 D (range: -1.12 to -9.00 D). Mean cylinder was -0.78 ± 0.66 D (range: 0.00 to -6.00 D). Postoperatively, the mean SEQ relative to target was -0.13 ± 0.30 D (range: -1.35 to +1.25 D) and was within ±0.50 D in 88.1% and ±1.00 D in 99.6% of eyes. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 95.4% of eyes and 20/25 or better in 98.7% of eyes. One line of CDVA was lost in 3.0% of eyes, and 0.08% (n = 3) lost two or more lines of CDVA, for which CDVA was restored following phototherapeutic keratectomy treatment. There was a statistically significant improvement of 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, and 0.07 log units for contrast sensitivity at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

SMILE achieved excellent outcomes for myopia up to -9.00 D with cylinder up to -5.50 D for a large population in patients without presbyopia. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(8):488-496.].

Survival analysis of myopic regression after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia

BACKGROUND

To report the predictive factors of myopic regression in patients who had undergone small incision lenticular extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileuses (FS-LASIK) after 3-12 months of follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective case series study recruited patients with a subjective sphere of - 1.00 to - 6.00 D myopia. SMILE was performed in 1629 eyes of 1629 patients with a subjective refraction spherical equivalent (SEQ) of - 4.57 ± 1.20 D and 1414 eyes of 1414 patients with a subjective SEQ of - 4.53 ± 1.26 D in FS-LASIK. Refractive outcomes were recorded at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Predictors affecting myopic regression and other covariates were estimated with a Cox proportional hazard (Cox PH) model for the two surgical methods.

RESULTS

At 12 months, no significant difference was evident in the efficacy (P = 0.934), predictability (P = 0.733), or stability (P = 0.66) between FS-LASIK and SMILE. The survival rates were 83.7% in the FS-LASIK group and 88.1% in the SMILE group. Multivariate analysis by the Cox PH model revealed a similar probability of postoperative myopic regression with SMILE or FS-LASIK (P = 0.630). Predictors of myopic regression included preoperative higher-order aberration root mean square with 3 mm pupil diameter (pre-HOA-RMS₃) (P = 0.004), anterior chamber depth (ACD) (P = 0.015), pre-subjective sphere (P = 0.016), corneal diameter (P = 0.016), optical zone (OZ) (P = 0.02), and predicted depth of ablation (DA) (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

SMILE and FS-LASIK had a similar risk of myopic regression for low to moderate myopia. Pre-HOA-RMS₃, ACD, pre-subjective sphere, corneal diameter, OZ, and predicted DA were predictors of myopic regression.

Comparison of fresh and preserved decellularized human corneal lenticules in femtosecond laser-assisted intrastromal lamellar keratoplasty

Substantial evidence has demonstrated the application of fresh and decellularized human corneal lenticules from increasing myopic surgeries. Further preservation of decellularized corneal lenticules would extend its clinical application. However, whether fresh and preserved decellularized lenticules have the same effects in vivo, including refractive correction, remains unclear. Here, we made comprehensive comparisons between fresh human lenticules (FHLs) and preserved decellularized human lenticules (DHLs). Another group of decellularized lenticules was combined with crosslinking for potential keratoconus therapy. Optical transparency, biomechanical properties, and fibrillar ultrastructure were analyzed to evaluate the DHLs and crosslinked DHLs (cDHLs) in vitro. The DHLs retained high transparency and regular ultrastructure, with genetic materials mostly being eliminated. The strength of lenticules in the cDHL group was markedly increased by crosslinking. Moreover, after storage in glycerol for 3 months, the lenticules were reimplanted into rabbit corneal lamellar pockets assisted by a femtosecond laser. The rabbits were followed for another 3 months. There were no obvious rejective complications in any of the three groups. From 1 week to 3 months postoperatively, the host corneas of the FHL group remained highly transparent, while slight hazes were observed in the DHL group. However, the corneas of the cDHL group displayed opacity throughout the 3-month postoperative period. Furthermore, all the lenticules could effectively induce corneal steepening and refractive changes. Taken together, our data indicated that FHLs are ideal inlay products, whereas preserved DHLs could be an alternative for intrastromal lamellar keratoplasty. Our study provides new insights into the clinical application of human lenticule recycling. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: : Currently, substantial evidence has demonstrated the application of fresh and decellularized human corneal lenticules from increasing myopic surgeries. Further preservation of decellularized lenticules would extend its clinical application. However, whether fresh and preserved decellularized lenticules have the same effects in vivo, including refractive correction, remains unclear. Herein, we decellularized human lenticules with or without mechanically strengthened crosslinking. After storage in glycerol for 3 months, the lenticules were reimplanted into rabbit corneas. Comprehensive comparisons were performed among fresh human lenticules (FHLs), decellularized human lenticules (DHLs) and crosslinked DHLs. Our study indicated that FHLs are ideal inlay products, whereas preserved DHLs could be an alternative for intrastromal lamellar keratoplasty. Our study provides new insights into the clinical application of human lenticule recycling.

Effective Optical Zone Following Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia Calculated With Two Novel Methods

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effective optical zone (EOZ) following small incision lenticule extraction in myopic eyes using two novel methods and investigate factors influencing postoperative EOZ.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 45 patients (45 eyes) with a mean spherical equivalent of -5.82 ± 1.58 diopters underwent SMILE and were observed during a 6-month follow-up. Postoperative EOZ was calculated using custom software that automatically distinguishes EOZ on the tangential curvature difference map (EOZc) and total corneal refractive power map (EOZp) of the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). The agreement between the two methods, the difference between postoperative EOZ and programmed optical zone (POZ), and its relationship with parameters including corrected spheres, cylinders, ablation ratio (ablation depth/central cornea thickness), and Q-value change were investigated.

RESULTS

The EOZc area was 20.76 ± 2.43 mm² (diameter: 5.04 ± 0.60 mm) and the EOZp area was 20.22 ± 4.70 mm² (diameter: 5.13 ± 0.30 mm). Both were significantly smaller than POZ (P < .001). Bland-Altman plots showed 4.44% (2/45) points located outside the 95% limits of agreement. EOZc and EOZp reductions were negatively related to corrected cylinders (r = -0.631, P < .001 and r = -0.594, P < .001, respectively). EOZp reduction was positively correlated with corrected spheres (r = 0.336, P = .024). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in EOZc and EOZp reduction between low and high astigmatism groups despite myopia degree.

CONCLUSIONS

EOZ after incision lenticule extraction, measured using two novel methods, was smaller than POZ. The reduction of EOZ was negatively correlated with the corrected cylinders. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(7):414-421.].

Evaluation of Wide Corneal Epithelial Remodeling after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) with Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose

This study aims to assess the corneal epithelial remodeling within a 9 mm diameter zone induced by small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and evaluate its relationship with the refractive outcomes.

Methods

A total of 64 eyes of 64 patients were included. Wide-field optical coherence tomography (OCT) was used to measure the epithelial thickness (ET) across a 9 mm diameter area, preoperatively, and after one day, one week, one month, three months, and six months postoperatively. The ET changes were compared among the different time points and analyzed zones.

Results

The ET increases from one week to three months and stabilized from three months to six months. Compared to the preoperative values, the mean ET changes at six months in central (2 mm), paracentral (2-5 mm), mid-peripheral (5-7 mm), and peripheral (7-9 mm) zones were 4.37, 4.36, 1.61, and -1.59 μm, respectively. The correlation between the epithelial thickening and the amount of myopia correction was positive in central (P = 0.001) and paracentral zones (P < 0.001) and negative in peripheral zone (P = 0.006). The intended diameter of the optical zone was negatively related to epithelial hyperplasia in the central (P = 0.020) and paracentral zone (P = 0.006), and the correlation was positive in the mid-peripheral zone (P = 0.001). The epithelial thickening of central zone (P = 0.012) and the difference of mean ET between central and paracentral zone (P = 0.020) were negatively related to the spherical equivalent at six months.

Conclusion

An asymmetric lenticule-like pattern of epithelial remodeling occurred in 9 mm diameter cornea at six months after myopic SMILE. The epithelial remodeling may affect the refractive outcomes of SMILE.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes and Refractive Stability following SMILE versus SMILE Combined with Accelerated Cross-Linking (SMILE XTRA)

Purpose

To compare the long-term safety, efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability following SMILE versus SMILE combined with accelerated cross-linking (SMILE XTRA), and to specifically study the regression patterns following the two procedures.

Methods

This retrospective study included 54 eyes of SMILE and 54 eyes of SMILE XTRA treated for normal and borderline cases of myopia/myopic astigmatism, respectively, based on certain predefined topographic features and risk factors. Patients in both the groups were matched for age and refractive error. The mean postoperative follow-up for the SMILE group was 22.18 ± 10.41 months and the SMILE XTRA group was 21.81 ± 10.19 months.

Results

At the end of follow-up, the mean sphere, cylinder, and SE reduced to −0.03, −0.09, and −0.08 D in the SMILE group and −0.06, −0.15, and −0.13 D in the SMILE XTRA group. 96% and 93% eyes remained within ±0.50 D in SMILE and SMILE XTRA groups, respectively, and 94% eyes maintained an UDVA of 20/20 or better in the SMILE as well as SMILE XTRA groups. Safety and efficacy indices for the SMILE group were 1.03 and 1.00. For the SMILE XTRA group, the safety and efficacy indices were 1.00 and 0.99. No eye in either group had postoperative ectasia or enhancement performed for significant residual refractive error.

Conclusion

Both the SMILE and SMILE XTRA groups exhibited comparable visual outcomes, safety, and efficacy. Contrary to the belief, combination of prophylactic CXL with SMILE did not result in a hyperopic shift in the long term. No eye in either group encountered postoperative ectasia; however, further follow-up is suggested to establish the long-term effects on refractive and corneal stability following SMILE XTRA, as all the eyes treated in this group were borderline.

Vector analysis of moderate to high myopic astigmatism after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): 12-month follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery in moderate to high myopic astigmatism.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective interventional case series.

METHODS

This study evaluated 111 eyes of 68 patients treated with femtosecond SMILE surgery for the correction of myopia and astigmatism. Inclusion criteria were myopia of - 0.5 D or more and astigmatism between - 1.0 D and -5.0 D. Refractive and visual measurements were obtained preoperatively, 1 and 12 month(s) postoperatively. Vector analysis was used to study the astigmatic outcomes at 12-month follow-up. Comparison of results in two groups of patients with astigmatism below and over 3.00 D was performed.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean spherical equivalent was -5.48 ± 2.17 D (range - 1.75 to - 10.00 D) and the mean cylinder was -2.02 ± 1.09 D (range - 1.00 to - 5.00 D). The mean postoperative cylinder value was -0.60 ± 0.52 D at 12-month visit. The 12-month safety and efficacy indices were 0.98 ± 0.07 and 0.97 ± 0.12, respectively. The high astigmatism group showed significantly lower safety and efficacy indices. The postoperative residual astigmatism was 0.5 D or less in 73% of the eyes. Higher amount of residual astigmatism was observed in the high astigmatism group. The angle of error was ± 5 degrees in 49% and ± 15 degrees in 87% of the eyes.

CONCLUSION

SMILE surgery is effective and safe method for correcting myopic astigmatism. Vector analysis indicated a tendency for the under correction of astigmatism in subjects with high astigmatism.

Long-term efficacy and safety profiles following small incision lenticule extraction in eyes with ≥ 5-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term efficacy, safety, predictability and stability (refractive and keratometric) of myopic and myopic astigmatism correction with Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

Single center retrospective review of eyes undergoing SMILE from 2012-2015. Forty-two eyes (23 patients) with ≥ 5-year follow-up. Variables analyzed were preoperative, 3-month, 1-year and last follow-up uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, spherical equivalent (SE) and mean keratometry. Descriptive statistics were performed and results reported following the Standard for Reporting Astigmatism Outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up of 5.98 ± 0.90 years. Mean preoperative SE was -5.26 ± 1.22D (range -2.50 to -8.12D). Mean preoperative cylinder was -0.66 ± 0.61D (range 0.00 to -2.25D). Efficacy and safety indices were 0.86 and 0.98, respectively. In total, 81% of operated eyes achieved an UDVA of ≥ 0.09 logMar (20/25 Snellen). At the last follow-up, ≥1 line of CDVA was gained in 14% of eyes. Five percent lost 1 line of CDVA, and no eye loss ≥2 lines of CDVA. Sixty-nine percent of eyes were within ± 0.50D and 86% within ± 1.00D of the attempted SE correction. Ninety-one percent of eyes had ≤0.50D of postoperative astigmatism and 71% were within ± 15° from the intended correction axis. At the final follow-up, a statistically significant myopic regression of 0.19 ± 0.50D was observed (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results demonstrate that SMILE is effective, predictable and safe. SMILE has good stability, low regression compared to LASIK, and no signs of corneal ectasia staging within our standard criteria.

Five-Year Follow-Up of Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction for Moderate and High Myopia

Introduction

This study investigated the long-term visual and optical quality changes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of moderate to high myopia.

Methods

Forty-one eyes of 41 patients with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of − 6.74 ± 1.45 D undergoing SMILE were enrolled. Preoperative and 1-month, 3-month, 1-year and 5-year postoperative follow-up examinations were performed including visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity. An optical quality analysis system was used to measure objective scatter index (OSI), Strehl ratio (SR) and modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF_cutoff).

Results

The safety and efficacy indices were 1.09 ± 0.12 and 1.03 ± 0.17, respectively, at the 5-year follow-up. No significant changes in SE from 1 month to 5 years postoperatively were found. The OSI significantly increased at 1 and 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01) and declined at 1 and 5 years (p = 0.81 and p = 0.87). MTF_cutoff and SR showed similar trends. Coma, spherical aberration and total higher-order aberration significantly increased after SMILE (p < 0.01) and remained stable from 1 month to 5 years after surgery (p > 0.05). Contrast sensitivity in the photopic and mesopic condition showed no significant changes during 5-year follow-up (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The SMILE procedure is satisfactory in terms of optical quality for correcting moderate and high myopia in the long-term period.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR-ONRC-13003114.

Time-varying regularity of changes in biomechanical properties of the corneas after removal of anterior corneal tissue

Background

The corneal biomechanical properties with the prolongation of time after corneal refractive surgery are important for providing a mechanical basis for the occurrence of clinical phenomena such as iatrogenic keratectasia and refractive regression. The aim of this study was to explore the changes of corneal elastic modulus, and stress relaxation properties from the 6-month follow-up observations of rabbits after a removal of anterior corneal tissue in simulation to corneal refractive surgery.

Methods

The anterior corneal tissue, 6 mm in diameter and 30–50% of the original corneal thickness, the left eye of the rabbit was removed, and the right eye was kept as the control. The rabbits were normally raised and nursed for 6 months, during which corneal morphology data, and both of corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were gathered. Uniaxial tensile tests of corneal strips were performed at months 1, 3, and 6 from 7 animals, and corneal collagen fibrils were observed at months 1, 3, and 6 from 1 rabbit, respectively.

Results

Compared with the control group, there were statistical differences in the curvature radius at week 2 and month 3, and both CH and CRF at months 1, 2, and 6 in experiment group; there were statistical differences in elastic modulus at 1, 3, and month 6, and stress relaxation degree at month 3 in experiment group. The differences in corneal elastic modulus, stress relaxation degree and the total number of collagen fibrils between experiment and control groups varied gradually with time, and showed significant changes at the 3rd month after the treatment.

Conclusions

Corneas after a removal of anterior corneal tissue undergo dynamic changes in corneal morphology and biomechanical properties. The first 3 months after treatment could be a critical period. The variation of corneal biomechanical properties is worth considering in predicting corneal deformation after a removal of anterior corneal tissue.

Bilateral Lenticule Creation Followed by Bilateral Lenticule Separation Improves Visual Outcomes After SMILE

PURPOSE

To explore the impact of different surgical sequences on the visual and refractive outcomes of bilateral small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

METHODS

Participants who underwent uneventful SMILE between March 2018 and September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into two groups: Sequence A (laser scanning [LS] of the right eye, manual separation lenticule [MSL] of the right eye, and LS and MSL of the left eye) and Sequence B (LS of the right eye, LS of the left eye, MSL of the left eye, and MSL of the right eye). PSM was conducted to minimize the effect of confounding factors on postoperative visual outcomes at days 1 and 7 and months 1, 3, and 6. Safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,854 eyes of 927 participants were included (Sequence A, n = 280; Sequence B, n = 647). After PSM, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, and 534 eyes (267 patients) in the Sequence A group were matched (1:1) to the Sequence B group. The postoperative corrected distance visual acuity significantly differed between groups at 3 months (adjusted P = .007). The uncorrected distance visual acuity significantly differed between groups at all follow-up visits (adjusted P < .01). The safety index (1.341 ± 0.265 and 1.413 ± 0.294) and efficacy index (1.173 ± 0.191 and 1.251 ± 0.269) were different in the Sequence A and Sequence B groups, respectively, at 3 months (adjusted P < .01). No difference in visual outcomes was found between right and left eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had bilateral lenticule creation followed by bilateral lenticule separation had better postoperative visual outcomes than those who underwent complete SMILE surgery in each eye separately. Regardless of the surgical sequence chosen for the SMILE procedure, there was no impact on outcomes between the right and left eyes. Adjusting the sequence of the surgical procedure may be a way to improve the visual results. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(11):726-733.].

Visual Outcomes After Implantation of Allogenic Lenticule in a 100-µm Pocket for Moderate to High Hyperopia: 2-Year Results

PURPOSE

To investigate 2-year visual outcomes, stability, and predictability after allogenic lenticule implantation in a 100-µm pocket for moderate to high hyperopia correction.

METHODS

In this prospective case series, 14 eyes of 9 patients with moderate to high hyperopia ranging from +3.00 to +8.00 diopters sphere were included between March and September 2018. Allogenic lenticules extracted from myopic small incision lenticule extraction were implanted into a pocket created by femtosecond laser at a 100-µm depth in recipients with hyperopia. All patients were followed up for 2 years. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, corneal topography, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography, and in vivo confocal microscopy were examined.

RESULTS

At postoperative 2 years, 2 eyes (14.3%) gained one line of CDVA, 11 eyes (78.6%) had unchanged CDVA, and 1 eye (7.1%) lost one line of CDVA. No eyes lost two or more lines of CDVA. Twelve of the treated eyes (85.7%) had postoperative uncorrected near visual acuity equal to or better than pre-operative values. The spherical equivalent decreased from +5.53 ± 1.45 D preoperatively to -0.60 ± 1.20 D at postoperative year 2 (P < .001). The anterior mean keratometric readings increased from 42.41 ± 1.03 D preoperatively to 48.38 ± 1.98 D at postoperative year 2 (P < .001). Of 14 treated eyes, 10 eyes (71.4%) had spherical equivalent within ±1.00 D.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that allogenic lenticule transplantation may be a promising option for the correction of moderate to high hyperopia. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(11):734-740.].

Monson small-incision lenticule extraction fixation device

Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a stromal based, flapless, minimally invasive form of laser vision correction for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SMILE surgery is a more technical procedure compared with other refractive surgeries and generally has a longer skill mastery acquisition period. Thus far, no new stabilization devices or techniques have been proposed. To rectify this, a new distal corneal countertraction device for SMILE surgery, the Monson SMILE Fixation Device, is introduced. This device provides reliable corneal and globe stabilization during delamination and lenticular dissection. It may minimize tissue distortion and manipulation, simplify lenticule dissection, and may decrease operation times and improve cosmesis. Countertraction can also easily be adjusted throughout the procedure.

Refractive results with SMILE using lower energy settings in the United States

Purpose

To report the visual and refractive results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with low energy settings in the United States (US) and to evaluate outcomes for low astigmatism treatment.

Setting

Private clinical practice.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed 462 consecutive eyes that underwent SMILE with lower energy settings. Inclusion criteria included all patients between the ages of 19–39 with myopic astigmatism up to -11.25 diopters (D) spherical equivalent (sphere up to -10.00 D, astigmatism up to -3.00 D), and corrected distance visual acuity of at least 20/25. Eyes with low astigmatism (0.25 D-0.50 D) were also included. Outcome analysis was performed according to the Standard Graphs for Reporting Refractive Surgery at postoperative month (POM) 1, and POM 3–6 when data were available.

Results

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent treated was -4.96 ± 2.07; at POM 1, 92% of eyes achieved uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better and maintained visual stability throughout the remainder of the study. At last visit, 431 eyes (93%) achieved UCVA of 20/20 or better, and 461 eyes (99.8%) were 20/25 or better. Ninety-seven (21%) eyes gained at least 1 Snellen line of corrected distance visual acuity and no eyes lost 2 or more lines. Almost all eyes (n = 453, 98%) were within 0.5D of target; 85% of eyes with low astigmatism had ≤0.25 D at last visit compared to 80% of eyes with moderate astigmatism.

Conclusions

SMILE with U.S.-approved low energy settings is safe, predictable, and efficacious and provides patients with a fast visual recovery.

7-Year Results of SMILE for High Myopia: Visual and Refractive Outcomes and Aberrations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 7-year visual, refractive, and optical outcomes following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia and myopic astigmatism.

METHODS

Sixty-nine eyes (69 patients) undergoing SMILE between March 2011 and January 2012 at Aarhus University Hospital were included. Preoperative, 3-month, 3-year, and 7-year evaluation included: manifest refraction and uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, total corneal refractive power (TCRP), average keratometry (Km), aberrations, and central corneal thickness (CCT).

RESULTS

Preoperative spherical equivalent averaged -7.53 ± 1.18 diopters (D). Twenty-seven eyes were targeted emmetropia. In the emmetropic eyes, the postoperative logMAR UDVA remained stable (P = .11). When including all eyes, UDVA became worse from 3 to 7 years (3 months: 0.050 ± 0.16 logMAR; 3 years: 0.044 ± 0.21 logMAR; 7 years: 0.131 ± 0.29 logMAR; P < .027), whereas CDVA remained stable (3 months: -0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR; 3 years: -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR; 7 years: -0.09 ± 0.08 logMAR, P > .99). At 7 years, 59.4% and 81.2% were within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D of target refraction, respectively. Average refractive regression was significant from 3 months to 7 years (-0.34 ± 0.69 D) and from 3 to 7 years (-0.25 ± 0.41 D, P < .05). After exclusion of three outliers with high myopic correction (< 9.63 D) and considerable regression (<-1.50 D), the average regression over 7 years was -0.25 ± 0.49 D (P = .004) with no significant change from 3 to 7 years (P = .069). Average CCT, TCRP, and anterior Km significantly increased (P < .001), whereas the posterior Km and total corneal aberrations remained stable (P > .092).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term visual outcome remained stable after SMILE, but with an average regression of -0.34 D over 7 years. A minor group with high myopic correction exhibited considerable refractive regression years after SMILE. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(10):654-661.].

Changes in Intraocular Pressure and Factors that Influence such Changes after FS-LASIK and SMILE

Purpose: We compared the intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and the relationships thereof with corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).Methods: A total of 234 eyes of 117 patients who underwent FS-LASIK surgery and 244 eyes of 122 patients who underwent SMILE surgery were included in this retrospective study. Data were collected preoperatively, and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, including IOP measured via non-contract tonometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), and mean keratometry (Km), flat keratometry (Kf), and steep keratometry (Ks) data obtained using a dual Scheimpflug analyzer. Between-group differences were compared. Simple linear regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between changes in the IOP and the various parameters.Results: The IOP changes were 5.41 ± 2.28 mmHg in the FS-LASIK group and 4.77 ± 2.38 mmHg in the SMILE group, thus significantly different (p = 0.004). The IOP did not change significantly from 1 to 6 months after FS-LASIK but increased significantly from 12.07 ± 1.77 mmHg at 3 months postoperatively to 12.77 ± 1.89 mmHg at 6 months postoperatively after SMILE (p = 0.002). All of the preoperative spherical equivalent and IOP, and changes in the Km, Kf, Ks, and CCT, were significantly associated with the IOP changes in both groups. The preoperative IOP evidenced the strongest relationship with the IOP changes in both groups (R2 = 0.414 in the FS-LASIK group, R2 = 0.292 in the SMILE group).Conclusions: The IOP fell significantly after FS-LASIK and SMILE surgery, significantly more so after FS-LASIK than SMILE. The preoperative IOP exhibited the greatest influence on the IOP decreases after both FS-LASIK and SMILE.

Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Small Incision Allogeneic Endokeratophakia Using a Hyperopic Lenticule in Rabbits

Purpose

To investigate the morphologic and histopathologic changes in allogeneic endokeratophakia using hyperopic lenticules derived from small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

Six New Zealand rabbits (12 eyes) were included in this experiment and randomly and evenly divided into donor and recipient groups. The donor group underwent bilateral hyperopic SMILE surgery, and the concave lenticules were implanted into eyes in the recipient group. Corneal topography and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) examinations were performed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 5 months after surgery. All eyes were enucleated 5 months after surgery. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to observe the corneal morphology in the recipient group.

Results

No complications were observed, and the corneas remained transparent in the follow-up period. There was mild corneal edema within 1 week after surgery. Slit-lamp microscopy and OCT showed that the lenticules were gradually integrated with the surrounding corneal stroma. HE staining showed that the arrangement of corneal collagen was regular. The boundary between the lenticules and surrounding tissue could be identified with HE staining and TEM, and no inflammatory cells were found under TEM. The corneal Km values were significantly lower at 5 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

This pilot study showed that allogeneic hyperopic SMILE lenticule endokeratophakia seems to be safe and feasible.

Translational Relevance

Allogeneic hyperopic SMILE lenticule endokeratophakia may be applicable for the correction of corneal regression, ectasia, ultra-high myopia, or keratoconus.

Nighttime Symptoms After Monocular SMILE: A Contralateral Eye Study

Introduction

To investigate nighttime symptoms in patients with myopic anisometropia after monocular small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery.

Methods

Thirty-six patients who had undergone monocular SMILE more than 6 months previously were recruited at the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University. The average age at surgery was 25.4 ± 6.1 years. Preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was −3.77 ± 1.56 D in SMILE-treated eyes and −0.08 ± 0.66 D in unoperated eyes. Main measurements included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, halo radius, contrast sensitivity, nighttime symptoms, and patient satisfaction.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 13.9 ± 3.4 months. The efficacy and safety indexes were 1.18 and 1.28, respectively. The halo radius was not significantly different between SMILE-treated and unoperated eyes under luminance conditions of 1, 5, and 100 cd/m² (P = 0.055). No significant differences were observed in contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies between eyes under both uncorrected and corrected conditions (all P > 0.05). None of the patients reported moderate or severe symptoms at night. Mild symptoms (glare, halo, starburst) were reported and binocularly equal in 13 patients, whereas four patients reported better night vision in SMILE-treated eyes than unoperated eyes, and one of them experienced mild night vision disturbance. The overall satisfaction score was 9.39 ± 0.80.

Conclusions

The disk halo size and contrast sensitivity in SMILE-treated eyes were similar to those in unoperated eyes, and nighttime symptoms almost completely resolved after SMILE.

Cap recovery technique and double-edge sign during small-incision lenticule extraction

PURPOSE

To describe a new technique for identifying the upper (cap) interface during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). If the lower interface is dissected first it can be challenging to locate the cap interface and complete the lenticule separation.

SETTING

London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

METHODS

The routine protocol was to open the primary small incision and separate the cap interface, followed by the lenticule interface. If the lenticule interface was dissected first, the modified Sinskey tip was inserted through the superior end of the incision, tangentially along the cap edge interface and then rotated anteriorly to engage the edge of the lenticule adherent to the underside of the cap. The Sinskey tip is then drawn inferiorly, creating a pocket of separation of the lenticule from the cap, enabling the dissection bulb and spatula to be used to dissect the upper interface.

RESULTS

A total of 629 consecutive eyes undergoing SMILE using the VisuMax femtosecond laser were included. The routine surgical protocol (cap interface first) was followed in 88% of eyes and the lenticule interface first in 12% of eyes. The lenticule was extracted successfully in all cases. Uncorrected distance visual acuity at the 1-day postoperative visit was 20/25 or better in 81% of the cap interface first group and 86% of the lenticule interface first group.

CONCLUSIONS

The visual results using this cap recovery technique were equivalent to those when a routine SMILE dissection was performed. The technique allowed surgeons to rescue more challenging cases where identifying the different interfaces was difficult. This technique meant that separating the lenticule interface first should no longer be considered a complication of SMILE.

Scheimpflug analysis of corneal power changes after hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction

Purpose

To assess the ability of the Pentacam in predicting the corneal power after hyperopic small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

Twenty-five eyes of 22 patients underwent hyperopic SMILE were prospectively followed. All patients finished at least 6 months visit. Cornea power was obtained by Pentacam HR, in the format of mean keratometry (Km), equivalent keratometry (EKR) and total cornea refractive power (TCRP). Calculation of TCRP were centered on either the corneal apex or the pupil center within a ring or zone, giving a total of four different subtypes naming AR、AZ、PR、PZ. Clinical history method (CHM) was regarded as a gold standard and was compared with other cornea power parameters.

Results

Center difference had no impact on the TCRP values (PR vs AR and PZ vs AZ, P > 0.05). Compared with CHM, no difference was found in Km, EKR 4.0 mm, EKR 4.5 mm, PR 3.0 mm, PR 4.0 mm, AR 3.0 mm and AR 4.0 mm. PR 4.0 mm showed the least difference with CHM (− 0.14 ± 1.03D, P > 0.05). The 95% limit of agreement (LOA) of the TCRPs and CHM was not close. The top two were PR 3.0 mm and PR 4.0 mm, LOA of which were − 2.20 to 1.84 D and − 2.18 to 1.68 D respectively. Central cornea thickness was correlated with error (TCRP – CHM) of PR 4.0 mm (r = 0.58, P = 0.003).

Conclusions

The Pentacam topographer is an alternative method of measuring corneal power in eyes after hyperopic SMILE. The optimal options seem to be the TCRP (PR 4.0 mm). The agreement needs more verifications.

[Long-term outcomes of PRK, LASIK and SMILE]

BACKGROUND

Patients and refractive surgeons have a legitimate interest in the long-term results of the most commonly used laser procedures for correction of ametropia.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety, predictability, stability and late complications according to the current recommendations of the committee for refractive surgery (KRC).

METHODS

Literature search in PubMed with the search term "long-term outcome" combined with either "PRK", "LASIK" or "SMILE". Articles about PRK and LASIK with a minimum follow-up of 10 years and SMILE with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were evaluated and duplications were eliminated.

RESULTS

From a total of 440 articles that matched these search terms 15 articles were selected and analyzed. The results of PRK were described in 4 studies with a total of 666 eyes, 7 studies (566 eyes) described the results of LASIK and 5 studies (188 eyes) the results after SMILE.

CONCLUSION

Long-term studies with follow-up periods of at least 10 years have shown that PRK and LASIK treatment carried out in the early days of medical excimer lasers have a very high level of safety and late complications occurred only rarely. The effectiveness of particularly high corrections declined over time. In contrast, there was no clinically significant regression within the indications recommended by the KRC. The results of SMILE were not inferior to those of PRK and LASIK. In direct long-term comparisons no procedure showed a clear superiority. Due to technological improvements in hardware and software for both preoperative diagnostics and lasers, treatment performed nowadays is presumably even safer, more efficient and also more stable over a long period of time.

Age-related differences in corneal nerve regeneration after SMILE and the mechanism revealed by metabolomics

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of age on wound healing after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and the underlying metabolomic mechanisms.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted on 216 patients in four groups: the 18-20 (n = 38, Group I), 21-30 (n = 84, Group Ⅱ), 31-40 (n = 58, Group Ⅲ), and 41-50 (n = 36, Group IV) age groups. The density of corneal epithelial wing cells, basal cells, corneal stromal cells, endothelial cells and corneal nerves were examined with a laser confocal microscope (HRT III-RCM) before and 1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year after SMILE. The central nerve fiber length (CNFL), the central corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), and the central corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) were analyzed by Nero J. The corneal stroma lenticules were obtained from SMILE to analyze metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-QTOF-MS).

RESULTS

The density of corneal wing epithelial cells and basal epithelial cells have no significant difference among the four groups. The CNFL was 21.90 ± 1.68 mm/mm² in Group Ⅰ and 21.63 ± 2.09 mm/mm² in Group Ⅱ after 1 year of SMILE, which represented a return to the preoperative level, whereas the CNFL of Group Ⅲ (19.40 ± 0.98 mm/mm²) and Group Ⅳ (18.94 ± 0.72 mm/mm²) were lower than that preoperation (P ˂0.01). CNFL repair had a negative correlation with age after surgery (Pearson's R = -0.572, P ˂0.01). The CNFD and the CNBD showed the same trend with the CNFL (Pearson's R = -0.602 and -0.531, P ˂0.05). Through screening the significantly different metabolites between the 18-30 age group (including Group I and Group Ⅱ) and other two groups, 6 common remarkably different metabolites were identified. Meanwhile, 5 unique different metabolites were identified only between the 18-30 age group and the 31-40 age group. Six unique different metabolites were identified only between the 18-30 age group and the 41-50 age group.

CONCLUSION

Corneal nerve repair after SMILE was significantly affected by age. The identified age-associated differences in metabolites were mainly related to inflammation, oxidation, nerve protection and regeneration.

Outcomes of bioptics with small-incision lenticule extraction as a sequential treatment after implantable collamer lens for management of extreme myopia

PURPOSE

To study the safety and efficacy of bioptics using implantable collamer lens (ICL) followed by small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for management of extreme myopia.

SETTING

Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for patients who underwent bioptics using ICL in the first stage and SMILE in the second stage for correction of the residual refractive error. The mean interval between stage 1 and stage 2 correction was 24.2 ± 13.33 days. The mean follow-up after the SMILE procedure was 12.26 ± 1.39 (range 11 to 14) months.

RESULTS

Fifteen eyes from 9 patients with mean age 26 ± 4.69 years were included. Preoperatively, the mean SE was -22.89 ± 3.04 diopter (D) (-16.50 to -28.00 D), which decreased to -3.40 ± 1.89 D after ICL and further reduced to -0.48 ± 0.24 D after final correction with SMILE, at the end of the mean follow-up. The mean cylinder reduced from -2.88 ± 1.69 D to -1.93 ± 1.07D post-ICL and to -0.38 ± 0.24 D post-SMILE surgery. The mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) significantly improved from 0.38 ± 0.22 to 0.068 ± 0.09 logMAR after SMILE correction (P = .00). The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at the end of follow-up was 0.15 ± 0.09 logMAR, with all eyes achieving UDVA of 0.3 logMAR or greater. All eyes had gain in CDVA, with 53% eyes gaining 2 or more lines. No wound-, intraocular pressure-, or ICL-related complications were observed during and after the SMILE surgery. No patient required spectacles, contact lenses, or enhancement for further improvement of vision.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioptics with SMILE after ICL implantation might be a valid option for extremely myopic patients, resulting in significant improvements in visual acuity and high patient satisfaction.

Small incision lenticule extraction retreatment in a patient with high residual refractive error after photorefractive keratectomy: A case report

A 36-year-old male underwent uneventful small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of his high residual refractive error 12 years after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Preoperatively, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was counting fingers in both eyes. Corrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 in the right and 20/30 in the left eye due to amblyopia. One month after SMILE, UDVA was 20/20 and 20/30 in the right and left eye, respectively; post-PRK corneal haze had reduced. During the 4-year follow-up, UDVA remained stable and there were no complications. SMILE could be a good alternative approach for retreatment in post-PRK patient.

Analysis of factors associated with unintended initial dissection of the posterior plane during small incision lenticule extraction

Background

To investigate potential risk factors for unintended initial dissection of the posterior plane in the initial learning curve of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

Data were derived from consecutive 263 eyes of 136 patients who underwent SMILE at the beginning of the surgeon's learning curve. Probabilities of unintended initial dissection of the posterior plane in left and right eyes were analyzed. Preoperative sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent (SE), J0, J45, lenticular diameter, lenticular thickness, corneal thickness, and axial length were assessed between eyes in which posterior plane dissection was unintended and those in which it was not.

Results

Unintended initial dissection of the posterior plane occurred in 29 eyes, corresponding to an incidence rate of 11.03%. The probability of difficulty in plane dissection in the left eye was significantly higher than that in the right eye (P=0.003). Significant differences were found in sphere (T =2.8, P=0.006), SE (T =2.37, P=0.019), J0 (T =2.05, P=0.043) and axial length (T =-2.79, P=0.006) between eyes with and without unintended initial dissection of the posterior plane.

Conclusions

In the present study, difficulty in plane dissection during SMILE was encountered significantly more often in left eyes for a right-hand doctor, and in eyes with low SE or high J0 values. Special attention should be paid to prevent unintended initial dissection of the posterior plane in such situations.

Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): Myths and Realities

The emergence of SMILE in the last decade has provided an alternative to LASIK for patients considering cornea laser refractive surgery. SMILE offers a novel approach using the femtosecond laser to create an intrastromal lenticule that can be removed through a small three to four millimeter incision.The purpose of this study is to review the recent literature on popular SMILE claims - reduced iatrogenic dry eye, better recovery of corneal sensation, and a biomechanically stronger cornea - summarize the published outcomes, and determine which claims are myths versus realities.SMILE is still in its infancy as a refractive technique in the US after recent USFDA approval for its treatment of myopia astigmatism in October 2018. Future randomized controlled studies are needed to compare its outcomes to LASIK, which has well-documented good visual outcomes, rapid postoperative recovery, and good safety profile.

Seven-year observation of posterior corneal elevation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in patients with moderate and high myopia

Purpose

To investigate the long-term changes in posterior corneal elevation in moderate and high myopia after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Setting

Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University.

Design

Prospective case series.

Methods

Thirty-three eyes of 20 patients (30.1+/-9.5 years, 7 male and 13 female, spherical equivalent [SE] range -4.00 to -8.75 D, average SE -6.25+/-1.29 D) who underwent SMILE were included. Changes in the posterior corneal elevation at central points (PCE), the thinnest point (PTE), the maximal point (PME), and an additional 20 points within the 4-mm area of the best-fit sphere were evaluated with a Pentacam (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) during a 7-year follow-up period. Mixed linear models were used to evaluate changes with P-values <0.05. Correlations of elevation changes and residual bed thickness (RBT) were also evaluated.

Results

No ectasia was observed among the 33 eyes. The safety index was 1.08, and the efficacy index was 1.03. The mean change in PCE at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years was -1.42+/-0.95, -2.67+/-0.98, -2.44+/-1.06, and -1.91+/-0.92 [micro]m, respectively. Significant differences were found at 3, 5, and 7 years (P=0.007, 0.023, and 0.040, respectively). PTE was significantly reduced at each time point compared to baseline. The mean change was -2.82+/-1.19, -3.55+/-1.22, -3.47+/-1.32, and -2.39+/-1.15 [micro]m, respectively (P=0.019, 0.004, 0.010, and 0.039, respectively). PME changed 2.45+/-1.02 [micro]m at 7 years compared to baseline (P=0.017). The changes in PCE and PME negatively correlated with the RBT.

Conclusions

Long-term posterior corneal elevation was stable in moderate and high myopia after SMILE.

Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results

PURPOSE

To compare 1-year visual outcomes after implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate myopia.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 67 eyes of 39 patients with a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent between - 3.00 and - 6.00 diopters (D) were selected from a database of SMILE and ICL implantation procedures performed from April 2018 to December 2018. Thirty-two eyes of 20 patients underwent EVO-ICL implantation, and 35 eyes of 19 patients underwent SMILE. At the routine 1-year follow-up appointment, all selected patients were examined for higher-order ocular aberrations, retinal image quality, and a quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. This data was then analyzed.

RESULTS

No complications were observed. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at 1 year after surgery were - 0.13 ± 0.07 and - 0.15 ± 0.06 logMAR in the SMILE group, and - 0.10 ± 0.07 and - 0.16 ± 0.05 logMAR in the ICL group. Twenty-nine eyes (90.6%) which underwent ICL implantation and 34 eyes (97.1%) which underwent SMILE were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted spherical equivalent (P = 0.49). Changes in coma after ICL were significantly less than after SMILE (P = 0.002). The leading complaints after ICL and SMILE were halos (84.4%) and blurred vision (65.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SMILE and ICL implantation provided good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting moderate myopia. The subjective visual complaints consisted mainly of halos after ICL and starbursts and blurred vision after SMILE.