Intracoronary stent implantation in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts: a consecutive experience with six types of stents without prolonged anticoagulation

Reduced incidence of clinical restenosis with newer generation stents, stent oversizing, and high-pressure deployment: single-operator experience

BACKGROUND

Over the last 4 years, several newer generation stents have become available, promising to change the scenery of coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with its attendant restenosis rate.

HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to review prospectively the results of a single operator adopting a uniform approach with approximately 0.5 mm stent oversizing and high-pressure (> or = 12-16 bar) deployment and compare them with conventional PTCA in a series of 244 consecutive patients.

METHODS

The study included 203 men and 41 women, aged 59 +/- 11 years, who presented with stable angina and/or positive exercise testing (n = 75), unstable angina (n = 161), or acute myocardial infarction (n = 8). Dilated vessels included the left anterior descending artery (n = 139), the right coronary artery (n = 86), the left circumflex artery (n = 47), the ramus branch (n = 4), or venous grafts (n = 2). Stents were implanted for dissection, suboptimal PTCA result, and electively. Two groups were compared: 83 patients who underwent balloon PTCA alone and 161 patients who also received stent(s).

RESULTS

The two groups had similar demographics, age (58 +/- 10 vs. 59 +/- 11 years), initial vessel stenosis (92 +/- 7 vs. 93 +/- 6%), and left ventricular ejection fraction (51 +/- 9 vs. 51 +/- 8%). Procedural success was also similar (97.6 vs. 99.4%), but as expected the residual stenosis was much lower in the stent group (< or = 0 vs. 17%). The following stents were employed: J & J (n = 1), NIR (n = 117), ACS (n = 59), AVE (n = 9), Inflow GoldFlex (n = 9), Crossflex (n = 5), Wictor (n = 1), Jostent (n = 16), R stent (n = 9), Seaquence (n = 2) and Wallstent (n = 1). Single stents were used in 118 patients, two stents in 31 patients, three in 6 patients, and four in 6 patients. There was one in-hospital death at 3 days unrelated to the procedure. There were no events of subacute stent thrombosis; all patients in the stent group received combined therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine, the latter for 1 month. During 18 +/- 14 months, the clinical restenosis rate was significantly lower in the stent group (6.9%) than in the PTCA group (28.4%) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In a series of 244 consecutive patients, newer generation stents and a consistent approach of stent oversizing and high-pressure stent deployment by a single operator resulted in high procedural success (99%), lack of stent thrombosis (0%), and a very low clinical restenosis rate (7%).

Influence of stent design on 1-year outcome after coronary stent placement: a randomized comparison of five stent types in 1,147 unselected patients

The objective of this randomized trial was to assess whether differences in stent design are translated in different clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary stent placement. This multicenter randomized trial included 1,147 patients who were randomly assigned to receive one of five types of stainless steel stents: Inflow, MULTI-LINK, NIR, Palmaz-Schatz, and PURA-A stent. Primary endpoint of the study was event-free survival at 1 year. Event-free survival at 1 year was significantly different between the groups (P = 0.014), ranging from 69.4% to 82.4%. Similarly, freedom from myocardial infarction was also significantly different (P = 0.022), with values between 88.2% and 95.2%. Diameter stenosis at 6 months varied from 38.1% +/- 25.0% to 45.6% +/- 27.7% (P = 0. 046), late lumen loss ranged from 1.01 +/- 0.70 mm to 1.20 +/- 0.82 mm (P = 0.085), and the incidence of restenosis varied between 25.3% and 35.9% (P = 0.145). Thus, stent design has a significant impact on the long-term results after coronary stent placement.

Angiographic and clinical restenosis following the use of long coronary Wallstents

This study assessed clinical and angiographic restenosis following the deployment of the long coronary Wallstent. Between May 1995 and June 1997, 182 Wallstents were deployed in 162 vessels in this unit. Forty-eight percent had an unstable coronary syndrome and 94% had AHA grade B or C lesions. The mean lesion length was 37 +/- 20 mm and the mean stent length was 48 +/- 20 mm. The procedural success rate was 99% and the primary success rate was 93%. Six in-patients suffered subacute stent thrombosis, the majority being in the era of anticoagulation rather than antiplatelet regimes. Seventy-three percent remained free of major adverse clinical events in the follow-up period, but 41% had angiographic restenosis. The Wallstent can be deployed in complex lesions with a high primary success rate and an acceptably low restenosis rate. The optimal management of in-stent restenosis remains to be defined.

Acute and long-term cost implications of coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES

We compared the acute and one year medical costs and outcomes of coronary stenting with those for balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) in contemporary clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

While coronary stent implantation reduces the need for repeat revascularization, it has been associated with significantly higher acute costs compared with coronary angioplasty.

METHODS

We studied patients treated at Duke University between September 1995 and June 1996 who received either coronary stent (n = 384) or coronary angioplasty (n = 159) and met eligibility criteria. Detailed cost data were collected initially and up to one year following the procedure. Our primary analyses compared six and 12 month cumulative costs for coronary angioplasty- and stent-treated cohorts. We also compared treatment costs after excluding nontarget vessel interventions; after limiting analysis to those without prior revascularization; and after risk-adjusting cumulative cost estimates.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics were generally similar between the two treatment groups. The mean in-hospital cost for stent patients was $3,268 higher than for those receiving coronary angioplasty ($14,802 vs. $11,534, p < 0.001). However, stent patients were less likely to be rehospitalized (22% vs. 34%, p = 0.002) or to undergo repeat revascularization (9% vs. 26%, p = 0.001) than coronary angioplasty patients within six months of the procedure. As such, mean cumulative costs at 6 months ($19,598 vs. $19,820, p = 0.18) and one year ($22,140 vs. $22,571, p = 0.26) were similar for the two treatments. Adjusting for baseline predictors of cost and selectively examining target vessel revascularization, or those without prior coronary intervention yielded similar conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary practice, coronary stenting provides equivalent or better one-year patient outcomes without increasing cumulative health care costs.

Anaesthesia care and the adult cardiac catheterization patient

The number and types of procedures being performed in the adult cardiac catheterization suite have increased dramatically, with an aggressive move towards percutaneous interventional cardiac procedures. Here we review many of these procedures, including the current trends in North America and Europe. Coronary angioplasty is now more commonly performed than coronary artery bypass grafting. The past 5 years have seen a proliferation of coronary stenting procedures. Restenosis of coronary arteries continues to be a major area of research and concern.

Randomised comparison of Micro Stent I with Palmaz-Schatz stent placement for the elective treatment of short coronary stenoses

This randomised trial compared the Micro Stent I and the Palmaz-Schatz stent for the elective treatment of short (<8 mm long), new-onset coronary stenoses. The primary endpoints were restenosis rate and minimal luminal diameter at 6 mo angiographic follow-up. The secondary endpoints were angiographic and procedural success of stenting and a composite clinical endpoint at 6 mo (death, myocardial infarction, and target site revascularisation). A total of 93 patients were randomised. Clinical and angiographic characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Angiographic success of stenting was 96% in both groups, and there were no complications so that the procedural success was also 96% in both groups. The restenosis rate was 29% for Micro Stent I and 27% for the Palmaz-Schatz stent (P = NS). The minimal luminal diameter at 6 mo was 1.75 +/- 0.72 mm in the Micro Stent I group and 1.84 +/- 0.59 in the Palmaz-Schatz group (P = NS). At 6 mo, a clinical endpoint was reached by 21% of the patients in the Micro Stent I group and by 11% in the Palmaz-Schatz group (P = NS). In conclusion, the elective treatment of short coronary stenosis with the Micro Stent I or the Palmaz-Schatz stent resulted in similar early and late outcomes. In particular, the late angiographic results were very similar.

Frequency of adverse clinical events in the 12 months following successful intracoronary stent placement in patients treated with aspirin and ticlopidine (without warfarin)

Little is known about the frequency of adverse events in the year following stent placement in patients treated with aspirin and ticlopidine, without warfarin. We analyzed the first such 234 consecutive patients treated at our hospital between October 1994 and December 1995. Their mean age was 62+/-12 years; 40% had had a prior myocardial infarction, 22% had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery, and 65% had multivessel disease. The indication for stent placement was dissection or abrupt closure in 24% of patients and suboptimal balloon angioplasty results in 14%; placement was elective in 62% of patients. Three hundred forty-five coronary segments were treated in the 234 patients; 305 stents (1.3 stents/patient) were placed. Palmaz-Schatz coronary stents (75%), Gianturco-Roubin stents (21%), and Johnson & Johnson biliary stents (4%) were used. Mean nominal stent size was 3.4+/-0.4 mm. High-pressure inflations (> or = 14 atm, mean 17+/-2) were performed in all patients. The mean residual stenosis was 3+/-5% by visual estimate. Intravascular ultrasound was utilized to facilitate stent placement in 53% of patients. Mean follow-up was 1.6+/-0.5 years. There were no deaths, Q-wave myocardial infarctions, coronary artery bypass operations, or repeat angioplasty procedures required during the remainder of the hospitalization or in 30 days after stent placement; stent thrombosis did not occur. Kaplan-Meier analysis of adverse events in the 6 months following the procedure revealed a mortality rate of 0.9%; the rate of myocardial infarction (Q-wave or non-Q-wave) was 1.3%. Bypass surgery was performed in 0.9% and angioplasty for in-stent restenosis was performed in 9.5% of patients. Any 1 of these events occurred in 11.7% of patients in the 6 months after the procedure. The corresponding event rates at 1 year were 1.3%, 2.2%, 3.5%, and 12.2%, respectively; any 1 of these events occurred in 16.5% of patients. In patients receiving intracoronary stents of varying designs followed by high-pressure postdeployment inflations in whom an excellent visual angiographic result is achieved, antithrombotic therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine is associated with a very low frequency of adverse cardiovascular events in the 12 months following the procedure regardless of the indication for stent placement.