Predicting the Benefit of Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients with Phosphorylated S6K1 Expression Status

Adipogenesis biomarkers as the independent predictive factors for breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive analysis of clinical evidence for breast cancer adipogenesis with prognosis is lacking. This study aims to consolidate the latest evidence on the relationship between adipogenesis and breast cancer outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane library.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that reported the correlation between tumor adipogenesis and cancer recurrence or empirical pathological markers were included for meta-analysis. The standard reference for pathological markers determination was set as histopathological examination. The PROSPERO ID was CRD489135.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Several adipogenesis biomarkers involved in the synthesis, elongation, and catabolism of fatty acids, such as FASN, Spot 14, pS6K1, lipin-1, PLIN2, Elovl6, and PPARγ, were identified as the potential biomarkers for predicting outcomes. Through meta-analysis, the predictive value of adipogenesis biomarkers for 5-year recurrence rate was calculated, with a pooled predictive risk ratio of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.11-4.34). In terms of empirical pathological markers, a negative correlation between adipogenesis biomarkers and ki-67 was observed (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.79). However, no significant correlation was found between the adipogenesis and ER, PR, HER2, or p53 positivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarker of adipogenesis in breast cancer is a significant predictor of long-term recurrence, and this prediction is independent of HR, HER2, and ki-67. The diverse roles of adipogenesis in different breast cancer subtypes highlight the need for further research to uncover specific biomarkers that can used for diagnosis and prediction.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID: CRD489135.

Determining the Optimal Cut-Off Values of Serum E2 and FSH for Evaluating the Menopausal Status of Breast Cancer Patients in a Southern Chinese Population

Background

Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) is one of universal phenomena in breast cancer (BC) patients, and it causes difficulties in evaluating the actual menopausal status which is important for the oncologists to choose appropriate treatment. Currently, serum estradiol (E2) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels are the most commonly used clinical parameters for the assessment of menopausal status in BC patients. However, the optimal cut-off points of serum E2 and FSH have little been explored in southern Chinese population.

Objective

This study is aimed to determine the optimal cut-off values of the serum E2 and FSH levels for evaluating the menopausal status of BC patients in a southern Chinese population.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was done among a total of 206 patients with BC from a southern Chinese area. The data of serum E2, FSH, and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were collected and analyzed for the comparison purpose. The receiver-operating curve (ROC) was generated to assess the specificity and sensitivity of the three biomarkers in discriminating the menopausal status of BC patients. The optimal cut-off values were determined according to the Youden index and then compared with the recommended reference values by the Chinese Anti-cancer Association (CACA) and those recommended by the manufacturers.

Results

The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of E2, FSH, and LH were 0.846 (95% CI: 0.790-0.903), 0.781 (95% CI: 0.714-0.847) and 0.608 (95% CI: 0.526-0.690), respectively. The optimal cut-off values were 130.0 pg/mL for E2, 23.325 IU/L for FSH, and 11.625 IU/L for LH with a maximum of the Youden index. When E2, FSH, and LH were used in combination for ROC analysis, the AUC increased to 0.847 (95% CI: 0.790-0.904), which was higher than that of any other biomarker alone. In this study, the sensitivity and specificity of E2 and FSH were 91.6% and 73.70% and 94.4% and 58.6%, respectively, in comparison with 85.0% and 75.80% and 76.6% and 65.7% according to the CACA-recommended cut-off points, or 92.5% and 68.7% and 96.3% and 53.5% according to the manufacturer recommended cut-off points.

Conclusion

Considering the sensitivity and specificity of serum E2 and FSH for assessing the menopausal status, the optimal cut-off values determined in the present study were similar to the manufacturer's recommendations, but obviously superior to the cut-off points suggested by CACA. These cut-off points calculated in this study seem to be valuable in southern Chinese population and might be used by clinicians to make a correct medical decision for BC patients who would benefit from endocrine therapy of aromatase inhibitor (AI).

Dr Effects of Adiponectin, Plasma D-Dimer, Inflammation and Tumor Markers on Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Ovarian Cancer

 [Abstract] Objective: To investigate the effects of adiponectin (ADPN), plasma D-dimer (D-D), inflammation and tumor markers on clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: A total of 80 patients with ovarian cancer treated in our hospital from April 2017 to November 2019 were enrolled as study subjects and evenly divided into observation group (patients with ovarian cancer) and control group (patients with benign ovarian tumor) based on the results of postoperative pathological biopsy. The levels of ADPN, plasma D-D, inflammatory factors and serum tumor markers [carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) and risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA)] were compared between the two groups. The diagnostic value of serum tumor markers CA125, HE4 and ROMA in ovarian cancer was explored. The correlations of the changes of ROMA with the changes in the levels of ADPN, plasma D-D, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), CA125 and HE4 were analyzed. Additionally, the related risk factors affecting the development of ovarian cancer were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: In comparison with control group, observation group exhibited a lowered ADPN level (p<0.05), notably raised levels of plasma D-D, inflammatory factors hs-CRP and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum tumor markers CA125 and HE4 and an evidently increased ROMA (p<0.05). Besides, the detection of serum ROMA showed the highest specificity and sensitivity and low false positive rate and false negative rate. The changes of ROMA were positively correlated with the changes in the levels of plasma D-D, hs-CRP, CA125 and HE4 (p<0.05), and negatively associated with the changes in ADPN level (p<0.05). The results of univariate analysis showed that abnormal ADPN, D-D, hs-CRP, IL-6, CA125 and HE4 levels were related risk factors affecting the development of ovarian cancer. It was found through multivariate logistic regression analysis that decreased ADPN level and increased D-D, hs-CRP, IL-6, CA125 and HE4 levels were independent risk factors affecting the development of ovarian cancer. Conclusion: In the case of ovarian cancer, the ADPN level declines, while the levels of plasma D-D, inflammatory factors, and serum tumor markers CA125, HE4 and ROMA rise obviously. Besides, the ROMA level displays a positive relation to the content of CA125, HE4, plasma D-D and inflammatory factors and a negative association with ADPN level.