Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta: A Bridge to Flight Survival

On-site placement of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in a hemorrhagic shock patient: A successful endeavor involving long-distance air transport

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is primarily utilized in traumatic non-compressible torso hemorrhage. We present a 49-year-old male with hemorrhagic shock necessitating on-site REBOA placement on an island 986 km away from the nearest critical care center. The patient experienced sudden pain in the right costal margin and visited the local clinic where computed tomography revealed a massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage and a renal artery aneurysm. An emergency care physician was deployed via fixed-wing aircraft who positioned the REBOA on-site in the thoracic aorta. Partial balloon inflation (partial REBOA) and intermittent inflation/deflation (intermittent REBOA) was repeated throughout the 5-h return flight. Despite prolonged REBOA placement, no safety issues or ischemic complications were documented and parent artery occlusion was subsequently performed via interventional radiology at our facility. The patient was later discharged home in a good state of health. On-site REBOA placement is not only applicable to trauma but also internal hemorrhaging due to non-traumatic causes. Partial and intermittent REBOA successfully stabilized circulation, prevented organ ischemia and facilitated long-distance patient transport in the present case.

Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The data on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) use continue to grow with its increasing use in trauma centers. The data in her last 5 years have not been systematically reviewed. We aim to assess current literature related to REBOA use and outcomes among civilian trauma populations.

METHODS

A literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and JAMA Network for studies regarding REBOA usage in civilian trauma from 2016 to 2020 is carried out. This review followed preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 35 studies for inclusion in our systematic review, involving 4073 patients. The most common indication for REBOA was patient presentation in hemorrhagic shock secondary to traumatic injury. REBOA was associated with significant systolic blood pressure improvement. Of 4 studies comparing REBOA to non-REBOA controls, 2 found significant mortality benefit with REBOA. Significant mortality improvement with REBOA compared to open aortic occlusion was seen in 4 studies. In the few studies investigating zone placement, highest survival rate was seen in patients undergoing zone 3. Overall, reports of complications directly related to overall REBOA use were relatively low.

CONCLUSION

REBOA has been shown to be effective in promoting hemodynamic stability in civilian trauma. Mortality data on REBOA use are conflicting, but most studies investigating REBOA vs. open occlusion methods suggest a significant survival advantage. Recent data on the REBOA technique (zone placement and partial REBOA) are sparse and currently insufficient to determine advantage with any particular variation. Overall, larger prospective civilian trauma studies are needed to better understand the benefits of REBOA in high-mortality civilian trauma populations.

STUDY TYPE

Systematic Review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III- Therapeutic.

Managing noncompressible torso hemorrhage with REBOA

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has reemerged as a treatment for noncompressible torso hemorrhage. This article discusses indications and contraindications for REBOA, describes the procedure, and reviews nursing considerations for patients undergoing REBOA.

Radiofrequency Identification of the ER-REBOA: Confirmation of Placement Without Fluoroscopy

INTRODUCTION

Non-compressible torso hemorrhage accounts for 70% of battlefield deaths. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging technology used to mitigate massive truncal hemorrhage. Use of REBOA on the battlefield is limited by the need for radiographic guided balloon placement. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) is a simple, portable, real-time technology utilized to detect retained sponges during surgery. We investigated the feasibility of RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm prospective proof-of-concept experimental study approved by the institutional review board at Naval Medical Center San Diego. The ER-REBOA (Prytime Medical Devices, Inc, Boerne, TX, USA) was modified by placement of a RFID tag. The tagged ER-REBOA was placed in zone I or zone III of the aorta in a previously perfused cadaver. Exact location was documented with X-ray. Five blinded individuals used the RF Assure Detection System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) handheld detection wand to predict catheter tip location from the xiphoid process (zone I) or pubic tubercle (zone III).

RESULTS

In zone I, actual distance (Da) of the catheter tip was 11 cm from the xiphoid process. Mean predicted distance (Dp) from Da was 1.52 cm (95% CI 1.19-1.85). In zone III, Da was 14 cm from the pubic tubercle. Mean Dp from Da was 4.11 cm (95% CI 3.68-4.54). Sensitivity of detection was 100% in both zones. Specificity (Defined as Dp within 2 cm of Da) was 86% in zone I and 16% in zone III.

CONCLUSIONS

Using RFID to confirm the placement of ER-REBOA is feasible with specificity highest in zone I. Future work should focus on refining this technology for the forward-deployed setting.