Efficacy of fulvestrant in heavily pretreated postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: a preliminary report

Real-world effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a snapshot of the last two years before conventional use of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in a Portuguese institution

Background

Monotherapy with aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant were the standard-of-care for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-type2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer, before integration of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Effectiveness data is essential for regulatory action, but little is known about real-world use of aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted resorting to data from a cancer registry to identify adult women with HR+/HER- advanced breast cancer exposed to aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant (31 May 2017-31 March 2019) at the main oncology hospital in Portugal. Cases were updated with follow-up until death or cut-off (31 March 2021) and pseudoanonymized data extracted. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary time to treatment failure (TTF), estimated using survival analysis and compared with published trials.

Results

192 patients were distributed by subgroups according to the medicine. Letrozole: OS 30.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 20.6-41.4); TTF 11.2 (95%CI 8.7-13.7). Exemestane: OS 22.1 (95%CI 9.7-34.6); TTF 6.0 (95%CI 4.1-7.8). Fulvestrant: OS 21.6 (95%CI 16.5-26.7); TTF 5.6 (95%CI 4.5-6.6).

Conclusions

Estimated effectiveness (OS) of letrozole and fulvestrant was, respectively, 3.2-3.5 months lower than reported. The clinical meaning seems uncertain and may be explained a higher proportion of worse prognostic characteristics in patients treated in the real-world.

The first decade of estrogen receptor cistromics in breast cancer

The advent of genome-wide transcription factor profiling has revolutionized the field of breast cancer research. Estrogen receptor α (ERα), the major drug target in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, has been known as a key transcriptional regulator in tumor progression for over 30 years. Even though this function of ERα is heavily exploited and widely accepted as an Achilles heel for hormonal breast cancer, only since the last decade we have been able to understand how this transcription factor is functioning on a genome-wide scale. Initial ChIP-on-chip (chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with tiling array) analyses have taught us that ERα is an enhancer-associated factor binding to many thousands of sites throughout the human genome and revealed the identity of a number of directly interacting transcription factors that are essential for ERα action. More recently, with the development of massive parallel sequencing technologies and refinements thereof in sample processing, a genome-wide interrogation of ERα has become feasible and affordable with unprecedented data quality and richness. These studies have revealed numerous additional biological insights into ERα behavior in cell lines and especially in clinical specimens. Therefore, what have we actually learned during this first decade of cistromics in breast cancer and where may future developments in the field take us?

Drug resistance to targeted therapies: déjà vu all over again

A major limitation of targeted anticancer therapies is intrinsic or acquired resistance. This review emphasizes similarities in the mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapies in breast cancer and those seen with the new generation of targeted cancer therapeutics. Resistance to single-agent cancer therapeutics is frequently the result of reactivation of the signaling pathway, indicating that a major limitation of targeted agents lies in their inability to fully block the cancer-relevant signaling pathway. The development of mechanism-based combinations of targeted therapies together with non-invasive molecular disease monitoring is a logical way forward to delay and ultimately overcome drug resistance development.

Tamoxifen resistance: from bench to bedside

Although tamoxifen is a classical example of a targeted drug, a substantial proportion of estrogen receptor alpha positive breast cancer patients does not benefit from the drug. Over the last few decades, many potential biomarkers have been discovered in cell biological studies that may aid in the prediction of tamoxifen sensitivity and guide in treatment selection. Nonetheless, the transition of such a biomarker from the scientific community towards a diagnostic test that can be used in daily clinical practice has been far from ideal, and such markers seldom face clinical introduction. From a large number of potential predictive biomarkers as described in cell biological literature, the clinical (translational) scientist has to make a decision which of these biomarkers should be tested in clinical material to determine their clinical validity. This problem is not trivial, since patient samples with clinical follow-up are a valuable asset that should therefore be cherished. In this review, we will describe a number of 'cell biological biomarkers' for tamoxifen resistance and their possible clinical implications. This may guide the clinical scientist in choosing what potential biomarkers to test on tumour samples, which may catalyse the translation of scientific discoveries into daily clinical practice of breast cancer medicine.