Level of Headaches After Surgical Aneurysm Clipping Decreases Significantly Faster Compared to Endovascular Coiled Patients

A Systematic Review of Neuropsychological Outcomes After Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a cause of profound morbidity and mortality. Its effects extend beyond functional neurological status to neurocognitive and psychological functioning. Endovascular treatment is becoming more prevalent after increasing evidence for its safety and efficacy; however, there is a relative paucity of evidence specific to neurocognitive status after treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare neuropsychological outcomes after the treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted searching for articles assessing the neuropsychological and cognitive outcomes after the treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Inclusion criteria were English language, publication between January 2000 and October 2020, and discussion of neuropsychological outcomes in adequate detail. Outcomes were categorized into 8 domains: 5 Neurocognitive (Language, Executive Function, Complex Attention, Memory and Learning, and Perceptual motor function), Intelligence Quotient, Affect, and Quality of Life.

RESULTS

Twenty-four articles were included comprising 2236 patients (924 surgical clipping, 1095 endovascular coiling, and 217 controls). These studies reported that most tests revealed no significant difference [n = 356/421 (84.56%)] between treatment modalities. More studies reported significantly superior test scores in the fields of language, executive function, and memory and learning after coiling [n = 53/421 tests (12.59%)] compared with clipping [n = 12/421 tests (2.85%)].

CONCLUSION

The current available data and published studies demonstrate a trend toward improved neurocognitive and psychological outcomes after endovascular treatment. Although these findings should be considered when deciding on the optimal treatment method for each patient, drawing definitive conclusions is difficult because of heterogeneity between patients and studies.

The clinical examination in the patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage is still the most reliable parameter for predicting pathophysiological changes

Background

Macrovasospasms and delayed cerebral injury are factors which correlate with high morbidity in patients suffering a subarachnoid hemorrhage. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and perfusion computed tomography (PCT) are diagnostic tools used to diagnose such pathologies. However, TCD is not very reliable and PCT exposes patients to radiation and cannot be performed daily.

Case Description

We present the case of a 47-year-old female with subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by rupture of an intracranial aneurysm. The aneurysm was coil embolized, and the clinical course of the patient was uncomplicated. She was writing notes about her stay in the intensive care unit. Without having any other complaints, she noticed that her writing became abruptly unrecognizable. TCD failed to show pathological signs, although PCT revealed decreased brain perfusion.

Conclusion

We rely more and more on our technical tools in medicine. However, clinical examination is and will stay the the first sign indicating cerebral pathologies and should remain the first priority to have an awake patient who can be examined routinely. In addition, we emphasize on the need of seeing the patient and not only the images. More than anything else, the patient is the first who shows signs of pathology and not the instruments (CT, TCD, etc.). The sentence "a fool with a tool is still a fool" should be present in every doctor's mind to avoid mistakes and react appropriately.