Simultaneous Topography-Guided PRK/CXL Versus Topography-Assisted PTK/CXL: 1-Year Prospective Outcomes in Keratoconic Eyes

Merging PRK and Collagen Crosslinking: An Analysis of Literature and a Guide to Prevalent Protocols

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review was to summarize the different surgical approaches combining photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal crosslinking (CXL), present each protocol template in a simple format, and provide an overview of the primary outcomes and adverse events.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted as outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Eight different databases were searched. Papers were included if PRK was immediately followed by CXL.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven papers met the inclusion criteria of a total yield of 823. The latest research into simultaneous PRK and CXL has been shown to not only stabilize the cornea and prevent keratoconus progression but also improve the visual acuity of the patient. Improvements in uncorrected distance visual acuity and (spectacle) corrected distance visual acuity were found to be significant when considering all protocols. There were also significant reductions in K1, K2, mean K, Kmax, sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent. Random-effects analysis confirmed these trends. Corrected distance visual acuity was found to improve by an average of 0.18 ± 1.49 logMAR (Cohen's D [CD] 0.12; P <0.02). There was also a significant reduction of 2.57 ± 0.45 D (CD 5.74; P <0.001) in Kmax. Cylinder and spherical equivalent were also reduced by 1.36 ± 0.26 D (CD 5.25; P <0.001) and 2.61 ± 0.38 D (CD 6.73; P <0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining the 2 procedures appears to be of net benefit, showing stabilization and improvement of ectatic disease, while also providing modest gains in visual acuity. Since customized PRK and CXL approaches appear superior, a combination of these would likely be best for patients.

Refractive surgical approaches to keratoconus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Advancements in diagnostic methods and surgical techniques for keratoconus (KC) have increased non-invasive treatment options. Successful surgical planning for KC involves a combination of clinical science, empirical evidence, and surgical expertise. Assessment of disease progression is crucial, and halting the progression should be the focus if it is progressive. While surgeons used to rely on experience alone to decide the surgical method, comparing the network of primary factors, such as visual acuity, across studies can help them choose the most appropriate treatments for each patient and achieve optimal outcomes. Meticulous tabulation methods facilitate interpretation, highlighting the importance of selecting the correct surgical and rehabilitation approach based on each patient's condition and stage of the disease. We detail the outcomes of a comprehensive network meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of various combined therapeutic refractive treatments for KC at identical stages of the disease, spanning four distinct follow-up intervals. Additionally, the comprehensive analysis suggests that for corneas with optimal best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) preoperatively (classified as regular), combining phakic intraocular lenses with intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) and corneal cross-linking (CXL) could offer the best therapeutic approach provided the disease stage does not exceed stage 3. For irregular corneas, although initial follow-ups show a significant difference in BCVA with surface ablation, longer-term follow-ups recommend combining surface ablation with ICRS and CXL, especially at higher stages.

Simultaneous Topography-guided Custom Ablation With Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: 10-Year Prospective Outcomes

PURPOSE

To assess 10-year visual and tomographic outcomes of topography-guided custom ablation (T-CAT) with corneal cross-linking (CXL) in eyes with keratoconus.

METHODS

T-CAT with CXL was performed in 600 eyes (522 patients). Based on the T-CAT ablation plan, the theoretical maximum ablation depth was 50 µm after epithelium removal. After ablation, accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) was performed in the central 8-mm zone (9 mW/cm2 for 10 minutes in "epi-off" mode). The visual acuity and tomography were assessed.

RESULTS

There was significant improvement in uncorrected (P = .001) and corrected (P = .001) distance visual acuity after the procedure. Keratometry, root mean square lower order aberrations and higher order aberrations, defocus, coma 90°, and spherical aberration reduced significantly after surgery at 10 years of follow-up (P < .005). All Pentacam (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH) tomographic variables showed significant changes indicating regularization after T-CAT (P < .005). Flattening of greater than 5.00 diopters in maximum keratometry was noted in 6 eyes (1%). Two of 600 eyes progressed postoperatively and required repeat CXL.

CONCLUSIONS

T-CAT plus CXL is a safe and effective technique even in the long term for regularizing the anterior corneal surface with significant visual improvement and reduction in higher order corneal aberrations. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):759-766.].

Keratoconus Diagnosis and Treatment: Recent Advances and Future Directions

Keratoconus is a disorder characterized by progressive corneal thinning and steepening that may result in significant visual impairment secondary to high astigmatism, corneal scarring, or even corneal perforation. Early detection and screening of keratoconus are essential for effective management and treatment. Several screening methods, such as corneal topography and tomography, corneal biomechanics, and genetic testing, are being developed to detect keratoconus at an early stage. Once detected, prevention of progression is the mainstay of keratoconus management. Corneal collagen cross-linking is a minimally invasive treatment option that can slow or halt the progression of keratoconus. Additionally, recent studies have investigated the potential use of copper sulfate eye drops (IVMED-80) and extracellular vesicles to prevent the progression of keratoconus as non-invasive treatment options. For visual rehabilitation, currently available treatments include scleral lenses, intracorneal ring segments, corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments, and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. The safety and efficacy of these emerging treatment options for keratoconus are currently being investigated.

Outcomes of topography-guided PRK/CXL in keratoconus using the NIDEK CXIII system-"Bharat Protocol" (Pilot study)

Purpose

Outcome of topography-guided excimer laser ablation in conjunction with accelerated, high-fluence cross-linking in corneal ecstatic disease using the NIDEK CXIII equipped with CATz algorithm from the FinalFit software-"Bharat Protocol."

Methods

Retrospective case record review of 30 eyes of 17 patients of stage 1-3 keratoconus who underwent the procedure was performed. Data collected were for visual acuity, distortion-induced eye pain, and keratometry. Pachymetry, lower order and higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and topographic cylinder were documented from by Scheimpflug imaging (Pentacam 70700: Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany).

Results

At a minimum follow-up of 6 months (range 6.2-13 months), there was significant improvement in UCVA (P < 0.00001), BCVA (P = 0.0061), decrease in Kmax (P = 0.0349), Ksteep (P < 0.0411), Kflat (P = 0.0099), and pachymetry (P = 0.0001). Significant improvement was also seen in distortion-induced eye pain (27/30 to 2/30; P < 0.00001). A more than two-line improvement in UCVA and BCVA was seen in 23/30 and 17/30 cases, respectively. Ectasia was stabilized in all cases at the last follow-up, and no complications were seen.

Conclusions

The "Bharat" Protocol to arrest keratectasia progression and improve corneal regularity is a safe and efficacious alternative as a keratoconus management option. This is the first such study on Nidek Platform for the same.

The Impact of Epithelial Remodeling on Surgical Techniques Used in Topography-guided Surface Ablation in Irregular Corneas

PURPOSE

To analyze the optical consequences of epithelial remodeling in irregular corneas and their impact on the choice of different surface ablation techniques.

METHODS

Anterior corneal and stromal surface topographies and epithelial thickness maps were analyzed in 24 eyes with irregular corneal optics. On two of the eyes, four different surface ablation techniques were simulated: (1) conventional anterior topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), (2) transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK), (3) transepithelial anterior topography-guided PRK, and (4) stromal topography-guided PRK.

RESULTS

Stromal surface topographies showed higher keratometric values, astigmatism, asphericity, and corneal higher order aberrations compared to topographies of anterior corneas covered by epithelium. Transepithelial anterior topography-guided PRK and stromal topography-guided PRK both resulted in regularized stromal surface, transepithelial PTK achieved partial regularization corresponding to the smoothing effect of the epithelial remodeling, and conventional anterior topography-guided PRK delivered after epithelial removal resulted in residual stromal surface irregularities.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in optical landscapes between the stromal and anterior surfaces in irregular corneas will represent a source of error when anterior topography-guided treatments are delivered on the deepithelialized stroma, as in conventional PRK. In contrast, anterior topography-guided ablations performed as transepithelial PRK and stromal topography-guided PRK delivered after epithelial removal address the full stromal irregularity, whereas transepithelial PTK alone may be used when topography-guided treatments are not possible. The authors conclude topography-guided PRK of irregular corneas should lead to significantly improved regularization only if it includes the effect of epithelial remodeling. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(8):529-537.].

36-Month Outcomes of Mechanical and Transepithelial PTK Epithelium Removal Techniques Prior to Accelerated CXL for Progressive Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To compare the 36-month visual, refractive, and topographic results and the optical quality of the cornea between mechanical and transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) epithelium removal techniques prior to the accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) procedure in patients with progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

Keratoconic eyes that received either mechanical epithelium removal or transepithelial PTK epithelium removal prior to accelerated CXL with 36 months of follow-up were included. The uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent (SE), manifest astigmatism, flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), maximum keratometry (Kmax) readings, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), topographic astigmatism, point spread function (PSF), and aberrometric parameters including root mean square higher order aberrations (RMS HOAs), vertical coma, and spherical aberration (SA) were assessed preoperatively and 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

One hundred ten eyes of 110 patients with keratoconus were included (mechanical epithelium removal group: 69 eyes, transepithelial PTK epithelium removal group: 41 eyes). After the CXL procedure, the mean UDVA, CDVA, manifest astigmatism, RMS HOAs, SA, vertical coma, and PSF improved significantly throughout the follow-up visits in both groups (P < .05 for all variables). The improvement in the mean UDVA, CDVA, manifest astigmatism, K1, K2, Kmax, RMS HOAs, SA, vertical coma, and PSF were significantly better in eyes that underwent transepithelial PTK epithelium removal when compared to eyes that underwent mechanical epithelium removal during the follow-up period (P < .05 for all variables).

CONCLUSIONS

Transepithelial PTK-assisted accelerated CXL seems to be more efficient in improving the visual acuity and the optical quality while stabilizing the cornea compared to the accelerated CXL with mechanical epithelium removal in patients with progressive keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(3):191-200.].