Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing for Humerus Fracture in a Supine Position: Performing an Unfamiliar Procedure in a Familiar Position

Nail-plate Combination Treatment of Ipsilateral Humeral Shaft and Distal Humerus Fractures - A Case Report

Introduction

Humeral shaft and distal humerus fractures have several different treatment options, including plate fixation and intramedullary nailing. Each has its own benefits, but typically, they are not used in conjunction. While nail-plate combinations (NPCs) have become more common in the lower extremity, literature on their use in upper extremity fractures remains scarce.

Case Report

A 74-year-old right-hand dominant male presented after a fall with a closed left transverse midshaft humerus fracture and an associated supracondylar distal humerus fracture with intercondylar extension through a medial column. Due to the segmental nature of his injury, medial column plating was used in conjunction with a retrograde intramedullary nail to obtain anatomic reduction and fixation of the articular injury while stabilizing the midshaft humerus fracture with minimal soft tissue disruption. The patient was recommended non-weight bearing through his left arm for 6 weeks, at which point he returned to weight bearing as tolerated. He was allowed to range his left elbow after 2 weeks. His left elbow range of motion at the 4-month follow-up was 20-135 degrees, and he reported minimal pain.

Conclusion

The retrograde NPC should be considered in segmental humeral fractures involving the distal articular surface and midshaft humerus fractures as it limits violation of the soft tissue while avoiding iatrogenic disruption of the articular surface at the shoulder or elbow.

Antegrade intramedullary locking nail in the management of proximal and middle thirds of humeral diaphyseal fractures

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the antegrade intramedullary locking nail osteosynthesis for the treatment of the proximal and middle thirds of humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was made on 218 patients diagnosed with humeral diaphysis fractures who undergo surgery with antegrade intramedullary locking nail between January 2017 and December 2021. The clinical follow-up started two days after surgery and continued at one month, three months, six months and one year. The functional recovery evaluation was performed using visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Rating Scale of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Form (ASES), Mayo Elbow Performance Score System (MEPS) and rate of complications.

RESULTS

Low intra-operative blood loss, short operation time, short hospitalisation, early mobilisation of the patient and high union rate imposed intramedullary nailing as a standard procedure for the treatment of proximal and middle thirds of humeral diaphyseal fractures in the past years, and the union rate was 99.5%. VAS score evaluated at one month, three months and six months indicated a very good overall post-operative experience. The ASES and MEPS score were evaluated at six months and one year and showed excellent results. All the patients (except 1 case) were able to return to their previous jobs within six months.

CONCLUSION

Humeral nailing is associated with early return to function of the upper limb, with very good clinical and functional outcomes of the shoulder and elbow. This method could be considered the best surgical option for the management of proximal middle humeral fractures.

Can the complications of distal locking be prevented with a new nail that offers a novel locking technique in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures?

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate whether complications related to distal locking can be prevented with InSafeLOCK® nail in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Hospital records of 31 patients (15 males, 16 females; mean age 54.4±10.1 years; range, 20 to 86 years) treated with InSafeLOCK® nail for humeral shaft fractures were investigated retrospectively between February 2016 and January 2019. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification was used to determine the type of fracture. During the implementation, the elapsed time for distal locking was investigated. Complications encountered during both implementation and postoperative follow-up were investigated.

RESULTS

Fourteen of the fractures were type A, 12 were type B, and five were type C. The mean follow-up time was 18.2 (range, 6 to 30.5) months. The mean duration for distal locking was 2.1 (range, 1.2 to 3.1) minutes. In one (3.2%) patient, cortical penetration occurred at the anterior cortex of the humerus at distal to the nail. In one patient, nail breakage occurred at the distal part of the nail. In one patient, rotational instability occurred due to screw loosening.

CONCLUSION

InSafeLOCK® humeral nail is safe when applied with the recommended technique. It can easily be applied without damaging the veins, nerves or other soft tissues around the elbow due to the internal distal locking feature; furthermore, there is no need to use fluoroscopy or targeting guide. Thus, it is possible to avoid complications that may occur during and after distal locking in conventional intramedullary nail implementations.

Locking compression plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: which one is better? A single-centre prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes of interlocking nail (ILN) and locking plate fixation (LCP) for humeral shaft fractures.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients with displaced humeral shaft fractures between October 2014 and January 2017 were evaluated prospectively. They were divided randomly into two as LCP fixation (group 1) and interlocking nail (ILN) (group 2). Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores, and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires, and pain was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

After fracture callus was radiologically observed, DASH, ASES, and UCLA scores as well as SF-36 questionnaires and VAS results were noted to have no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.109, p = 0.082, p = 0.146, p = 0.322, and p = 0.175, respectively). At the last follow-up (post-operative 24 months), the UCLA score was significantly better in group 1 (p = 0.034), whereas VAS result was significantly worse in group 2 (p = 0.017). DASH, ASES scores, and SF-36 questionnaires had no difference (p = 0.193, p = 0.088, p = 0.289). Other parameters revealed no significant differences. Fracture consolidation was observed at a mean of four months in both groups (3 to 7 months in group 1 and 3 to 8 months in group 2) (p = 0.189). Four patients in group 1 and five patients in group 2 underwent surgery for nonunion (p = 0.725). Post-operative radial nerve palsy was seen in one patient in group 2. Two patients in group 1 with superficial infection were treated with antibiotics, and they recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding our results, the LCP group had significantly better shoulder function than the ILN group, whereas the ILN group had significantly less pain, with similar complication rates. Therefore, both procedures are favourable surgical options for patients with humeral shaft fractures.