Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker of systemic inflammation in systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Additionally, the study aimed to establish an association between PLR and SLE disease activity, specifically lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant articles. Subsequently, we performed meta-analyses to compare PLR between SLE patients and controls, as well as active and inactive SLE cases, along with LN and non-LN groups. Furthermore, a meta-analysis was conducted on correlation coefficients between PLR and various parameters in SLE patients, including the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), C3, C4, anti-dsDNA, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP).

RESULTS

In total, fifteen studies comprising 1,522 SLE patients and 1,424 controls were eligible for inclusion. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant elevation of PLR in the SLE group compared to the control group (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] = 0.604, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.299-0.909, p < 0.001). Upon stratification by ethnicity, an elevated PLR was observed in the SLE group among both Asian and Arab populations. Subgroup analysis based on sample size revealed consistently higher PLR in both small (n < 200) and large sample (n ≥ 200) SLE groups. Moreover, when considering disease activity, there was a noteworthy trend of increased PLR in the active disease group compared to the inactive group (SMD = 0.553, 95% CI = 0.000-1.106, p = 0.050). However, the meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant distinction in PLR between the LN and non-LN groups. Notably, a positive association was established between PLR and SLEDAI (correlation coefficient = 0.325, 95% CI = 0.176-0.459, p < 0.001). Furthermore, PLR exhibited positive correlations with ESR, CRP, proteinuria, C3, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of this meta-analysis underscored the elevated PLR in SLE patients, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for gauging systemic inflammation in SLE. Additionally, PLR exhibited correlations with SLEDAI, as well as with key indicators such as ESR, CRP, proteinuria, C3, and anti-dsDNA antibody levels.

Associations of toll-like receptor polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus: A meta-analysis

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine whether polymorphisms in toll-like receptors 7 and 4 (TLR7 and 4) contribute to vulnerability to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science for relevant articles and performed a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between TLR7 rs179008, rs3853839, rs1790010, TLR4 rs4986791, and rs798690 polymorphisms and SLE.

Results

Eighteen studies and 16 papers including 8022 patients with SLE and 9822 healthy controls were retrieved. Meta-analysis revealed that the TLR7 rs179008 T variant was not associated with SLE (OR = 1.008, 95% CI = 0.849-1.394, P = 0.504). Ethnic classification revealed no association between the TLR7 rs179008 T gene and SLE in either European or Latin American groups. Additionally, homozygous comparison, recessive, and dominant models revealed no association between the TLR7 rs179008 variant and SLE. In contrast, a significant association between SLE and the TLR7 rsrs3853839 GG + GA allele (OR = 2.135, 95% CI = 1.502-3.035, <0.001; OR = 23.20, 95% CI = 14.13-38.08, <0.001) was observed in the Arab and Asian groups. The T variant of TLR7 rsrs179010 was also associated with SLE in Asians (OR = 1.177, 95% CI = 1.048-1.321, P = 0.006). In contrast, the TLR4 rs4986791 variant was not associated with SLE in Europeans when allele, homozygous comparison, recessive, and dominant models were used. Furthermore, no association between the TLR4 rs4986790 variant and SLE risk in Europeans was found using any genomic model.

Conclusions

Meta-analysis revealed that the TLR7 rs3853839 variant is associated with SLE risk in Asians and Arabs and that TLR7 rs179010 is associated with SLE in Asians. However, TLR7 rs179008, TLR4 rs4986791, and TLR rs798690 polymorphisms were not associated with SLE risk.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil as induction treatment and low-dose tacrolimus as treatment for lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as induction therapy and low-dose tacrolimus as treatment for lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and MMF as induction therapy for LN. We systematically reviewed RCTs and prospective cohort studies with a tacrolimus dose of 3 mg daily and performed a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as an induction treatment for LN in comparison to MMF.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were satisfied by eight studies (five RCTs and three prospective cohort studies) with a total of 408 individuals (289 for tacrolimus vs. MMF and 119 for low-dose tacrolimus). Tacrolimus and MMF had similar complete remission rates (odds ratio [OR] 1.028; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.589-1.796; p = 0.922). The partial remission rate did not differ between the tacrolimus and MMF groups (OR 1.400; 95% CI 0.741-2.646; p = 0.300). Tacrolimus and MMF showed no differences in proteinuria, serum albumin, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, renal Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), or extra-renal SLEDAI. The incidence of infection, severe infection, leukopenia, and hyperglycemia did not differ between the tacrolimus and MMF groups. However, herpes zoster infection was significantly less common in the tacrolimus group (OR 0.137; 95% CI 0.034-0.546; p = 0.005), whereas serum creatinine elevation was significantly higher in the tacrolimus group than in the MMF group (OR 8.148; 95% CI 1.369-48.50; p = 0.021). At 3 mg/d, tacrolimus was shown to be safe, well tolerated, and offered therapeutic benefits in all investigations.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus was comparable to MMF in terms of effectiveness and safety as an induction therapy for LN, with the exception of a reduced risk of herpes zoster infection and a rise in serum creatinine. In individuals with LN, 3 mg/d tacrolimus was proven to be efficacious and safe.

Treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus with baricitinib: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of baricitinib in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register to find relevant publications. Using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of baricitinib in patients with active SLE who did not respond well to standard treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 1849 individuals (1235 experimental participants and 614 controls) from three RCTs on baricitinib were included. A reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score in the baricitinib 4 mg group was greater than the placebo group's reduction (odds ratio [OR] = 1.407, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.123-1.763, p = .003). The baricitinib 4 mg group significantly outperformed the placebo group in terms of SLEDAI-2K remission of arthritis or rash (OR = 1.327, 95% CI = 1.059-1.663, p = .014). Other effectiveness outcomes such as the SRI4 response did not substantially improve in the baricitinib 4 mg group when compared with the placebo group. And there were no significant increase in the efficacy outcomes in the baricitinib 2 mg group than in the placebo group. However, there was a substantially higher incidence of severe adverse events (SAE) and serious infections in the baricitinib 4 mg group (OR = 1.493, 95% CI = 1.002-2.225, p = .049; OR = 2.303, 95% CI = 1.147-4.622, p = .019) compared to the placebo group. There were no differences between the baricitinib 2 mg and placebo groups in any of the safety outcome data.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analysis reveals that baricitinib 4 mg is beneficial for treating active SLE in terms of a reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2K score and SLEDAI-2K remission of arthritis or rash. However, the higher frequency of SAEs and serious infections was observed in the group receiving baricitinib 4 mg.

A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin or tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil as induction treatment for lupus nephritis

AIM

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus + MMF, and monotherapy with MMF or cyclophosphamide as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.

METHODS

The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of voclosporin + MMF, tacrolimus + MMF, and monotherapy for induction treatment in patients with lupus nephritis. To incorporate direct and indirect evidence from RCTs, we used a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Four RCTs, including 936 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Tacrolimus + MMF substantially increased the incidence of complete remission relative to that following monotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.87-4.39). Tacrolimus + MMF was also more effective than voclosporin + MMF (OR 1.43; 95% CrI 0.80-2.57). Tacrolimus + MMF showed the greatest chance of being the optimal treatment for overall response (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 0.942), followed by voclosporin + MMF (SUCRA = 0.558) and monotherapy (SUCRA = 0.001). In terms of safety based on severe event rates, monotherapy had the greatest chance of being the safest treatment (SUCRA = 0.903), followed by voclosporin + MMF (SUCRA = 0.517) and tacrolimus + MMF (SUCRA = 0.081).

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus + MMF and voclosporin + MMF were more effective than monotherapy, and tacrolimus + MMF was the most effective induction treatment for lupus nephritis patients. However, tacrolimus + MMF did pose a greater risk of serious adverse events than monotherapy.

Association between the interferon-γ +874 T/A polymorphism and susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis

We aimed to determine whether the interferon (IFN)-γ +874 T/A polymorphism (rs2430561) is associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between the IFN-γ +874 T/A polymorphism and SLE or RA using allele contrast, homozygous contrast, recessive, and dominant models. A total of nine studies (six on SLE and three on RA), involving 1839 patients and 2272 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed a significant association between SLE and the TT genotype of the IFN-γ +874 T/A polymorphism (odds ratio [OR] = 0.751, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.634-0.899, p = .001), and stratification by ethnicity indicated an association between the IFN-γ +874 TT genotype and the Asian population. The analysis also revealed a significant association between SLE and the TT + TA genotype of the IFN-γ +874 T/A polymorphism in Arab populations (OR = 1.598, 95% CI = 1.053-2.425, p = .028). However, no association between the IFN-γ +874 T/A polymorphism and RA was found using allele contrast, recessive, dominant or homozygous contrast models in all study subjects and ethnic groups. This meta-analysis demonstrated that the IFN-γ +874 T/A polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to SLE in Asian and Arab populations.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

Methods

We performed a literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. We also performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness and safety of DOACs versus warfarin in patients with APS.

Results

Five RCTs involving 648 patients with APS (330 in DOAC-treated and 318 in control groups) were included in the meta-analysis. Among the patients included in the analysis, 29 (8.8%) patients experienced recurrent thrombosis in the DOAC treatment group, and 10 patients (3.1%) had thrombosis recurrence in the warfarin treatment group, resulting in a higher incidence in DOAC-treated than in the warfarin-treated groups [odds ratio (OR) = 2.163, 95% CI = 0.985–4.748, p = 0.055]. Incidence of arterial thrombosis was significantly higher in DOAC-treated patients than in warfarin-treated patients (OR = 5.168, 95% CI = 1.567–17.04, p = 0.007). Stroke and thrombosis occurrences were significantly higher in the triple positivity group than in the warfarin therapy group (OR = 12.03, 95% CI = 2.249–64.36, p = 0.004; OR = 2.940, 95% CI = 1.016–8.504, p = 0.047). However, venous thrombosis occurrences did not differ significantly between the DOAC-treated and warfarin-treated groups. There were no significant differences between the DOAC and warfarin groups in terms of any bleeding, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and all-cause mortality.

Conclusion

DOACs were associated with higher rates of arterial thrombosis than warfarin in patients with APS, especially in the triple-positive group. However, a higher risk of recurrent venous thrombosis was not found in APS patients treated with DOACs compared to those treated with warfarin.