Dual Tasking during Trip Recovery and Obstacle Clearance among Young, Healthy Adults in Human Factors Research

Trip-induced falls are extremely common in ergonomic settings. Such situations can lead to fatal or non-fatal injuries, affecting the workers’ quality of life and earning capacity. Dual tasking (DT) is a leading cause of trips and ineffective obstacle clearance among workers. DT increases their attentional demand, challenging both postural control and concurrent secondary tasks. As the human brain has limited attentional processing capacity, even young, healthy adults need to prioritize duties during DT. This article aimed to analyze these secondary task types and their applications in recent trip-related studies conducted on young, healthy adults. An extensive review of the recent trip-related literature was performed to provide a condensed summary of the dual tasks used. In previous trip-related literature, distinct types of secondary tasks were used. The choice of the concurrent task must be made vigilantly depending on the occupation, environmental context, available resources, and feasibility. DT can be used as a tool to train workers on selective attention, which is a lifesaving skill in ergonomic settings, especially in the occupations of roofers, construction workers, or truck drivers. Such training can result in successful obstacle clearance and trip recovery skills, which eventually minimizes the number of falls at the workplace.

Gaze diversion affects cognitive and motor performance in young adults when stepping over obstacles

BACKGROUND

In many common multi-tasks, vision is used for two or more of the tasks, such as viewing cars, traffic signals, and the sidewalk curb at a crosswalk.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does gaze diversion affect adaptive locomotion in young adults?

METHODS

Seventeen young adults completed a simple reaction time (RT) task while (1) standing and (2) during the approach to an obstacle on an 8 m walkway. Participants pressed a remote switch in response to a light cue (activated once during approach phase). The light cue was located either (1) on the obstacle (gaze diverted to obstacle) or (2) at eye level (gaze diverted away from obstacle). A gait baseline task with no RT task was included.

RESULTS

An interaction was observed (task (standing versus walking) by gaze location (on versus away from obstacle), p = 0.01), where RT was not affected by the gaze location in the standing task, but RT was longer when gaze was diverted away from the obstacle in the gait task. Furthermore, trail foot placement was closer to the obstacle when the gaze was diverted away from the obstacle (p = 0.002), which increased risk of tripping.

SIGNIFICANCE

Gaze diversion did not affect cognitive performance in the standing task, as information regarding the obstacle was not relevant for the standing task. However, completing a simple discrete visual cognitive task during obstacle crossing impaired both cognitive and gait performance, but only when gaze was diverted away from the obstacle. The impaired performance is likely due to the larger amount of structural interference when gaze was diverted away from the obstacle. These findings highlight the critical role of vision during the approach phase to an obstacle.

Concurrent phone texting alters crossing behavior and induces gait imbalance during obstacle crossing

Texting during walking has become a very common daily activity and could alter gait performance, especially during locomotion when additional visual attention is demanded, such as obstacle crossing. The purpose of this study was to examine biomechanical changes in obstructed gait characteristics while engaging in a phone texting activity. Gait analyses were performed on ten young healthy adults under the following two tasks: 1) walking and crossing an obstacle set at a 10% of the subject's height and 2) walking and crossing an obstacle while responding to a text message. Whole body motion data were collected with a 10-camera motion capture system. Our data demonstrated that a conservative gait pattern was adopted while performing texting when approaching and crossing over the obstacle, which was indicated by slower walking speeds and greater toe-obstacle clearances. This gait pattern was, however, accompanied by a greater body sway in the frontal plane during crossing, which could be an indication of perturbed gait balance control. Increased visual-attentional demand from a concurrent phone texting could negatively impact young pedestrians' safety during obstacle crossing.