In vitro shear bond strength between fluorinated zirconia ceramic and resin cements

Shear bond strength between standard or modified zirconia surfaces and two resin cements incorporating or not 10-MDP in their matrix

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed first to compare the shear bond strength between zirconia samples luted to enamel with a 10-MDP- containing resin cement (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray, Japan) and those luted with a resin cement using a separated 10-MDP monomer-containing bottle (Panavia V5, Kuraray, Japan). The second objective was to evaluate the bond stability after 150 days of aging in water, between enamel and zirconia ceramic surface enhanced with a glass-ceramic coating.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

80 specimens composed of ceramic cylinders and enamel disks were obtained, within eight experimental groups (n = 10). 60 zirconia cylinders (Katana STML zirconia, Kuraray, Japan) were assigned to 3 groups according to their surface treatment: milled/sintered surface (ZRCT), tribochemical silica-coating (Cojet™ Sand, 3 M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) (ZRTC), and glass-ceramic coating (IPS e.max Zirpress) (ZRZP). 20 cylinders of lithium disilicate had a milled surface (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (ECAD). The cylinders of each group were further divided into two subgroups according to the resin cement used: Panavia F2.0 (-PF) and Panavia V5 (-PV). All specimens were stored in distilled water for 150 days before shear bond strength (SBS) tests. The fracture mode was analyzed, and data were statistically computed (two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, p < 0.05, SPSS, IBM, v26).

RESULTS

The ECAD-PF group recorded the highest SBS values (31.75 ± 2.2), and the ZRCT-PF group recorded the lowest values (5.59 ± 1.1). The two-way ANOVA test showed that ceramic surface treatment had a statistically significant effect on SBS (F (3,72) = 38.95, p < 0.001) while the type of ARC did not (F (1,72) = 2.40, p = 0.126). Tukey's post hoc test revealed no statistical difference between the ZRZP and the ZRTC or ECAD groups.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, the PV resin achieved similar shear bond strength results between tribocoated zirconia and enamel compared to the one for glass-ceramic and enamel. Furthermore, a long-term durable bond, similar to the glass-ceramic one, was achieved with the heat pressed ceramic coated specimens. Thus, this new surface treatment could be recommended for anterior cantilever bridges for its fracture resistance and bonding ability.

Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the mechanical properties of laminate veneers to determine their resistance to the shear force of three different types of cement used in the restorations. MATERIAL and METHODS: Laminate veneers were prepared using the standard tooth preparation methods for 30 extracted maxillary central incisors. To standardize the depth, guide burs were used to prepare a depth of 0.5 mm from the buccal angle. The samples were allocated into three randomized groups (n = 10): Group A (resin using the total etch method and Variolink Esthetic DC resin cement; Group B (resin using the PANAVIA F2.0 self-etch method; and Group C (self-adhesion bonded with Rely X U200 resin cement). The prepared specimens were stored in distilled water for one week before a shear test was used to determine the resistance of the veneers to the bonding. The obtained data were evaluated statistically. RESULTS: The values of the shear bond strength were statistically significant depending on the type of resin cement that was applied (p ˂ 0.05). The specimens that were cemented using the total-etch method (18.79±4.48 MPa) had the lowest shear force value. The obtained data were evaluated statistically by Tukey multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The cement is a highly effective factor in the bonding between fixed prosthetic restorations and the abutment tooth, and the cement used must have sufficient resistance to shear forces.

Cytotoxicity and Bonding Property of Bioinspired Nacre-like Ceramic-Polymer Composites

For clinical applications, non-cytotoxicity and good bonding property of dental restorative materials are the most essential and important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for clinical applications of two novel bioinspired nacre-like ceramic (yttria-stabilized zirconia)-polymer (polymethyl methacrylate) composites in terms of the cytotoxicity and bonding property. The relative growth rates (24 h) of the Lamellar and Brick-and-mortar composites measured by CCK8 were 102.93%±0.04 and 98.91%±0.03, respectively. According to the results of cytotoxicity and proliferation experiments, the two composites were not cytotoxic to human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (HPDLFs) in vitro. Both composites exhibited improved bonding strength as compared to the Control group (Vita In-Ceram YZ). As the polymer content in the composite material increases, its bonding strength also increases, which enhances the application potential of the material in the field of dental restoration. Meanwhile, by controlling the direction of loading force in the shear test, the effect of microstructure on the bonding strength of anisotropic composites was studied. After sandblasted, the bonding strengths of the Lamellar group in the longitudinal and transverse shear directions were 17.56±1.56 MPa and 18.67±1.92 MPa, respectively, while of the Brick-and-mortar group were 16.36±1.30 MPa and 16.99±1.67 MPa, respectively. The results showed that the loading direction had no significant effect on the bonding strength of the composites.

Effect of the nanofilm-coated zirconia ceramic on resin cement bond strength

Background. New surface treatments have been proposed to expand the clinical indications of zirconia prostheses. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of silica and fluorine nanofilms on zirconia ceramic on the resin cement bond strength. Methods. Zirconia blocks and discs underwent different surface treatments: untreated zirconia (CON), sandblasted, silica-coated alumina particles (30 µm) (SC), silica nanofilm (SN), and fluorine nanofilm (FN). Nanofilm deposition was performed through plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Zirconia surfaces were characterized on disks by morphology (atomic force microscopy, AFM), chemical analysis (x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, XPS), and contact angle analysis. A silane coupling agent was applied on each treated surface, and a cylinder of resin cement was built up. Half of the specimens in each group were submitted to 6000 thermal cycles (TC). Bond strength was analyzed using the shear test, and the fractographic analysis was performed with stereomicroscopy and SEM/EDS. Statistical analysis was performed through one-way ANOVA and Tukey test in the non-aged and aged specimens. Results. Nanofilms modified the zirconia surface, which became more hydrophilic and chemically reactive. Chemical bonding between Si-O was found in SN, and FN promoted a fluorination process on the ceramic surface, converting zirconia into zirconium oxyfluoride. Specimens of the SN (TC) group failed on pre-testing. FN (TC) bond strength (3.8 MPa) was lower than SC (TC) and CON (TC) after shearing. Adhesive failure predominated in the experimental groups. Silica nanofilm failure occurred after aging. Conclusion. Silica and fluorine nanofilms deposited by PECVD did not promote effective bonding between zirconia and resin cement.