Managing interstitial lung disease detected on CT during lung cancer screening

ERS/ESTS/ESTRO/ESR/ESTI/EFOMP statement on management of incidental findings from low dose CT screening for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Screening for lung cancer with low radiation dose computed tomography has a strong evidence base, is being introduced in several European countries and is recommended as a new targeted cancer screening programme. The imperative now is to ensure that implementation follows an evidence-based process that will ensure clinical and cost effectiveness. This European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force was formed to provide an expert consensus for the management of incidental findings which can be adapted and followed during implementation.

METHODS

A multi-European society collaborative group was convened. 23 topics were identified, primarily from an ERS statement on lung cancer screening, and a systematic review of the literature was conducted according to ERS standards. Initial review of abstracts was completed and full text was provided to members of the group for each topic. Sections were edited and the final document approved by all members and the ERS Science Council.

RESULTS

Nine topics considered most important and frequent were reviewed as standalone topics (interstitial lung abnormalities, emphysema, bronchiectasis, consolidation, coronary calcification, aortic valve disease, mediastinal mass, mediastinal lymph nodes and thyroid abnormalities). Other topics considered of lower importance or infrequent were grouped into generic categories, suitable for general statements.

CONCLUSIONS

This European collaborative group has produced an incidental findings statement that can be followed during lung cancer screening. It will ensure that an evidence-based approach is used for reporting and managing incidental findings, which will mean that harms are minimised and any programme is as cost-effective as possible.

ERS/ESTS/ESTRO/ESR/ESTI/EFOMP statement on management of incidental findings from low dose CT screening for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Screening for lung cancer with low radiation dose computed tomography has a strong evidence base, is being introduced in several European countries and is recommended as a new targeted cancer screening programme. The imperative now is to ensure that implementation follows an evidence-based process that will ensure clinical and cost effectiveness. This European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force was formed to provide an expert consensus for the management of incidental findings which can be adapted and followed during implementation.

METHODS

A multi-European society collaborative group was convened. 23 topics were identified, primarily from an ERS statement on lung cancer screening, and a systematic review of the literature was conducted according to ERS standards. Initial review of abstracts was completed and full text was provided to members of the group for each topic. Sections were edited and the final document approved by all members and the ERS Science Council.

RESULTS

Nine topics considered most important and frequent were reviewed as standalone topics (interstitial lung abnormalities, emphysema, bronchiectasis, consolidation, coronary calcification, aortic valve disease, mediastinal mass, mediastinal lymph nodes and thyroid abnormalities). Other topics considered of lower importance or infrequent were grouped into generic categories, suitable for general statements.

CONCLUSIONS

This European collaborative group has produced an incidental findings statement that can be followed during lung cancer screening. It will ensure that an evidence-based approach is used for reporting and managing incidental findings, which will mean that harms are minimised and any programme is as cost-effective as possible.

Quantitative Computed Tomography Assessment of Pectoralis and Erector Spinae Muscle Area and Disease Severity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Referred for Lung Volume Reduction

Patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) develop skeletal muscle loss (sarcopenia) that is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including mortality. We evaluated if thoracic muscle area is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with severe COPD. We analyzed consecutive patients with severe COPD undergoing evaluation for lung volume reduction from 2015 to 2019 (n = 117) compared to current and former smoking controls undergoing lung cancer screening with normal lung function (n = 41). Quantitative assessments of pectoralis muscle (PM) and erector spinae muscle (ESM) cross sectional area (CSA) were related to clinical outcomes including composite endpoints. Our results showed a reduction in PM CSA but not ESM CSA was associated with the severity of GOLD stage of COPD. Current smokers demonstrated reduced PM CSA which was similar to that in COPD patients who were GOLD stages 3 and 4. PM CSA was associated positively with FEV1, FEV₁% predicted, FVC, DLCO, and FEV₁/FVC ratio, and was associated negatively with the degree of radiologic emphysema. ESM correlated positively with DLCO, RV/TLC (a marker of hyperinflation), and correlated negatively with radiologic severity of emphysema. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that reductions in PM but not ESM CSA was associated with the composite end point of mortality, need for lung volume reduction, or lung transplant. In conclusion, in well-characterized patients with severe COPD referred for lung volume reduction, PM CSA correlated with severity of lung disease, mortality, and need for advanced therapies. In addition to predicting clinical outcomes, targeting sarcopenia is a potential therapeutic approach in patients with severe COPD.

Added benefits of early detection of other diseases on low-dose CT screening

Low-dose CT screening for lung cancer provides images of the entire chest and upper abdomen. While the focus of screening is on finding early lung cancer, radiology leadership has embraced the fact that the information contained in the images presents a new challenge to the radiology profession. Other findings in the chest and upper abdomen were not the reason for obtaining the screening CT scan, nor symptom-prompted, but still need to be reported. Reporting these findings and making recommendations for further workup requires careful consideration to avoid unnecessary workup or interventions while still maximizing the benefit that early identification of these other diseases provided. Other potential findings, such as cardiovascular disease and chronic pulmonary obstructive diseases actually cause more deaths than lung cancer. Existing recommendations for workup of abnormal CT findings are based on symptom-prompted indications for imaging. These recommendations may be different when the abnormalities are identified in asymptomatic people undergoing CT screening for lung cancer. I-ELCAP, a large prospectively collected multi-institutional and multi-national database of screenings, was used to analyze CT findings identified in screening for lung cancer. These analyses and recommendations were made by radiologists in collaboration with clinicians in different medical specialties.

Highlights of high-resolution computed tomography imaging in evaluation of complications and co-morbidities in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) represents a condition included in the heterogeneous group of interstitial lung diseases without known causes. The recent ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines and the white paper published by the Fleischner Society have well-defined diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis management is complex because it is also influenced by several co-morbidities and complications. The new frontier in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is represented by the effort to understand the complex mechanism of the pathogenesis and progression of disease in order to predict several consequences and co-morbidities. In our review, we tried to distinguish co-morbidities from complications of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In each complication, we have reviewed the existing literature and we have emphasized the complex pathobiological pathway which links the progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis to the development of the complication itself. For every co-morbidity, we tried to identify share common risk factors which explain the coexistence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with its co-morbidities. We then analyzed high-resolution computed tomography (CT) aspects of co-morbidities and complications of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis that the radiologist should be aware of. In this review, we focused on the role of high-resolution CT imaging in the evaluation of co-morbidities and complications in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis because their early diagnosis and treatment could change the prognosis in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. We have also pointed out that in some cases the final combined quantitative CT tools and conventional visual CT score would allow to get an accurate analysis and quantification of disease progression, co-morbidities, and complications of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in order to improve staging systems in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

The importance of the regimen of screening in maximizing the benefit and minimizing the harms

BACKGROUND

In CT screening for lung cancer, the regimen of screening is critical in diagnosing lung cancer early while limiting unnecessary tests and invasive procedures. The International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP) has developed a regimen based on evidence collected in the I-ELCAP cohort of more than 70,000 participants.

METHODS

Important in the development of the regimen is the recognition of the profound difference between the first, baseline round of screening and all subsequent rounds of repeat screening. For each person undergoing screening, the baseline round happens only once while repeat rounds will be performed annually for many years. This difference needs to be clearly recognized as it is these annual rounds which allow for identification of small, early, yet aggressive, lung cancers which have high cure rates despite their aggressiveness. The importance of nodule consistency and size are key factors in the regimen. The regimen needs to be continuously updated by incorporating advances in technology and knowledge.

RESULTS

The use of the I-ELCAP regimen reduces the workup of participants in the screening program to less than 10% in the baseline round and less than 6% in the annual repeat rounds. By use of this regimen, estimated cure rate of lung cancers diagnosed under screening is 80% or higher in both baseline and annual repeat rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

The I-ELCAP collaboration provides a new paradigm that answers the 2002 NCI call for multiple approaches to address relevant questions about screening and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) Roundtable on Evidence-based Medicine from the National Academy of Science's call for a "new clinical research paradigm that takes better advantage of data generated in the course of healthcare delivery would speed and improve the development of evidence for real-world decision making".