Homogenization of Atrial Electrical Activities: Conceptual Restoration of Regional Electrophysiological Parameters to Deter Ischemia-Dependent Conflictogenic Atrial Fibrillation

Destruction Of Medium Already Afected By Destructive Disorder: Fibrillating Atria Conceptually Need Therapeutic Help Rather Than Surgical Or Ablative Destruction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) as the most common supraventricular arrhythmia is scarcely amenable to contemporary treatment. Due to the diverse origin and variable clinical course of AF there is a broad spectrum of therapy options. However, optimal AF management has not become a gold standard yet. In general, the recurrence rate of AF is most often clinically unacceptable despite drug, surgical and/or ablation therapy. Substrate-based approach and ongoing ablation of atrial wall in its selected areas including the vicinity of pulmonary veins can be harmful. Applied physical factors do produce total disintegration of cardiomyocites - both intra- and inter-cellular damage which, in turn, leads to functional hypo-/inactivation of atria irrespective of whether the sinus rhythm is restored or not. In fact, iatrogenic phenomenon of ablation-induced atrial incompetence did emerge. Heterogeneity in clinical results reflects the uncertainty regarding the efficacy, risks and benefits of invasive AF therapy. In this regard the overall burden of AF may increase when using current therapy methods. Applicability of destructive techniques is yet to be fully elucidated and discussed. We hypothesize that currently used ablation and/or surgical techniques are potentially harmful since the success rates are likely achieved through violation of atrial myocardium. That is why a new and well-designed therapeutic strategy is needed. Invention of highly selective curative methods producing fibrillatory/electric blockage with concomitant saving of atrial transport function is to be encouraged.

Cardiac Events Theoretically Cannot Be Produced By Non-Ischemic And/Or Iso-Ischemic Myocardium: Challenging Postulations And Vitality Of The Concept Of "Ischemia-Dependent Conflictogenic Arrhythmias"

Ischemia plays a key role in cardiac arrhythmogenesis, particularly in elderly patients. Healthy, non-ischemic and structurally normal myocardium is universally free from dysrhythmias. Thereby intact coronary blood flow prevents potential cardiac events. Hypothetically, ischemia-related electrophysiological differences are responsible for the supraventricular and/or ventricular rhythm irregularities. The goal of this review is to determine the role of systemic and coronary circulatory peculiarities and their association with heart rhythm abnormalities. The current analytical review extends and enriches previous knowledge about the influence of these peculiarities on the genesis of ischemia-dependent conflictogenic arrhythmias. Different intensity of coronary blood flow resulting from stenotic obstacles or vasospasm potentially leads to the non-uniform perfusion of myocites thus creating albeit subtle but vulnerable and powerful electrophysiologic substrate impending cardiac rhythm disturbances. Apparently, the behavior of both non-ischemic and iso-ischemic myocardium in respect to electric cardiac activity is very similar, at least theoretically. Some different clinical entities, e.g. arterial hypotension and/or anemia containing ischemic component, in most cases are free from arrhythmias. This postulation may be helpful in furthering arrhythmogenicity insights which have been generated previously. On the contrary, increased blood pressure often concurs with the supraventricular and/or ventricular arrhythmias; this pattern also favorably reflects our previous hypothetical assumptions associated with the mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis. Conclusively, both non-ischemic and iso-ischemic myocardium may be attributed to nonarrhythmogenic milieu. Nevertheless, the inventive analysis and more explorative data are required to support the suggested postulations.