Lack of Association of High Backrest With Sacral Tissue Changes in Adults Receiving Mechanical Ventilation

Risk Factors for Pressure Injury Development Among Critical Care Patients

Identification of the appropriate pressure injury (PI) risk factors is the first step in successful PI prevention. Measuring PI risk through formalized PI risk assessment is an essential component of any PI prevention program. Major PI risk factors identified in the empirical literature in the critical care population include age, diabetes, hypotension, mobility, prolonged intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and vasopressor administration. Future risk assessment using sophisticated data analytics available in the electronic medical record may result in earlier, targeted PI prevention and will improve our understanding of risk factors that may contribute to unavoidable PIs.

Backrest elevation in the semi-lateral position: Case of a sacral pressure ulcer with undermining formation

Backrest elevation for a patient with a sacral-coccygeal pressure ulcer is necessary in certain situations, particularly to enable the patient to take meals. Deep pressure ulcers with undermining formations affect patients and create challenges for caregivers. The procedure of backrest elevation potentially worsens the pre-existing sacral-coccygeal pressure ulcers with undermining formations. Here, we report a Case of the clinical care of a patient using a simple approach for backrest elevation that minimizes additional injury to the existing sacral pressure ulcer covered with granulation tissue. In this case, we performed the backrest elevation in the semi-lateral position. After the backrest elevation, the patient was repositioned to the supine position to take a meal. The supine position was allowed at any time except during backrest elevation. The pressure ulcer of the patient improved rapidly using the combined treatment of our positioning approach and appropriate topical ointments. This practical approach may be effective for some patients as it potentially decreases the effect of shear force. The rationale for this approach can be explained by the mechanism of the undermining formation outlined in our experimental study using a pressure ulcer model mounted to a phantom. Although we used this position for patients with sacral-coccygeal pressure ulcers, this simple approach may also be considered for other patients based on our proposed pathogenesis of undermining formations.

Best Practices in Pressure Injury Treatment

Pressure injury treatments are tailored to the characteristics of the wound. Wound depth, exudate, presence of infection, and patient goals of care will guide appropriate dressing and treatment selection. The interprofessional team, patient, and family should collaborate to create a plan of care for wound healing.

The mechanism of persistent undermining of a sacral pressure ulcer: Experimental analyses using a deformable model and examination of skin mobility over different anatomical locations

Undermining is an important issue in the treatment and care of deep pressure ulcers. The frequency of the undermining over different bony prominences varies. In particular, deep pressure ulcers over the sacrum exhibit undermining more frequently than those occurring over the heel. Although shear force has been suggested as a critical factor in undermining, the exact mechanism remains unclear due to ethical and technical reasons in clinical practice. To clarify this issue, a deformable model was constructed to recreate the physical and morphological properties of a pressure ulcer with persistent undermining. The model was constructed using urethane to recreate the physical properties of a pressure ulcer. To examine the clinical relevance of the model, mechanical properties of the skin and the model were measured using a durometer. The model was further mounted onto a phantom that was laid on a bed. Backrest elevation of the bed induced deformities in the urethane model, suggesting a mechanism of persistent undermining of the sacral pressure ulcer. Moreover, a simple palpation examination in elderly volunteers revealed that the skin over the sacrum was more mobile than the skin over the heel. Therefore, persistent undermining is likely caused by specific external forces and the characteristic skin mobility of the sacral region. These two different factors explain the frequent undermining that occurs in sacral pressure ulcers.