Current trends in the management of corneal neovascularization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to highlight recent developments in the medical and surgical management of corneal neovascularization (NV).

RECENT FINDINGS

Improved understanding and diagnostic criteria among clinicians have led to advancements in the characterization of corneal NV and objective assessment of treatment response through ancillary imaging devices. Developments in corneal NV treatments, such as antivascular endothelial growth factor, fine needle diathermy, and photodynamic therapy, have improved treatment success rates and visual outcomes. More recent surgical treatment advancements include corneal cross-linking, endothelial keratoplasty, and mitomycin intravascular chemoembolization. Finally, a greater appreciation of the molecular pathogenesis and angiogenic factors involved in corneal NV has identified numerous potential targeted therapies in the future.

SUMMARY

The management of corneal NV has evolved to include several standalone and combination medical and surgical options. Additionally, improvements in quantifying corneal NV and understanding its molecular basis have contributed to new management strategies with improved outcomes.

Current and emerging therapies for corneal neovascularization

The cornea is unique because of its complete avascularity. Corneal neovascularization (CNV) can result from a variety of etiologies including contact lens wear; corneal infections; and ocular surface diseases due to inflammation, chemical injury, and limbal stem cell deficiency. Management is focused primarily on the etiology and pathophysiology causing the CNV and involves medical and surgical options. Because inflammation is a key factor in the pathophysiology of CNV, corticosteroids and other anti-inflammatory medications remain the mainstay of treatment. Anti-VEGF therapies are gaining popularity to prevent CNV in a number of etiologies. Surgical options including vessel occlusion and ocular surface reconstruction are other options depending on etiology and response to medical therapy. Future therapies should provide more effective treatment options for the management of CNV.

Assessment of therapeutic options for reducing alkali burn-induced corneal neovascularization and inflammation

This article aims to review and provide the current knowledge of the possibilities of topical treatment of corneal neovascularization due to alkali burns, evidenced by laboratory experiments, in vitro studies, and clinical trials published in the specialized literature. Authors present clinically relevant treatment of corneal neovascularization used in clinical practice, potential antiangiogenic topical therapeutics against corneal neovascularization, which are under investigation, and anti-angiogenic gene-therapy.

Topical use of antithrombotics: review of literature

While antithrombotics are usually administered intravenously, subcutaneously or orally, there are a number of publications reporting topical application of anticoagulation therapy. This paper aims to review the available literature regarding clinical conditions, the details of the topical antithrombotic treatment, as well as positive or adverse effects in an attempt to ascertain the safety and efficacy of this form of treatment. Published literature was searched to identify publications reporting the use of antithrombotic treatments administered via topical application between 1st January 1990 and 1st January 2013. There were 43 studies reported in 10 different clinical conditions. Majority of the studies were randomized controlled trials (51.2%), prospective studies (18.6%) or case reports (11.6%). The clinical conditions in which topical antithrombotics were administered included: microangiopathy, acute haemorrhoids, periodontitis, dermatitis, burns, ocular conditions and surgery, blunt force impact, scars, as well as clinical conditions associated with superficial venous thrombosis (SVT). The most commonly used topical antithrombotic was heparin (79.1% of studies). The respective dosage of different antithrombotics varied depending on specific clinical conditions. While most studies reported mean improvements or resolution of symptoms/condition in patients, the patient outcomes were variable. This review demonstrates that topical antithrombotic treatment is used according to a wide variety of protocols, with a subsequent variability in patient outcomes. Specific guidelines for the use of topical antithrombotics should be developed to standardize this form of treatment and ensure the best possible outcomes for patients.