Measuring Outcomes of an Intensive Care Unit Family Diary Program

A Qualitative Study to Explore the Nurses' Experience of Writing Caring Notes in Diaries for Extracorporeal Oxygenation Membrane (ECMO) Patients: Explore the nurse's experience

The use of diaries is known to reduce post-intensive care syndrome in the intensive care unit (ICU) for survivors and families. Studies are needed to explore nurses' experience with diaries. Although the diaries are written for the patient, the diary entries may be helpful for the nurse as well. Research has shown that ICU diaries fill in significant memory gaps and aid in the resolution of delusional memories. However, there is a shortage of knowledge about the nurses' experience of writing caring notes in diaries. The purpose of this research was to explore the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) nurses' experience of writing caring notes in diaries during the patients' ICU stay. This is a descriptive phenomenological qualitative research study using semi-structured interviews. A one-on-one interview was performed, audiotaped, and transcribed. Three investigators analyzed the data for themes, subcategories, and indicators. A purposive sample of 15 specialty-trained ECMO nurses participated in the study. Three themes emerged from the study relating to the nurse, family, and patient, including positive and negative aspects of writing in the diary and barriers. The vast majority (88%) of 340 comments answered during the interviews were positive. Overall, nurses found the diaries to be beneficial to the nurse, family, and patient. Diary writing may help nurses get back to the core of why we do what they do. Understanding the nurses' experience may help to improve communication and family satisfaction while optimizing dairy programs.

Opening Pandora's box by generating ICU diaries through artificial intelligence: A hypothetical study protocol

BACKGROUND

Patients and families on Intensive Care Units (ICU) benefit from ICU diaries, enhancing their coping and understanding of their experiences. Staff shortages and a limited amount of time severely restrict the application of ICU diaries. To counteract this limitation, generating diary entries from medical and nursing records using an artificial intelligence (AI) might be a solution.

DESIGN AND PURPOSE

Protocol for a hypothetical multi-center, mixed method study to identify the usability and impact of AI-generated ICU diaries, compared with hand-written diaries.

METHOD

A hand-written ICU diary will be written for patients with expected length of stay ≥ 72 h by trained nursing staff and families. Additionally at discharge, the medical and nursing records are analyzed by an AI software, transformed into understandable, empathic diary entries, and printed as diary. Based on an appointment with patients within 3 months, diaries are read in randomized order by trained clinicians with the patients and families. Patients and families will be interviewed about their experiences of reading both diaries. In addition, usability of diaries will be evaluated by a questionnaire.

EXPECTED FINDINGS AND RESULTS

Patients and families describe the similarities and differences of language and the content of the different diaries. In addition, concerns can be expressed about the generation and data processing by AI.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Professional nursing involves empathic communication, patient-centered care, and evidence-based interventions. Diaries, beneficial for ICU patients and families, could potentially be generated by Artificial Intelligence, raising ethical and professional considerations about AI's role in complementing or substituting nurses in diary writing.

CONCLUSIONS

Generating AI-based entries for ICU diaries is feasible, but raises serious questions about nursing ethics, empathy, data protection, and values of professional nurses. Researchers and developers shall discuss these questions in detail, before starting such projects and opening Pandora's box, that can never be closed afterwards.

Nurses' and Parents' View on Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Diaries: A Qualitative Study and Framework Conceptualization

OBJECTIVE

 The birth of a premature or critically ill newborn can be a traumatic event for the entire family. In these situations, the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) diary is a relevant coping intervention to support family members. However, a profound theoretical concept is lacking, and there is little evidence about how it is applied by nurses in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aims to investigate how NICU diaries are used by nurses to support family members cope with their experiences and to develop an evidence-guided and theory-based framework for conceptualizing diary usage in the NICU.

STUDY DESIGN

 A qualitative study design containing 12 narrative interviews with nurses from six different hospitals and two focus group interviews with nine parents from two different hospitals was chosen. The qualitative data were analyzed via content analysis inductively and separately and brought together via graphical coding in a second step.

RESULTS

 Four main categories emerged from the analyzed data to describe the NICU diary in nursing practice. Regarding diary (1) "usage," three different types of NICU diaries were identified, which seem to be established largely intuitive. The (2) "content" is constituted by the diary's title, introduction, textual, and nontextual components. Taking into account the diary (3) "function" for the parental coping process, three subcategories emerge: (a) strengthening the parental role, (b) supporting understanding of events, and (c) bringing joy and normality to the situation. (4) "Challenges" address an appropriate writing style, the reading of parental entries by nurses and limited resources. Based on these results and taking into account relevant literature, a framework for conceptualizing NICU diaries was developed.

CONCLUSION

 NICU diaries show great potential to support the parental coping process. Nevertheless, diary conceptualization should be based on a theoretical framework to clarify its usage for nurses and parents.

KEY POINTS

· NICU diaries are an established intervention used by nurses to support parental coping.. · In nursing practice, different types of NICU diaries emerge.. · Writing styles, content, and reading of entries are reported heterogeneously.. · A conceptualizing framework for NICU diaries is needed..

Finding the right words: A focus group investigation of nurses' experiences of writing diaries for intensive care patients with a poor prognosis

BACKGROUND

The overall purpose of diaries written during an intensive care stay is to help patients fill in memory gaps from the illness trajectory, which might promote long-term psychological recovery. Diaries have also been shown to benefit nurses in maintaining a view of the patient as a person in the highly technical environment and to promote reflection. There is a lack of research on how nurses might be affected by writing a diary for critically ill patients with a poor prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate nurses' experience of writing diaries for intensive care patients with a poor prognosis.

METHODS

This study has a qualitative descriptive design and was inspired by the methodology of interpretive description. Twenty-three nurses from three Norwegian hospitals with a well-established practice of writing diaries participated in four focus groups. Reflexive thematic analysis was used. The study was reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.

FINDINGS

The overarching theme resulting from our analysis was "Finding the right words". This theme represents the challenge of writing in view of the uncertainty of the patient's survival and of who would read the diary. It was important to strike the right tone with these uncertainties in mind. When the patient's life could not be saved, the purpose of the diary expanded to comforting the family. To put an extra effort into making the diary something special when the patient was dying was also a meaningful activity for the nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

Diaries may serve other purposes than helping patients to understand their critical illness trajectory. In cases of a poor prognosis, nurses adapted their writing to comfort the family rather than informing the patient. Diary writing was meaningful for the nurses in managing care of the dying patient.

The evidence base of nurse-led family interventions for improving family outcomes in adult critical care settings: A mixed method systematic review

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the consequences of a patient's admission to critical care settings, causing families to face more psychosocial issues than in previous years. Thus, nurses and other clinicians need to keep abreast of interventions that support the families of critical care patients.

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence of nurse-led family interventions and their family outcomes in adult critical care settings.

DESIGN

A mixed method systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist.

DATA SOURCES

The search included both a screen of relevant databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library) and the screening of citations in relevant articles. Studies published in the English language between January 2010 and October 2020 were considered. The final database searches were performed on 20 October 2020.

METHODS

Screening and eligibility assessment were conducted using the Rayyan software. Studies describing the family outcomes of nurse-led interventions in adult critical care settings through either qualitative or quantitative methods were included, i.e., the mixed method synthesis permitted the inclusion of either qualitative or quantitative findings. Article quality was evaluated by three authors using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools.

FINDINGS

A total of 15 studies - two trials, eight quasi-experimental studies, four qualitative, and one mixed method met the inclusion criteria. The described interventions were organized into five categories: educational/informational; family involvement in care; diary; communication; and bundled interventions. These categories varied in terms of elements, delivery, and family outcomes. Nurse-led interventions that resulted in small to medium improvements in family outcomes included educational interventions with digital storytelling, a bundled approach, informational nursing interventions, and nurse-driven emotional support. The included studies (n = 2) that investigated family rounds in the ICU reported that this approach did not noticeably influence family outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The differences in the intervention elements, tools, and outcomes evaluated in this review reflect the diversity of family needs, and that numerous interventions have already been developed to promote family health in critical care settings. The evidence suggests that interdisciplinary nurse-led family interventions can improve family outcomes. Tweetable abstract: Interprofessional nurse-led family interventions draw on diverse approaches and improve family outcomes in adult critical care settings.

Report on the Third International Intensive Care Unit Diary Conference

TOPIC

Many patients in intensive care units have frightening experiences and memories and subsequent post-intensive care syndrome, with psychiatric morbidity including depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Intensive care unit diaries, written by staff members and families, support patients' understanding of what occurred and may alleviate their psychological suffering.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

An increasing number of critical care nurses in the United States and elsewhere are implementing intensive care unit diaries, but implementation remains challenging.

PURPOSE

To address emerging questions and support implementation in the United States, we held the Third International Intensive Care Unit Diary Conference as a 1-day preconference during the Seventh Annual Johns Hopkins Critical Care Rehabilitation Conference on November 1, 2018, in Baltimore, Maryland. This article summarizes the conference.

CONTENT COVERED

Conference presentations included intensive care unit-related experiences of patients and families, psychosocial aspects of post-intensive care syndrome, the evolution of diaries, implementation strategies for intensive care unit diaries, special topics (eg, legal issues, electronic vs handwritten diaries, pediatric diaries, and time of handover), and psychosocial recovery.

Institutional Challenges and Solutions to Evidence-Based, Patient-Centered Practice: Implementing ICU Diaries

BACKGROUND

Although diaries are an evidence-based practice that improves the quality of life of patients in an intensive care unit and their loved ones, centers in the United States are struggling to successfully implement diary programs in intensive care units. Currently, few published recommendations address how to facilitate implementation of a diary program, and how to effectively sustain it, in an intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVES

To discuss challenges with implementing diary programs in intensive care units at 2 institutions in the United States, and to identify solutions that were operationalized to overcome these perceived difficulties.

METHODS

The teams from the 2 institutions identified local barriers to implementing diaries in their intensive care units. Both groups developed standard operating procedures that outlined the execution and evaluation phases of their implementation projects.

RESULTS

Barriers to implementation include liability and patient privacy, diary program development, and implementation and sustainability concerns. Various strategies can help maintain clinical and family member engagement.

CONCLUSION

Through a team's sustained dedication and a diligent assessment of perceived obstacles, a diary program can indeed be implemented within an intensive care unit.

Stressors in intensive cardiac care units: Patients' perceptions

BACKGROUND

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are often admitted to intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs) to have their vital signs and ventricular function monitored. In most cases, they are conscious and bedbound, causing high stress and anxiety levels.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the stressors affecting patients admitted to ICCUs.

DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study performed in a public hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

A sample of 100 patients with ACS admitted to an ICCU, after 24 hours of hospitalization, was recruited. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, and the Intensive Care Unit Stressor Assessment Scale (ICESS) was applied to investigate stressors. The ICESS' internal consistency was estimated by Cronbach's alpha, and the stressors were analysed by descriptive statistics, association tests, and correlation tests.

RESULTS

Most patients were male, married, and aged 51 to 60 years. The ICESS showed an excellent internal consistency. The mean score identified in patients pointed to a non-stressed to moderately stressed condition. The indicators considered to be more stressful were as follows: "Not knowing ICU length of stay," "Being unable to fulfil family roles," "Missing husband or wife," and "Loss of self-control."

CONCLUSIONS

Stress levels were considered to be non-stressful to moderately stressful. The main stressors were related to psychological distress and physical discomfort dimensions.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Mapping the main stressors of patients with coronary artery disease will allow health professionals to implement strategies to reduce them and consequently reduce their anxiety levels.

The use and usefulness of ICU diaries to support family members of critically ill patients

PURPOSE

To analyze and describe the use and usefulness of the ICU diary to support family members of critically ill patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A socio-technical systems model (SEIPS 2.0) guided data collection and analysis in this study aimed to gain a holistic understanding of factors that shape ICU diary processes and family requirements for support. Triangulated data sources, including interviews, observations, and photographs, were content analyzed for person, task, tool, and context attributes determining the use and usefulness of ICU diaries. Researchers recruited family members of critically ill patients admitted to ICUs in two hospitals (urban, rural) in the southeastern United States.

RESULTS

Nineteen female (100%) family members participated in this study. ICU diaries were used and adapted by family members to cope with the ICU experience in multiple ways. Results indicate that staff support, easy access, embedded instructional format, early initiation, and family ownership facilitated ICU diary use by family members. The ICU diary was useful as a medium to process emotions and gain insights, reduce stress, track information, and communicate with the staff and the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The ICU diary is useful to family members as a stress reduction, information management, and communication tool. The design of ICU diary implementations must address system factors to assure family members receive benefits from diary use. Further research is needed to expand our understanding of the optimal structure, process, and content of ICU diary implementations.

Assessment of patient satisfaction and preferences with an intensive care diary

Objectives

To evaluate the satisfaction of patients admitted to the intensive care unit using a diary and analyze possible points for improving this instrument.

Methods

This was an observational, retrospective study, conducted between March 2014 and July 2017, in a multidisciplinary intensive care unit of a district hospital. The diary was implemented in patients sedated for 3 or more days. Three months after discharge, their satisfaction was assessed using a questionnaire. A patient who agreed with the 5 statements assessing the diary's help in clarifying the intensive care unit stay, in filling memory gaps, in recovery, in reassurance, and in the recommendation of this intervention was defined as satisfied.

Results

A total of 110 patients were included, of whom 55 answered the questionnaire. Of these, 36 (65.5%) were classified as satisfied. Each item had a positive response in more than 74% of cases. A total of 60% of the participants suggested increasing the number of photographs. No significant differences were found in the subgroup analysis (age, sex, duration of sedation and ventilation, length of diary keeping, severity on admission, or delirium, depression, or anxiety in the intensive care unit).

Conclusions

Most patients were satisfied with the diary but suggested an increase in the number of photographs.

Feasibility and Perceptions of PICU Diaries

OBJECTIVES

To determine the feasibility of implementing an ICU diary in the pediatric critical care setting and to understand the perceptions held by family members who receive the diaries after PICU discharge.

DESIGN

Observational pilot study.

SETTING

PICU in a tertiary academic hospital in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Critically ill pediatric patients admitted to the PICU and their families.

INTERVENTIONS

The addition of a PICU diary to a patient's routine care.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty families of critically ill children admitted to the PICU were enrolled in the PICU diary pilot study between May 2017 and March 2018. Patients who had an anticipated length of stay of at least 3 days and whose families were English-speaking were included. The median age of patients was 6 years, ranging from newborns to 18 years old, and the median length of stay was 11.5 days (interquartile range, 8.5-41 d). A total of 453 diary entries were written in 19 diaries over 433 PICU days, the majority of which were composed by bedsides nurses (63%). Follow-up surveys sent to parents 2 weeks after PICU discharge revealed that of the parents who had contributed to the diary, most enjoyed doing so (7/8). Nine of 12 parents had reviewed the diary at least once since discharge, and all parent respondents found the diary to be a beneficial aspect of their experience after PICU discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ICU diaries in the PICU setting is feasible and perceived as beneficial by families of critically ill children. Future studies are needed to better understand if PICU diaries may objectively improve psychologic outcomes of patients and family members after PICU admission.

Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors

BACKGROUND

The intensive care unit (ICU) stay has been linked with a number of physical and psychological sequelae, known collectively as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Specific ICU follow-up services are relatively recent developments in health systems, and may have the potential to address PICS through targeting unmet health needs arising from the experience of the ICU stay. There is currently no single accepted model of follow-up service and current aftercare programmes encompass a variety of interventions and materials. There is uncertain evidence about whether follow-up services effectively address PICS, and this review assesses this.

OBJECTIVES

Our main objective was to assess the effectiveness of follow-up services for ICU survivors that aim to identify and address unmet health needs related to the ICU period. We aimed to assess effectiveness in relation to health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mortality, depression and anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), physical function, cognitive function, ability to return to work or education and adverse effects.Our secondary objectives were to examine different models of follow-up services. We aimed to explore: the effectiveness of service organisation (physician- versus nurse-led, face-to-face versus remote, timing of follow-up service); differences related to country (high-income versus low- and middle-income countries); and effect of delirium, which can subsequently affect cognitive function, and the effect of follow-up services may differ for these participants.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL on 7 November 2017. We searched clinical trials registers for ongoing studies, and conducted backward and forward citation searching of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised and non-randomised studies with adult participants, who had been discharged from hospital following an ICU stay. We included studies that compared an ICU follow-up service using a structured programme and co-ordinated by a healthcare professional versus no follow-up service or standard care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and synthesised findings. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies (four randomised studies; one non-randomised study), for a total of 1707 participants who were ICU survivors with a range of illness severities and conditions. Follow-up services were led by nurses in four studies or a multidisciplinary team in one study. They included face-to-face consultations at home or in a clinic, or telephone consultations or both. Each study included at least one consultation (weekly, monthly, or six-monthly), and two studies had up to eight consultations. Although the design of follow-up service consultations differed in each study, we noted that each service included assessment of participants' needs with referrals to specialist support if required.It was not feasible to blind healthcare professionals or participants to the intervention and we did not know whether this may have introduced performance bias. We noted baseline differences (two studies), and services included additional resources (two studies), which may have influenced results, and one non-randomised study had high risk of selection bias.We did not combine data from randomised studies with data from one non-randomised study. Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in ICU survivors may make little or no difference to HRQoL at 12 months (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.1 to 0.1; 1 study; 286 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found moderate-certainty evidence from five studies that they probably also make little or no difference to all-cause mortality up to 12 months after ICU discharge (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.22; 4 studies; 1289 participants; and in one non-randomised study 79/259 deaths in the intervention group, and 46/151 in the control group) and low-certainty evidence from four studies that they may make little or no difference to PTSD (SMD -0.05, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.10, 703 participants, 3 studies; and one non-randomised study reported less chance of PTSD when a follow-up service was used).It is uncertain whether using a follow-up service reduces depression and anxiety (3 studies; 843 participants), physical function (4 studies; 1297 participants), cognitive function (4 studies; 1297 participants), or increases the ability to return to work or education (1 study; 386 participants), because the certainty of this evidence is very low. No studies measured adverse effects.We could not assess our secondary objectives because we found insufficient studies to justify subgroup analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found insufficient evidence, from a limited number of studies, to determine whether ICU follow-up services are effective in identifying and addressing the unmet health needs of ICU survivors. We found five ongoing studies which are not included in this review; these ongoing studies may increase our certainty in the effect in future updates. Because of limited data, we were unable to explore whether one design of follow-up service is preferable to another, or whether a service is more effective for some people than others, and we anticipate that future studies may also vary in design. We propose that future studies are designed with robust methods (for example randomised studies are preferable) and consider only one variable (the follow-up service) compared to standard care; this would increase confidence that the effect is due to the follow-up service rather than concomitant therapies.

Humanization of critical care-psychological effects on healthcare professionals and relatives: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review and evaluate the effects of humanized care of the critically ill on empathy among healthcare professionals, anxiety among relatives, and burnout and compassion fatigue in both groups.

SOURCE

MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ProQuest Dissertations were searched from inception to 29 June 2017 for studies that investigated the effects of interventions with potential to humanize care of the critically ill on the following outcomes: empathy among critical care professionals, anxiety among relatives, and burnout and compassion fatigue in either group. We defined a humanizing intervention as one with substantial potential to increase physical or emotional proximity to the patient. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and data quality.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Twelve studies addressing four discrete interventions (liberal visitation, diaries, family participation in basic care, and witnessed resuscitation) and one mixed intervention were included. Ten studies measured anxiety among 1,055 relatives. Two studies measured burnout in 288 critical care professionals. None addressed empathy or compassion fatigue. Eleven of the included studies had an overall high risk of bias. No pooled estimates of effect were calculated as a priori criteria for data synthesis were not met.

CONCLUSIONS

We found insufficient evidence to make any quantitative assessment of the effect of humanizing interventions on any of these psychologic outcomes. We observed a trend towards reduced anxiety among family members who participated in basic patient care, liberal visitation, and diary keeping. We found conflicting effects of liberal visitation on burnout among healthcare professionals.

[Diaries for intensive care unit patients reduce the risk for psychological sequelae : Systematic literature review and meta-analysis]

BACKGROUND

Diaries are written for patients on intensive care units (ICU) by clinicians and relatives to reduce the risk of psychological complications such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression. The authors of a Cochrane Review on this topic published in 2015, included studies with PTSD diagnoses based on interviews carried out by qualified personnel, and concluded that there is inadequate evidence to support the thesis that ICU diaries reduce the risk of psychological complications.

METHODS

The present study replicated the design of the Cochrane Review with identical search algorithms, but included additional outcomes data from validated methods of diagnosing psychological complications that were not considered in the original Cochrane Review. The primary outcome was PTSD in patients or relatives with ICU diaries. Secondary outcomes were anxiety and/or depression symptoms. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment.

RESULTS

The replicated search produced 3179 citations, of which there were 6 eligible studies from which 605 patients and 145 relatives could be included in the meta-analysis. Studies ratings ranged from low to good. The meta-analyses of the PTSD outcome demonstrated the following: (a) for ICU patients (4 studies, n = 569 patients) a non-significant reduction (odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.24-1.42, p = 0.23), and (b) for relatives' PTSD (2 studies, n = 145 relatives) a significant reduction (OR 0.17, 95%CI: 0.08-0.38, p < 0.0001). The symptoms anxiety and depression in ICU patients (2 studies each, n = 88 patients) were significantly reduced (OR 0.23, 95%CI: 0.07-0.77, p = 0.02; OR 0.27, 95%CI: 0.09-0.77, p = 0.01, respectively). Heterogeneity was between 0 and 54%.

CONCLUSION

ICU diaries may reduce the risk of psychological complications in patients and relatives after ICU stays.