Robotic mitral valve repair in infective endocarditis

Robotic mitral repair: maintaining quality at all levels of complexity

Over the last two decades, robotic mitral valve surgery has evolved from application of standard repair techniques for focal degenerative disease to a broad range of repair techniques navigating nearly all mitral pathologies at different complexity levels, the latter only performed in highly experienced robotic programs. The basic setup and steps of the operation have been standardized and many groups have reported reproducibility, excellent long-term durability and exceedingly rare mortality rates comparable to sternotomy. This has created a surge of interest in robotic cardiac surgery by patients, referring physicians and cardiac surgeons, all seeking the least invasive approach to mitral valve repair. In response, a growing number of major institutions have initiated robotic programs. This article discusses the gaps in practice before the widespread shift to a robotic approach as a standard treatment of mitral valve disease. In addition, we describe our techniques to approach complex mitral pathologies that transcend current, limited patient selection criteria.

Is there a need for bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis in patients undergoing urological procedures?

Heart valve repair or replacement is a serious problem.The focused update on infective endocarditis of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2008 (ACC/AHA guidelines) and Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC guidelines) describe prophylaxis against infective endocarditis as not recommended for urinary tract procedures in the absence of active infection. A statistical association has been recently shown between urological procedures and the development of infective endocarditis. New evidences concerning infective endocarditis due to Actinobaculum schaalii, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aerococci and Staphylococcus aureus, and new findings indicate there is a need for bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis in patients undergoing urological procedures especially in elderly patients and in cancer and immunocompromised patients, to avoid serious consequences.

Is there a need for bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy?

Heart valve repair or replacement is a serious problem. Patients can benefit from an open dialogue between both cardiologists and gastroenterologists for the optimal effective patients care. The focused update on infective endocarditis of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2008 (ACC/AHA guidelines) and guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis (new version 2009) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC guidelines) describe prophylaxis against infective endocarditis (IE) as not recommended for gastroscopy and colonoscopy in the absence of active infection but increasing evidence suggests that the role of IE antibiotic prophylaxis remains a dark side of the cardio-oncology prevention. New evidences concerning infective endocarditis due to Streptococcus bovis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus durans, and new findings indicate that there is a need for bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy especially in elderly patients and in cancer and immunocompromised patients, to avoid serious consequences.