Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma resulting in cauda equina syndrome: a case report and review of the literature

Cauda Equina Syndrome Without Perineal Sensory Changes or Lower Extremity Neurological Deficits Following Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) is a rare but serious complication following lumbar surgery, with cauda equina syndrome (CES) being one of its most devastating outcomes. While CES typically presents with a combination of bladder and/or bowel dysfunction, diminished sensation in the saddle area, and motor or sensory changes in the lower limbs, atypical cases with isolated urinary symptoms are less recognized and pose significant diagnostic challenges.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 46-year-old male who developed CES following lumbar microdiscectomy, presenting solely with urinary retention, without the classic signs of lower limb weakness or perineal sensory loss. Initial symptoms were attributed to postoperative urinary issues, delaying the diagnosis of CES. On postoperative day 7, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed SEH, and emergency hematoma evacuation was performed. Despite the delayed intervention, the patient made a full neurological recovery, with bladder and bowel functions restored by 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the importance of recognizing CES in patients with isolated urinary dysfunction after lumbar surgery, even when typical neurological symptoms such as lower limb weakness or perineal sensory loss are absent. Early detection and prompt surgical intervention are critical, as delayed diagnosis may result in permanent neurological deficits. Moreover, this case underscores the need for vigilant postoperative monitoring, especially of urinary function, as isolated urinary symptoms may signal early CES. Maintaining a high index of suspicion for CES, even in atypical presentations, can facilitate timely diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, this case highlights the need for continued research into the prevention of SEH and the development of more robust diagnostic criteria for CES in postoperative patients. Future studies should focus on developing more comprehensive guidelines for monitoring postoperative patients, especially regarding urinary function, to aid in the early detection of CES.

Effectiveness of Surgical Drains in Obese Patients Undergoing Lumbar Discectomy

Background The placement of postoperative drains after spine surgery is a contentious issue, and its application has changed over time. Obesity itself is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. Hematomas in the surgical wound are a complication that may necessitate revision surgery. Orthopaedic surgeons frequently use closed drainage in orthopaedic surgery to prevent the formation of a hematoma. It remains unclear whether drains reduce postoperative complications and improve clinical outcomes, especially in obese patients who are already at risk of such complications. Objectives To assess the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) after lumbar discectomy in obese and morbidly obese patients with or without postoperative wound drainage and compare functional outcomes between both groups. Methodology A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted among 84 patients with obesity who underwent single-level lumbar discectomy at R. L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Centre, Kolar, India from May 2022 to April 2023. Drains were used for patients in Group A and avoided for patients in Group B. Results Postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the non-drainage group were much higher than in the drainage group and were statistically significant. There was a statistically significant association found between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative SSI. In Group A, only three patients had SSI while in Group B, eight patients suffered from SSI. Conclusion Closed suction drains were shown to have a positive impact in reducing SSI in patients with obesity. Drain tip culture may be beneficial in detecting SSI at the earliest. Hence, we believe that closed suction drainage can be considered as a standard protocol in obese patients.

A Report of Cauda Equina Syndrome Caused by Spinal Epidural Hematoma, a Complication of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Management

This case report delves into the infrequent yet substantial occurrence of cauda equina syndrome (CES) arising from a spinal epidural hematoma (SEH), a potential complication during deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treatment. An 83-year-old female patient previously diagnosed with various medical conditions, including moderate spinal stenosis, chronic kidney disease, and chronic lower extremity stasis, was detected with notable iliofemoral DVT during an office-based venous study. The patient was urgently referred to the Emergency Department. Following hospitalization, her cardiologist diagnosed DVT, prompted by the patient's report of significant swelling and pain in the left lower limb over the past week. A venous ultrasound unveiled occlusive DVT originating from the common femoral vein, extending down to the infrapopliteal vessels, with a complete absence of venous Doppler signal. Employing the ClotTriever device (Terumo Corporation, Shibuya City, Tokyo, Japan), a mechanical aspiration thrombectomy procedure, effectively resolved DVT. However, CES was diagnosed in the patient on a subsequent day due to the emergence of SEH. This case underscores the intricate balance required when managing DVT, involving anticoagulation or alternate therapies while acknowledging the potential risk of hemorrhagic complications leading to epidural hematoma and consequent CES. It is crucial for clinicians managing DVT and employing therapeutic strategies to be aware of this infrequent yet pivotal complication. This report highlights the significance of prompt identification and intervention in such cases, emphasizing the need for vigilance and understanding of potential complications during DVT treatment.

Effect of Duration of Symptoms on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives

The objective is to determine whether the preoperative duration of symptoms can affect the clinical and functional outcomes after microdiscectomy.

Method

This study is a single blind randomized controlled trial with level 1 evidence. From 3 January 2016 to 15 February 2017, 122 adult patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation were divided randomly by computer system into three groups were treated by microdiscectomy at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months from onset of symptoms respectively. Ninety‐seven patients, age (19–47) years, 42 males and 55 females, were analyzed at the end of this study with 3 years of follow up. Primary outcome measures are Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland‐Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain. Secondary outcome measures are post‐operative complications, length of hospital stay and time of return to daily activities.

Results

There was significant difference in VAS for back pain among study groups (P = 0.002) at 2 weeks). There were significant differences in VAS for leg pain among study groups (P < 0.001) at 2 weeks and at 3 months (P = 0.003). There was significant difference in ODI among study groups at 2 weeks, 3, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years (P = 0.037 at 2 weeks and P < 0.001 at other periods of assessments) and we found that the mean of ODI in group 6 weeks was better than group 3 months and this was better than group 6 months in all periods of assessment. Group 6 weeks was better than group 3 months and this was better than group 6 months in postoperative improvements regarding RMQ with significant difference at 2 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.001) and at 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Duration of preoperative symptoms, in patients with lumbar disc herniation, can affect the clinical and functional outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy as the shorter duration of symptoms resulted in better postoperative clinical and functional outcomes.

Disorders of the Cauda Equina

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cauda equina dysfunction (often referred to as cauda equina syndrome) is caused by a diverse group of disorders that affect the lumbosacral nerve roots. It is important to recognize dysfunction of the cauda equina quickly to minimize diagnostic delay and lasting neurologic symptoms. This article describes cauda equina anatomy and the clinical features, differential diagnosis, and management of cauda equina disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of disorders of the cauda equina continues to be a challenge. If a compressive etiology is seen, urgent neurosurgical intervention is recommended. However, many people with clinical features of cauda equina dysfunction will have negative diagnostic studies. If the MRI is negative, it is important to understand the diagnostic evaluation and differential diagnosis so that less common etiologies are not missed.

SUMMARY

Cauda equina dysfunction most often occurs due to lumbosacral disk herniation. Nondiskogenic causes include vascular, infectious, inflammatory, traumatic, and neoplastic etiologies. Urgent evaluation and surgical intervention are recommended in most cases of compressive cauda equina syndrome. Other types of treatment may also be indicated depending on the etiology.

Closed drainage versus non-drainage for single-level lumbar discectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Background

Postoperative epidural haematoma and wound infection can cause devastating neurological damage in spinal surgery. Closed drainage is a common method to prevent epidural haematoma, infection and related neurological impairment after lumbar decompression; however, it is not clear whether drainage can reduce postoperative complications and improve clinical efficacy. This randomized study aims to explore the role of closed drainage in reducing postoperative complications and improving the clinical efficacy of single-level lumbar discectomy.

Methods

A total of 420 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation were finally included in this study (169 females and 251 males, age 50.0 ± 6.4 years). A total of 214 patients were randomly assigned to the closed drainage group, and 206 patients were assigned to the non-drainage group. The incidence of postoperative fever, symptomatic epidural haematoma, wound infection and the need for revision surgery were compared between the two groups by the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the improvement of pain relief and the recovery of lumbar function. The VAS and ODI scores were compared between the two groups using t tests.

Results

The complications of the two groups were compared and analysed. There was only a statistically significant difference in the postoperative fever rate (p = 0.022), as the non-drainage group had a higher fever rate, but there were no significant differences in the rates of symptomatic epidural haematoma, wound infection or revision operation (p > 0.05). After concrete analysis, for the rate of fever less than 38.5 degrees, there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.027), but there was no significant difference when the fever was greater than 38.5 degrees (p > 0.05). When comparing the VAS scores of the operation area on the first day after the operation, the pain relief in the closed drainage group was significantly better than that in the non-drainage group, with scores of 5.1 ± 0.8 and 6.0 ± 0.7, respectively (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the other VAS scores of operation areas, the VAS scores of the lower extremity, or the ODI scores (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

For single-level lumbar discectomy, closed drainage is beneficial for reducing postoperative low-grade fever and relieving pain in the operation area in the very early postoperative stage. However, drainage does not have a significant impact on reducing the incidence of postoperative complications or improving clinical efficacy.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR1800016005, May/06/2018, retrospectively registered.

Iatrogenic Spinal Epidural Hematoma in the Acute Postoperative Period

Background

Spinal epidural hematomas (SEHs) are a rare but serious complication associated with spinal surgery, with an incidence estimated to be as high as 3%. Patients present with back pain and neurologic symptoms, with a typical onset time of several hours to days following surgery.

Case Report

A 60-year-old female who underwent cervical spine surgery had negative intraoperative neuromonitoring and no apparent neurologic deficits of the upper extremities immediately postsurgery. On arrival in the postanesthesia care unit, the patient reported a loss of sensation in her lower extremities, prompting the anesthesiology resident to perform a focused neurologic examination. The patient demonstrated 0/5 motor strength in the lower extremities and total loss of sensation to touch and temperature up to the level of T10 bilaterally. She was returned to the operating room, and surgical exploration revealed a cervical SEH. Decompression yielded abrupt return of motor evoked potentials and improvement in somatosensory evoked potentials.

Conclusion

As the primary clinician in the perioperative period, the anesthesiologist is ideally positioned to be the first to detect any deterioration in a patient's condition. Anesthesiologists should be cognizant of the potential for acute presentation of SEH so that it can be considered in the differential diagnosis.

Piezoelectric surgery -a novel technique for laminectomy

OBJECTIVE

Piezoelectric surgery is a novel technology that allows for the osteotomy of mineralized tissue with less risk of damaging underlying soft tissue structures. This selective cutting increases the safety of osteotomies performed in close vicinity to delicate structures such as dura mater, blood vessels, and neural tissue. This study aimed to develop and describe the technique of piezoelectric surgery for dorsal laminectomy and to assess its clinical safety in normal sheep.

METHODS

A piezoelectric, dorsal laminectomy technique was developed using ovine cadavers. Following technique development, six live sheep underwent a piezoelectric (n = 6) two-level dorsal laminectomy at L2-L3 and L4-L5 (PiezoL2-3,4-5), and another 30 live sheep underwent a three-level laminectomy at L1, L3, and L5 (PiezoL1,3,5) for a total of 102 laminectomy sites. Surgery time and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Dorsal laminectomy was safely and accurately performed in 35/36 study sheep using a Piezoelectric surgical instrument. No dural tears were noted in any animal. Non-ambulatory paraparesis in one study sheep (PiezoL1,3,5) led to euthanasia at 48 hr and only mild epidural hematoma was noted on necropsy. No other major postoperative complications were observed in any of the animals. Subjectively, PiezoL was easy to perform and with a rapid learning curve. Mean surgery time was 105 min (range: 75-165 min; median: 97.5) for PiezoL2-3,4-5 and 93 minutes (range 55-100 min; median: 67.5) for PiezoL1,3,5.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our study, PiezoL is considered a safe and viable technique for performing ovine dorsal laminectomy in the preclinical research setting.

Spinal intradural hematoma and permanent paraparesis after a lumboperitoneal shunt operation: an unusual complication

Pseudotumor cerebri is a condition of increased intracranial pressure in the absence of clinical, laboratory or radiological pathology. Spinal intradural hematoma formation after lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) implantation is very rare, but it can cause sudden and serious deterioration. In this report, we present a patient who developed an intradural hematoma following LPS operation. A 27-year-old male patient suffering from headaches and progressive vision loss was diagnosed with pseudotumor cerebri. He underwent LPS operation in January 2009. Four hours after the operation, he developed urinary and fecal incontinence with paraparesis (1/5). Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging identified an intradural hematoma at the level of L2-L3, and he was reoperated. The intradural hematoma was removed. Physical therapy was started because of paraparesis. Two months later, the patient's muscle strength had increased to 3/5. Surgeons must remember that, LPS implantation can cause a spinal intradural hematoma in a small percentage of patients, with catastrophic results.

Delayed postoperative epidural hematoma presenting only with vesicorectal disturbance

We present a rare case of delayed onset of epidural hematoma after lumbar surgery whose only presenting symptom was vesicorectal disturbance. A 68-year-old man with degenerative spinal stenosis underwent lumbar decompression and instrumented posterolateral spine fusion. The day after his discharge following an unremarkable postoperative course, he presented to the emergency room complaining of difficulty in urination. An MRI revealed an epidural fluid collection causing compression of the thecal sac. The fluid was evacuated, revealing a postoperative hematoma. After removal of the hematoma, his symptoms disappeared immediately, and his urinary function completely recovered. Most reports have characterized postoperative epidural hematoma as occurring early after operation and accompanied with neurological deficits. But it can happen even two weeks after spinal surgery with no pain. Surgeons thus may need to follow up patients for at least a few weeks because some complications, such as epidural hematomas, could take that long to manifest themselves.