Use of automated artificial intelligence to predict the need for orthodontic extractions

Real-time segmentation and detection of ponticulus posticus in lateral cephalometric radiographs using YOLOv8: a step towards enhanced clinical evaluation

OBJECTIVES

Ponticulus posticus (PP) is a bony structure in the cervical spine, often difficult to identify in radiographic images, and its detection is important for both orthodontic diagnosis and clinical decision-making related to craniovertebral pathologies. The purpose of this study is to develop a deep learning-based approach for detecting the PP in lateral cephalometric radiographs using the YOLOv8-seg model.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed a dataset of 1000 anonymized lateral cephalometric radiographs, focusing on the segmentation and detection of the PP. Images were resized to 640 × 640 pixels and labeled by two experienced dentomaxillofacial radiologists. The YOLOv8-seg model, designed for segmentation tasks, was trained over 100 epochs with a batch size of sixteen, using pre-trained weights from the COCO dataset. Model performance was evaluated using precision, recall, mean average precision (mAP), and F1 score metrics.

RESULTS

The YOLOv8s-seg model demonstrated high accuracy in detecting the PP, with a precision of 62.81%, recall of 88.7%, mAP50 of 75.27%, mAP95 of 62.28%, and an F1 score of 73.54%. Even in cases where the boundaries of the C1 cervical vertebra were not clearly distinguishable, the model performed effectively, suggesting its reliability in clinical applications.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed YOLOv8-seg model shows promising potential for improving the accuracy and efficiency of PP detection in lateral cephalometric radiographs. By integrating AI into the diagnostic process, orthodontic practices can benefit from more precise and reliable identification of small but clinically significant anatomical structures, ultimately enhancing patient care and diagnostic accuracy.

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Medicine: A Critical Review

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI), including its subfields of machine learning and deep learning, is a branch of computer science and engineering focused on creating machines capable of tasks requiring human-like intelligence, such as visual perception, decision-making, and natural language processing. AI applications have become increasingly prevalent in dental medicine, generating high expectations as well as raising ethical and practical concerns.

METHODS

This critical review evaluates the current applications of AI in dentistry, identifying key perspectives, challenges, and limitations in ongoing AI research.

RESULTS

AI models have been applied across various dental specialties, supporting diagnosis, treatment planning, and decision-making, while also reducing the burden of repetitive tasks and optimizing clinical workflows. However, ethical complexities and methodological limitations, such as inconsistent data quality, bias risk, lack of transparency, and limited clinical validation, undermine the quality of AI studies and hinder the effective integration of AI into routine dental practice.

CONCLUSIONS

To improve AI research, studies must adhere to standardized methodological and ethical guidelines, particularly in data collection, while ensuring transparency, privacy, and accountability. Developing a comprehensive framework for producing robust, reproducible AI research and clinically validated technologies will facilitate the seamless integration of AI into clinical practice, benefiting both clinicians and patients by improving dental care.

Artificial intelligence in dentistry: Exploring emerging applications and future prospects

OBJECTIVES

This narrative review aimed to explore the evolution and advancements of artificial intelligence technologies, highlighting their transformative impact on healthcare, education, and specific aspects within dentistry as a field.

DATA AND SOURCES

Subtopics within artificial intelligence technologies in dentistry were identified and divided among four reviewers. Electronic searches were performed with search terms that included: artificial intelligence, technologies, healthcare, education, dentistry, restorative, prosthodontics, periodontics, endodontics, oral surgery, oral pathology, oral medicine, implant dentistry, dental education, dental patient care, dental practice management, and combinations of the keywords.

STUDY

selection: A total of 120 articles were included for review that evaluated the use of artificial intelligence technologies within the healthcare and dental field. No formal evidence-based quality assessment was performed due to the narrative nature of this review. The conducted search was limited to the English language with no other further restrictions.

RESULTS

The significance and applications of artificial intelligence technologies on the areas of dental education, dental patient care, and dental practice management were reviewed, along with the existing limitations and future directions of artificial intelligence in dentistry as whole. Current artificial intelligence technologies have shown promising efforts to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice in dental education, as well as improved diagnostic information gathering and clinical decision-making abilities in patient care throughout various dental specialties. The integration of artificial intelligence into patient administration aspects have enabled practices to develop more efficient management workflows.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the limitations that exist, the integration of artificial intelligence into the dental profession comes with numerous benefits that will continue to evolve each day. While the challenges and ethical considerations, mainly concerns about data privacy, are areas that need to be further addressed, the future of artificial intelligence in dentistry looks promising, with ongoing research aimed at overcoming current limitations and expanding artificial intelligence technologies.

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for dental and occlusal parameters using standardized clinical photographs

INTRODUCTION

SmileMate (SmileMate, Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France) is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based Web site that uses intraoral photographs to assess patients' dental and orthodontic parameters and provide a report. This study aimed to investigate the ability of an AI assessment tool (SmileMate) for orthodontic and dental parameters.

METHODS

A United Kingdom-based prospective clinical study enrolled 35 participants in the study. The participants' occlusal and dental parameters were assessed, and standardized orthodontic photographs were taken and uploaded to the SmileMate Web site to produce an AI-generated assessment. A total of 19 parameters were evaluated: 9 orthodontic parameters and 10 dental parameters covering both soft and hard tissues. A crosstabulation for AI and clinician assessments was reported using Fisher exact tests. Cohen's kappa was calculated to provide an agreement between the gold standard (clinician assessment) and SmileMate (AI assessment). Finally, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were calculated.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences between a direct in-person assessment and the SmileMate AI assessment were noted across 9 of the 19 parameters (P <0.05, Fisher exact test). The overall kappa value was fair (0.29), with a variety of agreements between AI and clinician assessments; the level of agreement ranged from poor in 2 parameters (lateral open bite and teeth fracture) to almost perfect for missing and retained teeth. The level of agreement ranged from slight to moderate for the other variables in this study. The overall sensitivity of the AI-generated assessments was 72%, and the specificity was 54%. The specificity of AI was very low for gingivitis and oral hygiene, indicating a very high probability of false-positive findings for those parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall agreement between SmileMate and the clinician's assessment was slight to moderate. AI-generated assessments are inadequate for evaluating malocclusion.

Automated Machine Learning in Dentistry: A Narrative Review of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

The adoption of automated machine learning (AutoML) in dentistry is transforming clinical practices by enabling clinicians to harness machine learning (ML) models without requiring extensive technical expertise. This narrative review aims to explore the impact of autoML in dental applications. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted without time and language restrictions. Inclusion criteria focused on studies evaluating autoML applications and performance for dental tasks. Exclusion criteria included non-dental studies, single-case reports, and conference abstracts. This review highlights multiple promising applications of autoML in dentistry. Diagnostic tasks showed high accuracy, such as 95.4% precision in dental implant classification and 92% accuracy in paranasal sinus disease detection. Predictive tasks also demonstrated promise, including 84% accuracy for ICU admissions due to dental infections and 93.9% accuracy in orthodontic extraction predictions. AutoML frameworks like Google Vertex AI and H2O AutoML emerged as key tools for these applications. AutoML shows great promise in transforming dentistry by facilitating data-driven decision-making and improving patient care quality through accessible, automated solutions. Future advancements should focus on enhancing model interpretability, developing large and annotated datasets, and creating pipelines tailored to dental tasks. Educating clinicians on autoML and integrating domain-specific knowledge into automated platforms could further bridge the gap between complex ML technology and practical dental applications.

Artificial intelligence for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, and to evaluate whether AI improves accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency compared to expert-based manual approaches, while highlighting its current limitations.

DATA

This review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist.

SOURCES

An electronic search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases. Additional studies were identified from Google Scholar and by hand searching through included studies. The search was carried out until June 2023 without restriction of language and publication year.

STUDY SELECTION

After applying the selection criteria, 71 articles were included in the review. The main research areas were classified into three domains based on the purpose of AI: diagnostics (n = 29), landmark identification (n = 20) and treatment planning (n = 22).

CONCLUSION

This scoping review shows that AI can be used in various orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning applications, with anatomical landmark detection being the most studied domain. While AI shows potential in improving time efficiency and reducing operator variability, the accuracy and reliability have not yet consistently surpassed those of expert clinicians. At all moments, human supervision remains essential. Further advances and optimizations are necessary to strive towards automated patient-specific treatment planning.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

AI in orthodontics has shown its ability to serve as a decision-support system, thereby enhancing the efficiency of diagnostics and treatment planning within orthodontics digital workflow."

Evaluation of different machine learning algorithms for extraction decision in orthodontic treatment

INTRODUCTION

The extraction decision significantly affects the treatment process and outcome. Therefore, it is crucial to make this decision with a more objective and standardized method. The objectives of this study were (1) to identify the best-performing model among seven machine learning (ML) models, which will standardize the extraction decision and serve as a guide for inexperienced clinicians, and (2) to determine the important variables for the extraction decision.

METHODS

This study included 1000 patients who received orthodontic treatment with or without extraction (500 extraction and 500 non-extraction). The success criteria of the study were the decisions made by the four experienced orthodontists. Seven ML models were trained using 36 variables; including demographic information, cephalometric and model measurements. First, the extraction decision was performed, and then the extraction type was identified. Accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve were used to measure the success of ML models.

RESULTS

The Stacking Classifier model, which consists of Gradient Boosted Trees, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest models, showed the highest performance in extraction decision with 91.2% AUC. The most important features determining extraction decision were maxillary and mandibular arch length discrepancy, Wits Appraisal, and ANS-Me length. Likewise, the Stacking Classifier showed the highest performance with 76.3% accuracy in extraction type decisions. The most important variables for the extraction type decision were mandibular arch length discrepancy, Class I molar relationship, cephalometric overbite, Wits Appraisal, and L1-NB distance.

CONCLUSION

The Stacking Classifier model exhibited the best performance for the extraction decision. While ML models showed a high performance in extraction decision, they could not able to achieve the same level of performance in extraction type decision.

Evaluation of four machine learning methods in predicting orthodontic extraction decision from clinical examination data and analysis of feature contribution

Introduction

The study aims to predict tooth extraction decision based on four machine learning methods and analyze the feature contribution, so as to shed light on the important basis for experts of tooth extraction planning, providing reference for orthodontic treatment planning.

Methods

This study collected clinical information of 192 patients with malocclusion diagnosis and treatment plans. This study used four machine learning strategies, including decision tree, random forest, support vector machine (SVM) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) to predict orthodontic extraction decisions on clinical examination data acquired during initial consultant containing Angle classification, skeletal classification, maxillary and mandibular crowding, overjet, overbite, upper and lower incisor inclination, vertical growth pattern, lateral facial profile. Among them, 30% of the samples were randomly selected as testing sets. We used five-fold cross-validation to evaluate the generalization performance of the model and avoid over-fitting. The accuracy of the four models was calculated for the training set and cross-validation set. The confusion matrix was plotted for the testing set, and 6 indicators were calculated to evaluate the performance of the model. For the decision tree and random forest models, we observed the feature contribution.

Results

The accuracy of the four models in the training set ranges from 82% to 90%, and in the cross-validation set, the decision tree and random forest had higher accuracy. In the confusion matrix analysis, decision tree tops the four models with highest accuracy, specificity, precision and F1-score and the other three models tended to classify too many samples as extraction cases. In the feature contribution analysis, crowding, lateral facial profile, and lower incisor inclination ranked at the top in the decision tree model.

Conclusion

Among the machine learning models that only use clinical data for tooth extraction prediction, decision tree has the best overall performance. For tooth extraction decisions, specifically, crowding, lateral facial profile, and lower incisor inclination have the greatest contribution.

Applications of artificial intelligence for surgical extraction in stomatology: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been extensively used in the field of stomatology over the past several years. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-based models in the procedure, assessment, and treatment planning of surgical extraction.

STUDY DESIGN

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted on the Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases, covering English publications up to September 2023. Two reviewers performed the study selection and data extraction independently. Only original research studies utilizing AI in surgical extraction of stomatology were included. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was selected to perform the quality assessment of the selected literature.

RESULTS

From 2,336 retrieved references, 35 studies were deemed eligible. Among them, 28 researchers reported the pioneering role of AI in segmentation, classification, and detection, aligning with clinical needs. In addition, another 7 studies suggested promising results in tooth extraction decision-making, but further model refinement and validation were required.

CONCLUSIONS

Integration of AI in stomatology surgical extraction has significantly progressed, enhancing decision-making accuracy. Combining and comparing algorithmic outcomes across studies is essential for determining optimal clinical applications in the future.

The Future of Orthodontics: Deep Learning Technologies

Deep learning has emerged as a revolutionary technical advancement in modern orthodontics, offering novel methods for diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome prediction. Over the past 25 years, the field of dentistry has widely adopted information technology (IT), resulting in several benefits, including decreased expenses, increased efficiency, decreased need for human expertise, and reduced errors. The transition from preset rules to learning from real-world examples, particularly machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI), has greatly benefited the organization, analysis, and storage of medical data. Deep learning, a type of AI, enables robots to mimic human neural networks, allowing them to learn and make decisions independently without the need for explicit programming. Its ability to automate cephalometric analysis and enhance diagnosis through 3D imaging has revolutionized orthodontic operations. Deep learning models have the potential to significantly improve treatment outcomes and reduce human errors by accurately identifying anatomical characteristics on radiographs, thereby expediting analytical processes. Additionally, the use of 3D imaging technologies such as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can facilitate precise treatment planning, allowing for comprehensive examinations of craniofacial architecture, tooth movements, and airway dimensions. In today's era of personalized medicine, deep learning's ability to customize treatments for individual patients has propelled the field of orthodontics forward tremendously. However, it is essential to address issues related to data privacy, model interpretability, and ethical considerations before orthodontic practices can use deep learning in an ethical and responsible manner. Modern orthodontics is evolving, thanks to the ability of deep learning to deliver more accurate, effective, and personalized orthodontic treatments, improving patient care as technology develops.

Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: Critical Review

With increasing digitalization in orthodontics, certain orthodontic manufacturing processes such as the fabrication of indirect bonding trays, aligner production, or wire bending can be automated. However, orthodontic treatment planning and evaluation remains a specialist's task and responsibility. As the prediction of growth in orthodontic patients and response to orthodontic treatment is inherently complex and individual, orthodontists make use of features gathered from longitudinal, multimodal, and standardized orthodontic data sets. Currently, these data sets are used by the orthodontist to make informed, rule-based treatment decisions. In research, artificial intelligence (AI) has been successfully applied to assist orthodontists with the extraction of relevant data from such data sets. Here, AI has been applied for the analysis of clinical imagery, such as automated landmark detection in lateral cephalograms but also for evaluation of intraoral scans or photographic data. Furthermore, AI is applied to help orthodontists with decision support for treatment decisions such as the need for orthognathic surgery or for orthodontic tooth extractions. One major challenge in current AI research in orthodontics is the limited generalizability, as most studies use unicentric data with high risks of bias. Moreover, comparing AI across different studies and tasks is virtually impossible as both outcomes and outcome metrics vary widely, and underlying data sets are not standardized. Notably, only few AI applications in orthodontics have reached full clinical maturity and regulatory approval, and researchers in the field are tasked with tackling real-world evaluation and implementation of AI into the orthodontic workflow.

Radiographic Imaging for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Skeletal Class III malocclusion is one type of dentofacial deformity that significantly affects patients' facial aesthetics and oral health. The orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion presents challenges due to uncertainties surrounding mandibular growth patterns and treatment outcomes. In recent years, disease-specific radiographic features have garnered interest from researchers in various fields including orthodontics, for their exceptional performance in enhancing diagnostic precision and treatment effect predictability. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the valuable radiographic features in the diagnosis and management of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Based on the existing literature, a series of analyses on lateral cephalograms have been concluded to identify the significant variables related to facial type classification, growth prediction, and decision-making for tooth extractions and orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Furthermore, we summarize the parameters regarding the inter-maxillary relationship, as well as different anatomical structures including the maxilla, mandible, craniofacial base, and soft tissues from conventional and machine learning statistical models. Several distinct radiographic features for Class III malocclusion have also been preliminarily observed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

AI in Orthodontics: Revolutionizing Diagnostics and Treatment Planning-A Comprehensive Review

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine has transformed various medical specialties, including orthodontics. AI has shown promising results in enhancing the accuracy of diagnoses, treatment planning, and predicting treatment outcomes. Its usage in orthodontic practices worldwide has increased with the availability of various AI applications and tools. This review explores the principles of AI, its applications in orthodontics, and its implementation in clinical practice. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on AI applications in dental diagnostics, cephalometric evaluation, skeletal age determination, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) evaluation, decision making, and patient telemonitoring. Due to study heterogeneity, no meta-analysis was possible. AI has demonstrated high efficacy in all these areas, but variations in performance and the need for manual supervision suggest caution in clinical settings. The complexity and unpredictability of AI algorithms call for cautious implementation and regular manual validation. Continuous AI learning, proper governance, and addressing privacy and ethical concerns are crucial for successful integration into orthodontic practice.

Can we predict orthodontic extraction patterns by using machine learning?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the utility of machine learning (ML) in accurately predicting orthodontic extraction patterns in a heterogeneous population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The material of this retrospective study consisted of records of 366 patients treated with orthodontic extractions. The dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and test sets (30%) and was stratified according to race/ethnicity and gender. Fifty-five cephalometric and demographic input data were used to train and test multiple ML algorithms. The extraction patterns were labelled according to the previous treatment plan. Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms were used to predict the patient's extraction patterns.

RESULTS

The highest class accuracy percentages were obtained for the upper and lower 1st premolars (U/L4s) (RF: 81.63%, LR: 63.27%, SVM: 63.27%) and upper 1st premolars only (U4s) extraction patterns (RF: 61.11%, LR: 72.22%, SVM: 72.22%). However, all methods revealed low class accuracy rates (<50%) for the upper 1st and lower 2nd premolars (U4/L5s), upper 2nd and lower 1st premolars (U5/L4s), and upper and lower 2nd premolars (U/L5s) extraction patterns. For the overall accuracy, RF yielded the highest percentage with 54.55%, followed by SVM with 52.73% and LR with 49.09%.

CONCLUSION

All tested supervised ML techniques yielded good accuracy in predicting U/L4s and U4s extraction patterns. However, they predicted poorly for the U4/L5s, U5/L4s, and U/L5s extraction patterns. Molar relationship, mandibular crowding, and overjet were found to be the most predictive indicators for determining extraction patterns.

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics: Current State and Future Perspectives

In recent years, there has been the notable emergency of artificial intelligence (AI) as a transformative force in multiple domains, including orthodontics. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the present state of AI applications in orthodontics, which can be categorized into the following domains: (1) diagnosis, including cephalometric analysis, dental analysis, facial analysis, skeletal-maturation-stage determination and upper-airway obstruction assessment; (2) treatment planning, including decision making for extractions and orthognathic surgery, and treatment outcome prediction; and (3) clinical practice, including practice guidance, remote care, and clinical documentation. We have witnessed a broadening of the application of AI in orthodontics, accompanied by advancements in its performance. Additionally, this review outlines the existing limitations within the field and offers future perspectives.

A machine learning model for orthodontic extraction/non-extraction decision in a racially and ethnically diverse patient population

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the present study was to create a machine learning (ML) algorithm with the ability to predict the extraction/non-extraction decision in a racially and ethnically diverse sample.

METHODS

Data was gathered from the records of 393 patients (200 non-extraction and 193 extraction) from a racially and ethnically diverse population. Four ML models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], support vector machine [SVM], and neural network [NN]) were trained on a training set (70% of samples) and then tested on the remaining samples (30%). The accuracy and precision of the ML model predictions were calculated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The proportion of correct extraction/non-extraction decisions was also calculated.

RESULTS

The LR, SVM, and NN models performed best, with an AUC of the ROC of 91.0%, 92.5%, and 92.3%, respectively. The overall proportion of correct decisions was 82%, 76%, 83%, and 81% for the LR, RF, SVM, and NN models, respectively. The features found to be most helpful to the ML algorithms in making their decisions were maxillary crowding/spacing, L1-NB (mm), U1-NA (mm), PFH:AFH, and SN-MP(̊), although many other features contributed significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

ML models can predict the extraction decision in a racially and ethnically diverse patient population with a high degree of accuracy and precision. Crowding, sagittal, and vertical characteristics all featured prominently in the hierarchy of components most influential to the ML decision-making process.

A Novel Machine Learning Model for Predicting Orthodontic Treatment Duration

In the field of orthodontics, providing patients with accurate treatment time estimates is of utmost importance. As orthodontic practices continue to evolve and embrace new advancements, incorporating machine learning (ML) methods becomes increasingly valuable in improving orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. This study aimed to develop a novel ML model capable of predicting the orthodontic treatment duration based on essential pre-treatment variables. Patients who completed comprehensive orthodontic treatment at the Indiana University School of Dentistry were included in this retrospective study. Fifty-seven pre-treatment variables were collected and used to train and test nine different ML models. The performance of each model was assessed using descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients, and one-way analysis of variance tests. Random Forest, Lasso, and Elastic Net were found to be the most accurate, with a mean absolute error of 7.27 months in predicting treatment duration. Extraction decision, COVID, intermaxillary relationship, lower incisor position, and additional appliances were identified as important predictors of treatment duration. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of ML in predicting orthodontic treatment duration using pre-treatment variables.

Short- and Long-Term Prediction of the Post-Pubertal Mandibular Length and Y-Axis in Females Utilizing Machine Learning

The aim of this study was to create a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm for predicting the post-pubertal mandibular length and Y-axis in females. Cephalometric data from 176 females with Angle Class I occlusion were used to train and test seven ML algorithms. For all ML methods tested, the mean absolute errors (MAEs) for the 2-year prediction ranged from 2.78 to 5.40 mm and 0.88 to 1.48 degrees, respectively. For the 4-year prediction, MAEs of mandibular length and Y-axis ranged from 3.21 to 4.00 mm and 1.19 to 5.12 degrees, respectively. The most predictive factors for post-pubertal mandibular length were mandibular length at previous timepoints, age, sagittal positions of the maxillary and mandibular skeletal bases, mandibular plane angle, and anterior and posterior face heights. The most predictive factors for post-pubertal Y-axis were Y-axis at previous timepoints, mandibular plane angle, and sagittal positions of the maxillary and mandibular skeletal bases. ML methods were identified as capable of predicting mandibular length within 3 mm and Y-axis within 1 degree. Compared to each other, all of the ML algorithms were similarly accurate, with the exception of multilayer perceptron regressor.

Prediction of Pubertal Mandibular Growth in Males with Class II Malocclusion by Utilizing Machine Learning

The goal of this study was to create a novel machine learning (ML) model that can predict the magnitude and direction of pubertal mandibular growth in males with Class II malocclusion. Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 123 males at three time points (T1: 12; T2: 14; T3: 16 years old) were collected from an online database of longitudinal growth studies. Each radiograph was traced, and seven different ML models were trained using 38 data points obtained from 92 subjects. Thirty-one subjects were used as the test group to predict the post-pubertal mandibular length and y-axis, using input data from T1 and T2 combined (2 year prediction), and T1 alone (4 year prediction). Mean absolute errors (MAEs) were used to evaluate the accuracy of each model. For all ML methods tested using the 2 year prediction, the MAEs for post-pubertal mandibular length ranged from 2.11-6.07 mm to 0.85-2.74° for the y-axis. For all ML methods tested with 4 year prediction, the MAEs for post-pubertal mandibular length ranged from 2.32-5.28 mm to 1.25-1.72° for the y-axis. Besides its initial length, the most predictive factors for mandibular length were found to be chronological age, upper and lower face heights, upper and lower incisor positions, and inclinations. For the y-axis, the most predictive factors were found to be y-axis at earlier time points, SN-MP, SN-Pog, SNB, and SNA. Although the potential of ML techniques to accurately forecast future mandibular growth in Class II cases is promising, a requirement for more substantial sample sizes exists to further enhance the precision of these predictions.

Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in a Cephalometric Analysis: A Narrative Review

In recent years, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) has become more and more widespread in medicine and dentistry. It may contribute to improved quality of health care as diagnostic methods are getting more accurate and diagnostic errors are rarer in daily medical practice. The aim of this paper was to present data from the literature on the effectiveness of AI in orthodontic diagnostics based on the analysis of lateral cephalometric radiographs. A review of the literature from 2009 to 2023 has been performed using PubMed, Medline, Scopus and Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source databases. The accuracy of determining cephalometric landmarks using widely available commercial AI-based software and advanced AI algorithms was presented and discussed. Most AI algorithms used for the automated positioning of landmarks on cephalometric radiographs had relatively high accuracy. At the same time, the effectiveness of using AI in cephalometry varies depending on the algorithm or the application type, which has to be accounted for during the interpretation of the results. In conclusion, artificial intelligence is a promising tool that facilitates the identification of cephalometric landmarks in everyday clinical practice, may support orthodontic treatment planning for less experienced clinicians and shorten radiological examination in orthodontics. In the future, AI algorithms used for the automated localisation of cephalometric landmarks may be more accurate than manual analysis.

Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: Survey on Dentists' and Final-Year Undergraduates' Perspectives

The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI)-based dental applications into clinical practice could play a significant role in improving diagnostic accuracy and reforming dental care, but its implementation relies on the readiness of dentists, as well as the health system, to adopt it in everyday practice. A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was conducted among experienced dentists and final-year undergraduate students from the School of Dental Medicine at the University of Belgrade (n = 281) in order to investigate their current perspectives and readiness to accept AI into practice. Responders (n = 193) in the present survey, especially final-year undergraduates (n = 76), showed a lack of knowledge about AI (only 7.9% of them were familiar with AI use) and were skeptical (only 34% of them believed that AI should be used), and the underlying reasons, as shown by logistic regression analyses, were a lack of knowledge about the AI technology associated with a fear of being replaced by AI, as well as a lack of regulatory policy. Female dentists perceived ethical issues more significantly than men regarding AI implementation in the practice. The present results encourage an ethical debate on education/training and regulatory policies for AI as a prerequisite for regular AI use in dental practice.

Artificial Intelligence and Its Theranostic Applications in Dentistry

As new technologies emerge, they continue to have an impact on our daily lives, and artificial intelligence (AI) covers a wide range of applications. Because of the advancements in AI, it is now possible to analyse large amounts of data, which results in more accurate data and more effective decision-making. This article explains the fundamentals of AI and examines its development and present use. AI technology has had an impact on the healthcare sector as a result of the need for accurate diagnosis and improved patient care. An overview of the existing AI applications in clinical dentistry was provided. Comprehensive care involving artificial intelligence aims to provide cutting-edge research and innovations, as well as high-quality patient care, by enabling sophisticated decision support tools. The cornerstone of AI advancement in dentistry is creative inter-professional coordination among medical professionals, scientists, and engineers. Artificial intelligence will continue to be associated with dentistry from a wide angle despite potential misconceptions and worries about patient privacy. This is because precise treatment methods and quick data sharing are both essential in dentistry. Additionally, these developments will make it possible for patients, academicians, and healthcare professionals to exchange large data on health as well as provide insights that enhance patient care.

Prediction of the Post-Pubertal Mandibular Length and Y Axis of Growth by Using Various Machine Learning Techniques: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study

The aim was to predict the post-pubertal mandibular length and Y axis of growth in males by using various machine learning (ML) techniques. Cephalometric data obtained from 163 males with Class I Angle malocclusion, were used to train various ML algorithms. Analysis of variances (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences between predicted and actual measurements among methods and between time points. All the algorithms revealed an accuracy range from 95.80% to 97.64% while predicting post-pubertal mandibular length. When predicting the Y axis of growth, accuracies ranged from 96.60% to 98.34%. There was no significant interaction between methods and time points used for predicting the mandibular length (p = 0.235) and Y axis of growth (p = 0.549). All tested ML algorithms accurately predicted the post-pubertal mandibular length and Y axis of growth. The best predictors for the mandibular length were mandibular and maxillary lengths, and lower face height, while they were Y axis of growth, lower face height, and mandibular plane angle for the post-pubertal Y axis of growth. No significant difference was found among the accuracies of the techniques, except the least squares method had a significantly larger error than all others in predicting the Y axis of growth.

Where Is the Artificial Intelligence Applied in Dentistry? Systematic Review and Literature Analysis

This literature research had two main objectives. The first objective was to quantify how frequently artificial intelligence (AI) was utilized in dental literature from 2011 until 2021. The second objective was to distinguish the focus of such publications; in particular, dental field and topic. The main inclusion criterium was an original article or review in English focused on dental utilization of AI. All other types of publications or non-dental or non-AI-focused were excluded. The information sources were Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, queried on 19 April 2022. The search string was “artificial intelligence” AND (dental OR dentistry OR tooth OR teeth OR dentofacial OR maxillofacial OR orofacial OR orthodontics OR endodontics OR periodontics OR prosthodontics). Following the removal of duplicates, all remaining publications were returned by searches and were screened by three independent operators to minimize the risk of bias. The analysis of 2011–2021 publications identified 4413 records, from which 1497 were finally selected and calculated according to the year of publication. The results confirmed a historically unprecedented boom in AI dental publications, with an average increase of 21.6% per year over the last decade and a 34.9% increase per year over the last 5 years. In the achievement of the second objective, qualitative assessment of dental AI publications since 2021 identified 1717 records, with 497 papers finally selected. The results of this assessment indicated the relative proportions of focal topics, as follows: radiology 26.36%, orthodontics 18.31%, general scope 17.10%, restorative 12.09%, surgery 11.87% and education 5.63%. The review confirms that the current use of artificial intelligence in dentistry is concentrated mainly around the evaluation of digital diagnostic methods, especially radiology; however, its implementation is expected to gradually penetrate all parts of the profession.