When Foods Cause Itch: Clinical Characteristics, Pathophysiology, and Recommendations for Food-Induced Skin and Mucosal Pruritus

Itch occurs in various dermatologic and systemic conditions. Many patients report that certain foods instigate itch, although there is limited published information in dermatology on food-induced pruritus. In addition, itch severity is rarely mentioned. Food can induce pruritus through either ingestion or direct contact with skin or mucosal membranes. The most common type of itch provoked by food is acute urticaria, often through the classical immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated pathway. Other mechanisms include non-IgE-mediated, mixed (IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated), T-cell-mediated, and nonimmune reactions. For patients presenting with urticaria, generalized pruritus, oral pruritus, or dermatitis, a thorough history is warranted, and possible food associations should be considered and assessed. Although any food seems to have the potential to elicit an immune response, certain foods are especially immunogenic. Treatment includes avoidance of the trigger and symptom management. Careful consideration should be used as to avoid unnecessarily restrictive elimination diets.

When Foods Cause Itch: Clinical Characteristics, Pathophysiology, and Recommendations for Food-Induced Skin and Mucosal Pruritus

ABSTRACT

Itch occurs in various dermatologic and systemic conditions. Many patients report that certain foods instigate itch, although there is limited published information in dermatology on food-induced pruritus. In addition, itch severity is rarely mentioned. Food can induce pruritus through either ingestion or direct contact with skin or mucosal membranes. The most common type of itch provoked by food is acute urticaria, often through the classical immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated pathway. Other mechanisms include non-IgE-mediated, mixed (IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated), T-cell-mediated, and nonimmune reactions. For patients presenting with urticaria, generalized pruritus, oral pruritus, or dermatitis, a thorough history is warranted, and possible food associations should be considered and assessed. Although any food seems to have the potential to elicit an immune response, certain foods are especially immunogenic. Treatment includes avoidance of the trigger and symptom management. Careful consideration should be used as to avoid unnecessarily restrictive elimination diets.

Serum Cytokine Interactions Are Implicated in the Mechanism of Action of Sublingual Immunotherapy for Japanese Cedar Pollinosis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether interactions between multiple serum cytokines may be implicated in the mechanism of action (MOA) of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis.

METHODS

A Tokyo Metropolitan Bureau of Social Welfare and Public Health-initiated clinical study of active SLIT involving 202 patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis was jointly conducted by Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science and Nippon Medical School between 2006 and 2008. Fifty target cytokines were quantified in serum samples collected at 6 times from baseline to the end of the study, for 300 cytokine measurements in total, using Bio-Plex Pro Human Cytokine Group I/II Panels. Therapeutic outcome was assessed based on nasal symptom scores and quality-of-life questionnaire results.

RESULTS

Fifty-five percent of patients were free of symptoms or reported symptomatic improvements by 2 grades or greater after 2 years of SLIT treatment, while 27% showed no improvement or worsening of symptoms. Thirty-eight patients who benefited the most from treatment (responders) as well as 37 patients who benefited the least from treatment (non-responders) were identified and their serum cytokine profiles were compared. Cluster analysis of the 300 cytokine measurements identified 6 cytokine clusters that were strongly correlated with a positive response to treatment, and this correlation was consistent throughout the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Certain cytokine clusters are strongly correlated with a positive therapeutic outcome, suggesting they have a role in the MOA of immunotherapy.

Oral allergy syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To review oral allergy syndrome (OAS).

METHODS

We searched several medical literature data bases with the following key words: "oral allergy syndrome," "OAS," "pollen-food allergy syndrome," "PFAS," "allergy," "diagnosis," "treatment."

RESULTS

Oral allergy syndrome (OAS), also called "pollen-food allergy syndrome," is a type of food allergy brought about by flavors, nuts, raw fruit, and vegetables. The most well-known symptoms are mouth and throat itching, which starts rapidly after a food is placed in the mouth, and that, as a rule, continues for just a couple of minutes after the food has been swallowed. The frequency of OAS with pollen allergy has been reported as 5-8%; 1-2% of patients with OAS with pollen allergy show extreme responses, e.g., anaphylaxis. Birch tree pollen, ragweed pollen, and grass pollen hypersensitivity cause the symptoms. The diagnosis of OAS is confirmed by a positive history and positive skin-prick test result triggered by the food's fresh extract. Oral challenge result is normally positive with the raw food and negative with the similar cooked food.

CONCLUSION

Patients with grass allergy may have a response to peaches, oranges, celery, tomatoes, and melons. Patients with ragweed allergy may show OAS symptoms with melon, cucumber, banana, and zucchini. Physicians should be aware of OAS and know the appropriate treatment.

[Relationship between IgE antibodies to recombinant allergens rBet v 1 and rBet v 2 and food causing oral allergy syndrome in cases of birch-pollen allergy]

BACKGROUND

Persons allergic to birch pollen often report oral and pharyngeal hypersensitivity to fruit and vegetables, such as apples and peaches due to immunological cross-reactivity, or oral allergy syndrome (OAS) sometimes accompanied by systemic reaction. Such cross-reactive antigen reactions involve Bet v 1, the main birch-pollen allergen, and Bet v 2, birch-pollen profilin. We evaluated the food/antigen relationship.

METHODS

Subjects interviewed numbered 60-40 women and 20 men aged 12 to 70 (mean age: 35 years)-suffering OAS episodes and having IgE birch-pollen antibodies. Using CAP scoring we examined IgE antibodies to recombinant Bet v 1 (rBet v 1), recombinant Bet v 2 (rBet v 2), and recombinant Pru p 3 (rPru p 3) a peach lipid transfer protein (LTP). A CAP score of 0.35 or more was considered positive. We evaluated the relationship between recombinant allergens and 9 fruit often involving OAS--apple, peach, cherry, kiwi, pear, melon, plum, strawberry, and watermelon-based on subjects' reports.

RESULTS

Of the 60, all (100%) were rBet v 1-positive, 9 (15%) rBet v 2-positive, and none (0%) rPru p 3-positive. Rose-family fruit-apples, peaches, cherries, pears, plums, and strawberries-often caused OAS regardless of positive or negative rBet v 2 CAP and were associated with rBet v 1. In contrast, more of those who were rBet v 2 CAP-positive had OAS to non-rose-family fruit-melon and watermelon-than those rBet v 2-negative. In rose-family and non-rose-family classification of the 9 fruit, cluster analysis and kappa statistics showed non-rose-family melon, watermelon, and kiwi to be associated with rBet v 2, as were grass and mugwort pollen allergies.

CONCLUSION

Bet v 1 is associated with OAS due to rose-family fruit and Bet v 2 with OAS due to non-rose-family fruit.