[Acute diarrheal disease caused by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in Colombia]

Genetic diversity of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli

Studied 74 E. coli strains isolated from stool samples (60) and urine samples (14) of patients examined for clinical indications. Molecular methods included: PCR with electrophoretic detection of genes associated with diarrheal E. coli pathogroup EAgEC (aggR, aaf, aap, aatA, pet, ast, aai) and ExPEC pathogroup UPEC (pap, sfa, afa, kpsMT II, iutA, hlyA, cnf), MLST typing, whole genome sequencing. Strains isolated from stool samples were significantly more likely (88.3%, p > 0.05) to be typical EAgECaggR+ compared to atypical EAgECaggR-. Strains isolated from urine samples, significant differences between typical and atypical EAgEC were not detected (p > 0.05). Genes associated with ExPEC were present in all strains isolated from urine samples and in 45 strains (75%) isolated from stool samples. Coproisolates belonged to 10 serogroups and 13 serovars: O3:H2, O11:H10, O16:H48, O51:H30, O55:H21, O73:H18, O73:H33, O86:H2, O86:H10, O92:H33, O140:H2, O159:H10. Two strains had unique nucleotide sequences of genes encoding O-antigens that were missing from the SerotypeFinder database. 80% of EAgEC isolated from feces and urine was characterized by an enteroaggregative/uropathogenic genotype (EAgEC/UPEC). Most of the strains isolated from urine belonged to the virulent clone of high-risk epidemic spread ST 38 associated with hybrid strains of UPEC / EAgEC.

Incidence of Intestinal Infectious Diseases due to Protozoa and Bacteria in Mexico: Analysis of National Surveillance Records from 2003 to 2012

Background

According to national epidemiological surveillance records, in Mexico six intestinal infectious diseases (IID) are among the top infectious communicable diseases. However, their incidence, relative importance, and spatial patterns have not been studied in detail.

Aims

We examine the epidemiology of IID due to bacteria and protozoa to identify which diseases are most important at two spatial scales, what is their integrated importance locally, and how their incidence correlates with Human Development Index (HDI).

Methods

We retrieved yearly number of new cases of eight IID from the national epidemiological morbidity report from 2003 to 2012 at the national level, by state, and to assess such information at a higher spatial resolution we included the municipalities for Mexico City. However, no comparisons were made to other municipalities due to unavailability of data. We compared incidence, obtained the disease-specific relative importance, and inspected spatial patterns for the integrated incidence. Finally, we tested whether HDI is correlated with incidence.

Results

We found that, except for two diseases, the relative importance of the other six IID contrasted not only between the national level and Mexico City, but also among states and municipalities in Mexico City. Besides, at both scales the distribution of the incidence showed disease-specific spatial patterns. Finally, there was a lack of consistent correlation between HDI and individual IID at both scales.

Conclusion

Our results emphasize the need for local disease-focused selective models for control and prevention of IID. The maps displaying our analyses of epidemiological similarities may be used in orienting such effort.