The importance of geriatric and surgical co-management of elderly in muscoloskeletal oncology: A literature review

Association between geriatric co-management and receipt of rehabilitation services in the inpatient postoperative period among older adults with cancer

PURPOSE

Geriatric co-management is associated with a lower postoperative mortality among older adults with cancer. This might be due to a higher use of rehabilitation services such as physical therapy (PT) or occupational therapy (OT). In this study, we assess the relationship between geriatric co-management and PT /OT use.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of adults aged 75 years and older with cancer who underwent elective surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between February 2015 and February 2018. We used two separate multivariable logistic regression models for PT and OT, adjusted for age at surgery, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology score, preoperative albumin, operative time, and estimated blood loss. We also evaluated the association between frailty and receipt of PT and or OT using separate models by additionally including frailty as a primary predictor.

RESULTS

Of the 1650 patients, 308 (19%) did not receive PT or OT, 747 (45%) received only PT, and 593 (36%) received both PT and OT. Geriatric co-management was significantly associated with higher PT use (OR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.19, 2.11, p = 0.002) and higher OT use (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.08, 1.71, p = 0.010). The associations between geriatric co-management and rehabilitation service remained after additional adjustment for frailty. Higher degree of frailty was also associated with higher PT use (OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.22, p = 0.033) and higher OT use (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.15, 1.34, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Geriatric co-management and frailty were associated with greater use of PT and OT. Future studies should investigate the impact of geriatric co-management on functional recovery.

Periprosthetic knee fractures in an elderly population: open reduction and internal fixation vs distal femur megaprostheses

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures of distal femur (PPDFFx) after primary total knee arthroplasties is described around 0.3% and 2.5% and it is increasing as the number of patients with total knee arthroplasty continues to arise. surgical options treatments for PPDFFx include fixation in the form of eather Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), or retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN), or conventional (non locked) plating, or locked plating such as the Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS), or dynamic condylar screws. In recent years, however, the use of megaprostheses has been increasing.

Patients with periprosthetic fractures of distal femur after primary total knee arthroplasties treated with ORIF or with the use of Distal femur replacement (DFR) were retrospectively analyzed in this to evaluate differences in intra-operative blood loss, need of blood trasfusion, weight bearing, range of motion, rate of complications, rate of revision surgery and functional outcome according Oxford Knee Score between two groups.

Treatment of Periprosthetic distal femur fracture remains controversial. While ORIF seems to guarantee less percentage of complications and reoperation rate, those treated with megaprosthesis seem to gain better range of motion in a very short post-operative time.

In the future it will be necessary to investigate with greater numbers possible advantages and disadvantages of the various treatments in periprosthetic distal femur fractures.