Surviving heart failure: Robert L. Frye lecture

Definition of Polypharmacy in Heart Failure: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Patients with heart failure (HF) have a high prevalence of polypharmacy, which can lead to drug interactions, cognitive impairment, and medication non-compliance. However, the definition of polypharmacy in these patients is still inconsistent. The aim of this scoping review was to find the most common definition of polypharmacy in HF patients. We conducted a scoping review searching Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane using terms including polypharmacy, HF and deprescribing, which resulted in 7,949 articles. Articles without a definition of polypharmacy in HF patients and articles which included patients < 18 years of age were excluded; only 59 articles were included. Of the 59 articles, 49% (n = 29) were retrospective, 20% (n = 12) were prospective, 10% (n = 6) were cross-sectional, and 27% (n = 16) were review articles. Twenty percent (n = 12) of the articles focused on HF with reduced ejection fraction, 10% (n = 6) focused on HF with preserved ejection fraction and 69% (n = 41) articles either focused on both diagnoses or did not clarify the specific type of HF. The most common cutoff for polypharmacy in HF was five medications (59%, n = 35). There was no consensus regarding the inclusion or exclusion of over-the-counter medications, supplements, or vitamins. Some newer studies used a cutoff of 10 medications (14%, n = 8), and this may be a more practical and meaningful definition for HF patients.

Pathogenesis of chronic heart failure: change of dominating paradigm

The review considers literature data reflecting the evolution of views on pathogenesis of chronic heart failure. Connection of revision of a dominating paradigm of pathogenesis at every stage of development of cardiology with changes in approaches to therapy of chronic heart failure is analyzed.

Diastolic heart failure demystified

The mystery of diastolic heart failure (DHF), described by authorities as a "puzzle" and a "clinical paradox," stems from the following misperception: (1) that the normal ejection fraction implies normal cardiac output (CO), (2) that therefore low CO is not operative (it is rarely mentioned in relation to the pathophysiology of DHF), and (3) the congestive phenomena are due to the stiff left ventricle. In fact, a normal ejection fraction is not a reliable indicator of normal CO; low CO is the fundamental pathophysiologic abnormality of all heart failure (HF), whether systolic and/or diastolic (or, indeed, "high output"); and increased ventricular stiffness is not the principal cause of congestion in DHF. Pathophysiologic explorations supporting these understandings further reveal the following: (1) the premise that a clinical event as dramatic as acute pulmonary edema (systolic and/or diastolic) would be contingent on similarly dramatic acute hypertensive or ischemic ventricular dysfunction, while intuitive, is unsubstantiated, and there is an alternate explanation satisfying both theoretical and clinical observations; (2) contrary to general perception, DHF is no more vulnerable to diuretic-induced hypotension than systolic HF; (3) heart rate reduction should not yet be considered an established therapeutic goal in DHF; (4) since HF is HF whether systolic and/or diastolic, studies are likely to show that therapeutic similarities outweigh differences except as the various agents might modify the underlying structural and/or functional pathology; (5) although long evident that HF occurs by only two mechanisms (systolic dysfunction and/or diastolic dysfunction), it has only recently been acknowledged that the mere exclusion of one is diagnostic of the other; and (6) the definition of HF currently in widespread use is unnecessarily confounded by neglect of the fundamental distinction between ventricular dysfunction and failure.

Demonstrating the impact of nutrition intervention in a heart failure program

Outpatient heart failure centers using a multidisciplinary approach to management of heart failure are recognized as essential to decreasing costs of treating heart failure. These centers do not typically employ registered dietitians. With hospital foundation funding, our objective was to develop the role of the dietitian and to evaluate the impact of nutrition intervention in a multidisciplinary heart failure program. Based on a needs assessment, the dietitian developed and tested a medical nutrition therapy protocol, education materials, and special education projects. Unannounced 24-hour recalls at 3 points in time were used to determine changes in sodium and fluid intakes. An outcome tracking system was implemented. Intake data were analyzed for patients who were in the program 9 or more months (n = 79). Patients' sodium and fluid intakes at 2 to 3 months and 6 to 9 months were compared with their baseline intakes using paired t test. The sodium decrease of 0.5 g at 2 to 3 months and 6 to 9 months and the fluid decrease of 15 oz at 2 to 3 months and 12 oz at 6 to 9 months were all highly significant (P < .001). Patients active in year 3 (n = 82) completed the Minnesota Quality of Life Questionnaire. Compared with baseline, quality of life scores improved by 6.7 points (P < .003) at 3 months and by 5.9 points (P < .04) at 6 months. Of 83 patients hospitalized over 3 years, 6 hospitalizations were the result of an excessive sodium intake. At the completion of the project, the center provided funding for the dietitian to become a permanent team member. These positive findings indicate dietitians should seek involvement in heart failure centers.

Levosimendan: A promising agent for the treatment of hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure

Levosimendan is a new inodilator, whose mechanism of action includes calcium sensitization of contractile proteins and the opening of ATP-dependent potassium channels. The combination of positive inotropy with anti-ischemic effects of K-channel opening offers many potential benefits in comparison to currently available intravenous inotropes, that are more or less contraindicated in patients with ongoing myocardial ischemia. Levosimendan has been extensively studied in various animal models of heart failure, in which the drug has increased contractility without adverse effects on diastolic function. These results have been repeated in patients with heart failure, by whom levosimendan dose-dependently increases cardiac output and reduces pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. On higher doses, the drug can induce tachycardia and hypotension. In clinical trials, drug-induced ventricular arrhythmia have been rare. Recently, trials in patients with decompensated heart failure have suggested that short-term intravenous treatment with levosimendan might improve the survival of these critical patients. These results highlight the importance of adequate treatment of the acute heart failure patients for their long-term outcome.