1
|
Kathanadan Chackochan B, Johnson S, Thameemul Ansari HJ, Vengellur A, Sivan U, Koyyappurath S, P S BC. Transcriptomic analysis of CNTF-treated mouse subventricular zone-derived neurosphere culture reveals key transcription factor genes related to adult neurogenesis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e38496. [PMID: 39430537 PMCID: PMC11490819 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Neural Stem Progenitor Cells (NSPCs) maintenance and neuronal cell differentiation are the two key aspects of sustained neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain. Transcription factors (TFs) are known to regulate these biological processes under the influence of various neurotrophic factors. Understanding the role of key TF genes in regulating adult neurogenesis is essential for determining the functional complexity and neuronal diversity seen in the adult mammalian brain. Although several molecular mechanisms leading to adult neurogenesis have been reported, details on its transcriptional regulation are still limited. Our initial results showed that Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF) induced neuronal differentiation in SVZ-derived NSPC cultures. To investigate further the role of CNTF in inducing the expression of TF genes related to adult neurogenesis and the potential pathways involved, whole transcriptome RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was done in CNTF-treated Sub-ventricular Zone derived neurosphere cultures from the mouse brain. The study revealed 483 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), among which 33 DEGs were identified as coding for transcription factors (TFs). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Gene and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed MAPK, PI3K-Akt, and FoxO as the significantly enriched signaling pathways. Gene co-expression network analysis identified five upregulated TF genes related to adult neurogenesis (Runx1, Hmga2, Fos, ID2, and Prrx1) in a single cluster, interacting with each other, and was also validated by quantitative PCR. Our data suggest several potential TFs that may act as critical regulators in the intrinsic transcriptional networks driving the adult neurogenesis process. Further investigation into these molecular regulators may yield a homogeneous population of neuronal progenitors for translational stem cell studies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bins Kathanadan Chackochan
- Department of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
- Centre for Neuroscience, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
| | - Sinoy Johnson
- Department of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
| | - Hilmi Jaufer Thameemul Ansari
- Department of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
- Centre for Neuroscience, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Ajith Vengellur
- Department of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
- Centre for Neuroscience, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
| | - Unnikrishnan Sivan
- Department of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
- Centre for Neuroscience, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
- Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Cochin -682506, Kerala, India
| | - Sayuj Koyyappurath
- Department of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
| | - Baby Chakrapani P S
- Department of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
- Centre for Neuroscience, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Cochin-682022, Kerala, India
- Centre for Excellence in Neurodegeneration and Brain Health, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Drugs and Endogenous Factors as Protagonists in Neurogenic Stimulation. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2022; 18:2852-2871. [PMID: 35962176 DOI: 10.1007/s12015-022-10423-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Neurogenesis is a biological process characterized by new neurons formation from stem cells. For decades, it was believed that neurons only multiplied during development and in the postnatal period but the discovery of neural stem cells (NSCs) in mature brain promoted a revolution in neuroscience field. In mammals, neurogenesis consists of migration, differentiation, maturation, as well as functional integration of newborn cells into the pre-existing neuronal circuit. Actually, NSC density drops significantly after the first stages of development, however in specific places in the brain, called neurogenic niches, some of these cells retain their ability to generate new neurons and glial cells in adulthood. The subgranular (SGZ), and the subventricular zones (SVZ) are examples of regions where the neurogenesis process occurs in the mature brain. There, the potential of NSCs to produce new neurons has been explored by new advanced methodologies and in neuroscience for the treatment of brain damage and/or degeneration. Based on that, this review highlights endogenous factors and drugs capable of stimulating neurogenesis, as well as the perspectives for the use of NSCs for neurological and neurodegenerative diseases.
Collapse
|
3
|
De Gioia R, Biella F, Citterio G, Rizzo F, Abati E, Nizzardo M, Bresolin N, Comi GP, Corti S. Neural Stem Cell Transplantation for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E3103. [PMID: 32354178 PMCID: PMC7247151 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21093103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are disabling and fatal neurological disorders that currently lack effective treatment. Neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation has been studied as a potential therapeutic approach and appears to exert a beneficial effect against neurodegeneration via different mechanisms, such as the production of neurotrophic factors, decreased neuroinflammation, enhanced neuronal plasticity and cell replacement. Thus, NSC transplantation may represent an effective therapeutic strategy. To exploit NSCs' potential, some of their essential biological characteristics must be thoroughly investigated, including the specific markers for NSC subpopulations, to allow profiling and selection. Another key feature is their secretome, which is responsible for the regulation of intercellular communication, neuroprotection, and immunomodulation. In addition, NSCs must properly migrate into the central nervous system (CNS) and integrate into host neuronal circuits, enhancing neuroplasticity. Understanding and modulating these aspects can allow us to further exploit the therapeutic potential of NSCs. Recent progress in gene editing and cellular engineering techniques has opened up the possibility of modifying NSCs to express select candidate molecules to further enhance their therapeutic effects. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding these aspects, promoting the development of stem cell therapies that could be applied safely and effectively in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta De Gioia
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Neurology Unit, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Biella
- Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Citterio
- Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Rizzo
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Neurology Unit, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Abati
- Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Nizzardo
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Neurology Unit, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Nereo Bresolin
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Neurology Unit, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Giacomo Pietro Comi
- Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Neuromuscular and Rare Diseases Unit, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Corti
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Neurology Unit, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|