1
|
Garabedian C, Berveiller P, Guerby P. [Other Methods of Consumption: Electronic Cigarette, Heated Tobacco, Shisha and Snus - CNGOF-SFT Expert Report and Guidelines on the management for Smoking Management During Pregnancy]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2020; 48:583-586. [PMID: 32247094 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Other methods of cigarette consumption include a variety of electronic products, as well as heated tobacco, snus and shisha. The questions in this chapter are: what other methods of consumption are used during pregnancy (either electronic or containing tobacco) and what is their prevalence? What is their benefit/risk balance? Can their use during pregnancy be proposed? Although the fetus is not exposed to the combustible toxins of tobacco, e-cigarette products may contain nicotine, which maintains the exposure of the fetus. Further research is needed on the other components of the electronic cigarette, such as flavorings and propylene glycol and/or glycerol, in order to assess the benefit/risk balance. In addition, some solvents contain ethanol. In the current state of knowledge, the precautionary principle should be respected and not recommend the initiation or continuation of the electronic cigarette during pregnancy (professional agreement). For smoking cessation or electronic cigarette cessation, it is recommended to provide the same advice and to use methods that have already been evaluated (professional agreement). For the JUUL, there are currently no data on obstetrical outcome when used. The use of shisha during pregnancy is associated with decreased fetal growth. It is recommended not to use shisha during pregnancy (GradeC). There are currently no data on the use of heated tobacco and obstetrical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Garabedian
- CHU Lille, clinique d'obstétrique, 1, avenue Eugène-Avinée, 59000 Lille, France; Univ. Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, 59000 Lille, France.
| | - P Berveiller
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHI de Poissy St-Germain, 78300 Poissy, France
| | - P Guerby
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU de Toulouse, 31300, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rygh E, Gallefoss F, Grøtvedt L. Trends in maternal use of snus and smoking tobacco in pregnancy. A register study in southern Norway. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019; 19:500. [PMID: 31842873 PMCID: PMC6915947 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2624-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of tobacco products including Swedish snus (moist snuff) in pregnancy may cause adverse health outcomes. While smoking prevalence has decreased among fertile women in Norway, snus use has increased during the last years. We investigated whether these trends were reflected also during pregnancy in a population of women in Southern Norway. METHODS Data on smoking tobacco and snus use at three time points before and during pregnancy for 20,844 women were retrieved from the electronic birth record for the years 2012-2017. The results for the three-year period 2015-2017 were compared with a previously studied period 2012-2014. Prevalence and quit rates of tobacco use within groups of age, parity and education were reported. Within the same groups adjusted quit rates were analyzed using logistic regression. Mean birthweight and Apgar score of offspring were calculated for tobacco-users and non-users. RESULTS There was an increase of snus use before pregnancy from the period 2012-2014 to the period 2015-2017 from 5.1% (CI; 4.6 to 5.5) to 8.4% (CI; 7.8 to 8.9). Despite this, the use of snus during pregnancy did not increase from the first to the second period, but stabilized at 2.8% (CI; 2.5 to 3.2) in first trimester and 2.0% (CI; 1.7 to 2.2) in third trimester. Cigarette smoking decreased significantly both before and during pregnancy. Snus use and smoking during pregnancy were associated with a reduction in average birthweight, but no significant effects on Apgar scores. Odds ratios for quitting both snus and smoking tobacco during pregnancy were higher for women aged 25-34 years, for the primiparas and for those with a high level of education. Pregnant women were more likely to have quit tobacco use in the last time period compared to the first. CONCLUSIONS While smoking during pregnancy was decreasing, the use of snus remained constant, levelling off to around 3% in first trimester and 2% in third trimester. Approximately 25% of those that used snus, and 40% that smoked before pregnancy, continued use to the third trimester. This calls for a continuous watch on the use of snus and other nicotine products during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Rygh
- Research Department, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Frode Gallefoss
- Chief of Clinical Research, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Liv Grøtvedt
- Department Health and Inequality, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Sandakerveien 24c, Bygg B, 0473, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kreyberg I, Hilde K, Bains KES, Carlsen KH, Granum B, Haugen G, Hedlin G, Jonassen CM, Nordhagen LS, Nordlund B, Rueegg CS, Sjøborg KD, Skjerven HO, Staff AC, Vettukattil R, Lødrup Carlsen KC. Snus in pregnancy and infant birth size: a mother-child birth cohort study. ERJ Open Res 2019; 5:00255-2019. [PMID: 31803771 PMCID: PMC6885591 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00255-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale While recent studies show that maternal use of snus during pregnancy is increasing, the potential effects on infant birth size is less investigated, with conflicting results. Objectives We aimed to determine if maternal use of snus during pregnancy influences the infant anthropometric and proportional size measures at birth. Methods In 2313 mother–child pairs from the population-based, mother–child birth cohort PreventADALL (Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies) in Norway and Sweden, we assessed nicotine exposure by electronic questionnaire(s) at 18 and 34 weeks of pregnancy, and anthropometric measurements at birth. Associations between snus exposure and birth size outcomes were analysed by general linear regression. Results Birthweight was not significantly different in infants exposed to snus in general, and up to 18 weeks of pregnancy in particular, when adjusting for relevant confounders including maternal age, gestational age at birth, pre-pregnancy body mass index, parity, fetal sex and maternal gestational weight gain up to 18 weeks. We found no significant effect of snus use on the other anthropometric or proportional size measures in multivariable linear regression models. Most women stopped snus use in early pregnancy. Conclusion Exposure to snus use in early pregnancy, with most women stopping when knowing about their pregnancy, was not associated with birth size. We were unable to conclude on effects of continued snus use during pregnancy because of lack of exposure in our cohort. Snus use in pregnancy, reported by 7.1% of 2313 women, was not associated with infant birth size. As most women stopped snus use by 6 weeks gestational age, it was not possible to assess potential birth size effects of persistent use during pregnancy.http://bit.ly/2IG8Vnk
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Kreyberg
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Katarina Hilde
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karen Eline S Bains
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kai-Håkon Carlsen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Berit Granum
- Dept of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guttorm Haugen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunilla Hedlin
- Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christine M Jonassen
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.,Genetic Unit, Centre for Laboratory Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway
| | - Live S Nordhagen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Björn Nordlund
- Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Corina S Rueegg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Katrine D Sjøborg
- Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway
| | - Håvard O Skjerven
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne C Staff
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Riyas Vettukattil
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karin C Lødrup Carlsen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kreyberg I, Nordhagen LS, Bains KES, Alexander J, Becher R, Carlsen KH, Glavin K, Carlsen KCL. An update on prevalence and risk of snus and nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Acta Paediatr 2019; 108:1215-1221. [PMID: 30719748 DOI: 10.1111/apa.14737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM In parallel with falling smoking rates, use of the oral moist tobacco product snus increases among women in reproductive age. We report an update on prevalence and effects of maternal use of snus and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) during pregnancy and breastfeeding. METHODS A literature search of human studies in Medline, PubMed and EMBASE was conducted from September 2016 to May 2018, with stepwise screening of abstracts and subsequent relevant full-text papers for inclusion in Scandinavian and English languages. RESULTS Based on three studies, the prevalence of snus use in pregnancy was up to 3.4% in the first trimester and 2.1% in the third trimester. In 12 studies, we found increased risk of several adverse effects, especially preterm delivery, stillbirth and small for gestational age associated with maternal snus use during pregnancy. Knowledge on effects of NRT during pregnancy was conflicting and inconclusive in 10 studies. We did not identify any studies on prevalence or potential health effects of snus or NRT during breastfeeding. CONCLUSION Few studies with updated data on the prevalence and adverse health effects of maternal use of snus and NRT during pregnancy were found. No studies during breastfeeding were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Kreyberg
- Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - L S Nordhagen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
- VID Specialized University Oslo Norway
| | - K E S Bains
- Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - J Alexander
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway
| | - R Becher
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway
| | - K H Carlsen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| | - K Glavin
- VID Specialized University Oslo Norway
| | - K C L Carlsen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ratsch A, Steadman K, Ryu B, Bogossian F. Tobacco and Pituri Use in Pregnancy: A Protocol for Measuring Maternal and Perinatal Exposure and Outcomes in Central Australian Aboriginal Women. Methods Protoc 2019; 2:E47. [PMID: 31181680 PMCID: PMC6632177 DOI: 10.3390/mps2020047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Maternal tobacco smoking is a recognized risk behavior that has adverse impacts onmaternal and fetal health. However, in some populations, the use of smokeless tobacco exceeds theuse of smoked tobacco. In central Australia, Aboriginal populations utilize wild tobacco plants(Nicotiana spp.) as a smokeless product. These plants are known by a variety of names, one of whichis pituri. The plants are masticated and retained in the oral cavity for extended periods of time andtheir use continues throughout pregnancy, birth, and lactation. In contrast to the evidence related tocombusted tobacco use, there is no evidence as to the effects of pituri use in pregnancy. CentralAustralian Aboriginal women who were at least 28 weeks pregnant were stratified into three tobaccoexposure groups: (a) Pituri chewers, (b) smokers, and (c) non-tobacco users. Routine antenatal andbirth information, pre-existing and pregnancy-related maternal characteristics, fetal characteristics,and biological samples were collected and compared. The biological samples were analysed fortobacco and nicotine metabolite concentrations. Samples from the mother included venous blood,urine, hair and colostrum and/or breast milk. From the neonate, this included Day 1 and Day 3 urineand meconium, and from the placenta, arterial and venous cord blood following delivery. This is thefirst study to correlate the pregnancy outcomes of central Australian Aboriginal women with differenttobacco exposures. The findings will provide the foundation for epidemiological data collection inrelated studies. Note to readers: In this article, the term "Aboriginal" was chosen by central Australianwomen to refer to both themselves and the Aboriginal people in their communities. "Indigenous" waschosen to refer to the wider Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Ratsch
- Research Education, Development and Support, Wide Bay Hospital and Health Service,Hervey Bay 4655, Australia.
| | - Kathryn Steadman
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
| | - BoMi Ryu
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
| | - Fiona Bogossian
- School of Health & Sports Science and School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore 4558, Australia.
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kreyberg I, Bains KES, Carlsen KH, Granum B, Gudmundsdóttir HK, Haugen G, Hedlin G, Hilde K, Jonassen CM, Nordhagen LS, Nordlund B, Sjøborg KD, Skjerven HO, Staff AC, Söderhäll C, Vettukatil RM, Lødrup Carlsen KC. Stopping when knowing: use of snus and nicotine during pregnancy in Scandinavia. ERJ Open Res 2019; 5:00197-2018. [PMID: 30972353 PMCID: PMC6452060 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00197-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The risk of adverse health effects in offspring due to maternal tobacco smoking during pregnancy is well documented [1], including epigenetic changes persisting in the offspring after prenatal exposure [2]. The effects of fetal exposure to nicotine from non-combustible tobacco products, such as snus or nicotine-replacement therapies (NRTs), are less clear. Use of snus leads to systemic absorption of nicotine into the maternal circulatory system, with subsequent exposure of the foetus through the placenta [3]. In young women, the use of snus increases in parallel with decreasing smoking rates but the use in pregnancy is unclear. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of snus use, smoking and other nicotine-containing product use during pregnancy, and to identify predictors for snus use in pregnancy. Prevalence was determined for 2528 women in Norway and Sweden based on the Preventing Atopic Dermatitis and ALLergies (PreventADALL) study, a population-based, mother–child birth cohort. Electronic questionnaires were completed in pregnancy week 18 and/or week 34, and potential predictors of snus use were analysed using logistic regression models. Ever use of any snus, tobacco or nicotine-containing products was reported by 35.7% of women, with similar rates of snus use (22.5%) and smoking (22.6%). Overall, 11.3% of women reported any use of nicotine-containing products in pregnancy up to 34 weeks, most often snus alone (6.5%). Most women (87.2%) stopped using snus by week 6 of pregnancy. Snus use in pregnancy was inversely associated with age and positively associated with urban living and personal or maternal history of smoking. While 11.3% of women used snus or other nicotine-containing products at some time, most stopped when recognising their pregnancy. Younger, urban living, previously smoking women were more likely to use snus in pregnancy. Of the 11.3% of women using any nicotine products in pregnancy (most often snus (6.5%)), the majority stop within pregnancy week 6. Snus use is associated with urban living, previous smoking, in utero smoking exposure of the index woman and lower age.http://ow.ly/Gyg230nmxIo
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Kreyberg
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karen E S Bains
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kai-H Carlsen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Berit Granum
- Dept of Toxicology and Risk Assessment, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hrefna K Gudmundsdóttir
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Guttorm Haugen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunilla Hedlin
- Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katarina Hilde
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christine M Jonassen
- Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.,Genetic Unit, Centre for Laboratory Medicine, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway
| | - Live S Nordhagen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Björn Nordlund
- Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katrine D Sjøborg
- Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Østfold Hospital Trust, Kalnes, Norway
| | - Håvard O Skjerven
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne C Staff
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cilla Söderhäll
- Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Riyas M Vettukatil
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karin C Lødrup Carlsen
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jacobsen GW. Should pregnant women refrain entirely from using nicotine? TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2016; 136:1320. [PMID: 27637028 DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
8
|
Løvik M. Re: Bruk av snus og røyketobakk hos gravide i Agder. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2016; 136:1609. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
9
|
Rygh E, Gallefoss F, Reiso H. E. Rygh og medarbeidere svarer:. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2016; 136:1703-1704. [DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|