Long-Term Results after Surgical Treatment of Ebstein's Anomaly: a 30-year Experience

Permanent pacemaker implantation in post one-and-a-half ventricle repair with tricuspid valve replacement in Ebstein anomaly: An innovative technique

INTRODUCTION

Transvenous pacemaker implantation in patients post bidirectional Glenn anastomosis in one-and-a-half ventricle repair is usually not feasible. However, with a modified surgical technique for Glenn anastomosis and a combined interventional and electrophysiologic approach, the transvenous pacemaker was successfully implanted.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

We reported a novel technique of pacemaker implantation in a 27-year-old woman, underlying Ebstein anomaly of the tricuspid valve, who developed intermittent complete atrioventricular block at 5 years after surgical repair. The patient had a tricuspid valve replacement and a novel modified bidirectional Glenn anastomosis for one-and-a-half ventricle repair. The Glenn circuit was conducted by opening a window between the posterior wall of the superior vena cava (SVC) and the anterior wall of the right pulmonary artery (RPA), combined with putting a Goretex membrane in the SVC below the SVC-RPA window without disconnecting the SVC from the right atrium. The transvenous pacemaker was implanted by perforating the Goretex membrane, then passing the leads from the axillary vein through the perforated membrane and placing them in the coronary sinus and right atrium.

A multidisciplinary approach to re-intervention in an Ebstein patient: a case report

Background

Ebstein's anomaly is a rare condition due to incomplete delamination of the tricuspid valve (TV) leaflets with downward displacement of the proximal leaflet attachments. It is associated with a smaller functional right ventricle (RV) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) that is typically treated with TV replacement or repair. However, future re-intervention poses challenges. We describe a multidisciplinary team approach to re-intervention in a pacing-dependant Ebstein patient with severe bioprosthetic TV regurgitation.

Case summary

A 49-year-old female patient underwent bioprosthetic TV replacement for severe TR in Ebstein's. Post-operatively, she developed complete atrioventricular (AV) block necessitating the implantation of a permanent pacemaker which included a coronary sinus (CS) lead as the ventricular lead. Five years later, she presented with syncope due to a failing ventricular pacing lead, and a new RV lead was positioned across the TV bioprosthesis due to the lack of CS options. Two years later, she presented with breathlessness and lethargy with severe TR identified on transthoracic echocardiography. She successfully underwent a percutaneous leadless pacemaker implant, extraction of existing pacing system, and implantation of valve-in-valve TV.

Discussion

Patients with Ebstein's anomaly typically undergo TV repair or replacement. Following surgical intervention, owing to the anatomical location, patients can develop AV block requiring a pacemaker. Pacemaker implantation may involve a CS lead to avoid placing a lead across the new TV in efforts to avoid lead induced TR. Over time, these patients not uncommonly require re-intervention that can be challenging especially in pacing-dependant patients with leads across the TV.

A Systematic Review of Ebstein’s Anomaly with Left Ventricular Noncompaction

Traditional definitions of Ebstein’s anomaly (EA) and left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC), two rare congenital heart defects (CHDs), confine disease to either the right or left heart, respectively. Around 15–29% of patients with EA, which has a prevalence of 1 in 20,000 live births, commonly manifest with LVNC. While individual EA or LVNC literature is extensive, relatively little discussion is devoted to the joint appearance of EA and LVNC (EA/LVNC), which poses a higher risk of poor clinical outcomes. We queried PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science for all peer-reviewed publications from inception to February 2022 that discuss EA/LVNC and found 58 unique articles written in English. Here, we summarize and extrapolate commonalities in clinical and genetic understanding of EA/LVNC to date. We additionally postulate involvement of shared developmental pathways that may lead to this combined disease. Anatomical variation in EA/LVNC encompasses characteristics of both CHDs, including tricuspid valve displacement, right heart dilatation, and left ventricular trabeculation, and dictates clinical presentation in both age and severity. Disease treatment is non-specific, ranging from symptomatic management to invasive surgery. Apart from a few variant associations, mainly in sarcomeric genes MYH7 and TPM1, the genetic etiology and pathogenesis of EA/LVNC remain largely unknown.

Outcomes of Ebstein's Anomaly Patients Treated with Tricuspid Valvuloplasty or Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Experience of a Single Center

Background:

The incidence of Ebstein's anomaly is extremely low, and except for the Mayo Clinic, no cardiac center has reported on a sufficient number of patients. The aim of our study was to report the outcomes of Ebstein's anomaly patients treated with tricuspid valvuloplasty (TVP) or tricuspid valve replacement (TVR).

Methods:

TVP or TVR was performed in 245 patients from July 2006 to April 2016. We reviewed patients' records and contacted patients via outpatient service and over the telephone.

Results:

The mean follow-up time was 43.6 ± 32.6 months, and 224 (91.4%) patients underwent follow-up. The mean operative age was 31.2 ± 15.7 years. TVR was performed in 23 patients, and TVP was performed in 201 patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.3%, and the overall survival rate was 97.9% at 5 and 10 years. The early mortality rate of the TVP group was lower than that of the TVR group (0.5% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.028), and the overall mortality rate of the TVP group was lower than that of the TVR group, without statistical significance (1.0% vs. 8.7%). After propensity score matching, the rates of mortality and New York Heart Association class ≥ III were lower in the TVP group than those in the TVR group without statistical significance. Seven patients with Type B Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome underwent one-stage surgery, and arrhythmias disappeared. Six patients suffered from episodes of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) during surgery. Severe LVOTO could be treated with reoperation of the atrialized right ventricle.

Conclusions:

Ebstein's anomaly patients treated with TVP or TVR can experience optimal outcomes with midterm follow-up. However, TVP should be the first-choice treatment. Optimal outcomes can be obtained from one-stage operation in patients with Type B WPW syndrome. Severe LVOTO during surgery might be related to improper operation of the atrialized right ventricle.