[Histopathological studies on paranasal mucosa from patients treated with erythromycin]

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis in Japan

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a heterogeneous disease. In Europe and the United States, it has recently been divided into two subgroups: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). The majority of CRSwNP cases have a strong tendency to recur after surgery and show eosinophil-dominant inflammation. However, this definition has proved difficult to apply in Japan and East Asia, because more than half of the CRSwNP cases do not exhibit eosinophil-dominant inflammation in these areas of the world. In Japan in the 1990s, refractory CRSwNP to the standard treatment was focused on in clinical studies and the term "eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis" (ECRS) was introduced to identify this subgroup of chronic rhinosinusitis in 2001. ECRS is different from non-ECRS in terms of many clinical features: symptom appearance, occurrence site of nasal polyps, CT scan findings, the histology of nasal polyps, blood examination findings, clinical course after surgery, and co-morbid asthma, etc. In this review, we describe these clinical features and mention how to make a clinical diagnosis of ECRS as well as how to treat it. Finally, we discuss the pathophysiology of ECRS. The concept of ECRS in Japan would be applicable for CRSwNP in other countries including Europe and the United States.

Therapeutic approaches to mucus hypersecretion

Mucolytic and related agents have been in use since prehistoric times. Although widely prescribed and used extensively in over-the-counter preparations, their efficacy and mechanisms of action remain in doubt. These agents belong to several distinct chemical classes. Mucolytic agents such as N-acetyl-cysteine are thiols with a free-sulfhydryl group. They are assumed to break disulfide bonds between gel-forming mucins and thus reduce mucus viscosity. Mucokinetic agents are thiols with a blocked sulfhydryl group. Expectorants such as guaifenesin increase mucus secretion. They may act as irritants to gastric vagal receptors, and recruit efferent parasympathetic reflexes that cause glandular exocytosis of a less viscous mucus mixture. Cough may be provoked. This combination may flush tenacious, congealed mucopurulent material from obstructed small airways and lead to a temporary improvement in dyspnea or the work of breathing. The roles of anticholinergic agents, DNase, and other drugs are also discussed with regard to their roles in reducing mucus production in rhinitis and other airway diseases.

In vivo and in vitro effects of macrolide antibiotics on mucus secretion in airway epithelial cells

To examine the in vivo effects of macrolide antibiotics on mucus hypersecretion, we induced hypertrophic and metaplastic changes of goblet cells in rat nasal epithelium by intranasal instillation of ovalbumin (OVA) in OVA-sensitized rats and by intranasal LPS instillation. Oral administration of clarithromycin (CAM) (5-10 mg/kg) significantly inhibited OVA- and LPS-induced mucus production and neutrophil infiltration, whereas josamycin and ampicillin showed no effect. In vitro effects of macrolide antibiotics on airway epithelial cells were examined using NCI-H292 cells and human nasal epithelial cells cultured in air-liquid interface. Mucus secretion was evaluated by ELISA using anti-mucin monoclonal antibodies (anti-MUC5AC and HCS18). CAM and erythromycin significantly inhibited spontaneous and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (20 ng/ml)-induced mucus secretion from NCI-H292 cells at 10-6 to 10-7 M and from human nasal epithelial cells at 10-4 to 10-5 M. MUC5AC messenger RNA expression was also significantly inhibited. These results indicate that the 14-member macrolide antibiotics, CAM and erythromycin, exert direct inhibitory effects on mucus secretion from airway epithelial cells and that they may be useful for the treatment of mucus hypersecretion caused by allergic inflammation and LPS stimulation.