The Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Estrogen Receptor Negative and Progesterone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

ER-/PR+ breast cancer is controlled more effectively with an inflammatory inhibitor than hormonal inhibitor

BACKGROUND

The anti-estrogen tamoxifen is a highly effective hormonal therapy for hormonal-positive (HR+) breast cancer patients; however, the estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive (ER-/PR+) subtype does not give the benefits of tamoxifen. Therefore ER-/PR+ breast cancer has a poor clinical outcome, and novel drug therapy for ER-/PR+ breast cancer could benefit these patients.

METHODS

53,805 gene expressions were characterized into HR+ BC and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyzed through Breast Cancer Gene Expression Miner in 4319 breast cancer patient samples. The clinical outcomes including overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and relapse-free survival were obtained from the PrognoScan database containing 1190 human breast cancer patient samples. To determine the function of ERα and inflammation-related genes such as USP1, CDC20, and CASP1, we used the CRISPR-Cas9 system or gene knockdown (KD) system. To check tumor cell proliferation and migration of ERα KO breast cancer cell line, we used tamoxifen and the inflammation inhibitor Ac-YVAD-CHO. For further confirmation, cancer growth was checked with the inflammation inhibitor in ERα KO breast cancer cell line using a three-dimensional (3D) organoid tissue culture system (ex vivo).

RESULTS

We found that gene expression in ER-/PR+ hormonal-positive breast cancer is positively related to ER-/PR- very similar to TNBC, not other HR+ breast cancer using a 4319 breast cancer patient database. Especially, inflammation-related genes, USP1, CDC20, and CASP1, which are highly expressed in TNBC, are also upregulated in ER-/PR+ HR+ breast cancer. Suppression of USP1, CDC20, and CASP1 inhibited tumor cell growth and metastasis in ERα KO (ER-/PR +) cell lines. Interestingly, loss of ERα in HR+ cell lines is not responsive to tamoxifen, but highly sensitive to the inflammation inhibitor, Ac-YVAD-CHO. In in vitro and ex vivo (3D organoid) models, inflammation inhibitor-specific blocks ER-/PR+ tumor proliferation and migration.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that an inflammation inhibitor might be a potential option for therapy for ER-/PR+ HR breast cancer patients.

Negative estrogen receptors and positive progesterone receptors breast cancers

CONTEXT

Hormone receptors (estrogen receptor ER and progesterone receptor PR) are prognostic and predictive factors of outcome for invasive breast cancer. Some tumors only express one of these hormone receptors (ER or PR). ER negative/PR positive breast cancer is a rare subtype (1-4 %) and its existence still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics of this group of tumors.

METHODS

We collected data of all consecutive patients managed in our institution for invasive breast cancer between the 1st January 2007 and 31 December 2013. The aim of the study was to compare data of patients with ER-/PR+tumors with the three other subgroups.

RESULTS

Of the 2071 patients included during the study period, 1.2 % were ER-/PR+. These patients were younger than those with the two ER+groups (p<0.0001). The ER-/PR+tumors differed from the ER+groups for several histological prognostic factors: greater histological size (p=0.0004), higher histological grade, more HER2 overexpression/amplification, more association with ductal carcinoma in situ, more lymphovascular invasion, more nodal metastasis (p<0.0001). Chemotherapy was more often used as an adjuvant treatment in addition of endocrine therapy. Survival was equivalent for patients with ER-/PR+tumors and ER+tumors and significantly higher than patients with ER-/PR- tumors (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Women with ER-/PR+breast cancer have worse prognostic factors than women with ER+cancers but have better overall survival than women with ER-/PR- tumors. We may think that the more frequent association of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy is responsible for this better outcome.

Clinicopathological characteristics of oestrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor positive breast cancers: re-evaluating subsets within this group

Aims

The presence of oestrogen and progesterone receptors (ER, PR) in breast carcinoma is an important prognostic indicator as well as a predictor of likely response to hormonal treatment. Current ambiguity surrounds ER-negative (–)/PR-positive (+) breast cancer (BC) as to whether this phenotype exists as a distinct entity. The independent predictive value of PR for treatment considerations is also in question, as some investigators believe ER status to be the single most important therapeutic predictive factor in BC. We undertook this study to determine the existence of ER(–)/PR(+) BC and the prognostic effect, if any, of this phenotype.

Methods

We investigated 267 archival documented ER(–)/PR(+) BCs diagnosed between January 1994 and July 2009. Histological slides were retrieved and reviewed. Tissue microarrays were constructed by selecting two 1 mm cores of tumour per case. Repeat immunohistochemistry was performed for confirmation of the ER(–)/PR(+) status. Clinicopathological parameters including age, ethnicity, tumour size, histological grade, histological subtype, associated ductal carcinoma in situ, lymphovascular invasion and lymph node status were evaluated.

Results

On repeat immunohistochemistry, 92 tumours were confirmed as ER(–)/PR(+) BCs. This phenotype accounted for 1.1% of all BC phenotypes and exhibited different clinicopathological features and survival outcome when compared with other phenotypes. ER(–)/PR(+) tumours showed a trend for an early recurrence and poorer overall survival as compared with the patients with ER(+)/PR(+) tumours and similar to ER(–)/PR(–) tumours.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that ER(–)/PR(+) BCs exist, although rare, with distinct pathological and clinical characteristics from patients with ER(+)/PR(+) BCs.