Time to Revisit the Time in the Therapeutic Range

Analysis of Postoperative Bleeding After Oral Surgery in Patients Receiving Anticoagulants: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: Patients taking anticoagulants, particularly warfarin and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs), face an elevated risk of postoperative bleeding during minor oral surgeries, highlighting the urgent need to identify reliable predictors for bleeding complications. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of predictors of bleeding complications in patients receiving anticoagulants who underwent minor oral surgeries. Materials and Methods: The electronic medical and dental records of 206 patients who underwent oral surgery at the University of Ulsan Hospital between 2015 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into those taking warfarin and those taking NOACs, and postoperative bleeding was determined. Risk factors were statistically analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test. Results: Among the 206 patients (86 on warfarin, 120 on NOACs), 84 (36 on warfarin, 48 on NOACs) experienced bleeding complications following their procedures. Time in the therapeutic range (TTR) and international normalized ratio (INR) values were significantly associated with bleeding complications in the warfarin group, while the type of NOAC was associated with bleeding in the NOAC group. Perioperative bleeding was significantly correlated with postoperative bleeding in both groups. Conclusions: Taken together, these findings highlight the correlations between postoperative bleeding and specific factors associated with anticoagulant drugs in patients that underwent oral surgery. Identifying these predictors can improve patient management by enhancing pre- and perioperative assessments, reducing the risk of bleeding, and optimizing surgical outcomes.

Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Graft Outcome Disparities in African American Kidney Transplants (MITIGAAT Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The outcome disparities for African American recipients of kidney transplant is a public health issue that has plagued the field of transplant since its inception. Based on national data, African American recipients have nearly twice the risk of graft loss at 5 years after transplant, when compared with White recipients. Evidence demonstrates that medication nonadherence and high tacrolimus variability substantially impact graft outcomes and racial disparities, most notably late (>2 years) after the transplant. Nonadherence is a leading cause of graft loss. Prospective multicenter data demonstrate that one-third of all graft loss are directly attributed to nonadherence. We have spent 10 years of focused research to develop a comprehensive model explaining the predominant risk factors leading to disparities in African American kidney recipients. However, there are still gaps in patient-level data that hinder the deeper understanding of the disparities. Lack of data from the patient often lead to provider biases, which will be addressed with this intervention. Culturally competent, pharmacist-led interventions in medication therapy management will also address therapeutic inertia. Pharmacist interventions will mitigate medication access barriers as well (cost and insurance denials). Thus, this multidimensional intervention addresses patient, provider, and structural factors that drive racial disparities in African American kidney recipients.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the impact of multimodal health services intervention on health outcomes disparities in African American recipients of kidney transplant. The aims of this study are to improve adherence and control of late clinical issues, which are predominant factors for racial disparities in kidney recipients, through a technology-enabled, telehealth-delivered, 4-level intervention.

METHODS

The Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Graft Outcome Disparities in African American Kidney Transplants (MITIGAAT) study is a 24-month, 2-arm, single-center (Medical University of South Carolina), 1:1 randomized controlled trial involving 190 participants (95 in each arm), measuring the impact on adherence and control of late clinical issues for racial disparities in kidney recipients, through a technology-enabled, telehealth-delivered, 4-level intervention. The key clinical issues for this study include tacrolimus variability, blood pressure, and glucose control (in those with diabetes mellitus). We will also assess the impact of the intervention on health care use (hospitalizations and emergency department visits) and conduct a cost-benefit analysis. Finally, we will assess the impact of the intervention on acute rejection and graft survival rates as compared with a large contemporary national cohort.

RESULTS

This study was funded in July 2023. Enrolled began in April 2024 and is expected to be complete in 2026. All patients will complete the study by the end of 2028.

CONCLUSIONS

In this protocol, we describe the study design, methods, aims, and outcome measures that will be used in the ongoing MITIGAAT clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06023615; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06023615.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/57784.

Diabetes is a significant and independent predictor for tacrolimus immediate release and LCP-tacrolimus conversion ratios

Diabetes (DM) is a common comorbidity in transplant patients with known effects on gastrointestinal (GI) motility and absorption; however, DM's impact on immediate release (IR) tacrolimus to LCP-tacrolimus (LCP) conversion ratios has not been studied. This multivariable analysis of a retrospective longitudinal cohort study included kidney transplant recipients converted from IR to LCP between 2019 and 2020. The primary outcome was IR to LCP conversion ratio based on DM status. Other outcomes included tacrolimus variability, rejection, graft loss, and death. Of the 292 patients included, 172 patients had DM and 120 did not. The IR:LCP conversion ratio was significantly higher with DM (67.5% ± 21.1% no DM vs. 79.8% ± 28.7% in DM; P < .001). In multivariable modeling, DM was the only variable significantly and independently associated with IR:LCP conversion ratios. No difference was observed in rejection rates. Graft (97.5% no DM vs. 92.4% in DM; P = .062) and patient survival (100% no DM vs. 94.8% in DM; P = .011) were lower with DM. The presence of DM significantly increased the IR:LCP conversion ratio by 13%-14%, compared to patients without DM. On multivariable analysis, DM was the only significant predictor of conversion ratios, potentially related to GI motility or absorption differences.

Warfarin Monitoring in Safety-Net Health Systems: Analysis by Race/Ethnicity and Language Preference

BACKGROUND

Racial/ethnic disparities in anticoagulation management are well established. Differences in warfarin monitoring can contribute to these disparities and should be measured.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed for differences in international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring by race/ethnicity and language preference across safety-net care systems serving predominantly low-income, ethnically diverse populations.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of process and safety data shared from the Safety Promotion Action Research and Knowledge Network (SPARK-Net) initiative, a consortium of five California safety-net hospital systems.

PARTICIPANTS

Eligible patients were at least 18 years old, received warfarin for at least 56 days during the measurement period from July 2015 to June 2017, and had INR testing in an ambulatory care setting at a participating healthcare system.

MAIN MEASURES

We conducted a scaled Poisson regression for adjusted rate ratio of having at least one INR checked per 56-day time period for which a patient had a warfarin prescription. Adjusting for age, sex, healthcare system, and insurance status/type, we assessed for racial/ethnic and language disparities in INR monitoring.

KEY RESULTS

Of 8129 patients, 3615 (44%) were female; 1470 (18%), Black/African American; 3354 (41%), Hispanic/Latinx; 1210 (15%), Asian; 1643 (20%), White; and 452 (6%), other. Three thousand five hundred forty-nine (45%) were non-English preferring. We did not observe statistically significant disparities in the rate of appropriate INR monitoring by race/ethnicity or language; the primary source of variation was by healthcare network. Older age, female gender, and uninsured patients had a slightly higher rate of appropriate INR monitoring, but differences were not clinically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a race/ethnicity nor language disparity in INR monitoring; safety-net site was the main source of variation.

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Remote Warfarin Management Model Using a Smartphone Application (Yixing) in Improving Patients' Knowledge and Outcomes of Anticoagulation Therapy

Background: The management of warfarin-treated patients has been recognized as a challenge due to narrow therapeutic range and food and drug interactions in warfarin therapy. We aim to evaluate the effect of a pharmacist-led remote warfarin management model using a smartphone application (app) on anticoagulation therapy.

Methods: Eligible patients who had received warfarin therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement were enrolled. The intervention group was offered a pharmacist-led remote warfarin management model using the app named Yixing. Yixing incorporates functions including automatic daily reminder, personal health record, educational program, and online counseling. The control group received traditional pharmacy services without Yixing. Co-primary outcomes were patients’ awareness score of warfarin therapy obtained from questionnaire, the medication adherence measured by the percentage of the correct-warfarin-taken days in the monitored period, the fraction of time in therapeutic range (FTTR), and the incidence of anticoagulation-related complications. The needed information of the patients was acquired via electronic medical records from the hospital, Yixing system and telephone follow-up when necessary.

Results: 64 and 66 patients were initially in the intervention and control groups respectively. After propensity score matching, 50 patients were assigned in each group. The intervention group had a median age of 51.0 years, in which 27 (54%) were male. The control group had a median age of 50.5 years, in which 28 (56%) were male. Patient awareness score in the intervention group was 8.00 (2.00), which was higher than that in the control group, with score at 6.50 (2.50) (p = 0.001). No significant difference was found in the percentage of the correct-warfarin-taken days between the two groups (p = 0.520). The median (interquartile range) value of FTTR was 80.3% (21.9%) and 72.1% (17.7%) in the intervention and control groups respectively (p = 0.033), and no significant differences in the incidence of anticoagulation-related complications were observed (p = 0.514).

Conclusion: The pharmacist-led remote warfarin management model using Yixing improves patients’ awareness of warfarin therapy and increases FTTR, but may not have significant improvements on medication adherence and safety.

Poor Time in Therapeutic Range Control is Associated with Adverse Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Report from the Nationwide COOL-AF Registry

BACKGROUND

Warfarin remains the most commonly used oral anticoagulant (OAC) in Thailand for stroke prevention among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between time in therapeutic range (TTR) after warfarin initiation and clinical outcomes of NVAF.

METHODS

TTR was calculated by the Rosendaal method from international normalized ratio (INR) data acquired from a nationwide NVAF registry in Thailand. Patients were followed-up every six months. The association between TTR and clinical outcomes was analyzed.

RESULTS

There was a total of 2233 patients from 27 hospitals. The average age was 68.4 ± 10.6 years. The average TTR was 53.56 ± 26.37%. Rates of ischemic stroke/TIA, major bleeding, ICH, and death were 1.33, 2.48, 0.76, and 3.3 per 100 person-years, respectively. When patients with a TTR < 65% were compared with those with TTR ≥ 65%, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for the increased risks of ischemic stroke/TIA, major bleeding, ICH, and death were 3.07, 1.90, 2.34, and 2.11, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Poor TTR control is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with NVAF who were on warfarin. Efforts to ensure good TTR (≥65%) after initiation of warfarin are mandatory to minimize the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.

Performance of the LumiraDx Platform INR Test in an Anticoagulation Clinic Point-of-Care Setting Compared With an Established Laboratory Reference Method

Vitamin K antagonists, such as warfarin, have a narrow therapeutic window; patients on these therapies therefore require regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring to maintain optimal dosing. This involves periodic checks and laboratory testing using venepuncture, which are often perceived as a burden. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and precision of the LumiraDx INR Test, a new point-of-care in vitro diagnostic platform, in an anticoagulation clinic setting. In this observational, cross-sectional study, precision of the LumiraDx INR Test was assessed using paired replicate samples (n = 366) and 3 test strip lots. Accuracy was determined by comparing capillary blood INR, ascertained by the LumiraDx INR Test, with venous plasma INR, measured by the laboratory reference instrument, the IL ACL ELITE Pro. Furthermore, INR was assessed across a range of hematocrit (25%-55%). In addition, feedback was collected from health-care professionals via a self-completed questionnaire. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03682419). The precision (% coefficient of variation) of the LumiraDx INR Test was <4 when samples were applied by direct application or via a capillary transfer pipette, as well as between test strip lots. Accuracy of the LumiraDx INR Test, across the INR range of 0.8 to 7.5, was confirmed by a strong correlation of 0.965 (95% confidence interval: 0.959-0.970) when compared with the IL ACL ELITE Pro, which was maintained across the hematocrit range. Feedback from health-care professionals indicated that the instructions given by the system were easy to follow. In conclusion, the strong agreement between the LumiraDx Platform INR point-of-care test and the IL ACL ELITE Pro laboratory reference system, as well as between the different application methods and test lots, indicates that it can provide a rapid, accurate, and reliable INR analysis.